Business RadioX ®

  • Home
  • Business RadioX ® Communities
    • Southeast
      • Alabama
        • Birmingham
      • Florida
        • Orlando
        • Pensacola
        • South Florida
        • Tampa
        • Tallahassee
      • Georgia
        • Atlanta
        • Cherokee
        • Forsyth
        • Greater Perimeter
        • Gwinnett
        • North Fulton
        • North Georgia
        • Northeast Georgia
        • Rome
        • Savannah
      • Louisiana
        • New Orleans
      • North Carolina
        • Charlotte
        • Raleigh
      • Tennessee
        • Chattanooga
        • Nashville
      • Virginia
        • Richmond
    • South Central
      • Arkansas
        • Northwest Arkansas
    • Midwest
      • Illinois
        • Chicago
      • Michigan
        • Detroit
      • Minnesota
        • Minneapolis St. Paul
      • Missouri
        • St. Louis
      • Ohio
        • Cleveland
        • Columbus
        • Dayton
    • Southwest
      • Arizona
        • Phoenix
        • Tucson
        • Valley
      • Texas
        • Austin
        • Dallas
        • Houston
    • West
      • California
        • Bay Area
        • LA
        • Pasadena
      • Colorado
        • Denver
      • Hawaii
        • Oahu
  • FAQs
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our Audience
    • Why It Works
    • What People Are Saying
    • BRX in the News
  • Resources
    • BRX Pro Tips
    • B2B Marketing: The 4Rs
    • High Velocity Selling Habits
    • Why Most B2B Media Strategies Fail
    • 9 Reasons To Sponsor A Business RadioX ® Show
  • Partner With Us
  • Veteran Business RadioX ®

The Intersection of Law and Business: Strategies for Effective IP Protection

November 11, 2025 by Jacob Lapera

High Velocity Radio
High Velocity Radio
The Intersection of Law and Business: Strategies for Effective IP Protection
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

In this episode of High Velocity Radio, Lee Kantor interviews Daniel Scola, managing partner of Hoffman and Baron, an intellectual property law firm. Daniel discusses the importance of protecting patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets for entrepreneurs across various industries. He emphasizes that effective IP attorneys must understand clients’ businesses and future goals, blending legal expertise with business development skills. Daniel also shares his client-focused approach to building trust and relationships, highlighting the need for lawyers to embrace both legal and entrepreneurial roles. The episode offers valuable insights into the intersection of IP law and business growth.

Daniel A. Scola, Jr. is the managing partner of Hoffmann & Baron, LLP, and also manages the chemical, pharmaceutical/biochemical and medical device practice group in the New Jersey office. He has extensive experience in polymers, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices.

He specializes in building IP portfolios and designing strategies to protect and enhance company value. He also practices extensively in Post Grant Proceedings at the USPTO and has argued Post Grant Proceedings at the appellate level, before the CAFC. Previously, he was Counsel, patents, and trademarks as well as Assistant Corporate Secretary at The Warner-Lambert Co. and Intellectual Property Attorney at Loctite Corporation.

Prior to earning his law degree, Scola was a chemist with particular experience in material science including polymers, adhesives, and biodegradable approaches to material engineering. He was a scientist at the Pratt & Whitney Division of United Technologies.

Connect with Daniel on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.

What You’ll Learn In This Episode

  • Importance of intellectual property (IP) law for entrepreneurs and businesses
  • Role of Hoffman and Baron in protecting various IP assets (patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets)
  • Significance of IP protection across different industries, including technology and healthcare
  • Intersection of IP law and business development strategies
  • Necessity for attorneys to understand clients’ businesses and future plans for effective IP protection
  • Daniel Scola’s approach to business development focused on client needs and trust-building
  • Challenges faced by lawyers in developing client relationships and business skills
  • The need for law schools to teach business development and client relationship skills
  • Emphasis on personal connections and communication in client interactions
  • The importance of generosity and a service-first mentality in business development

Transcript-iconThis transcript is machine transcribed by Sonix.

 

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: Broadcasting live from the Business RadioX studios in Atlanta, Georgia. It’s time for High Velocity Radio.

Lee Kantor: Lee Kantor here. Another episode of High Velocity Radio, and this is going to be a good one. Today on the show, we have the managing partner of Hoffman and Baron, Daniel Scola. Welcome.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Yeah. Thank you. Lee. Glad to be here.

Lee Kantor: Well, I’m so excited to learn what you’re up to. Tell us about Hoffman and Baron. How you serving folks?

Daniel Scola Jr.: Well, Hoffman and Baron is an intellectual property law firm, so we are exclusively devoted to protecting people’s ideas, basically. So that that entitles includes patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets and those sorts of things. And those are real assets that are involved in so many people’s businesses, so many products, so many processes. And people don’t realize how often the intellectual property comes, uh, comes their way. It’s it’s involved in almost everything.

Lee Kantor: Now, how important is it for an entrepreneur? I would imagine it’s different depending on your industry. But if you’re an entrepreneur, like, say, even in the legal field that you are in. How important is it to properly protect your intellectual property?

Daniel Scola Jr.: Yeah, it’s it’s extremely important because if you think about what, uh, you know, really gives us the basis for, for really being an entrepreneur, it’s it’s your ideas, right? And it’s, it’s your ability to take your ideas and translate them into either workable, meaningful commercial assets. And that could be, you know, in the form of products you sell or a service that you sell. And and that’s what, you know, that’s how you, you actually develop, uh, the economy. So it’s very important. And investors like to know when they give money to startups, for example, or to even large, you know, loans to large companies. They want to know their money is somehow backed by some sort of an asset. Now, in, you know, there’s real property assets like your house, and then there’s the intangible assets, which are the intellectual property assets. So your ideas then get protected in a form which gives you patent rights or trademark rights. And those things can be sold just like you sell a car or just like you sell a house. And investors love to know that there is something that’s securing their interest.

Lee Kantor: Now, if you’re, uh, that makes sense. Like if you’re in a technology firm or in healthcare or you’ve invented something, I can understand protecting it. But if you’re an entrepreneur and in, um, maybe a trusted advisor and your service or your work is not a thing or is tangible. Is it a good move to protect like every everything that you’ve done in that aspect? Is that even possible? Because things can change, like next week, it may not be as relevant and we’ve changed it a bit. So now do I have to protect that? Like when when does it end for those folks?

Daniel Scola Jr.: It’s a really good question. I mean there there are things that some industries, uh, change so fast that you have to look at. Well, does it make sense if this is not going to be around in in the next six months, what should I do? Because it’s all about, you know, having a monopoly on that particular idea. Or it could be something like involved in a trademark, which, you know, you can change your product um, many times, but have the same trademark. So let’s say you have a Nike makes a thousand different shoes and they have different models and so forth. But the Nike name stays the same. So it it goes over across their all their, their shoe line, their clothing lines. So that sort of thing, you know, that’s something where if they didn’t protect that name, that name is more valuable than, than anything else they have. So that’s an example or the copyright stuff, you know, uh, let’s say you, you have a very particular process of doing something or you’re training and so forth and so on. There are training materials and you want to copyright those training materials because those aren’t going to change. Maybe the way you explain it might change, or maybe the way you interact, um, you know, might change, but the, the actual, um, you know, training materials themselves won’t. Um, so these are things that, you know, if you’re if things are going to change all the time, then probably you have to look at a different mechanism. And maybe you keep maybe you keep some things, uh, trade secret. Um, but the chances are you’re better off trying to get some protection somewhere. Um, and that’s why you need an intellectual property adviser to say you don’t need it here or that’s already known. Um, and you can’t protect things that are already known. Obviously, it’s got to be something that that is, uh, you’re bringing to the table. That’s that’s new.

Lee Kantor: So now, in your role in the firm, are you primarily doing the work of helping people protect their intellectual property, or do you also help in maybe growing the business and, um, you know, business development kind of things?

Daniel Scola Jr.: Well, they’re kind of intertwined, uh, intertwined rather. Um, and the reason I say that is if you’re really going to do well and give a, you know, your clients a full service on intellectual property, I think you have to know, uh, four things. You have to know something about their business, because if you’re going to say, I’m going to protect you, you know, the the ideas of your business that you’re coming up with, you know, either the new trademarks or the new new copyrighted stuff that you’re doing or the new inventions. You have to know how that fits in with your business. So that kind of is really related to the business development, and you need to know what is your future plan. Like where’s your company going? Because I want to make sure that I capture in intellectual property some of the future if I can, so I can get a monopoly around a piece of that as well. It’s not just the present thing. Let’s let’s look, you know, is this going to be 5 or 10 years down the line? Can I capture some of that here? Yeah. So I do think it, it, uh, it relates not just to the present, but also business development.

Lee Kantor: Now, you recently were, uh, featured in a book, uh, titled Be That Lawyer 101 Top Rainmaker Secrets to Growing a Successful Law Practice. Can you talk about how that came about and why it was important for you to be a contributor?

Daniel Scola Jr.: Yeah, I mean, I there’s a this author, Steve Fretzin, who’s, who’s also a lawyer. Is he, he really specializes in, um, you know, training, uh, lawyers how to deal with getting new clients and business and what our clients really looking for and what he liked about, um, my approach. And that’s why he he contacted me, was that my approach to business development in the IP space is I’m not really keen on the pitch, you know, like pitching something to a client with, with cookie cutter answers. And this is bragging about, you know, how how good our firm is and credentials. I’m not that’s not my, you know, my main, um, focus when I’m looking to I don’t give it much weight when I’m looking to to business development. What I look for is I find out what client’s needs are. And so as that’s part of what he wrote about in it’s called Beyond the Pitch. Is the section of the book that that he, um, he interviewed me for, and then he, he put in his book, um, you find out what clients need, and then you, you give them something for free. If you, you know, if you offer some ways that you’ve solved similar problems to other people, you know, to other clients, you have, uh, oftentimes that resonates really well with, with potential new clients. And you can build up credibility by, you know, giving something first. You get a long term relationship, hopefully out of it. Um, so it’s not about making the deal in the first place and, you know, telling you about how great you are. It’s about saying, what are your needs? And I have some thoughts about, you know, those kinds of needs or, you know, I’ve addressed these needs and other clients. It’s very interesting. You know, maybe you could try an approach like this. And then the client says, oh, gosh, uh, do you do you think you could do that for me? And that that’s a very good approach. And it builds trust long term because that’s what you’re really looking for right.

Lee Kantor: Now in, in the in the legal world, if you’re an attorney, are you responsible for kind of generating your own clients or is that something somebody else on the firm does? And then all you do is kind of the law part.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Well, that’s an interesting, uh, question actually, because it depends on on the model of the firm. Um, you know, some law firms have business development, you know, people that are attorneys. That’s all they do is business development. But, uh, that’s not my approach. Uh, I think every attorney has to view themselves. That’s in it’s in an IP firm. At least in my firm, they have to view themselves as a, a little cog in a separate a separate little business person, and they have to do what the bigger firm also does. And that is you have to build relationships with clients and bring in work. Now the issue is whether you are good enough with clients, with people to do that. Some people are are not as good because we all have to be scientists. In my area, they’re both scientists, and you have to have a law degree. And the combination of science and law, sometimes it doesn’t make the most, uh, you know, congenial type of combination. And some people are not comfortable, you know, if you’re used to being in a laboratory all the time, maybe that’s because you would prefer to be there than than out meeting people. And like, being the sales force, there is a sales component to representing yourself, you know, as a member of the firm that you got to sell yourself in addition to the firm a little bit, but you do it not by talking about how great you are, you are, but that’s a responsibility every attorney has. They must they must develop business if they’re going to be in it long term. Otherwise they could work for a corporation. Don’t be in private practice.

Lee Kantor: Now, is that something that’s taught in law school, like do do people who are going to be a lawyer understand that a portion of their day has to be spent in growing a business? Because like you said, it’s you’re you’re an entrepreneur, in essence, just as part of a bigger entity.

Daniel Scola Jr.: You’re you’re correct. It’s not it’s not taught in law school. Um, I often thought about teaching or pitching, not pitching. That’s a I don’t like the word pitch. And I just told you why I don’t pitch, but I suggesting to to, uh, law school, uh, and letting me teach a course which actually talks about, uh, that, that business development aspect. And it’s really not about how much law you do or how much science, which in my area you have to know both. It’s it’s about being able to understand people and what is their readiness level to hear certain things. You the assumption is you know enough about science and law, otherwise you wouldn’t be in this area. That’s that’s a basic assumption. Sometimes it’s wrong, but usually that’s what people look for. And then they want to know, well, do I do I does this person connect with me well? Do they communicate well? Do they understand my needs? Are they going to be responsive? The human connection? They don’t teach that in law school. In fact, you know, most of it is. Well, you know, if you want to have you’re going to have an adversary. And this is how you approach an adversary. Well, clients are not adversaries. And so they really don’t teach how to go about attracting clients. It’s a it’s a problem. I don’t know any law schools that do it. Maybe there are some because obviously there’s lots of curriculums out there. But um, I don’t know any.

Lee Kantor: So what advice would you give a young lawyer, um, who is kind of buying what you’re selling in terms of I have to treat this as I’m an entrepreneur, I’m a business owner, and I have to at some point go out and, um, identify, persuade, uh, another business person to, you know, use our firm. Like, what are some of the do’s and don’ts or some of the, the things they should be thinking about as they, you know, put on their rainmaker hat?

Daniel Scola Jr.: Yeah. They it’s a it’s a good question that that everyone, every one going into law should have an answer for. And I would suggest that, you know, because of the current, uh, sort of trend to not get personal connections as much and you do more things over text and you do less phone work, you do less in-person person meetings. It’s all email. I would suggest, you know, going the other way, going back to trying to get a human connection, get get a short time meeting, get a lunch with someone, don’t even talk about work, create a relationship, go to meetings, you know, go meet people as much as you can. You know, ask someone to lunch. Do something other than just electronically communicate with them. Because now you’re in in the whole mass of noise, everything. You know. How many emails do we get a day? You know, you can’t even look at them all sometimes. So if you’re just relying on the typical text and email communication, I don’t think it’s going to work. Your chances are greatly decreased. Make a phone call, you know, go out and meet somebody. Establish the relationship, the human relationship, because people will only work really long term with people that they know and like and trust. So it’s about this keep getting an ecosystem of trusted people. Um, So, so so get out there. You know, the news, the new people, you know, the real brand new associates.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Li they they have a it’s tough because they come in and they trying to learn about what it is they’re supposed to do, you know, on the legal end. And so they okay, so they know some science and they know some law. But we all know that you know nothing until you’ve practiced and made mistakes and get a, you know, you’re really an apprentice. You have someone mentoring it. And so you think, well, I don’t know enough to go out and attract clients. Why would they come to me? I don’t have the experience. And I tell them, yeah, but you you have a personality. You have, uh, you know, you present. Well, you have someone, something you can say about, you know, whatever it is you might have in common. So create the relationship because eventually you’re going to have the experience and people are going to say, oh, I know you. I’ve met you a number of times. Oh, I like you. It’s. You know, it doesn’t matter how much, you know when you create a relationship. It’s that’s why you’re doing it. You’re not. You’re not out there pitching. Hey, we’re a great firm. I’m a great lawyer. Hire me. You know that’s not the way to do it. And that’s what I tell them. Get out of your comfort zone.

Lee Kantor: Is that kind of a tough wedding for some of these folks? Because in their head, they thought the law was one thing. And now you’re telling them I’m also a salesperson, and I don’t know if I thought I was buying that when I got this degree.

Daniel Scola Jr.: You know, it’s so true. And you and probably 50 to 60% of the people that go into this area, into the legal area, fit into that category of not being comfortable. But, you know, as you know, sales is is, you know, you have to be truthful and you have to be honest and you have to, you know, be able to connect. But I think if you’re going to be good in business, you need those things anyway. I mean, there’s plenty of room for people who are sitting and just doing the work. You need people like that. But if you’re going to be an entrepreneur and you’re going to build a business, you’re not going to be in that category.

Lee Kantor: And would those people be less likely to, like, make partner? Is that some of the qualities that a partner has is they are able to generate clients?

Daniel Scola Jr.: No question about it. Absolutely. Now there are partners and there they’re really called working partners. They’re not they’re not partners who are client getters or, you know, they’re they’re not really entrepreneur related. They’re not rainmakers. There’s a place for them as well. But they have they have less leverage in usually in the businesses because without your book of business is really the key and the and the leverage you have um, in any law firm And, you know, I’m looking for some partners right now and there’s plenty of guys that would like to come, but they don’t have any business. They want me to feed them work, and I would. I won’t do that. I want them to come with business and we’ll help them develop the business. So yeah, you’re right, you have less. I say that to any lawyer. It doesn’t matter not just the IP lawyer, but your your client relationships and your book of business. And the reason people come is because of you. That’s all your leverage is in a law firm.

Lee Kantor: So it’s the totality of what you know, along with who you’re connected with, what relationships, how strong those relationships are. They, you know, are they going to follow you to this new law firm if you make a move like all those things are part of the algorithm you’re using when you’re looking for kind of the next hire over there.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Absolutely. Yeah. That’s it. You got it.

Lee Kantor: And that seemed I mean, again, I, would imagine young people out there that are in law school are thinking, well, I’m learning the law. This is hard. There’s a lot to learn. I’m going to be great at this. And they think their job is going to end there, but it’s really not. That’s just kind of table stakes, it sounds like.

Daniel Scola Jr.: It’s absolutely true. And I think the more people understand this, the easier it will be to make a decision. Do I go into this or not? Uh, you know, I mean, you don’t have to be entrepreneurial to be in law. You can go into, uh, you know, be be one of the working attorneys and you can still make a good living, or you can go inside to a corporation where they really don’t care if you develop business. But honestly, that human component is, is is important even in corporations, because there you’ve got a whole layer of political aspects and you know who who at what level is willing to trust which lawyer and that sort of thing. And if they don’t know you, you know, that’s not a great thing. They have to know that you’re not only good at what you do, but you’re going to make it easy. You’re not going to say something ridiculous at a very important meeting with investors, for example. You know, they have to trust that you understand. You can read the room, that you’re good with people. And I’m not saying that you’re just a gladhand person, you know, like, oh, you’re a great personality, but you’re you’re you’re intelligent about, uh, you know, your communications with people and you’re respectful and you’re, you know, you you don’t just, you know, want to show that you’re the smartest guy in the room all the time.

Daniel Scola Jr.: That that that will not. That’s I can tell you, a lot of lawyers, um, in a lot I have it even more so when I have a lot of clients who are who are in the medical profession. Uh, at some sometimes you put a couple of, um, you know, letters after people’s names, like a PhD or an MD or a JD or whatever it is. And all of a sudden they they’re talking, they get really, uh, a little bit, you know, arrogant about the way they express things, and that’s a turnoff to most people. Um, so you have to have some sort of understanding. It’s so much people relate. It’s amazing. And maybe, maybe I’m underselling all the other stuff a little bit, but I’m I’m really not trying to. You have to be a competent, uh, both in the law and the science to do what I do. But if you’re going to be really good, you have to be good with the people.

Lee Kantor: Now, do you mind sharing kind of. When you had that aha moment that, hey, I am good with people, I can do this, I can generate revenue for my firm. Did something happen that gave you the confidence, or at least the insight that, hey, this is something I can do and I’m I can figure this out?

Daniel Scola Jr.: Yeah. I mean, I moved around a lot when I was a kid. My my father changed jobs even in the same, uh, state, you know, a number of times. So I went to six, you know, primary schools, for example. And most people would say, oh, gosh, that’s that’s terrible. You know, and this was back when, you know, in the days when they didn’t really have standardized education. So every every time you move to a school, they were you either had the courses already or you or the you had no idea, no background for the courses you’re about to take. So it was a challenge that. But but I one thing I did learn is I learned that there were so many diverse cultures and different types of people, and I, I, I learned that I was reasonably good at, you know, understanding the differences and the similarities in people and getting along really well with them. And so that just carried through to high school and to college. And then when I actually, you know, after law school, when I actually got a job, um, it, it effectively turned into a way that I could negotiate out of situations easily because I could read what was bothering somebody or the type of a type of person that what his concerns might be Or, you know, I look, you know, body language is big. You know, facial expressions is big way they say things is big. What they say is, is important. But also, you know, just somehow this intangible how you connect.

Daniel Scola Jr.: So that’s when I realized how important it was to, you know, even people would have issues between themselves in a, in a single, you know, company. Because I came from in a corporate environment and I, I left corporations to go to, to into private practice, which is not a normal thing. Normally you’re in private practice, you learn something, you’re kind of like Luke Skywalker. You’ve got 3 or 4 years. You really don’t know enough to to to really practice on your own, but you’re not sure you’re going to make partners. So you go inside a corporation where it’s nice and it’s a lot easier. And, you know, people feed you work. And so that’s that’s how you do it. But but you’ve got to get you’ve got to know that to get along with people. And I learned that from just moving around and then being put in in situations in a company where I realized that some of the lawyers were not liked. And the reason was, is they were arrogant, or they didn’t care about the needs of the marketing people or the business people. And when you paid attention to them and, you know, I’m not saying like you, you, uh, you did everything they wanted to because you have to be honest about recommending real legal solutions and telling them there’s risks and why they can’t exactly do what you’re doing, but find a pathway. They could do it. Be positive. That’s how I learned it, basically. That’s why I thought it was key.

Lee Kantor: Now, is there a story you can share that maybe illustrates what it looks like when you sell somebody something that you meet somebody, you build a relationship, you find out their need and you they’re able to kind of help them get through whatever challenge that they had. Is there something you can share? That was a memorable time you did that and helped another, either a company or a person get the protection they needed.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Yeah, I mean, I can give you I’m trying to think of a the best one I can give you a number of those. Um, where there was a, there was a company that was looking to change, uh, intellectual property attorneys. They, they weren’t getting any traction with the attorney they had, and they really didn’t know. How about, you know, how to go about picking another attorney? Um, but someone recommended they they talk to me. And so during the conversation, I mean, I obviously did some homework, uh, about who the company was and what they did and who I was going to be speaking to and so forth. So that’s important to, to get that background because that, you know, you need to know something in order to have a good conversation. And he, you know, this this gentleman who was in charge, uh, of the hiring, he also was a scientist. He wasn’t a lawyer, but he was a scientist. And he was a pretty, pretty well respected guy in the industry. And I said to him, so what, you know, what is the issue that you’re having? Uh, you know, why are you looking to change attorneys? And he said, well, we’ve we’ve been trying to get patents in this one area for a long time, and we just can’t seem to do it. Now, there’s a lot of reasons that could happen. You know, it may not be the attorney’s fault, but I said to him, well, um, you know, sometimes it’s not the attorney’s fault.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Sometimes there’s other things. And he and I went through all the other things that could, could happen. But I said to him, when I’m faced with something that’s very difficult at, at, let’s say, getting a patent through, here’s the approach I take. And then he says, okay, that’s that’s interesting. I said, perhaps you can suggest that your attorney, your current attorney look and take that kind of approach. And he said, well, how did you come up with that? And I said, because I looked online, which. Which it’s available. And I looked at what your attorney did and I said, it’s not categorically wrong what he did, but he wasn’t focusing on the right aspect of your invention that I saw that the examiner was focusing on. And that’s also reading between the lines there. Again, it’s a little bit of a people thing. What is he really getting at? What is this? What is the real issue that this patent examiner was having and that that attorney did not get it. He missed it. And that’s why they weren’t getting anything through. So I said to him, I’d be happy to do this for you. And I would take a little different approach. Now, I could not give him the full answer, because why would he hire me if I didn’t give him the full answer? But I gave him enough so he understood that the pathway was a better pathway.

Lee Kantor: Right? You were. You were showing you were hearing him, and then you were explaining it to him using an example of his own making and just saying that here’s a I would go a different path. And obviously you still can’t guarantee that it’ll get through. I mean, you just approaching it a different way and then that person either resonates or doesn’t resonate with your thinking.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Absolutely. And I also told him another thing. I said, you know, that if you have a relationship with the examiner and the examiner trusts you, that he’s going to take things differently than if he doesn’t know you and you’re spewing all kinds of arguments. And he’s like, well, I don’t really know if I believe that, but I call up the examiner or I have a zoom call with the examiner. So I know the examiner’s not not all of them, because there’s several thousand at the patent office, for example. Several thousand. The same thing happens, you know, with with other aspects of IP, you know, and so you, you talk to the examiner. You know, you find out what is. You know, the young people don’t like to do that. They’re, you know, they they would rather just say, well, I’ll send them an email. And I’m like, okay, how about you send them an email and I’ll make a phone call and we’ll see who gets further, you know, in the next, in the next week.

Lee Kantor: Right. And I think to your earlier point, I mean, doing the contrarian thing and investing in human to human relationship allows you to stand out and build that relationship. That’s strong enough. So they give you the benefit of the doubt. They’re not just dismissing you out of hand. They’re they’re they feel like they know and trust you, like you said earlier, that that’s important. And then you’re going to get that okay. Yeah. And then they’re going to lean in your direction more times than not. If you invest in the relationship as opposed to just being another, you know, um, application on a pile.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Absolutely. It’s, you know, I refer to it as the ecosystem of trust. You build that.

Lee Kantor: But it’s it’s not intuitive for a lot of folks, especially, I would imagine, with the brain types that you’re dealing with in your firm and then you’re working with it. That’s not their go to move, is, hey, let me build a relationship. Human to human. Like they’re probably trying to get out of those kind of interactions using a digital method if possible.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Yeah, it’s so true. And if you can, if you can do it, though, you will stand out in this area because that’s exactly right. Most of the, you know, a lot of scientists or a lot of people that are not, uh, comfortable putting themselves out there. Another thing which I’m thinking of imposing is, um, making new associates go to, um, you know, these lunch meetings where they, they make you get up in.

Lee Kantor: Oh, like Toastmasters.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Toastmasters type of thing. Um, you know, because I, you know, everybody’s in the same boat there and you realize that, you know, lots of people are a little nervous to speak in front of people and or meet new people. They don’t show it, but they are. And, you know, really, you know, you just, you know, everybody’s afraid of being judged. You know, it’s that’s a normal instinct, right? Normal thing. Um, but you have to get over that, um, and, and realize that, uh, it will stop progress if you, if you live in that kind of fear, just this won’t work.

Lee Kantor: Yeah. I mean, in my opinion, when I a big mindset shift for me, um, when it came to sales occurred when I reframed selling to helping and I’m just trying to help the person. I’m not trying to sell them anything. And if I’m just trying to help them get the best outcome they desire. You know, it would be great if they picked me. But if they don’t, at least I help them. And then there’s no more pressure. There’s no more. Um, you know, I’m not self-conscious anymore. Now I’m just trying to help somebody, you know? That’s all.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Terrific. And that’s a that’s a great approach. That’s a great approach. It’s it’s a little it’s it’s very much, I think not a little. It’s a very much, uh, sort of embedded in what I’m saying as well.

Lee Kantor: Right. I think that’s at the heart of what you’re saying is that let me listen to them. Let me try to help them and you know it. If if I do a good job, a good portion of those people I’m trying to help are going to pick me and.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Absolutely.

Lee Kantor: You know, and then and you don’t feel icky about it. A lot of these especially young people think sales is a, you know, a four letter word that they don’t want any of that on them. They don’t want to be the kind of that used car salesman person.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Yeah, it’s it’s funny, you know, as much as, you know, sales has this, you know, sort of that like negative shadow a little bit to some people. Same thing with attorneys. You know, you say, oh, those are the attorneys. Uh, you know, you give it to the attorneys that, you know, there’s always that, you know, subterfuge of, of negativity that, uh, that’s associated with it. But it’s it’s because there’s a few that spoil it. It’s not not really the most. Most of it is like that. Uh, yeah. So there’s so look so many aspects of doing any business or any entrepreneurship, um, that have to do with the people connection. I mean, I don’t see how you, you you do it otherwise. I mean.

Lee Kantor: Yeah, and I don’t think it’s it’s it’s law. It’s only law. It’s like every business person has to also have a sales hat if you want to be successful. I mean, you can’t just think you can be a cog in a machine in today’s day and age where they’re automating everything. You better stand out. And in a great way to stand out is if I can generate revenue for my company, I’m going to I’m not going to be the one that gets let go.

Daniel Scola Jr.: That’s it. And that’s it. And if you’re going to generate revenue, you got to put yourself out there. You got to take some risks. You got to be willing to hear, uh, thanks, but no thanks. Um, and then give something for nothing, you know, give something without any expectation of getting it back. You hope you do. But that’s not like you said. It’s helping somebody. It’s not. It’s not expecting.

Lee Kantor: And right. It’s serve first.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Great. I am.

Lee Kantor: Exactly right. Serve first and don’t pitch good. Those are good lessons.

Daniel Scola Jr.: No, it’s true, it’s absolutely true.

Lee Kantor: So if somebody wants to learn more about your firm or what you’re up to, uh, get a hold of that book. What? What are the coordinates? What’s the website? What’s the best way to connect with you?

Daniel Scola Jr.: Well, the best way to connect with me is, um, you can use my personal website, which is my. It’s d at h b I p IP law.com. Or you can just go to, you know, put Google, Hoffman and Barron LLP and you’ll see we have three offices. We have one in, uh, new Jersey, one in, uh, Long Island and one down in Washington, D.C. and we specialize in, you know, protecting people’s ideas. So, you know, patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, uh, unfair competition. We do litigation and we do procurement, you know, like the patents getting patents and trademarks and copyrights for people and enforcing them and defending them. So yeah.

Lee Kantor: Well, Dan, thank you so much for sharing your story, doing such important work. And we appreciate you.

Daniel Scola Jr.: Yeah, appreciate being on Lee. Thank you very much.

Lee Kantor: All right. This is Lee Kantor. We’ll see you all next time on High Velocity Radio.

Intro: Broadcasting live from the Business RadioX studios in Atlanta, Georgia. It’s time for High Velocity Radio.

Tagged With: Daniel A. Scola, Hoffmann & Baron, Jr, LLP

Daniel A. Scola, Jr. With Hoffman & Baron

January 23, 2023 by Jacob Lapera

High Velocity Radio
High Velocity Radio
Daniel A. Scola, Jr. With Hoffman & Baron
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Daniel A. Scola, Jr. is the managing partner of Hoffmann & Baron, LLP, and also manages the chemical, pharmaceutical/biochemical, and medical device practice group in the New Jersey office. He has extensive experience in polymers, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices. He specializes in building IP portfolios and designing strategies to protect and enhance company value.

Previously, he was Counsel, patents, and trademarks as well as Assistant Corporate Secretary at The Warner-Lambert Co. and Intellectual Property Attorney at Loctite Corporation.

Prior to earning his law degree, Scola was an adhesive and composite materials engineer at the Pratt & Whitney Division of United Technologies.

Connect with Daniel on LinkedIn.

What You’ll Learn In This Episode

  • Intellectual property
  • Importance of intellectual property to any business or entity
  • Protecting assets for start-up companies
  • IP to be implemented at the same time funding is received
  • Venture capitalist to work with an IP law firm

This transcript is machine transcribed by Sonix.

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: [00:00:04] Broadcasting live from the Business RadioX studios in Atlanta, Georgia. It’s time for High Velocity Radio.

Lee Kantor: [00:00:15] Lee Kantor here another episode of High Velocity Radio and this is going to be a good one. Today on the show we have Daniel Scola with Hoffman and Baron. Welcome, Dan.

Daniel Scola: [00:00:26] Thanks, Lee. Thanks for having me.

Lee Kantor: [00:00:28] I am so excited to learn what you’re up to. Tell us a little bit about Hoffman and Baron and how you serve in folks.

Daniel Scola: [00:00:33] Yeah, so we’re an intellectual property law firm, and that means we’re exclusively devoted to procuring, protecting and enforcing protection of ideas, creations and expressions of those ideas into intellectual property.

Lee Kantor: [00:00:50] Now, in today’s world, intellectual property seems to be an area there’s a lot of gray area in terms of what is my intellectual property, what is kind of the public’s intellectual property, how is it defined, number one? And number two, how can you possibly protect it?

Daniel Scola: [00:01:08] Well, there are very good vehicles for protecting it. And they go back to the constitutional mandate that if you exchange your ideas and teach the public how to do certain things, the government will in return give you a limited monopoly or monopoly for a short period of time. So, for example, there’s different vehicles that protect things like patents, protect inventions, for example, and you get 20 years of protection and then you’ve got the creation of expressions and ideas that go into brands and that’s covered by trademarks. And then you’ve got copyrights, which is protection of things that are reduced to a tangible form like like books, movies, dance steps and so forth and so on. And what actually happens is these rights become property rights just so just like real property, like you can sell real property. It’s an asset. You can, you could license it, you could, you could rent your, your, your land, for example. Same thing goes on with assets that are formed from these intangible ideas. You reduce them to a tangible form and they become property rights that you can license, you can sell, and they’re quite valuable.

Lee Kantor: [00:02:21] Now, the area where for me it gets gray and I was in Chicago the other day with my son and we were walking and there was a truck that was selling like a roofer or something. It was some manual labor vehicle. And on it they had pictures of all kinds of superheroes that are well known. And then my son made a comment about, Wow, how did they do that? And I’m like, something tells me they didn’t ask for permission to do that, that they just did that. And so how like is Marvel going to search these people out to try to tell them to stop doing this? Like it just seems like that in today’s world where there’s so much content just constantly being thrown around, it’s hard to defend your trademarks or your your marks in terms of everywhere that somebody is misusing it.

Daniel Scola: [00:03:16] Well, that’s a very good question, but there also is a very good answer to it. You know, normally what they would what most companies do who have like certainly the famous brands, for example, like the Marvel Comics, you know, all those action figures there, they have a a daily, weekly and a monthly program where they police their their marks and the use of their marks. So they hire people. Sometimes it’s outside law firms like ourselves. And we look to see, you know, on a constant ongoing basis, monitoring basis who is using something that is similar or identical because it’s not just using identical, it’s something that’s confusingly similar to the public. And so what happens then is they’ll get they’ll get a letter saying, you know, you either have to stop doing this or you have to have some discussions with us to allow us to develop maybe a license situation. And, you know, it’s just a way of policing it. So you really do have to to you know, one of the big advantages of having IP is that when you do get a copy copycat, you do have rights to to stop them from doing it. And I know that there’s a lot of content out there, but it’s also a lot easier to find the content these days so you can search and find lots of things it used to be, and they still do it to some extent.

Daniel Scola: [00:04:45] Used to be in the old days before social media became so prevalent, you could hear in a restaurant, for example, you could hear various songs that, you know, well known music being played in the background. Well, all those commercial establishments have licenses to play that music and they play they they they go through a a single source. Usually it’s it’s ASKAP. And they’re responsible for giving royalties to all of the performers and the people who have copyrights in the music. And they pay a limited amount for certain amount of plays that they’re you know, it’s sort of an average. And they go back and it’s a little bit on the honor system, but they do audit audited it. So all those restaurants that are playing commercially available music are paying license fees on those. So you can imagine how many restaurants out there and how many royalties are getting paid just for that, and that’s restaurants. It applies to any commercial situation. And yeah, you’re right. You’ve got to monitor it and police it and then you’ve got to get someone to to write the letter or actually follow up on on something like a lawsuit.

Lee Kantor: [00:06:03] And if you don’t follow up, are you at risk of losing your marks?

Daniel Scola: [00:06:09] Well, you do have some risks if you don’t follow up. So, for example, in the trademark situation, if you allow someone to exist so long, it becomes more difficult to to make the argument that the coexistence is creating an issue for you, even though there’s infringement. I mean, you can still get them off. But it’s always almost like, for example, in patents, the patent area, if you have an invention and you have a patent on it and you know there’s infringement and you don’t follow up on that for a period of time, usually it’s a six year period of time. There’s a doctrine called latches, which means you basically sat on your rights, you didn’t enforce them, and now you can’t enforce them. So, yeah, you have to pay if you’re going to have an asset. It’s very much like if I have a house sitting empty on a lot and I do nothing with it and I just let whoever wants to go live there, you know, I’m sitting on my rights. I have the right to charge them rent, but I’m not not a good thing to do in any field.

Daniel Scola: [00:07:15] And also the IP field is the same way. Can’t do it. So you really should pay attention. Look, it’s an asset. You know, these are valuable, valuable assets. They’re property. They can be licensed, they can be sold. They they increase the value of your company. And and by the way, whenever you’re looking for money for an investment, IP is is right at the forefront. They’ll say, okay, what is your product or what are your services? And then is it protected by IP because IP represents a barrier to the public getting in. So normally you would be you would say, I have IP and here’s here’s what it is. And they would do an evaluation. They say, oh, well, you know, the people shouldn’t be able to get to where you are easily. They have to redesign something and that’s going to cost them money and that’s going to take time. So you’ll be out there for a while first in the market will invest in you. And that’s sort of the thought process.

Lee Kantor: [00:08:17] Now is the recommendation for a, you know, maybe a startup or a new firm, even a professional service or consulting firm to develop some IP that is uniquely theirs. Will that help them in the long run, maybe get more value down the road if and when they sell?

Daniel Scola: [00:08:37] Absolutely. You know, IP always increases the value. Sometimes it’s exponential. I can tell you many examples of situations where startup companies have come to me and to my firm and we’ve worked with them to develop an IP portfolio. So it becomes a thicket of of little think of them as little land masses where people have to figure out how to walk in between these land masses so they don’t step on your IP because they don’t want to infringe. And and nobody wants infringement, right. But you know that you can enforce it if you if someone does. So it’s a real barrier and they have to redesign spend the money and sometimes they just go it’s it’s too expensive, it’s too difficult. I will just take a license from them and I’ll just compete with them. But I’ll I’ll make mine a different name. So I’ll call it a different brand and I’ll work on my brand and just try to develop that as opposed to the product and the patent behind it. But but no, you know, almost all investors look very heavily at the market and how they can prevent others from getting into the market if they invest in this in this particular asset. So if a company has a good portfolio of of IP assets or a dominant position in that technology area in terms of patents and a dominant position in terms of trademark, which is the awareness, the goodwill associated with the name and everybody knows it’s that company that sells that name, you know, then, you know, they really feel much more comfortable and they do a lot of due diligence before they put, you know, hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars in in investments.

Lee Kantor: [00:10:32] Now, if somebody is thinking about protecting their IP, when you’re working with an IP attorney, is their job just kind of just kind of going through the process of protecting it and defending it or is a good relationship with an IP attorney, one in which maybe your brainstorming together and you’re saying, you know what the IP attorney maybe is making recommendations of, hey, you should think about protecting this, or if you did this a little differently than that might be protectable. Like, is it is it kind of more of a partnership or is it more of a kind of person that’s executing some tasks?

Daniel Scola: [00:11:10] You’ve you’ve hit on a very important point. It’s actually the latter. It’s a person who is in a partnership with the client and has added value in terms of creativity, where to step, where not to step, how to take an idea which might be somewhat narrow and say, listen, we can develop this into a little broader concept and still not be within the scope of other people’s property. And you know, you do you do searches, you do patent searches, you hire specialized patent search firms, you do an analysis. You say, you know what, there’s a range of competitors or we’re doing something similar, it’s yours is distinguishable, but it’s going to narrow the scope of your protection. Do you still want to go forward with this? Or we can redesign this to actually broaden it out in another aspect which goes away from those competitors? What do you think? It really is a partnership and and a good IP attorney who is thinking ahead also has to add creativity to it to really be. And so what does that mean? It means a lot of times you have to know or learn something about the technology because, I mean, we do everything from complex immunology to, you know, in engineering, industrial engineering, chemistry, I.T. computer business methods is a whole array of technology. So, you know, you have a lot of specialists. So you hire people who have you know, the attorneys have electrical backgrounds or they have I.T. backgrounds, or they might be a biological guy or a chemical guy. And it’s sometimes you get a team and the same thing goes when you’re enforcing it. You know, you have that whole litigation aspect to it, which is more more than just protecting it. It’s defending it. So, yeah, it’s an excellent question. It’s really a partnership.

Lee Kantor: [00:13:05] And when you’re in your firm, when you’re working with clients as your client, maybe the business owner, or sometimes are you working with like private equity firms or venture capitalists who might have a portfolio of clients that it might be more efficient to work with one IP attorney firm in order to help my whole portfolio of clients rather than, you know, one at a time.

Daniel Scola: [00:13:30] Well, you know, it’s it’s the the the portfolio management like with with investors, what we’re looking to do is work with investor groups who need an evaluation of all their IP, because we have we have different departments which can handle that. But the idea is you want a consistent source of, of judgment in the evaluating of the IP. So we we work with we do diligent diligence for investment companies, but we also do a lot of work for eight universities, large companies, small companies, startups. I love startups because and I love the due diligence, which comes when investors are looking to put money into startups because that’s where I feel I can be particularly creative and add value. And and I have a lot of experience judging when something is going to be too close to for comfort and that you need to change something so you don’t get into a situation which is uncomfortable, you know, maybe a litigation or maybe someone saying the product isn’t differential enough. And, you know, but we work with all kinds of and all levels of people, including some individuals and professors and inside guys, the business guys are fun to work with. Sometimes it’s a small company and the top business guy will come and, you know, if they’re a really sharp entrepreneur, it’s a pleasure to work with them because they understand what it means to take prudent risks. They also they also know when they see creativity, they they latch on to it. So it’s it’s really it’s a fun area to practice. And I have to say, and you have to be able to to trust experts. And so this is our expertise. But when we talk to inventors, for example, or marketing people, you know, they’re experts at what they do. So it’s a nice integration of expertise coming together. When you when you work together, like in a partnership like that.

Lee Kantor: [00:15:42] Now, can you share a story? Don’t name the name, but explain maybe the challenge they had or where the opportunity was. Were you able to add value, maybe make a recommendation that that took their business or their idea to a new level?

Daniel Scola: [00:15:56] Sure. Actually, I won’t name the name, but it’s a it’s a company that was a one person startup and now it’s a public company and it is a leader in its field and it’s in the pharmaceutical area. They came to me with an idea of how to make a particular dosage form for a drug. And the idea was it came from watching the way California pulp manufacturers dried dried fruit. And they said, Gosh, that’s a cool process. I wonder if I can take certain pieces of that and adapt it into a new process and make something that will be useful to deliver drugs, which no one has done before. So in evaluating that, I found that there was an awful it was just a terrible amount of a huge amount of prior art. But in other words, patents and and disclosures in different publications which talked about, you know, this particular delivery system that this this client wanted to make, but they never described how they went about to make it. They would describe what we have a product and here’s what the product is made of X, Y and Z. But the process of getting there was never described. So what I had suggested to them is focus on that process piece, because if you can dominate a process of making it, nobody else has that. And then they all have to go through your patent to do it. And that’s exactly what happened. We got coverage on the particular and it had to do with the uniformity of content. So when you go to make a dosage form, the FDA wants to make sure the public is getting whatever the label says. If it says ten milligrams of a certain drug, you want to make sure that there’s ten milligrams in there with a small variation one way or the other, plus or minus.

Daniel Scola: [00:18:02] But when you’re doing that particular dosage form happened to be a film, like a small film, I mean, years ago. Give you an idea of what a small film is. It’s like a one inch by one inch very thin film you put on your tongue and that’s how you got your dosage form. They were making Listerine pocket parts. If you remember, Listerine used to sell a little thin strip. You could pull out and put it in your mouth. If you saw some years ago. Yeah, well, it was similar to that. Only they had to have uniformity of content. So the drug in each one of those strips had to be the same amount of drug that it’s that they said it was in it and each one of the strips had to have that. Now when you go to make they’re not making individual one by one strips. They’re making hundreds of thousands of yards of film and then cutting it. So how do you make sure that every every one by one inch film cut has the right drug in it, the right amount that you’re saying it does? So that was their invention. So when I saw that, I said, don’t worry about the compositional nature of it. Go and try to get the best coverage we can get. And sure enough, they have several hundred patents on it. They’re a public company. We still represent them. And that’s that’s an idea. I’ll give you another quick one, very quick, if you like, on Super Glue. That’s that was a patent one I just gave you. This will be a trademark example. So you’re familiar with the trademark super glue?

Lee Kantor: [00:19:33] Sure.

Daniel Scola: [00:19:34] Yeah. Most people, they know Super Glue. Well, when I was a fledgling attorney with, you know, I had maybe a couple of months experience, I was on the ground floor when the guy who came up with the name Super Glue came in to me and of course I was assigned to him. So he came in and he was a big marketing guy and he was he was herald to be this this real marketing genius. So I was a little intimidated by the guy at the time because I was just brand new and he was asking me all these questions. But the one question that he asked me was, What do you think of the name Super Glue as a trademark? And I knew this much. I said, I think it’s great from a marketing perspective, but I don’t think it’s protectable. And he said, Why not? He said, I said, Well, you know, to be protectable, it has to be something that doesn’t it can’t be generic, right? Because no one can own the rights to a generic name like glue. Glue is a generic name, and it has to be something that’s fanciful that doesn’t describe the product. That’s what most people get confused. Trademarks should not describe the product.

Daniel Scola: [00:20:45] They’re really adjectives, but they don’t describe the product per se. And Super Glue Super was just saying, Well, it’s kind of a laudatory thing, saying it’s pretty good glue and you know, you would not get that that trademark through. So I said to him, I don’t think you’re it’s very protectable. He goes, Well, I don’t care. I’m putting $10 Million into this program. And we’ll just beat them on the market side. So, you know, we’ll do our best from the legal side, but I think it’s going to be difficult. So he didn’t listen to me. But he did listen to me. And the reason I said he didn’t, because he launched the product was very, very successful. The reason I said he did listen to me is because very shortly after that, he left the company and he started his own company called the Superglue Corporation. And and we sued him. And we we basically lost because it’s a terrible trademark. Trademarks. Look at look at the word tide. That’s a pretty famous trademark, right? It doesn’t describe what the product is. It’s a great mark. It’s very fanciful. It’s like, well, you know, it gives you the connotation of suds.

Daniel Scola: [00:22:03] You know, like when you see the ocean waves come in. They look like, you know, the tides come in. It gives you that sort of foamy action. And so they named their detergent that way. And everyone knows Procter and Gamble makes Tide. And you’ve got to enforce it. And going back to your other question real quickly there, you know, Velcro is a very well known mark, and it was almost in, you know, going generic because of misuse. People would refer to say, give me a I’d like to buy some Velcro. It really it’s it’s a hook and loop structure and the brand is Velcro. So people were identifying it like Velcro is a noun. And if you said Velcro brand, fine. Ibm went through this when with I’m sorry, I’m sorry Xerox went through this with photocopying. Everyone would say, make a Xerox copy of this. Well, you know, there’s a lot of different copying machines out there. So Xerox put a whole marketing program together saying don’t misuse our trademark. If you misuse the trademark and you let people do it long enough, you will use it. Lose it. So. So did you know that escalator was a trademark that went generic?

Lee Kantor: [00:23:18] I didn’t I didn’t know escalator. I imagine Kleenex was one Kleenex.

Daniel Scola: [00:23:23] Right. Kleenex. I’m not sure if Kleenex still. Kleenex still may be. I’m not sure it’s generic. I’ll tell you what really is surprising. It was surprising to me when I learned it. Adrenaline was a trademark. In fact, it was it was a trademark of a company I once worked for, which was the Warner-Lambert Company. Adrenaline was the trademark for epinephrine. So and everyone uses adrenaline now to get your adrenaline going. Well, you know, drink some, drink some coffee, and you’ll get your adrenaline going.

Lee Kantor: [00:23:54] So they created their own word. That’s now just that’s.

Daniel Scola: [00:24:01] That’s amazing. In that’s what trademarks are great on you be be creative. You know, you can come up with some great names and I’m guessing that adrenaline came from the adrenal glands, right? Right. But they called it for it was for a shot that contained epinephrine. And that’s that’s what they named it. So, you know, it’s these these trademarks can be extremely valuable. I mean, you know, and sold. I remember when when Johnson and Johnson bought the Mylanta name, they bought it. In fact, I was involved in the sale and. My lanta was a it’s. It had a distinct color on the bottle. It has a distinct name and so forth. And they even the color of the bottle in combination with the name was a protectable thing under trade dress. It’s part of the trademark genre of protection. So IP can really be a fun place to be if you’re if you create. And the one thing that entrepreneurs don’t do usually early enough is get their IP, because once they disclose their idea, if that’s not under a non disclosure, it’s gone. You can’t protect it anywhere. I mean, you get it, you get a little time in the States, they give you a little grace period. But you know, you always have to file first if you’re going to get the best out of your IP because you never know if you’re going to misstep. Otherwise, it’s just very much safer. So what do you do if you don’t have the money? You have to have the money early enough. You’ve got to get some money to get some IP early enough or you will you will really be sorry later. And there are many stories I could tell you where people come and there’s not a lot you can do with the early stage stuff they had now, which was excellent but now can be copied. So it’s just a lesson, you know, for entrepreneurs.

Lee Kantor: [00:26:08] So now who is the ideal client for you and your firm? What is that, that perfect fit client for you?

Daniel Scola: [00:26:16] Well, I think, you know, between companies where they’re they’re really technology driven and that’s really independent of the size and they really have a lot that they want to do in the IP side. That’s the kind of client because that’s where you can you can have the most room for being creative. I love the due diligence aspects. I love evaluating IP and creating it. So investment firms like large companies that that large investment companies that that are looking to buy and companies that are looking to get new IP, it could be there could be small firms, it could be medium sized firms, they could do large firms. And we have all of those small investors, big investors. You know, a lot of times people think, well, patent patent firms, they really just, you know, deal with single inventors who come in, who have got a better way to slice bread. That’s not really the bulk of the work that we do. We certainly do some of that because there are investors. I mean, it takes a little bit of money to get some patents going. So, you know, you can’t think you’re going to get have a patent with that’s going to cover anything for a small amount of money. This doesn’t happen. You have to know you’re in for it for the long haul. You’re getting a monopoly. So you’ve got to pay for a monopoly. Monopoly? It’s not it’s not a free thing.

Lee Kantor: [00:27:49] Right. So but these larger entities, like a VC firm, private equity firm, a university where they they have a lot of intellectual property or potentially could have a lot that’s a good fit for you to have conversations with.

Daniel Scola: [00:28:02] Absolutely. Yeah.

Lee Kantor: [00:28:04] Now, if somebody wants to connect with you or your firm, is there a website?

Daniel Scola: [00:28:08] There is. You know, it’s it’s the Hoffman and Barron website. W. W w h. B ip locked. Or you could put in Hoffman and Baron, and you’ll see it come up on any of the search engines. And the firm number is is, is on there as well. So.

Lee Kantor: [00:28:32] And you’re open. If they go to the website they can find information to connect with you, maybe learn some things.

Daniel Scola: [00:28:39] Absolutely. Yeah, absolutely. You know, you can go and do some there’s a blog page where you might be able to there’s there’s I know that we have some basics on why should I get a pad and what should I do, you know, when is it a good time? And then if they just want to give a call or an email, I can answer them. Or we can get people, other attorneys who might specialize in that particular question.

Lee Kantor: [00:29:06] Well, Dan, thank you so much for sharing your story today. You’re doing such important work and we appreciate you.

Daniel Scola: [00:29:12] Well, thank you, Lee. It was a pleasure to be on.

Lee Kantor: [00:29:14] All right. This is Lee Kantor. We’ll see you next time on High Velocity Radio.

Tagged With: Daniel A. Scola, Hoffman & Baron, Jr

Business RadioX ® Network


 

Our Most Recent Episode

CONNECT WITH US

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Our Mission

We help local business leaders get the word out about the important work they’re doing to serve their market, their community, and their profession.

We support and celebrate business by sharing positive business stories that traditional media ignores. Some media leans left. Some media leans right. We lean business.

Sponsor a Show

Build Relationships and Grow Your Business. Click here for more details.

Partner With Us

Discover More Here

Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy

Connect with us

Want to keep up with the latest in pro-business news across the network? Follow us on social media for the latest stories!
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Business RadioX® Headquarters
1000 Abernathy Rd. NE
Building 400, Suite L-10
Sandy Springs, GA 30328

© 2025 Business RadioX ® · Rainmaker Platform

BRXStudioCoversLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of LA Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDENVER

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Denver Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversPENSACOLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Pensacola Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversBIRMINGHAM

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Birmingham Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversTALLAHASSEE

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Tallahassee Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRALEIGH

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Raleigh Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRICHMONDNoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Richmond Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversNASHVILLENoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Nashville Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDETROIT

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Detroit Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversSTLOUIS

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of St. Louis Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCOLUMBUS-small

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Columbus Business Radio

Coachthecoach-08-08

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Coach the Coach

BRXStudioCoversBAYAREA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Bay Area Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCHICAGO

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Chicago Business Radio

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Atlanta Business Radio