Business RadioX ®

  • Home
  • Business RadioX ® Communities
    • Southeast
      • Alabama
        • Birmingham
      • Florida
        • Orlando
        • Pensacola
        • South Florida
        • Tampa
        • Tallahassee
      • Georgia
        • Atlanta
        • Cherokee
        • Forsyth
        • Greater Perimeter
        • Gwinnett
        • North Fulton
        • North Georgia
        • Northeast Georgia
        • Rome
        • Savannah
      • Louisiana
        • New Orleans
      • North Carolina
        • Charlotte
        • Raleigh
      • Tennessee
        • Chattanooga
        • Nashville
      • Virginia
        • Richmond
    • South Central
      • Arkansas
        • Northwest Arkansas
    • Midwest
      • Illinois
        • Chicago
      • Michigan
        • Detroit
      • Minnesota
        • Minneapolis St. Paul
      • Missouri
        • St. Louis
      • Ohio
        • Cleveland
        • Columbus
        • Dayton
    • Southwest
      • Arizona
        • Phoenix
        • Tucson
        • Valley
      • Texas
        • Austin
        • Dallas
        • Houston
    • West
      • California
        • Bay Area
        • LA
        • Pasadena
      • Colorado
        • Denver
      • Hawaii
        • Oahu
  • FAQs
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our Audience
    • Why It Works
    • What People Are Saying
    • BRX in the News
  • Resources
    • BRX Pro Tips
    • B2B Marketing: The 4Rs
    • High Velocity Selling Habits
    • Why Most B2B Media Strategies Fail
    • 9 Reasons To Sponsor A Business RadioX ® Show
  • Partner With Us
  • Veteran Business RadioX ®

What to Know about EEOC Investigations

October 14, 2022 by John Ray

What to Know about EEOC Investigations
Advisory Insights Podcast
What to Know about EEOC Investigations
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

What to Know about EEOC Investigations

What to Know about EEOC Investigations (Advisory Insights Podcast, Episode 13)

On this episode of Advisory Insights, Grace Tillman of Oberman Law Firm talked with Stuart Oberman about what to know about EEOC investigations. Grace’s single most important tip:  if you receive a letter of investigation from the EEOC, NEVER ignore it and hope the whole matter will go away. Grace also discussed how these letters may be delivered electronically, what you do immediately when you receive one, what you should never do (which includes talking to the complainant), and much more.

Advisory Insights is presented by Oberman Law Firm and produced by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®. The series can be found on all the major podcast apps. You can find the complete show archive here.

Grace M. Tillman, Senior Corporate and Litigation Counsel, Oberman Law Firm

Grace Tillman
Grace Tillman, Senior Corporate and Litigation Counsel, Oberman Law Firm

Grace M. Tillman is Senior Corporate Counsel with Oberman Law Firm. For nearly 25 years, Ms. Tillman has represented small to large corporate clients in a wide variety of practice areas such as commercial litigation, real estate, health care, mergers & acquisitions, governmental compliance, and employment law.

Ms. Tillman provides guidance to clients regarding simple to complex labor and employment law matters, including the complexities of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. In addition, Ms. Tillman also provides expert guidance on complex HR (Human Resources) issues, including specific employment matters involving the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA); the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); and, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

In the area of health care, which continues to evolve at the speed of light, Ms. Tillman’s experience includes oversight of hospital regulations, HIPAA Compliance, fraud and abuse, Medicare and/or Medicaid regulations, Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, Telemedicine, state and federal insurance audits, and licensing board requirements.

Ms. Tillman has extensive litigation experience in federal, state, and appellate courts, as well as before administrative boards.

Ms. Tillman received her undergraduate degree in Business Management from Kennesaw State University, and Doctor of Jurisprudence from the University of Georgia School of Law. In addition, Ms. Tillman is licensed to practice law in Georgia and Tennessee.

LinkedIn

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: [00:00:02] Broadcasting from the studios of Business RadioX, it’s time for Advisory Insights, brought to you by Oberman Law Firm serving clients nationwide with tailored service and exceptional results. Now, here’s your host.

Stuart Oberman: [00:00:20] Welcome everyone to Advisory Insights. Stuart Oberman here, Oberman Law Firm. Well, we have got a bombshell of a topic today, folks. It is precisely EEOC, Equal Opportunity or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. And that is a nasty, nasty organization you do not want to get a notice from or be involved in.

We have a very distinguished guest speaker today, Miss Grace Tillman, who is with Oberman Law Firm. And she is our guidance as far as federal investigations go, litigation, partnerships, buy ins, buyouts, mergers, acquisitions. I don’t know if there’s anything that Grace really does not do and do it well, but it is a very, very exciting topic.

Grace, great to have you on today. I know at the firm, you do an enormous amount of problematic areas. EEOC is one of them. So, welcome to this topic.

Grace Tillman: [00:01:22] Why, thank you. I appreciate it. Thanks for having me.

Stuart Oberman: [00:01:25] This is such an explosive topic. You know, I don’t think a lot of people know what the EEOC does. So, I want you to maybe, you know, again, just something that you’re well within your wheelhouse. You know, let’s tell the listeners what they investigate and what happens before litigation and what happens if you get a nasty letter and how to deal with it.

And also, look, let’s maybe mention a minute or two of how you prevent these things where I know you do an awful lot of preventive maintenance for our clients who are local, regional, and national, and global. So again, let’s hear the topic. I would take us through what’s going on with the EEOC and some bombshells we have there. So, without further ado, have at it Miss Tillman.

Grace Tillman: [00:02:12] Thank you. Thank you. Stuart explain the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is a federal agency that is charged with investigation — investigating any and all claims or charges of discrimination which may be based on race, color, religion, sex, which would include pregnancy, gender identity, sexual orientation, also national origin, age for any employees who are over the age of 40, claims based discrimination on disability, any of your genetic information, or a retaliatory claim for discrimination or reporting discrimination for any of those reasons.

Stuart Oberman: [00:02:56] Now, I’m going to interrupt you there one second.

Grace Tillman: [00:03:00] Sure.

Stuart Oberman: [00:03:00] That last definition you gave is such an important thing, retaliation. Now, you’ve just touched on, I believe, the whistleblower statute.

Grace Tillman: [00:03:09] It is — that is it. That is what it is. If you have an employee who comes to you and makes allegations of discrimination and then you retaliate, doesn’t have to be terminating them, but you elect not to promote them. You don’t give them the same benefits that you give to someone else. Any way that they are treated less than or alternatively to other employees who have not made such complaints, you can have a charge of retaliation brought against you by an employee.

Stuart Oberman: [00:03:36] Yeah, that was such a great word that I did — I just — I didn’t know if you were going to speak about it later, but I wanted you to touch on that. That was such an important word, but good. I’m sorry. Sorry to interrupt.

Grace Tillman: [00:03:47] Absolutely. Absolutely. Well, some people may not know this, but before you can actually sue and you being an employee, before an employee can actually sue their employer for any charges of discrimination, with limited exception, and we’ll talk about those, you would have to file a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The EEOC would receive in your complaint, and they open an investigation.

Now, I did say almost all, if you are making an allegation that is based on a violation of the Equal Pay Act, you do not actually have to file a claim with EEOC first. You can actually move right ahead, and I’ll touch on that a little bit later on how you do that. But what happens is a disgruntled employee who either genuinely believes they have been discriminated against or believes that they have been discriminated against for any reason would contact the EEOC. It’s almost all done electronically now. They don’t actually have to show up in an office. They can do it all online. You file the complaint online.

And I know you mentioned to the listeners about waiting to get that letter. It’s now often sent electronically. The EEOC doesn’t mail you anything. They send you an email if they’ve got your email. So, as a warning to our listeners, if you receive an email from an entity that identifies itself as the EEOC, don’t delete it. Don’t think it’s, “Oh, that’s spam. Oh, that’s trash”. No, that’s actually the way they communicate with you.

So, be very careful and cautious if you receive something that says notice of the — notice of charge of discrimination, because that’s what it’s going to be titled, notice of charge of discrimination. It may come through the mail if your employee did not provide a good or didn’t know your email address. But more often than not, like I said, it’s sent via email because the EEOC uses what’s called the digital charge system. That’s their electronic, I don’t want to say like message board, but really that’s what it is. It’s like a document retention. They communicate with you about your case on this electronic system that they have.

Stuart Oberman: [00:06:04] I got one question for you. One, I’m probably going to have a lot of this topic. But how important is it — if these notices are being sent by mail, how important is it to have a process in place where if you get a complaint, you have a process to handle this? Or what happens if your employee is complaining checking your mail?

Grace Tillman: [00:06:30] Well.

Stuart Oberman: [00:06:32] I just threw that one out there, didn’t I?

Grace Tillman: [00:06:35] Yeah. Well, here’s the thing.

Stuart Oberman: [00:06:36] That one’s such a softball.

Grace Tillman: [00:06:39] Yeah. They’re going to give you — it’s actually not a long window to respond. I mean, it’s not like, oh, you have 60 days to file a response. You may only get 10 to 15 days to file your initial response from the date that the charges filed. So, if it’s coming by snail mail, you can chew up seven, ten days of that time for your response just by waiting for the mail to get delivered.

So, not only is it important, but it can be fatal if you do not have a process in place for official mail to be dealt with officially at your place of business. Because if you’re having a lower-level employee pick up the mail and they don’t recognize the significance of getting this document, you could shoot yourself in the foot because you will not be given an opportunity to respond. And EEOC can think, well, you haven’t responded because what the other person saying is true.

Stuart Oberman: [00:07:29] Right?

Grace Tillman: [00:07:29] And you don’t want that. So — but I’m going to start off with a list of do nots when you receive that notice of charge of discrimination. Do not contact the complaining party. Do not call them up and say, “Well, what are you talking about? Why did you do this? You know, we like you.” Don’t do that. Don’t call anybody. Do not discuss the notice of charge of discrimination with anyone in your office before you talk to your attorney, because, again, you can find yourself in hot water if you launch an investigation on your own. Don’t do it right.

Stuart Oberman: [00:08:08] Right, right.

Grace Tillman: [00:08:09] Do not retaliate against anyone who has filed a complaint or against anyone who is named in the complaint as a potential violator. You don’t know if they really did what’s in the complaint until you and your attorney have launched the investigation to actually review these things. So, the next is a — make sure you have this. If you don’t have it, you need to get it now. And what that is, is a process in place to preserve relevant documents.

So, if a charge of discrimination has been made, you need to make sure nobody’s going through your computer system and deleting files, whether intentionally or as routine practice. That can backfire on you in so many ways. Make sure that any documents that you have, employee files, statistical information, customer information, all of that is preserved as it may apply to the charge that’s been file, because you do not want to, in addition to a charge of discrimination being made against you, have a charge that says you have intentionally destroyed or created false documents that are related to the investigation. You don’t want to do that.

So again, I say relevant documents. Maybe the complaining part is employment file. It could be other complaints or allegations that have been made against the company. It could be your employee manual, it could be your payroll records, could be your customer records. It could be things that would contain any information which would support or refute the charge of discrimination.

And I mentioned that you may get your charge of discrimination electronically through the digital charge system. If that happens and you access it, one of the things EEOC is going to do is make you create a new password. Make sure you remember what that password is, write it down, because you’re going to have to give your attorney that new password versus the old. And it’s human nature somebody says you’ve got a charge against you, you’re going to want to look at it and you want to do that right away.

And so, you’re going and you’re looking and it says, well, give me a password. And you create this fantastically secure password and now you don’t remember it. And now we can’t, as your attorney, access those records either. So, it’s going to delay. It’s going to cause time that could otherwise be used responding to the complaint or investigating the complaint. We’re going to be hunting down passwords. So, if you change the password, write it down.

Next thing. And this maybe should have been at the top of the list. But after you get the complaint, you all of a sudden can catch your breath again, your next phone call really should be to your attorney. You need to call your attorney because as again, as I explained, you have a very short window to respond to EEOC.

And so oftentimes, if you say, oh, I’m going to call my attorney, oh, I’ll deal with this next week, you may be out of time or your attorney may not be able to address it as quickly, or it may require more investigation than you think. So, what your attorney does in this case, because the attorneys like our firm, we’ve dealt with these for years, they’re going to request that you provide them with copies of all the relevant documents.

They may conduct interviews of any witnesses. They may ask you to provide them with statistical data so that they can review these charges in a more abstract way, like from a statistical standpoint. Your attorney will also then respond to the EEOC. They’re going to advise them of their representation. And again, this now is all done through their digital charge system. So, you log in, you say, oh, I’m the attorney. And all of a sudden, that communications will start coming to the attorney.

Another very, very important decision that gets made very early on is do you want to participate in mediation? Almost every EEOC charge now comes with an option. If both parties agree to participate in an early intervention mediation proceeding. Your attorney will review the specific charges because not all cases are geared towards resolution through mediation. But if it is, they’ll let you know, and they’ll advise you of the pros and cons.

If you agree to proceed with mediation, you are assigned an EEOC mediator, and you will coordinate a date for mediation to take place. And until mediation is complete, you won’t have any other documents that are required to be filed through the EEOC until mediation is complete. You will participate in that first.

If you elect not to participate in mediation or both parties don’t agree, if the complaining charging party doesn’t agree, then you are then going to have to file a response to the EEOC charges. And again, this is where your attorney is key because your attorney is going to know what should be included exactly in that response.

And it’s known as a position statement. And that position statement is filed by deadline that’s imposed by the EEOC that then gets filed by that date. And then the investigation part begins by EEOC. And if it wasn’t clear, but if in mediation, you did not — if you elected to go through mediation, the EEOC doesn’t do an investigation until it’s done, because they’re not going to waste their resources if the parties are going to agree to resolution.

So, there is no investigation unless mediation either is not done or mediation is unsuccessful. And like I said, the investigation starts with reviewing the charging statement and then your position statement in response as the employer.

Stuart Oberman: [00:13:51] Well, you know, you mentioned two really important points that I think that as we come to a close, that one, if you’re an employer, you better have your act together as far as policies and procedures, employee manuals. If not, you’re in a world of hurt. Two, you’ve — it’s no longer an option. You better have a procedure in place to avoid sexual harassment. I mean — and that can be across gender lines no matter what it is.

Grace Tillman: [00:14:28] It’s not just sexual harassment. There’s a host of forms of harassment. You have to have an anti-harassment policy.

Stuart Oberman: [00:14:35] Yeah. It’s just amazing. And I think that in this world we live in today, I think would be amiss if we didn’t advise the listeners and our clients. You know, they need to have a gender identity policy and procedures in place. It doesn’t matter what your belief is. It doesn’t — it’s irrelevant. But you better know what the law is. You better have it in place. And that’s a huge topic. And I don’t think that a lot of our employers who we represent and then who are listening, they don’t have a plan for that which is sort of the death kill of problems as we go.

So, but anyway, Grace, amazing topics. I just — I mean, I’m taking notes here. And again, it’s a four-day topic in a seminar. But no, it’s amazing, amazing stuff. In closing, is there anything that you would add that our clients listening or businesspeople listening or even employees who are listening, what are some things that, you know, they need to know in brief summary?

Grace Tillman: [00:15:43] Well, in brief, you need to take these charges seriously. Even if you think they were without merit, you need to take the charges seriously. You need to respond seriously. And like I said, you need to be prepared on the front end as far as how you’re going to address it. And you need to have a plan in place.

A lot of employers don’t even know what’s going on sometimes at their place of employment. If it’s another employee who’s harassing another. Like, sometimes it doesn’t come up. You need to have those in place, policies to deal with all of that. And then when these charges are made, take it serious. And I could go on and on.

Unfortunately, I think I would like to about what you do next, what happens and how these cases are resolved, because it’s not cheap when these causes — I think the average EEOC complaint is settled in the neighborhood of $40,000. I think that’s statistically what I read online. That’s the average settlement on an EEOC complaint.

Stuart Oberman: [00:16:38] That’s a lot. Well –.

Grace Tillman: [00:16:40] A lot of money.

Stuart Oberman: [00:16:41] Amazing, amazing information. Amazing information. Grace, thank you for your time today. I know you’ve got a lot of things lined up today and giving a lot, lot of good advice for sure to our listeners.

Well, ladies and gentlemen, thanks for joining us. If you want to reach Grace Tillman at the firm, it is Grace,G-R-A-C-E,@Obermanlaw.com. Office number, 7708862400. That is the EEOC wrap up.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much for joining us. And we look forward to having Grace back on the podcast and share some other lights into what employers need to know. Ladies and gentleman, thanks a lot. Have a great day.

Outro: [00:17:28] Thank you for joining us on Advisory Insights. This show is brought to you by Oberman Law Firm, a business centric law firm representing local, regional, and national clients in a wide range of practice areas, including healthcare, mergers and acquisitions, corporate transactions, and regulatory compliance.

  

About Advisory Insights Podcast

Presented by Oberman Law Firm, Advisory Insights Podcast covers legal, business, HR, and other topics of vital concern to healthcare practices and other business owners. This show series can be found here as well as on all the major podcast apps.

Stuart Oberman, Oberman Law Firm

Stuart Oberman
Stuart Oberman, Founder, Oberman Law Firm

Stuart Oberman is the founder and President of Oberman Law Firm. Mr. Oberman graduated from Urbana University and received his law degree from John Marshall Law School. Mr. Oberman has been practicing law for over 25 years, and before going into private practice, Mr. Oberman was in-house counsel for a Fortune 500 Company. Mr. Oberman is widely regarded as the go-to attorney in the area of Dental Law, which includes DSO formation, corporate business structures, mergers and acquisitions, regulatory compliance, advertising regulations, HIPAA, Compliance, and employment law regulations that affect dental practices.

In addition, Mr. Oberman’s expertise in the healthcare industry includes advising clients in the complex regulatory landscape as it relates to telehealth and telemedicine, including compliance of corporate structures, third-party reimbursement, contract negotiations, technology, health care fraud, and abuse law (Anti-Kickback Statute and the State Law), professional liability risk management, federal and state regulations.

As the long-term care industry evolves, Mr. Oberman has the knowledge and experience to guide clients in the long-term care sector with respect to corporate and regulatory matters, assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs). In addition, Mr. Oberman’s practice also focuses on health care facility acquisitions and other changes of ownership, as well as related licensure and Medicare/Medicaid certification matters, CCRC registrations, long-term care/skilled nursing facility management, operating agreements, assisted living licensure matters, and health care joint ventures.

In addition to his expertise in the health care industry, Mr. Oberman has a nationwide practice that focuses on all facets of contractual disputes, including corporate governance, fiduciary duty, trade secrets, unfair competition, covenants not to compete, trademark and copyright infringement, fraud, and deceptive trade practices, and other business-related matters. Mr. Oberman also represents clients throughout the United States in a wide range of practice areas, including mergers & acquisitions, partnership agreements, commercial real estate, entity formation, employment law, commercial leasing, intellectual property, and HIPAA/OSHA compliance.

Mr. Oberman is a national lecturer and has published articles in the U.S. and Canada.

LinkedIn

Oberman Law Firm

Oberman Law Firm has a long history of civic service, noted national, regional, and local clients, and stands among the Southeast’s eminent and fast-growing full-service law firms. Oberman Law Firm’s areas of practice include Business Planning, Commercial & Technology Transactions, Corporate, Employment & Labor, Estate Planning, Health Care, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Privacy & Data Security, and Real Estate.

By meeting their client’s goals and becoming a trusted partner and advocate for our clients, their attorneys are recognized as legal go-getters who provide value-added service. Their attorneys understand that in a rapidly changing legal market, clients have new expectations, constantly evolving choices, and operate in an environment of heightened reputational and commercial risk.

Oberman Law Firm’s strength is its ability to solve complex legal problems by collaborating across borders and practice areas.

Connect with Oberman Law Firm:

Company website | LinkedIn | Twitter

 

Tagged With: Dental Practice, discrimination, EEOC, EEOC investigations, Grace Tillman, Oberman Law, Oberman Law Firm, Stuart Oberman

What Every Partnership Needs to Know

October 7, 2022 by John Ray

What Every Partnership Needs to Know, Grace Tillman, Oberman Law Firm
Advisory Insights Podcast
What Every Partnership Needs to Know
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

What Every Partnership Needs to Know, Grace Tillman, Oberman Law Firm

What Every Partnership Needs to Know (Advisory Insights Podcast, Episode 12)

On this episode of Advisory Insights, Grace Tillman of Oberman Law Firm talked with Stuart Oberman about some of the key provisions that should be included in an operating agreement for a partnership, such as buy-sell provisions, redemption provisions, and dissolution provisions. Speaking from the experience of working with many other partnerships which have gone sour, the insights Grace offers in this episode could save you costly legal battles down the road.

Advisory Insights is presented by Oberman Law Firm and produced by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®. The series can be found on all the major podcast apps. You can find the complete show archive here.

Grace M. Tillman, Senior Corporate and Litigation Counsel, Oberman Law Firm

Grace Tillman
Grace Tillman, Senior Corporate and Litigation Counsel, Oberman Law Firm

Grace M. Tillman is Senior Corporate Counsel with Oberman Law Firm. For nearly 25 years, Ms. Tillman has represented small to large corporate clients in a wide variety of practice areas such as commercial litigation, real estate, health care, mergers & acquisitions, governmental compliance, and employment law.

Ms. Tillman provides guidance to clients regarding simple to complex labor and employment law matters, including the complexities of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. In addition, Ms. Tillman also provides expert guidance on complex HR (Human Resources) issues, including specific employment matters involving the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA); the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); and, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

In the area of health care, which continues to evolve at the speed of light, Ms. Tillman’s experience includes oversight of hospital regulations, HIPAA Compliance, fraud and abuse, Medicare and/or Medicaid regulations, Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, Telemedicine, state and federal insurance audits, and licensing board requirements.

Ms. Tillman has extensive litigation experience in federal, state, and appellate courts, as well as before administrative boards.

Ms. Tillman received her undergraduate degree in Business Management from Kennesaw State University, and Doctor of Jurisprudence from the University of Georgia School of Law. In addition, Ms. Tillman is licensed to practice law in Georgia and Tennessee.

LinkedIn

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: [00:00:01] Broadcasting from the studios of Business RadioX, it’s time for Advisory Insights. Brought to you by Oberman Law Firm, serving clients nationwide with tailored service and exceptional results. Now, here’s your host.

Stuart Oberman: [00:00:20] Welcome everyone to Advisory Insights. My name is Stuart Oberman of Oberman Law Firm. We have a fantastic guest with us today who’s going to cover some bombshell topics for those that are in a partnership. Grace Tillman, nice to see you today. How are you?

Grace Tillman: [00:00:38] Hi. Thank you for having me. I’m doing very well.

Stuart Oberman: [00:00:40] For those that don’t know Grace, Grace is our senior counsel at the firm, handles a lot of litigation, handles a lot of federal compliance issues, and loves and adores operating agreements, partnership agreements, everything that makes up a partnership.

Stuart Oberman: [00:01:02] Now, what we’ve got to take a look at is – Grace, you and I say this all the time – it is easy to get into a marriage, it is very difficult to get out. So, again, we could spend so much time on this one topic, but I want you to cover where are partnerships? You know, the buy-sell provisions, redemption provisions, dissolutions, majority of decisions. Who’s making that decisions? What’s the structure of this? And I know you solve a lot of problems in this area.

Stuart Oberman: [00:01:40] So, I want you to talk about some operating agreements, which is sort of like the constitution, if you will, in partnership agreements. But tell us really what’s going on, on some of these things, some of these things you’re running into and some of the problems. I know we could talk all day on this, but I want you to hit on a couple of things that really you’re running into all the time and what our listeners need to know.

Grace Tillman: [00:02:04] Sure. Sure. An operating agreement mostly are used with limited liability companies. They also can be used for partnerships. And while they’re not required, whenever there are two or more members in an LLC, like you said, like for a partnership, it is strongly recommended that you actually have an operating agreement which lays out what the member’s expectations are about what’s going to happen running and operating the LLC or partnership.

Grace Tillman: [00:02:32] But one of the most overlooked items that actually should be in every operating agreement is your exit strategy. I mean, of course nobody goes into a business, much like nobody goes into a marriage, thinking that it’s going to fail. Unfortunately, that does not always happen and people don’t always get along forever and ever, and then the company is passed on to their children.

Grace Tillman: [00:02:56] So, we need to have set in advance, while everybody is still friendly, it’s nice to set out what’s going to happen if the members no longer agree. What happens if one of the partners wants to retire? What happens if somebody dies or becomes disabled? So, these are all very important things to consider when entering into a partnership.

Grace Tillman: [00:03:23] So, some of the things that we see and we wish we would see because, oftentimes, like you said, they come to us because they don’t have a provision and people say, “Well, what do I do now?” And now we need to craft this on the backend when people aren’t in agreement or friendly and it winds up costing – I can’t even tell you how much more money to do it on the back side – because if everybody’s friendly, we can say, “Oh, yeah. It’s fair. Let’s split it this way.”

Grace Tillman: [00:03:49] But when you’re mad at somebody, it’s like a divorce and people are fighting over the dishes. Nobody wants the dishes. They just don’t want the other person to have the dishes. And so, that’s what we find out here.

Grace Tillman: [00:04:02] So, here are some provisions we like to see, some are optional, you can have maybe one or more. But a buy-sell provision, which you mentioned, buy-sell provisions are kind of like if you have two kids, they both want the cookie, and you’re asking them to split it. Somebody’s going to split it very evenly so that both people get an even share. What happens is one of the parties offers to either buy the interest of the other member in the company or sell their interest in the company for the same price.

Grace Tillman: [00:04:34] So, the offering party sets the price, says to the party that they’re trying to buy out, “Here, I would like to buy your interest for this amount.” Now, they’re going to give you a very fair and equitable amount because whatever they offered to buy your interest for, they also have to sell their interest at the same price. If the person who receives the offer says, “No, I don’t want to sell, but I would like to buy you out,” that becomes the set price. So, again, like I said, it becomes a very fair and equitable price because you’re not going to offer to buy somebody else out for $10 a share if you then had to sell your shares for $10. So, you will find generally that helps.

Grace Tillman: [00:05:20] And the problem is maybe sometimes people don’t want to buy or sell. So, now, we have some other options that are available. And one is a mandatory redemption by the company at a fair market value upon the occurrence of certain events. Fair market value is determined generally by the parties in advance. How they calculate that, it would be a predetermined valuation or formula such as an appraisal. And usually this is upon the occurrence of a specific event. Let’s say somebody wants to retire or they passed away or they become permanently disabled. We have a mandatory redemption in those situations at a set value.

Grace Tillman: [00:06:01] And the mandatory redemption, generally, is intended to maximize the value of the selling party, but also to preserve any interests that the company may have. And everybody is looking out for the best interests of both parties in this situation.

Grace Tillman: [00:06:18] Another mandatory redemption event could be upon the occurrence of other events. This time it’s a mandatory redemption at a reduced value. Now, this is usually used in a case where one of the members or a partner has engaged in some type of negative behavior, if you will, that could damage or has damaged the company, the partnership, or the other members of the company or partnership.

Stuart Oberman: [00:06:44] That never happens.

Grace Tillman: [00:06:45] It does happen. Things like this could be if you’re in a business that requires you to be licensed. Well, you’ve lost your license, you’ve done something, it might be some type of negligence, or it could be just some type of administrative error. But you’ve lost your license and now you can’t practice in whatever field that might be. It could be dentistry, medicine, the law practice, engineer, there’s lots of things. Don’t pay those bar dues and see what happens [inaudible].

Grace Tillman: [00:07:16] Other things that could be, maybe one of the members got arrested or indicted or convicted of a crime, and now you don’t want to be associated with them. Or maybe they have materially violated the terms of your partnership or operating agreement. They could have committed fraud or embezzlement. Well, in this instance, the company has a mandatory or a right to purchase the interest of this defaulting member, if you will, at a reduced value. And you can set those reduced values, it might be 75 to 50 percent of the appraised value or it could be the value determined by a specific formula.

Grace Tillman: [00:07:54] Oftentimes, we’ll see these, “We’re going to buy you back, but we’re giving you nothing for goodwill because you did your best to damage it.” So, you don’t get anything for that. You’re going to get a value of assets only.

Grace Tillman: [00:08:05] Another option, there could be mandatory dissolution of the company where everybody gets liquidated. We’re at loggerheads. We’re the complete stalemate. We can’t agree with one another. Fine. Business is over. You don’t want to agree with me. You don’t want to work with me. Then, we’re both packing up our toys and we’re going home.

Stuart Oberman: [00:08:22] I got a question for you on the cases that you work on. You mentioned fraud, so percentage-wise – and it’s maybe a little bit hard to do – but the cases that you and I work on, you work on and the office works on, how many do you think involve fraud when, basically, one partner wants to get out of the marriage, if you will.

Grace Tillman: [00:08:50] It’s actually more than you would think. But to answer the question, in true lawyer fashion I’m coming back with a question, well, how do you define fraud? Because some people, it’s intentional fraud. Other people, it’s unintentional fraud. “Oh, wait. We weren’t supposed to be doing this. I didn’t know I wasn’t allowed to be running my mortgage through the business. Wait.” But it can be a higher percentage than you think. And, again, sometimes it’s minor fraud, something little. Other times it’s a big deal. It can be something that potentially, again, if you’re in a licensed business, could put your license at risk what your partner is doing, especially if the fraud involves your client.

Stuart Oberman: [00:09:36] Well, it’s funny. A lot of businesses as a whole, like embezzlement, that’s a little bit different than what we’re talking about. But embezzlement is about 60 percent of all businesses. I’m just thinking out loud here, that may be another topic that we cover on what to do if you suspect your partner is defrauding you. That’s a whole internal investigation.

Grace Tillman: [00:10:05] It is something that is totally different, and it is absolutely a problem.

Stuart Oberman: [00:10:08] We may look at that down the road. But I’m sorry, I got off track. I’m sorry to interrupt you.

Grace Tillman: [00:10:15] No, no, no. And, again, I think that’s very important. I think it’s worthwhile exploring because I think that our clients, our listeners, everybody would benefit from that knowledge because it happens, like I said, much more often than you think it does.

Grace Tillman: [00:10:28] So, we were talking about mandatory dissolution or sale of a company in the event that the members of the partners reach a stalemate. Again, it’s set out in advance. If we’ve reached a point where we cannot agree anymore, and this is a situation, honestly, when you reach it, you don’t want to be in business with this other person anymore because you’re just fighting.

Grace Tillman: [00:10:51] It’s like the point in the marriage where all you do is fight and everybody knows it’s over. And that’s where you are, and you’re saying, “We need to call an end to it. I’m not going to continue the business without you. You’re not continuing the business without me.” And there could be any number of reasons why that may happen, but we’re done and we’re either going to sell or liquidate.

Stuart Oberman: [00:11:14] Now, you mentioned something going on. I keep going back because you’ve said so much information. I’m trying to absorb it all. I’m thinking from what our clients would say, but you mentioned something along these lines of what we call a put call option as far as sale goes.

Grace Tillman: [00:11:34] Right. That was the first one, kind of like the buy-sell. Say, I’m either going to buy you out or you’re going to buy me out. But either way, one of us is leaving at the end of this deal.

Stuart Oberman: [00:11:43] So, how many of those put call options do you see? I know the ones that I’ve looked at they’re pretty nasty.

Grace Tillman: [00:11:53] A lot of times they are, and they’re usually a whole lot nastier if they’re not equal partners and they’re drafted in a way that gives the majority partner maybe a little more push. Because somebody’s got to come up with a whole lot of money, cash at closing to buy out a partner, that becomes harder to do. But they can be nasty.

Grace Tillman: [00:12:19] Again, if they’re drafted in advance when everybody is still friends or they think the business is going to be continuing for a longer period of time, they’re not. But my recommendation is they should be in every operating agreement, whether you exercise the option or not, I think that you should have, if not that exit strategy, you need to have something. And you need to have something that addresses what happens when the parties, maybe, reach deadlock or stalemate.

Grace Tillman: [00:12:48] And first step maybe isn’t selling. There’s lots of other options that you and your attorney can work and come up with creative options, things that range from mediation to arbitration, and who do we select, do we defer to a third party, can we go to an expert and get an opinion if we disagree. There’s a whole lot of things you can put into an operating or membership agreement or partnership agreement short of shutting everything down, buying one party out. But, again, we’re just talking exit strategy. So, we’ve reached the point where we’re done and the parties aren’t going to continue anymore in this business.

Grace Tillman: [00:13:28] Kind of sort of the last one I want to touch on – and I know we don’t have a tremendous amount of time to talk about all of them because I could go on for hours.

Stuart Oberman: [00:13:35] This is a week long seminar. Are you kidding me?

Grace Tillman: [00:13:37] It could be. It could be. And I have actually spent daylong seminars just talking about operating agreements. So, the last one would be if there is a majority member or partner where one party is disproportionately greater invested in the business, a lot of times we’ll see in an operating agreement or partnership agreement where that member, that majority member, has a right to buy out the minority member if they can’t agree anymore. It’s like, “We’re not going to be in business anymore, but here it is.”

Grace Tillman: [00:14:09] And the formula is established in advance so that the minority member actually enters into the partnership or limited liability company knowing what their payment is on the backend. It’s not that the majority member can squeeze them out and say, “I am going to pay you $0.10 per membership unit that you own.” No. It’s going to be some version of a more equitable, fair market value for the minority member’s interests. And, again, it would be before the minority member entered into the business. They would know what they were getting when they were coming out, if the parties couldn’t agree.

Grace Tillman: [00:14:45] I know we talked about this briefly, and I know I really kind of flew through a bunch of these, but if there’s not an exit strategy in place – which I see a lot – and the members can agree on how to terminate or wrap up their business or what to do, you can be looking at a very costly legal battle for both parties.

Grace Tillman: [00:15:10] And when I talk about a costly legal battle, I’m not just talking about the financial cost because there is a whole bunch of work that goes into creating a business, and a lot of that comes with an emotional component. And when you’re watching that be unsuccessful or dismantled, there’s a cost to that that a lot of people don’t realize. And you don’t want to be in a position where you no longer wish to be associated professionally with someone and you’re forced to still be there.

Stuart Oberman: [00:15:44] Wow. That’s amazing information. Well, I want to mention one other thing, is that, how in tuned you are into the employment side and partnership agreements. And I know we come to the end of our podcast for this particular topic, but you have another podcast that you’ll be doing for the firm regarding EEOC, which I can’t wait to share with our business partners, we have local, national, and some global clients. But you’re also speaking on October 27th for SHRM-Atlanta. So, that’s going to be a great event.

Stuart Oberman: [00:16:30] Again, it’s a great honor because you’ve been in the forefront of what’s going on as far as employment law goes. And I know you did an enormous job during COVID-19, keeping everyone informed by the hour, including us at the firm.

Stuart Oberman: [00:16:43] But in closing, is there anything you want to add on that 10,000 foot view of getting into a marriage and getting out?

Grace Tillman: [00:16:55] Well, it’s much like a pre-nup. If you enter into an agreement or into a business relationship or a romantic relationship, and everybody knows what happens if things go south, you are going to save money, you are going to save time, you are going to save aggravation. And best of all, you have some certainty. You’re not wandering around lost wondering what happens now. You know what happens.

Stuart Oberman: [00:17:21] Perfect. I agree. Grace, thank you so much for joining us today. I can’t wait to hear your subsequent podcast on EEOC’s investigations.

Stuart Oberman: [00:17:32] Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us. If you want to reach Grace Tillman, please feel free to email her at grace, G-R-A-C-E, @obermanlaw.com Phone number 770-886-2400. Thank you again, Grace. It was great having you. Ladies and gentlemen, thanks. Have a fantastic day. And we look forward to our next podcast. Thank you.

Outro: [00:17:56] Thank you for joining us on Advisory Insights. This show is brought to you by Oberman Law Firm, a business-centric law firm representing local, regional, and national clients in a wide range of practice areas, including health care, mergers and acquisitions, corporate transactions, and regulatory compliance.

 

About Advisory Insights Podcast

Presented by Oberman Law Firm, Advisory Insights Podcast covers legal, business, HR, and other topics of vital concern to healthcare practices and other business owners. This show series can be found here as well as on all the major podcast apps.

Stuart Oberman, Oberman Law Firm

Stuart Oberman
Stuart Oberman, Founder, Oberman Law Firm

Stuart Oberman is the founder and President of Oberman Law Firm. Mr. Oberman graduated from Urbana University and received his law degree from John Marshall Law School. Mr. Oberman has been practicing law for over 25 years, and before going into private practice, Mr. Oberman was in-house counsel for a Fortune 500 Company. Mr. Oberman is widely regarded as the go-to attorney in the area of Dental Law, which includes DSO formation, corporate business structures, mergers and acquisitions, regulatory compliance, advertising regulations, HIPAA, Compliance, and employment law regulations that affect dental practices.

In addition, Mr. Oberman’s expertise in the healthcare industry includes advising clients in the complex regulatory landscape as it relates to telehealth and telemedicine, including compliance of corporate structures, third-party reimbursement, contract negotiations, technology, health care fraud, and abuse law (Anti-Kickback Statute and the State Law), professional liability risk management, federal and state regulations.

As the long-term care industry evolves, Mr. Oberman has the knowledge and experience to guide clients in the long-term care sector with respect to corporate and regulatory matters, assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs). In addition, Mr. Oberman’s practice also focuses on health care facility acquisitions and other changes of ownership, as well as related licensure and Medicare/Medicaid certification matters, CCRC registrations, long-term care/skilled nursing facility management, operating agreements, assisted living licensure matters, and health care joint ventures.

In addition to his expertise in the health care industry, Mr. Oberman has a nationwide practice that focuses on all facets of contractual disputes, including corporate governance, fiduciary duty, trade secrets, unfair competition, covenants not to compete, trademark and copyright infringement, fraud, and deceptive trade practices, and other business-related matters. Mr. Oberman also represents clients throughout the United States in a wide range of practice areas, including mergers & acquisitions, partnership agreements, commercial real estate, entity formation, employment law, commercial leasing, intellectual property, and HIPAA/OSHA compliance.

Mr. Oberman is a national lecturer and has published articles in the U.S. and Canada.

LinkedIn

Oberman Law Firm

Oberman Law Firm has a long history of civic service, noted national, regional, and local clients, and stands among the Southeast’s eminent and fast-growing full-service law firms. Oberman Law Firm’s areas of practice include Business Planning, Commercial & Technology Transactions, Corporate, Employment & Labor, Estate Planning, Health Care, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Privacy & Data Security, and Real Estate.

By meeting their client’s goals and becoming a trusted partner and advocate for our clients, their attorneys are recognized as legal go-getters who provide value-added service. Their attorneys understand that in a rapidly changing legal market, clients have new expectations, constantly evolving choices, and operate in an environment of heightened reputational and commercial risk.

Oberman Law Firm’s strength is its ability to solve complex legal problems by collaborating across borders and practice areas.

Connect with Oberman Law Firm:

Company website | LinkedIn | Twitter

Tagged With: dental practices, dissolving a partnership, Grace Tillman, Oberman Law, Oberman Law Firm, operating agreements, Partnership, Stuart Oberman

Business RadioX ® Network


 

Our Most Recent Episode

CONNECT WITH US

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Our Mission

We help local business leaders get the word out about the important work they’re doing to serve their market, their community, and their profession.

We support and celebrate business by sharing positive business stories that traditional media ignores. Some media leans left. Some media leans right. We lean business.

Sponsor a Show

Build Relationships and Grow Your Business. Click here for more details.

Partner With Us

Discover More Here

Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy

Connect with us

Want to keep up with the latest in pro-business news across the network? Follow us on social media for the latest stories!
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Business RadioX® Headquarters
1000 Abernathy Rd. NE
Building 400, Suite L-10
Sandy Springs, GA 30328

© 2025 Business RadioX ® · Rainmaker Platform

BRXStudioCoversLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of LA Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDENVER

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Denver Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversPENSACOLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Pensacola Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversBIRMINGHAM

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Birmingham Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversTALLAHASSEE

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Tallahassee Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRALEIGH

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Raleigh Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRICHMONDNoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Richmond Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversNASHVILLENoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Nashville Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDETROIT

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Detroit Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversSTLOUIS

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of St. Louis Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCOLUMBUS-small

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Columbus Business Radio

Coachthecoach-08-08

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Coach the Coach

BRXStudioCoversBAYAREA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Bay Area Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCHICAGO

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Chicago Business Radio

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Atlanta Business Radio