
In this episode of High Velocity Radio, Lee Kantor interviews Nathan Gaydosik, a trauma-informed leadership coach with Gaydosik Collective, about the power of becoming a story-conscious leader. Nathan explains how past experiences can influence workplace relationships, communication, trust, and performance, and how leaders can create safer environments where people can thrive. He also shares practical strategies for building psychological safety, asking better questions, embracing transparency, and leading employees according to their individual needs rather than treating everyone exactly the same.
Nathan Gaydosik is a trauma-informed coach and facilitator that empowers organizations and individuals to initiate deep and systemic change.
He holds a Master’s Degree in Clinical Mental Health, an International Coaching Federation ACC designation, and 1000s of hours facilitating experiential work.
He values wisdom, growth, and adventure, and is often found moving outdoors or enjoying music in many forms.
Connect with Nathan on LinkedIn.
What You’ll Learn In This Episode
- Understanding trauma and how past experiences can influence workplace behavior
- The principles behind story-conscious and trauma-informed leadership
- Creating psychological, emotional, and physical safety in the workplace
- Recognizing signs of low trust, employee disengagement, and relational waste
- Using open-ended questions to give employees greater voice and choice
- Supporting employees without needing to know the details of their personal experiences
- Leading people according to their individual needs and backgrounds
- Using transparency and clear communication during organizational change
- Building healthier relationships, stronger teams, and more thriving workplace cultures
This transcript is machine transcribed by Sonix.
TRANSCRIPT
Intro: Broadcasting live from the Business RadioX Studios in Atlanta, Georgia. It’s time for High Velocity Radio.
Lee Kantor: Lee Kantor here another episode of High Velocity Radio and this is gonna be a good one. But before we get started, it’s important to recognize our sponsor, Business RadioX. If you’re a business coach who’s tired of being a best kept secret, set up a call with Stone Payton at bookstonephone.com to unlock your perpetual prospect pipeline. Today on the show, we have a trauma informed leadership coach, part of Gaydosik Collective. Nathan Gaydosik. Welcome.
Nathan Gaydosik: Thanks for having me. Honored to be here.
Lee Kantor: Well, I’m excited to learn what you’re up to. Tell us about Gaydosik Collective. How are you serving folks?
Nathan Gaydosik: Yeah, I coach leaders to become Story conscious to behave in ways that are sensitive to and aware of the past stories that might be affecting present relationships.
Lee Kantor: So how’d you get into this line of work? What’s your backstory?
Nathan Gaydosik: So I’ve been a student of leadership and personal growth since before I could drive a car. Really, my career started in experiential learning and leadership retreats where I was teaching the chick fil A leadership content, and it evolved into professional leadership coaching. And in coaching conversations, I was hearing and seeing signs of trauma and the stories that my clients were telling about their work, about their relationships. And that led me down the path to study clinical mental health therapy so that I could professionally see the whole picture. I decided to stay in the coaching space because I see caring for your mind at work as perfectly relevant to everyone and in every workspace. And so building story conscious leaders is what I would call a trauma informed leadership endeavor. I want people to become leaders that behave in trauma informed ways, so that they can become safe places for people to grow and thrive.
Lee Kantor: Now the word trauma has some weight. Can you explain what it is and what it isn’t?
Nathan Gaydosik: Yeah. So I would start actually at the beginning, which is I’d love to define leadership. Leadership as I define it, is the stewardship of our influence and authority. And so leaders automatically and everybody can be a leader. You can have influence, you have some level of authority in your job and it’s your responsibility to steward it. So that’s an important definition, an important piece. Trauma I would define as any negative event or relationship that causes a change in behavior. So trauma really has taken on a heavy meaning. But the root of the word trauma is just the word wound and wounding. Experiencing pain and trauma is really just part of the human experience. And so part of my vision for some of this work is actually to pathologize the word trauma. And for us to acknowledge that we have wounds that that we experience at work and in relationship with other people. And that’s not necessarily a problem. It’s when we have really bad, really dysfunctional responses to that wound and to that experience. That’s where the problems lie. Um, and so I’d like to take some of the weight out of the word trauma if possible in my work.
Lee Kantor: So is there a reason why that word carries so much emotional kind of baggage nowadays? Maybe compared to the way the word was formed initially.
Nathan Gaydosik: That’s a good question, I think. I was having a conversation with a leader in a firm local to Atlanta, and she was explaining, you know, you’re really going to have two camps of people. Um, you’re going to have one camp of people that will say, you know, everything is trauma. And, um, trauma is being overused as a word and everybody is maybe overusing it. And then there’s going to be another group that’s going to say, um, well, no, everything is trauma and they’re going to be the people that are really comfortable using that word. Um, I think that the, one of the reasons it’s become such a heavy term is because it’s tied to some of the most extreme things, which is true. But I think we’ve discounted the small hurts and the small instances of, of stories where people are experiencing wounding in the workplace. I mean, you take things that happen every day, like somebody getting a pretty negative performance review or someone being laid off from their job or having a difficult interaction with a customer or a client. Those might be in somebody’s mind and in their story. A traumatic event that changes their behavior and how they respond in future events and in future stories. And so, um, because the word captures so many things, I think people tend to focus on the most extreme, even though the really small things can actually make a big difference in people’s behavior.
Lee Kantor: And you’ve made it a point to cast a wide net in the definition, not be narrow very intentionally.
Nathan Gaydosik: Yes. Yeah. Because it is part of everyone’s story and in my experience in the mental health space, but even in the coaching space, people aren’t even acknowledging the big heavy trauma things. They’re not label them, labeling them correctly, much less the small, seemingly small traumatic events and especially in the workplace. Um, people aren’t acknowledging how work can hurt. We spend a lot of time at work. We spend a lot of energy and, and there can be things that really affect us, um, not just at work, but in our life as a whole, um, at work. And so I really would love leaders to be equipped with some of the therapists superpowers for causing behavior change, for innovating thinking, for building better futures. And that’s a little bit of what story conscious leadership trauma informed leadership is about for me, is helping people to behave in ways that make relationships safer, that make, uh, stronger relationships, that help people get access to their best thinking. And that’s by practicing the trauma informed principles in the workplace.
Lee Kantor: Now, how much of this, um. Uh, how much of the trauma from. Let’s assume the leader is not kind of being mean. They’re just being a leader that is uninformed about certain things. Um, so they’re not bullying or they’re not purposely, uh, trying to, uh, create trauma, but they’re doing the best they can with what knowledge they have to this point. How do you kind of help educate them about how to maybe communicate, um, and lead people differently? Because maybe that leader had grown up in a, maybe in, say, in the military where it was very directive and they were told what to do. And it was, you know, they were telling me to jump and they’re telling me how high and I shouldn’t think and I should just do what I’m told. And now they’re have a, a group of people they’re leading that maybe learn differently or need to be communicated differently. So how do you help that individual, um, lead, uh, more effectively?
Nathan Gaydosik: Yeah, it’s a great question. Uh, so I would say the main goal is a story conscious leader is going to behave in light of their awareness and sensitivity to how past stories might be interfering in the present. And so that has many layers that could be, um, just raising awareness of, um, what somebody might be coming into the workplace, you know, with a different background. They’re coming as a leader. They have a military background. Um, maybe this other person has never been in any situation like that before. And so to be met with a really strong, uh, Commanding leadership style that might be a a really triggering experience for them. That might be an experience that is really difficult, um, for them based on their past story. Um, and it also could be, um, that the leader maybe should look at their own experience and, and their own story and how, um, they’re maybe modeling things that didn’t really work as well for them as maybe they think it did. Um, or it just doesn’t work for the people that they’re with. I think that’s a lot of what leaders maybe fail to see is, um, the importance of treating everybody the same by treating them differently and according to their needs and, and how they need to be led.
Nathan Gaydosik: Um, so it really starts, my work starts probably at the awareness level of just helping people to see at the very basic psychological level. What happens when someone experiences a negative experience really at any level? How that changes how they think, how that impacts their ability to have access to their best thinking. Um, and that’s not a flaw. That’s actually just a basic biological system in our brain. Um, and so that would be a place that I would start is by exposing just the general system at play in human, in the human mind. Um, and then people tend to start to think differently and see their interactions differently when they realize, when I sit down to have a performance review conversation with someone, that person is not just seeing me, but they’re seeing every boss that they’ve had before. They’re seeing every person they’ve ever gotten feedback from. Um, their brain is looking for the patterns and is bringing all of those patterns to this interaction. No matter how I behave, the past stories are present in the conversation that we’re having, and that’s going to hopefully change how they show up to those conversations.
Lee Kantor: Now, is this something that is unique in America? Like, are there different cultures that approach trauma differently? And maybe they communicate in and around it and lead in and around it in a different manner?
Nathan Gaydosik: Yeah, that’s that’s a good question. I do come from the kind of American background, but I have a huge learner of the different cultures in the world. Um, there are tons of different approaches to this. I think America can be at times behind in how, um, we acknowledge and how we see, um, human centered workplaces, how we see, uh, how work affects people, how we value, um, health and flourishing and all those things. And so the system, the trauma informed principles are actually pretty universal across the globe. Like you can see countries all over the world, therapists, psychologists, medical professionals using these trauma informed principles. Um, and so it is actually pretty universal again, because it’s the human experience and it’s the human mind operating no matter what language, no matter what background, um, the system that is at play with having a negative experience and then having a response that is universal in the human experience, which is why I believe so strongly it belongs in the workplace. Being talked about is because we can’t escape it.
Lee Kantor: Now, are you typically being hired by the organization, um, to work with a team, or is this something that an individual who’s struggling at work hires you to help them manage their work situation from an employee lens.
Nathan Gaydosik: Yeah, that’s a great question. I love, I love working for organizations and doing entire trainings and workshops for large groups of leaders. And so I have one coming up in September where I’ll be meeting with about 20 managers and supervisors. And going through this work. I coach executive leaders one on one to build and initiate culture change in their organization. Often that is somewhat connected to deep, personal, transformational work that an executive leader is doing. Um, I do work occasionally with employees that are trying to, to grow and improve and change. Um, but my vision, this work is much more effective at the higher levels where behaviors can actually be changed, cultures can be changed, organizational policies can be changed. Um, and that’s really what I feel passionate about helping to see so that less and less employees are having to go get counseling because of their work situation, or find professional help, which usually is going to lead to them leaving their job, um, and going somewhere else. I’ve coached a lot of people out of their jobs because their leader is not a story conscious person. And there’s really nothing that is going to change from the employee’s perspective. And so they have to make a change. Um, so ultimately it’s, I want to be training organizations and that’s some of the best work I do is in the group space. And then executive leaders who are looking to make culture change happen at their organization.
Lee Kantor: Now, what is kind of what does it look like from the leader’s standpoint right before they hire you? What are some of the signs and signals that maybe that they should be calling Nathan and his team?
Nathan Gaydosik: Yeah. So a lot of, uh, if you have an organization that’s trauma uninformed. You have trauma uninformed leaders. They’re not going to know that. They’re not going to acknowledge that that’s what’s happening. But they will notice that, hey, we have a team that doesn’t really have any trust. Trust has has been eroded here. Um, our people are not performing at the high levels that we believe that they’re capable of what is happening there. Um, maybe there is, uh, high turnover or um, they’re getting poor scores on employee engagement surveys. Um, there’s something that I would call relational and emotional waste, which is really hard to measure, but is often easily felt within an organization. Um, there’s a lot of time spent trying to fix and work on things, um, that are totally relational and not actually the work that is supposed to be done that the group is there to do. And so they would see a lot of these signs and symptoms. Um, and they would be thinking, how do we make our people, how do we help our people thrive? How do we help our organization to thrive? And that’s usually where the conversation might start. They also might be seeing that they have, um, a lot of employees talking about mental health in the workplace and they don’t know how to interact with that. They don’t know what to do with that. They don’t know how to do that safely. And so, um, this would be a great work for them as well if they see that happening, um, a lot and aren’t sure how to engage, that might be a case where an executive leader comes to figure out how to navigate leading people who are sharing about that in the workplace.
Lee Kantor: Now, do you ever work with like private equity or venture capital where there’s some mergers, some acquisition that someone’s going to get bought out or somebody just got bought out and they want to integrate, you know, kind of two cultures into one.
Nathan Gaydosik: Yeah. Those major organizational changes are really interesting. I haven’t actually worked through any of those directly that I can think of, but a lot of times when major change is occurring, that is a great opportunity for some story conscious trauma informed behavior. Um, because there are ways, so many ways for it to go wrong. And there are a lot of pretty simple things that people can do and pretty simple things leaders can practice, um, in those times to kind of soften the, the blow to make the transition easier. One of them I would fight for and I fight for a lot is just clear transparency, um, as much transparency as possible, um, for people to know what to expect to understand what’s happening. Um, and, and being as clear as possible with people about if this happens, then this is what’s going to happen, giving them positive and negative consequences of their actions and their performance, those kinds of things. Um, even though they might be seem kind of hard line or actually can be really important and, and create a sense of clarity, um, and safety, um, even in unsafe and unsure times.
Lee Kantor: Now when you’re working with somebody, like that’s a great piece of advice. What would be, what are some of the other kind of low hanging fruit? A leader, um, who wants to be more trauma informed, wants to be a more trauma informed leader, could be doing, uh, to better communicate with their people. Is there some easy thing, some baby steps that anyone could take that’s listening right now?
Nathan Gaydosik: Absolutely. Um, so the number one kind of foundational element of creating a space where people can thrive is creating safety, psychological, emotional, physical safety, all of those things. Um, and so the first thing that a leader can do, the baby step is really to just start asking questions to identify where are some emotional, psychological safety risks in the organization. Um, I was actually in a coffee shop and heard one of the managers of the coffee shop having a one on one with a team member, and I just couldn’t help but overhear what was happening. And I was really appreciating the conversation that they were having. And she was asking questions like, hey, if you have a good idea, do you feel that you can bring that idea and be heard and considered if a problem arises, how comfortable are you bringing that up to a leader? Do you know what support you have? If you have a problem with your leader, those kinds of questions, you can start to ask questions about safety. Even just asking the team, hey, paint a picture of what a safe work environment looks like.
Nathan Gaydosik: And then you have now you have a checklist of things that you can start looking for and doing. It really is as simple as that. Something I want to emphasize is that being story conscious does not necessarily mean that, you know, the stories that people have experienced, that you know, the trauma that maybe somebody has. And actually, it’s more safe to not know. You can be a safe person and a safe work environment and a healing work environment without ever knowing the details or the background of the story. And if you are, find yourself digging to know more of what happened. Stop. Please stop. That’s not really necessary. And it’s actually can be more harmful to dig into. Ask. And so trauma informed leaders shouldn’t be encouraging emotional dumping of past stories, but they should be really focused on what do we need to do here and now and in the future to make this a place where you can flourish? And that’s really the main place to start and to be in the habit of doing over and over again.
Lee Kantor: And that’s a great example of how maybe a trauma informed leader would, uh, ask a question versus how someone who maybe isn’t trauma informed would ask the same question. Are there any other kind of questions that you can show us? Both sides? Like what? How a trauma informed leader would ask versus what a non trauma informed leader might ask?
Nathan Gaydosik: Yeah, I think it’s a trauma informed leader’s gonna ask and give opportunities for employees to have as much voice into issues and decisions and situations. They’re going to offer as many choices as possible. They’re going to encourage, um, you a sense of mutuality. So I’m invested in your success. You’re invested in our success. Um, there’s going to be that team environment. Um, and I think often it’s, it really is asking open questions, um, that allow them to really bring their response, um, their, their true thoughts. Um, often leaders default to closed questions, um, which can be unsafe because they’re, you’re looking for a very specific answer. And, and oftentimes, uh, there isn’t a specific answer. There isn’t a short answer to some of these deeper, heavier things. And so the more open questions a leader can ask, the more humble that leader can be in the asking and the listening to the response. Those are signs that someone’s tending towards being a more trauma informed leader. Um, and a trauma informed leader is going to, um, you mentioned earlier, despite their intentions, they’re going to perpetuate harms. They’re going to remind people of historical hurts, they’re going to miss these responses, these trauma and trauma responses that are at play. Um, they’re going to ignore emotional information and potentially cause harm for the employee simply through neglect, simply through lack of awareness. Um, and so it really is about asking a lot of questions, um, and being, being humble and being patient in the answers.
Lee Kantor: Now, is there a story you can share that maybe illustrates what it’s like to work with you? Don’t name the individual or the organization, but maybe share the challenge they came to you with and how you were able to help them get to a new level.
Nathan Gaydosik: Yeah. Um, I worked with a large group of executives recently and, um, they actually work in a space where they’re dealing with some heavy things. It’s a heavy industry, um, emotionally heavy. Um, and we were discussing becoming a trauma informed leader in that space for their team members. Specifically, how do we engage our team members? Um, and I think one of the biggest takeaways from the group, they mentioned it at the end of our workshop at the end of the day was, um, you don’t have to know. You really don’t have to know in order to create space for someone to thrive in order to ask them what they need to help, give them space to empower them to give them options, um, to manage your behavior in interacting with them. You don’t have to know the details of what’s going on, even if that’s something that’s completely outside of work, something that’s personal, something that’s very, uh, recent and relevant. Somebody’s going through something personally at home. They bring that to work. You don’t have to know the details. You may just have to know, hey, I’m having a really hard time right now. Totally heard. What do you need from me? That’s all that conversation needs to be. It doesn’t need to become an impromptu counseling session with your manager. Um, and I think that was really freeing for them is you don’t have to get into the details. And it’s actually better if you don’t get into the details, but you can get into what do you need from me? How can I support you? How can I create space for you? That’s the kind of conversation that needs to happen. And I think that’s really freeing. But I think it’s also a new challenge for people not to disengage, which often is the temptation. I don’t know what to do, so I disengage, but to engage with the right boundaries. And I think that is easier said than done. But I think that just having that new awareness was really impactful to this group of about 50 executive leaders and would love. I’d love for more people to know about it.
Lee Kantor: Now, is there an industry you typically work in, like healthcare or nonprofits, or is this something that’s industry agnostic and you can work on any organization? You know, that is open minded to this type of leadership.
Nathan Gaydosik: It’s definitely industry agnostic. I tend to work with service based organizations. So organizations that are serving clients, customers, um, in an in person or in a personal way. Um, but any team, anybody that’s working with other humans. This work is for them. Um, and so that tends to be a lot of organizations, but typically I’m serving, uh, restaurants, service industries. I have, um, some nonprofits that I serve financial industries, banks, um, lots of people that are customer people facing, uh, this work is really helpful because not only does it help how you interact with your employees and your teammates, but it helps how you interact with your customers and the clients that are coming to you and the stories that they might be bringing to the meeting or to the interaction that you have. Um, and it can help how you interact with them as well.
Lee Kantor: Now what’s the way you deliver your service? You mentioned, um, workshops and working with teams and things like that. Do you do. Is it online in person? How do you deliver your coaching?
Nathan Gaydosik: Yeah. Online. Um, can do, uh, take, a one day full day workshop. That would happen in person. Um, I love the in-person work, but you can also take that split it up over six weeks, um, six one hour sessions, virtually online. Um, all of the work that I do is my background’s in experiential learning. I believe in it. All of it is very experiential and interactive. So it’s not just me lecturing, but it’s actually us having discussions, us, uh, putting into practice these things, wrestling with some of the concepts, diving into, uh, theoretical stories of what somebody might be experiencing and how do we then interact with it as a leader. Um, but yeah, virtual in person. Um, and then the one on one coaching is completely virtual wherever people are, I can connect to them.
Lee Kantor: So if somebody wants to learn more, have a more substantive conversation, what is the website? What’s the best way to connect?
Nathan Gaydosik: Yeah, they can go to storystoryconscious.co that’s co and they can meet me there. They can find me on LinkedIn. Uh, there’s not many of us out there, so, um, they can find me on LinkedIn. Um, and I’m sure you’ll attach in the show notes, um, other places that they can find me, but those are the main places. I have a Substack where I write as well. Same, same thing. Uh, Nathan on Substack. Um, and I write pretty short newsletters there that people can start to read about some of this work, some of, uh, my thoughts and my perspective on leadership in the workplace. And so that’s another place they can find me.
Lee Kantor: Well, Nathan, thank you so much for sharing your story today. You’re doing such important work and we appreciate you.
Nathan Gaydosik: Thank you.
Lee Kantor: All right. This is Lee Kantor. We’ll see you all next time on High Velocity Radio.


Randi Shannon, ND, is a Naturopathic Doctor, author, speaker, and media personality with nearly 30 years of experience in natural health and holistic wellness. She is the founder of 

Rob Young spent two decades as a senior executive, working in leadership roles in companies ranging from a startup to a global corporation. After burning out on 80-hour workweeks, too much travel, and office politics, he left the corporate world.

Dr. Thomas Trautmann is a neuroscientist, executive coach, author and speaker dedicated to making business owners unforgettable. As the founder of 
Mike Lemire is the CEO and Founder of 
Dr. James Walsh is an Air Force veteran, retired Department of Defense civilian, and educator with extensive experience teaching leadership and management worldwide.
He has taught graduate and undergraduate courses across diverse professional settings and currently teaches online at Park University. Dr. Walsh resides in Stafford, Virginia, with his spouse, Mary.


Sharon Reitman has been building 

Brett Horton, PhD, is the CEO and founder of 

Scott Goodson is a titan of the global advertising industry. As the co-founder of 













