Business RadioX ®

  • Home
  • Business RadioX ® Communities
    • Southeast
      • Alabama
        • Birmingham
      • Florida
        • Orlando
        • Pensacola
        • South Florida
        • Tampa
        • Tallahassee
      • Georgia
        • Atlanta
        • Cherokee
        • Forsyth
        • Greater Perimeter
        • Gwinnett
        • North Fulton
        • North Georgia
        • Northeast Georgia
        • Rome
        • Savannah
      • Louisiana
        • New Orleans
      • North Carolina
        • Charlotte
        • Raleigh
      • Tennessee
        • Chattanooga
        • Nashville
      • Virginia
        • Richmond
    • South Central
      • Arkansas
        • Northwest Arkansas
    • Midwest
      • Illinois
        • Chicago
      • Michigan
        • Detroit
      • Minnesota
        • Minneapolis St. Paul
      • Missouri
        • St. Louis
      • Ohio
        • Cleveland
        • Columbus
        • Dayton
    • Southwest
      • Arizona
        • Phoenix
        • Tucson
        • Valley
      • Texas
        • Austin
        • Dallas
        • Houston
    • West
      • California
        • Bay Area
        • LA
        • Pasadena
      • Colorado
        • Denver
      • Hawaii
        • Oahu
  • FAQs
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our Audience
    • Why It Works
    • What People Are Saying
    • BRX in the News
  • Resources
    • BRX Pro Tips
    • B2B Marketing: The 4Rs
    • High Velocity Selling Habits
    • Why Most B2B Media Strategies Fail
    • 9 Reasons To Sponsor A Business RadioX ® Show
  • Partner With Us
  • Veteran Business RadioX ®

Search Results for: regions business radio

Decision Vision Episode 45: Should I Increase My Prices? – An Interview with John Ray, Ray Business Advisors, LLC

January 2, 2020 by John Ray

should I increase my prices
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 45: Should I Increase My Prices? - An Interview with John Ray, Ray Business Advisors, LLC
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Should I Increase My Prices
Mike Blake and John Ray

Decision Vision Episode 45:  Should I Increase My Prices? – An Interview with John Ray, Ray Business Advisors, LLC

“Should I increase my prices?” If this question makes you pause, then this “Decision Vision” episode is for you. Price and value authority John Ray speaks with host Mike Blake on the importance of pricing in a business, how to negotiate prices, why hourly billing is the wrong way to price, and dealing with the “it’s too expensive” objection. “Decision Vision” is presented by Brady Ware & Company.

John Ray, Ray Business Advisors, LLC

should I increase my prices
John Ray, Ray Business Advisors, LLC

Because pricing is the fastest way to change the profitability of a business, John Ray advises business owners on the “should I increase my prices” question, how to change their pricing, and moving to a value pricing model. His clients include attorneys, CPAs, consultants, other professional services firms, and technology companies. His blog, “Pricing for Profit,” regularly features examples and stories which help business owners in their own pricing journey. John is also a speaker on pricing and value at numerous chambers, business events and seminars. John also helps small to mid-sized companies achieve their profit and growth goals as an outside CFO.

John also owns and operates the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®. John is the host of “North Fulton Business Radio” and “Alpharetta Tech Talk.” He also plans, produces, and promotes radio show/podcasts for businesses and entrepreneurs.

John is extremely active in the North Fulton community. He is on the board of the Greater North Fulton Chamber of Commerce (GNFCC), and serves in a variety of capacities there, including Chairman’s Circle, member of the Finance Committee, and Chair of the Awards Committee. John was named the 2018 Harry Rucker Jr. Volunteer of the Year by GNFCC.

For more information on John and his firm, find John’s LinkedIn profile here, go to raybusinessadvisors.com, or call John directly at (404) 287-2627.

Michael Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of “Decision Vision”

Michael Blake is Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

“Decision Vision” is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the “Decision Vision” podcast. Past episodes of “Decision Vision” can be found here. “Decision Vision” is produced and broadcast by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Visit Brady Ware & Company on social media:

LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/company/brady-ware/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bradywareCPAs/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BradyWare

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bradywarecompany/

Show Transcript

Intro: [00:00:01] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions, brought to you by Brady Ware & Company. Brady Ware is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality.

Mike Blake: [00:00:19] And welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast giving you, the listener, clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision making on a different topic from the business owners or executives’ perspective. We aren’t necessarily telling you what to do, but we can put you in a position to make an informed decision on your own and understand when you might need help along the way.

Mike Blake: [00:00:39] My name is Mike Blake and I’m your host for today’s program. I’m a director at Brady Ware & Company, a full-service accounting firm based in Dayton, Ohio, with offices in Dayton, Columbus, Ohio, Richmond, Indiana, and Alpharetta, Georgia, which is where we are recording today. Brady Ware is sponsoring this podcast. If you like this podcast, please subscribe on your favorite podcast aggregator and please consider leaving a review of the podcast as well.

Mike Blake: [00:01:03] So, today, we’re going to talk about adjusting your prices. And this show is going to be published shortly after the secular New Year. So, for those of you who celebrate Christmas, I wish you a merry Christmas after the fact. And those of you who celebrate the Catholic Protestant New Year, Happy New Year to you. If you are a Kwanzaa celebrant, I will wish you a happy Kwanzaa and readers as well. And happy Hanukkah. This will probably come out, I guess, a few days after the last evening of Hanukkah. And if you’re an atheist and don’t believe in any of this, I’ll just wish that you have a nice day.

Mike Blake: [00:01:49] But anyway, we wanted to make sure that this particular program started off the new year because it’s a topic that I think most business people are thinking about revisiting. And if you’re not, you probably should. And that is the topic of pricing. Pricing, I think, is one of the hardest things to get right, particularly, but not limited to professional services. Figuring out the price that you need to charge your clients, your customers is a challenge.

Mike Blake: [00:02:26] And it’s a challenge as much as anything because the market is not very transparent. Our competitors, at least in professional services, we don’t know exactly what they are charging except on rare occasions. And even if you do, you’re not exactly sure necessarily how to equate the value propositions. You may or may not be sure how your client equates those value propositions. And because pricing is so difficult, it is important, I think, to revisit that on a regular basis at least every year. Because that way, if you’re getting it wrong, you only have to live with the mistake for about a year or so.

Mike Blake: [00:03:07] And on the other hand, if you’re getting it right, great, you revisit it, you think about it for five minutes, “I’m good”, and you move on. And pricing has some interesting psychology to it as well, because we are making a statement to the market that we believe our product and service is worth X. And when somebody decides not to buy, whether it is a product or service, they are telling us that they don’t agree that it’s worth X. And that requires some mental toughness in order to kind of sustain yourself through that.

Mike Blake: [00:03:44] So, it’s an important topic and we’re going to get into it today. I was thinking about relaying an anecdote, actually, of a pricing challenge, an event that I just have. Now, I’m going to wait until we do the interview, because I think it will flow better. So, let’s jump into it. Joining us today is John Ray, who is the owner of Ray Business Advisors. John helps small to mid-sized companies, including law firms and CPA firms achieve their profit and growth goals, and God knows we need help.

Mike Blake: [00:04:16] John’s clients come to him to reduce the stress and anxiety, which often comes with day-to-day management of a business. John works with businesses to enhance their pricing strategies and make more money. John also relieves the burden of accounting and bookkeeping and improves business processes. John holds a Bachelor of Arts from Vanderbilt University, a school with a terrific baseball program, an okay basketball program, and a football program that’s lousy and that’s to see what probably is good in almost any other conference.

John Ray: [00:04:46] The longest bear market in history.

Mike Blake: [00:04:47] The longest bear market in history. Although Tennessee maybe giving them a run for their money now, interestingly enough. With honors in English and economics, John is also a studio partner for Business RadioX, voice of the Fortune 500,000 and produces this Decision Vision podcast. He helps business owners plan, produce, and promote their own radio shows and podcasts. And I can tell you that we’ve been very happy with John’s service and the impact that we’ve had and have the opportunity to make in the marketplace and sharing our knowledge.

Mike Blake: [00:05:18] So, you know, as an aside, maybe we’ll probably do a show on this. Should I do a podcast? I can tell you that for us, it’s been a successful activity and one that’s been well worth doing, we’re going to continue doing it for a while. So, if you’re hoping we would go away, sorry. John is very active in the North Fulton community. He sits on the board of the Greater North Fulton Chamber of Commerce and serves in a variety of capacities, including the chairman circle, member of the finance committee, and co-chair of the awards committee. John was named the 2018 Harry Rucker Junior Volunteer of the Year by the Greater North Fulton Chamber of Commerce. John, welcome to the program.

John Ray: [00:05:55] Great to be here. Great to be on the other side of the mic.

Mike Blake: [00:05:58] Yeah. So, I know you’ve been chomping at the bit to sort of jump in here, but I have to ask you, do you know who Harry Rucker Junior is and why the award is named for him?

John Ray: [00:06:08] I have no clue.

Mike Blake: [00:06:09] Okay.

John Ray: [00:06:10] I Googled him, but I couldn’t find him.

Mike Blake: [00:06:12] That’s an honest man right there. So, I guess he was so generous, he wanted all of his volunteer activities to go anonymously. So, there you have it.

John Ray: [00:06:22] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:06:22] So, let’s jump into this. I mean, why are we talking about this? You make a living off of helping companies figure out their pricing and correct their pricing, why is it so hard?

John Ray: [00:06:33] Well, first of all, it’s hard, I think, a couple of things. Well, first of all, I don’t know that folks get much training, if any, in pricing. And that’s really odd because of what an impact pricing has on the bottom line. So, studies from folks like McKinsey show that pricing has the biggest variable impact on the bottom line of the business. This is an accounting fact. So, it’s more than cutting expenses, it’s more than let’s do a better job with marketing or converting leads or what have you. So, pricing’s got the biggest impact whatsoever.

John Ray: [00:07:12] Yet, business schools, the last that I saw shows that only less than 10 percent of business schools out there actually have a course, just one course on pricing. So, we put entrepreneurs out there into the marketplace, get them going, and they’re good at customer discovery and they’re good at a lot of things that have to do with the business and if they’re not, they can go easily get those skills outsourced to receive those skills, but pricing is always a problem, because of this lack of training and education that they have once they start a company.

Mike Blake: [00:07:55] Yeah. It’s interesting. You know, going back to my own MBA experience, which was a very long time ago, my diploma is on a cave painting in France someplace. But we learned almost nothing about price. And the only time I remember it ever really coming up in a rigorous way was we did a marketing simulation and we had to do pricing and that was fine as far as it went, right?

John Ray: [00:08:17] Sure.

Mike Blake: [00:08:18] But there’s a limit to that. And I mean, I think you’re so right. In one respect, price is the easiest thing to change about your business, right? You can just decide to do it.

John Ray: [00:08:29] Sure.

Mike Blake: [00:08:30] Now, you may not do it correctly, but you can’t do it almost instantaneously, right? Whether it’s just changing the number you put on your engagement letters or going off the price gun-

John Ray: [00:08:39] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:08:39] … it’s fairly easy to change. In your experience, when people or businesses mispriced their offerings, do they tend to overprice or underprice them?

John Ray: [00:08:50] Underprice. And I’m an example of this, I have to say. I mean, I got passionate about this because-

Mike Blake: [00:08:56] You’re gonna testify, aren’t you?

John Ray: [00:08:57] Yes, I am. I’m going to confess right here. If anybody’s listening, I’m confessing. So, no, I mean, it’s, you underprice what you do, particularly, as you said in the intro, in professional services. Because in professional services, we price our sales and there’s these voices that speak to us that sit on our shoulder and whisper in our ear that says, “Oh, that person’s not going to pay that much. You know, that company is talking to other people”, or what have you. And, you know, you need to knock a little bit off of that. That’s not going to work. And we talk ourselves out of the way we should price.

John Ray: [00:09:42] I think there’s a misconception also that if you lower your price, you’ll get more business. And actually, the opposite is sometimes true because price is an indication of quality. And I could relay a lot of anecdotes about how increasing prices actually increase sales, because suddenly, that the customer base, that product or service was aimed at, saw a lot more quality in what they were being presented than they had previously. So, price is a signal, and it’s actually a marketing signal.

Mike Blake: [00:10:23] There’s a great episode on Frasier, where Frasier and Niles were talking about, I think it was some sort of massage therapist or something. And they’re bragging, basically bragged in terms of the hourly rate, right?

John Ray: [00:10:42] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:10:43] So Niles was saying, you know, “My massage therapist is $500.” Frasier comes in and says, “Mine is a $1,000-an-hour.” And Niles goes, “She sounds fantastic.”

John Ray: [00:10:52] That’s right. Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:10:54] And, you know, I remember, earlier in my career, you know, one of the services we provide is something called a fairness opinion, which is an appraisal of a business where we have some fiduciary responsibility attached to it. So, there’s liability, so we tend to charge more. First one I ever did or maybe the second one I ever did but for a very friendly client. And I want to make sure I got the business, I underpriced it.

Mike Blake: [00:11:20] I got the business, but my client told me after the fact, he said, “Look, I appreciate the price, but I got to tell you, you almost didn’t get the work because your bid was so much lower than everybody else’s. We were concerned or the board was concerned that you actually knew what you were doing and you could put the requisite time and effort into this exercise. And I had to go to bat for you and say, ‘No. He knows what he’s doing in valuation, he just don’t know anything about pricing.'” I said, “Thanks.”

John Ray: [00:11:49] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:11:49] Right?

John Ray: [00:11:49] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:11:50] But, you know, we rarely get insight into that process. But I can tell you that, you know, A, I left about $35,000 on the table, no doubt, a minimum. And B, I nearly got nothing because I was so good at negotiating with myself-

John Ray: [00:12:05] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:12:05] … that I almost negotiated myself right out of that business.

John Ray: [00:12:09] And we’ve all looked at something and said, “That’s too good to be true”, in terms of the price. There’s something wrong. But we rarely take that sentiment and turn it around on our own product or service, right?

Mike Blake: [00:12:23] Right.

John Ray: [00:12:23] So, I think that’s what you’re getting at and it makes tons of sense. And I have never seen anybody. And if you’re out there, please write in and let us know and we’ll stand corrected. But I’ve never seen a business start out by overpricing.

Mike Blake: [00:12:44] We have no e-mail free to write in, by the way. We’re trying to fix that, but write in sort of metaphorically.

John Ray: [00:12:50] That’s right.

Mike Blake: [00:12:52] Or John will give you his e-mail at the end of this podcast, so you can write into there, I guess.

John Ray: [00:12:55] Yeah, there you go.

Mike Blake: [00:12:57] So, we’re over-thinking it, should pricing just be simple as, “Here’s what it costs me to deliver this product or service, here’s the amount of profit I want to make off of it”?

John Ray: [00:13:11] Well, certainly, your revenues have to exceed your costs. So, let’s just start with that. So let’s make the accountants happy and we’re going to agree to that. What I find, particularly in professional services, is that when a professional services provider focuses on pricing relative to the value that they deliver and just getting a piece of the value they deliver and that’s their equation, then they make a lot more money and they really don’t have to worry about their cost because they deliver so much value, generally.

John Ray: [00:13:54] So, sure, it’s important to have a profitable business, but that’s not really what we’re talking about here in getting our pricing right for professional services providers, it’s really about getting a piece of the value that you provide such that you can have a more focused business working with the best clients and not be so stressed, really running a business where you’ve got a bunch of clients where you really don’t want to service a bunch of them, right?

Mike Blake: [00:14:25] Yeah.

John Ray: [00:14:26] 20% or 30% of them, you really don’t want, but you’ve got them simply because you’re getting the revenue out of them. But they’re very low margin clients.

Mike Blake: [00:14:34] And that’s where you get back in the podcast number two, how should I fire my client?

John Ray: [00:14:38] That’s right. My favorite of the series, so far.

Mike Blake: [00:14:42] So, can different clients have different prices for roughly the same product or deliverable? And is that okay?

John Ray: [00:14:50] Absolutely. So, different clients have different values. And it’s okay to price based on those values. And it’s okay to offer options that clients can select, the options based on service levels, speed of delivery of the service, et cetera. In fact, I highly, highly recommend, in fact, demand of my clients that they offer options because that really helps ferret out what you’re getting at. So, I think the biggest mistake a lot of folks make is here’s my price, it’s kind of a fill or kill adversarial situation, right? Either you accept or you don’t. That’s the way the client looks at it, right? I think, Mike, what folks need to understand is that clients love options. They like to select. They like to see what your panoply of services are and come out with what they want.

Mike Blake: [00:15:59] And, you know, I think, perhaps, the best example, and I do this more and more, I offer choices as well, because I find that it enables clients to then choose what they want to do, right?

John Ray: [00:16:12] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:16:12] And when you’re with our clients, you make the relationship less adversarial. But, you know, that rule of three has been embraced for a long time by who I think is the king of price in the airline industry.

John Ray: [00:16:23] Yes.

Mike Blake: [00:16:24] Right? I don’t think there’s an industry anywhere that is more sophisticated about pricing than the airline industry.

John Ray: [00:16:30] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:16:31] And what do they offer on most of their flights? Business class, first class-

John Ray: [00:16:36] Coach.

Mike Blake: [00:16:36] … economy/surf class-

John Ray: [00:16:40] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:16:40] … or steerage. And, you know, they let you choose, right? If you want to have the first class experience and the glass of champagne before the flight even leaves a gate, you pay that. And, you know, if you don’t mind taking an elbow to the back of your head every once in a while on a five-hour flight to the West Coast, you can do that, too, right? And so, you know, the funny thing is, in my experience—and I’m just going to say this sort of on the down low, because nobody’s listening except for the two of us, right?

John Ray: [00:17:11] That’s right.

Mike Blake: [00:17:12] Most often, the most profitable service I offer is the lowest priced one.

John Ray: [00:17:18] And that means you’ve got it correctly priced, right? It’s important to understand that different clients have different values and will value things differently across the spectrum. So, here’s an example outside of professional services, coffee. So, I’m a cheapskate on coffee. I mean, I may buy the dollar cup at racetrack, I’d prefer to wait until I get wherever I am and hope they’ll give me a cup of coffee for free, right?

John Ray: [00:17:46] Then, there’s my daughter at college who’s racking up $5 charges at Starbucks seemingly every half-hour on the half-hour, right? And then, the most expensive cup of coffee sold in the United States the last time I looked was $75 a cup. And it comes from some “exclusive farm in Panama, where they get one crop a year and they have a big party and a tasting at this coffee place in California that serves this coffee and they sell out”. So, I think that’s crazy. But there’s some people that look at coffee as fine wine. So-

Mike Blake: [00:18:28] Yeah.

John Ray: [00:18:28] Right? And that’s cool. That’s their value system. They may have other things that they look at and they’re cheapskates about, but we all have a panoply of values that we ascribe to a lot of different products and services. And so, as professional services providers offering our services, we have to recognize that and price accordingly.

Mike Blake: [00:18:51] So, everyone saw an article pops up, it’s probably click bait, but I’ll probably take that click bait, which is on why hourly pricing is the wrong price for professional services. Do you agree with that and why?

John Ray: [00:19:08] Absolutely. So, hourly pricing, well, it’s wrong on a number of levels. One is that it’s not really the end price. It’s not what a client pays. Clients are interested in what they’re getting in to pay. So, when you deliver an engagement letter and it says, “We’re gonna charge you, the partner time is to $250 or $300-an-hour and the associate time is $125”, or whatever, fill in the blanks, that’s not a price, that’s just half the equation.

John Ray: [00:19:44] It doesn’t tell me how many hours each of them were gonna put into that. It doesn’t tell me what happens when the project blows up and it takes longer than what we thought it was gonna take, which is almost inevitable because things never go the way they are supposed to go, right? So, it’s wrong from that point of view. It is a relic of the industrial age when industrial companies were trying to price get their professional services providers to deliver pricing that they could equate with their inputs, basically.

John Ray: [00:20:20] I mean, I could go in the whole history of it, but the point of it all is that it’s from another age and another time. And what clients are really paying for is not how much time you spend on a project, they’re paying for the grey matter between your ears and your experience and all the things that you’ve seen with other clients. That’s what they’re paying for. I mean, I had this experience with one of your colleagues where I brought a client in. And this was just an exploratory meeting on whether this client ought to sign up to be a Brady Ware client, right?

John Ray: [00:20:56] And in 15 minutes, they gave tremendous help and advice that I think pushed that engagement over in terms of getting that client to sign up. But the point is, is if that were a paying client at that time and that client had been paying by the hour, then the value-to-price ratio would be ridiculous. That client would have gotten much, much, much more value relative to the price they paid than they should have if you’re billing in 15-minute increments.

Mike Blake: [00:21:30] Yeah. And, you know, one of the fallacies then also is that you’re punished for being more efficient-

John Ray: [00:21:36] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:21:36] … which is not the way economics are supposed to work. And, you know, use the accounting example, you know, I don’t think any of our clients are paying for our time or they should not be.

John Ray: [00:21:48] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:21:49] Right? On our tax side, they’re paying for one of two things. One, I’m bulletproof against an IRS audit, right? Or two, I’m exercising my civil obligation to minimize what I pay to Uncle Sam as much as I possibly can.

John Ray: [00:22:12] Sure.

Mike Blake: [00:22:12] Right?

John Ray: [00:22:13] Sure.

Mike Blake: [00:22:13] When you’re a tax client, the client’s are one of those two things, right? They either are terrified of Uncle Sam, they want nothing to do with them or they want to go into combat with Uncle Sam.

John Ray: [00:22:23] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:22:24] Right? And man, if your client would like to go into combat with Uncle Sam, please call us, because, boy, we make a lot of money there.

John Ray: [00:22:31] Sure.

Mike Blake: [00:22:33] And, you know, whether that takes one hour or fifteen hours, it’s the outcome you’re buying.

John Ray: [00:22:37] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:22:37] Right. Not the inputs.

John Ray: [00:22:41] Not the inputs.

Mike Blake: [00:22:41] Who cares? And also, it has to sort of go both ways, right?

John Ray: [00:22:49] Yes.

Mike Blake: [00:22:51] The client’s not going to let you suddenly charge more if something that was supposed to take you 10 hours, you know, takes you 100.

John Ray: [00:22:58] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:22:58] First of all, well, that’s not my problem if you couldn’t get your act together, right?

John Ray: [00:23:01] Right. Exactly.

Mike Blake: [00:23:02] So, by definition, you know, for the most part, some industries are not like this, but many industries, that hourly notion is a one-way street.

John Ray: [00:23:14] Yeah. And, you know, I think technology is such, artificial intelligence is such that I saw one study that this study said was, “In five years, 99% of all bookkeeper jobs would be eliminated.” Then, I think it was the same percentage for tax-prepared jobs. Well, I don’t know that that’s true, but directionally, it’s probably correct because of technology.

Mike Blake: [00:23:39] Absolutely.

John Ray: [00:23:40] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:23:40] I mean, we don’t have people cranking out tax returns by hand and-

John Ray: [00:23:44] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:23:44] … with slide rules and so forth.

John Ray: [00:23:47] Yeah. And so, as technology and particularly, artificial intelligence, links between institutions get more robust, I could foresee a time when tax returns are real time. You can see your tax return in real time as the year goes on, right?

Mike Blake: [00:24:02] Yeah.

John Ray: [00:24:02] And so, the value of a tax preparer, let’s say, comes from the advice they give around that return, not for the preparation of the return. And so, as you say, if you’re pricing by the hour and based solely on preparation of return, your business is headed straight down over the next few years.

Mike Blake: [00:24:25] Yeah.

John Ray: [00:24:25] Period. The pig is in the python, shall we say.

Mike Blake: [00:24:30] Yeah. So, how do you help your clients respond when they have their own customer, client or prospect that pushes back on price? You know, you’re charging me too much, I don’t want to pay that. What are some of the approaches that you advocate to engage in that conversation?

John Ray: [00:24:50] What I tell folks is that if you get that response to a proposal, typically, you’ve not had a great value conversation, because the client’s comparing that price or those prices relative to something other than the value that you’re providing. So, you’ve not done a really good job at marketing your value to that client or getting that client to understand that value. And you don’t have a good sense of where their values are.

John Ray: [00:25:23] And again, you know, it’s kind of interesting. I’ll give you an example of this. I had a client who I was having an exploratory meeting with and, you know, it was going well and he was almost downplaying what he really needed until his wife came in the room. And she was talking about how screwed up he was and how they needed to get their financial act together and their books were a mess and she was sick of it.

John Ray: [00:25:52] And it occurred to me at that point that this man’s value was getting his wife off his back. That had nothing to do with the services that I may have been providing, really, in terms of the way he looked at value. So, the point is, if I had never had an in-depth discovery session with him, I wouldn’t have understood that value and I might have priced my services a lot differently and he might have given me the “it’s too expensive” response, right?

John Ray: [00:26:27] So, you know, I think it’s really important to understand client value. And then, the other thing I tell folks is when a client says it’s too expensive, I say, you know, “Too expensive relative to what? Relative to doing nothing?” Meaning is, what’s the cost of doing nothing for this problem that you were sitting here talking about? Is it too expensive relative to you doing it yourself? See, when you ask those kind of questions back, then you get to the root of where the value really is in that client’s head.

Mike Blake: [00:27:03] So, you know, a lot of it, it sounds like is doing your homework upfront and then, if you get that push back, it means you have more homework that you have to do.

John Ray: [00:27:10] Absolutely.

Mike Blake: [00:27:12] And, you know, that makes sense to me. And, you know, in every case, this goes back to the right client provider match, right? And in some cases, you know, it’s also about letting clients sort of select themselves out, right?

John Ray: [00:27:29] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:27:32] You know, I know you and I have a slightly different viewpoint on this, so I’m going to raise it because I think it will provoke an interesting sidebar here, you know, when a client calls me and they say, “Hey, you know, I’ve got this valuation project, you know, here are the basic parameters, what do you think it will cost?” I will tell them because I want them to then self-select, right?

John Ray: [00:27:57] Sure.

Mike Blake: [00:27:57] In my view, if they have a heart attack over that price, right? Then, there’s no amount of value exploring I can do that’s likely going to bridge that gap, right? And it just saves both of our time. I know you take a different view on that. So, why don’t you explain your view, how you respond to that discussion or what?

John Ray: [00:28:19] I do take a different view on that. And here’s the issue, I’ll look at it and I say to a client, “Look, I’m not sure we’re a great fit, because what I’m sensing here is that you’re looking for a transaction because that’s your first question is what the price is. And I’m interested in relationships, I mean, you know, the way my practice is based. So, we’re probably not a good fit. Let me recommend some folks that might be better fits for you that you ought to have a conversation with.”.

John Ray: [00:28:55] And usually, what happens is, first of all, people are taken aback. Sometimes, they’re insulted. And I tell them I don’t mean to insult them. It’s just, you know, we have different ways of looking at a potential engagement. And I’m not offended when they start with that question. As a matter of fact, I’m happy because they’ve told me that they’re very price-sensitive and it’s probably a client I don’t want.

Mike Blake: [00:29:21] Yeah, absolutely.

John Ray: [00:29:21] Right? So, they’ve done me a favor. So, that’s the way I typically respond. Now, what I would say to you is if you’re going to respond to a price, I think the first price you should name is the absolute highest price you can come up with. So, I don’t know what your engagements cost, but let’s just make this up, okay? So, let’s say the biggest engagement you could ever imagine having is, you know, $150,000. What the way I would respond is, you know, “Hey, our engagements could range from $300,000 to $500,000.” Do you see what I just did?

Mike Blake: [00:30:04] Right.

John Ray: [00:30:04] Right? “On down. So, tell me what what we’re talking about and then, I can quote you a more accurate figure.” And so, then it adjust that conversation back around to where it needs to be.

Mike Blake: [00:30:19] So, let’s talk a little bit then about negotiating price. How do you do that, right? You can’t do business without some sort of negotiation. And, you know, people will haggle over. We’ll haggle over prices for, you know, where they can for things like cars and professional services. What are some tips you can offer to people that maybe aren’t all that comfortable haggling over price?

John Ray: [00:30:49] So, a couple things, I really think it’s important, this is where options come in. If you offer folks options, the good, better, best model, then it really gets into negotiating around service levels, or it should, not price. So, that’s what I highly recommend, is take your services and break them down into a good, better, best, and price around that. And then, the negotiation is about how we’re going to engage. It’s not, first of all, yes or no. And it should not be around price. The levels of negotiation should be what services we’re going to include or take out, depending on which option, either good, better, or best you’re interested in.

Mike Blake: [00:31:48] Well, actually, let me touch on one thing here, because one implicit assumption we’ve had about this entire discussion is that you, as a provider or as a producer, don’t want to compete on price.

John Ray: [00:32:05] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:32:05] But there are some businesses in which the thesis of competing on price is exactly your value proposition, right? And there’s nothing wrong with that as long as that’s sort of the strategy that you’re embarking on and you drive your business in that direction, right?

John Ray: [00:32:21] Sure.

Mike Blake: [00:32:22] You know, just as you mentioned, you’ll tell a prospect that leads off with price that, you know, here, maybe providers that are a better fit because price is sort of the start of their value proposition. I have those in my world as well.

John Ray: [00:32:34] Sure.

Mike Blake: [00:32:37] So, there’s nothing wrong with that, where you can run askew from that as if you don’t want price to be the lead of your value proposition. And then, you get sucked into the trap of the next thing you know, you’re negotiating on price and not on value.

John Ray: [00:32:51] Yes.

Mike Blake: [00:32:53] So, I just had this happen. I posted this on my LinkedIn profile last week and actually gets a post that got me the most engaged in the whole year. So, people felt my pain. And I basically said, “I’m never going to do this again”, which means I’ll probably screw it up in a couple of months. But-

John Ray: [00:33:11] You’re going to tell the story, right?

Mike Blake: [00:33:12] And I’m going to tell the story.

John Ray: [00:33:13] Okay. Good. Good.

Mike Blake: [00:33:13] And the story is that I was asked to bid on a project where I had a relationship with the company, but not the executives, they had some turnover. But we’ve done some work with them before. So, what we were going to do was effectively an update, not a de novo valuation exercise. And they submit a competitive bid, which is fine again, because I didn’t have a relationship with the people, just the company. So, it’s weird. There is institutional relationship, but not personal relationships.

John Ray: [00:33:43] And, you know, they came back to me and they said, “Look, you know, love to work with you, but, you know, this other provider came in a little bit lower, will you match that? You know, if you’ll match that, we’ll work with you.” And I wrestled with that. I slept on it overnight. I’d tell myself, “Don’t do it, don’t do it, don’t do it.” I’m like, “Oh, but the work is going to be fairly easy to do and I hate to lose a client”, right?

John Ray: [00:34:10] Sure.

Mike Blake: [00:34:10] Different from a new client because to me, losing a client is more painful than not getting when you could have.

John Ray: [00:34:16] Yes.

Mike Blake: [00:34:17] I think for me, psychologically, that was part of it.

John Ray: [00:34:20] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:34:22] The word is ego. And against my better judgment, I said, “You know what, yeah, I’ll do that.” But I did one thing right, which is I made them give me back something for the price. I didn’t just match it because I think when somebody says, “Can you do better?” and you just match and don’t give up anything, you’re telegraphing to the world that you’re trying to rip them off, basically, right?

John Ray: [00:34:42] Yeah. Yeah. I couldn’t agree more.

Mike Blake: [00:34:43] Right?

John Ray: [00:34:43] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:34:45] But if I can get something back from them, right? Then, it’s a more empowered discussion. I said, you know, “As long as we can do something where I get paid more if the work gets more complicated and you’ll agree to a multi-year contract with us, then I’ll go ahead and do it.” And two days later, they came back to me by email and said, you know, “Another provider came in, they matched your price and they’re not going to charge more even if the work gets more complex.” And for a second, I was a little upset because I did what they said and they didn’t. But after I took a deep breath, I wrote them an email message, “You know what, I think you found the right match for you. All the best.”

John Ray: [00:35:29] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:35:30] And, you know, as I thought about that, it occurred to me that they did me an enormous favor.

John Ray: [00:35:37] Yes.

Mike Blake: [00:35:37] Because that was not going to be the last time that happened between me and them.

John Ray: [00:35:42] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:35:43] And they were going to find some small thing, a spelling error inside of a footnote some place that to them was going to constitute a material error and find a way to break the contract anyway.

John Ray: [00:35:56] Right. Right.

Mike Blake: [00:35:57] And, you know, what they also told me is that their time was not viable. Because of the fact we’ve done work with them before, they’ve been working out to tell us about how their business worked and we had models built, they’re going to have to do that with a new provider. And it is frightening to work with a client whose time is not viable to them.

John Ray: [00:36:18] Oh, yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:36:18] Because they’re going to think my time is not viable.

John Ray: [00:36:21] Oh, exactly.

Mike Blake: [00:36:21] So, I posted it on my LinkedIn that I didn’t get burnt, I got singed because I dropped a few more hours into the proposal process than I should have. But it was actually a good ending, in that, I didn’t get the work and one of my competitors did.

John Ray: [00:36:37] And that time you put into it was tuition.

Mike Blake: [00:36:41] That’s right.

John Ray: [00:36:42] Right?

Mike Blake: [00:36:42] That’s exactly right.

John Ray: [00:36:42] That will help you next time.

Mike Blake: [00:36:44] That’s exactly right.

John Ray: [00:36:45] But what happened there is if you hadn’t had that conversation, right? If you hadn’t had that back and forth, then that client would not have revealed themselves. And it’s really important to get clients to reveal themselves to you.

Mike Blake: [00:36:59] Right.

John Ray: [00:36:59] Right? So that you understand what you’re dealing with. And if you’re okay having, you know, a business where, you know, you’re dealing with misers, because that’s what I call those folks—and by the way, just as an aside, statistically, for goods and services, studies show there’s about 25% to 30% of buyers are misers that they don’t want to pay. And so, it’s really important to understand them. So, because you had that interaction with them, because you had that back and forth, you got a real good picture on a client you really didn’t want at the end of the day. And all you really had to do was deal with, with your own psychology of saying, “Hey, it’s okay to let that one go. I’m better off.”

Mike Blake: [00:37:46] Yeah, that’s exactly right.

John Ray: [00:37:47] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:37:48] And I made it public for two reasons, number one, because I thought it was instructive. And number two, I was inviting mockery and the trolls of the internet so that I would be emotionally battered and bruised so much that I’d never, ever, ever do it again.

John Ray: [00:38:05] So, the bad memory of that would keep you from doing that ever again.

Mike Blake: [00:38:09] It was-

John Ray: [00:38:11] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:38:11] … intentional PTSD.

John Ray: [00:38:13] I love it.

Mike Blake: [00:38:13] Because I think in that case, it serves a process. So-

John Ray: [00:38:16] And you got all this love from people that have this problem, right? See, that’s what’s so revealing.

Mike Blake: [00:38:21] That’s right.

John Ray: [00:38:22] Yeah. I mean, that’s what’s so revealing to me about that story. One of the things about that story is people come back and say, “Hey, I’ve got that same problem.”

Mike Blake: [00:38:30] Yeah. That’s right. And you and I are both business advisors and, you know, one of the things, I think, a good business adviser does is understand that they make mistakes, too.

John Ray: [00:38:41] Yes.

Mike Blake: [00:38:41] And that they don’t know everything.

John Ray: [00:38:43] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:38:44] Because really, who wants to be around a know-it-all all the time, right?

John Ray: [00:38:49] Right. Particularly, when you know they don’t know it all, right?

Mike Blake: [00:38:51] Yeah, that’s right. It’s one thing if you can back it up.

John Ray: [00:38:54] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:38:55] John, we’re running out of time here, but thanks so much for coming on, especially, we’re recording this Christmas Eve here. John, how can people reach out to you if they want to learn more about pricing and get some advice on pricing in the new year?

John Ray: [00:39:08] yourpriceistoolow.com. How about that?

Mike Blake: [00:39:12] I love that.

John Ray: [00:39:13] I’d just put it out there.

Mike Blake: [00:39:15] Okay.

John Ray: [00:39:15] And if you want to go the old-fashioned way, raybusinessadvisors.com will get you to the same place and/or you can call me, 404-287-2627, or I put that challenge out there about folks that feel like they’ve priced adequately from the very beginning, so if you want to email me, let me know about you, we’ll do a podcast with you, maybe.

Mike Blake: [00:39:39] Absolutely. We’ll read your story online as you gloat to the rest of the internet.

John Ray: [00:39:43] That’s right. But jray@raybusinessadvisors.com.

Mike Blake: [00:39:47] So, that’s going to wrap it up for today’s program. I’d like to thank John Ray so much for joining us and sharing his expertise with us. We’ll be exploring a new topic each week. So, please tune in so that when you’re faced with your next executive decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy these podcasts, please consider leaving a review with your favorite podcasts aggregator. It helps people find us so that we can help them. Once again, this is Mike Blake. Our sponsor is Brady Ware & Company. And this has been the Decision Vision podcast.

Tagged With: CPa, CPA firm, Dayton accounting, Dayton business advisory, Dayton CPA, Dayton CPA firm, Decision Vision, increasing prices, Michael Blake, Mike Blake, price increase, pricing, product pricing, professional services, ray business advisors, service pricing, value, value pricing, value to client

Decision Vision Episode 43: Should My Business Buy Real Estate? – An Interview with James Pitts, FRED – Fractional Real Estate Department

December 12, 2019 by John Ray

Decision Vision
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 43: Should My Business Buy Real Estate? – An Interview with James Pitts, FRED - Fractional Real Estate Department
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

should my business buy real estate?
Mike Blake and James Pitts

Decision Vision Episode 43: Should My Business Buy Real Estate? – An Interview with James Pitts, FRED – Fractional Real Estate Department

Should I lease my real estate or buy? What are the factors to consider if I do buy? Answers to these questions and much more come from James Pitts, FRED – Fractional Real Estate Department, on this edition of “Decision Vision.” Mike Blake is the host of “Decision Vision,” presented by Brady Ware & Company.

James Pitts, FRED – Fractional Real Estate Department

James Pitts

James Pitts is the CEO of FRED – Fractional Real Estate Department. James is a 20 year corporate real estate professional with experience at Jones Lang Lasalle, Grubb & Ellis, Johnson Controls (JCI) Global Workplace Solutions, and Sheraton Hotels. Most notably, James worked as Solutions Development Director at JCI Global Workplace Solutions where he was responsible for the design of global and regional corporate real estate outsourcing solutions for companies such as Motorola, Barclays, HP, SunTrust Banks, HSBC with annual spends of $50M-$500M.

FRED – Fractional Real Estate Department is a corporate real estate services firm designed to serve middle market companies that don’t have a real estate department but need one. For most businesses, real estate is the second or third highest cost after people, and a lease or purchase of real estate can be one of the longest commitments a company makes. These strategic decisions have cost and business risk implications but are typically left to managers with non-real estate backgrounds and outside real estate brokers to handle. The FRED team is made up of former heads or managers of corporate real estate for Coca Cola, E&Y, Wells Fargo & AT&T with 30+ years of experience each. FRED doesn’t do real estate transactions; they provide analysis, strategy, and manage the client’s process and brokers on behalf of the business. They are paid on a project, cost savings or retainer basis and promise to provide trustworthy real estate expertise.

For more information, go to their website or email James directly.

Michael Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of “Decision Vision”

Michael Blake is Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

should my business buy real estate?“Decision Vision” is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the “Decision Vision” podcast. Past episodes of “Decision Vision” can be found here. “Decision Vision” is produced and broadcast by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Visit Brady Ware & Company on social media:

LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/company/brady-ware/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bradywareCPAs/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BradyWare

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bradywarecompany/

Show Transcript

Intro: [00:00:01] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions brought to you by Brady Ware & Company. Brady Ware is a regional service accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality.

Michael Blake: [00:00:19] And welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast giving you, the listener, a clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision making on a different topic, rather than making recommendations because everyone’s circumstances are different. We talk to subject matter experts about how they would recommend thinking about that decision. My name is Mike Blake and I’m your host for today’s program.

Michael Blake: [00:00:40] I’m a director at Brady Ware & Company, a full-service accounting firm based in Dayton, Ohio, with offices in Dayton, Columbus, Ohio, Richmond, Indiana, and Alpharetta, Georgia, which is where we are recording today. Brady Ware is sponsoring this podcast. If you like this podcast, please subscribe in your favorite podcast aggregator and please consider leaving a review of the podcast as well.

Michael Blake: [00:01:02] Today, we’re going to talk about, should your business buy its real estate. And I’m prompted to this question because it comes up a lot. And interestingly enough, I’m actually seeing it come up more now with technology companies under the thesis that a technology company, by acquiring hard assets in some way, makes itself less risky in front of an investor and potentially, even a bank financing candidate.

Michael Blake: [00:01:35] Now, I’m not a real estate expert at all. In fact, I’m a disaster at Monopoly. Both my kids wiped me out. I think that’s because I’m a technology guy, by the way. Because I think in SAS terms, I’m always by the utilities and the railroads because there’s a more kind of recurring revenue as opposed to, you know, idiosyncratic by landing in a hotel in Boardwalk. But the problem is, and spoiler alert, if you do that in Monopoly, you basically die a slow death to your children who do a victory dance over you, by the way.

Michael Blake: [00:02:04] So, don’t be like me in Monopoly. But anyway, real estate is a different animal. And I get asked about real estate a lot because I’m in the appraisal business, but I’m in the business appraisal business. Again, I don’t know anything about real estate. We lucked out when we got a good deal on our house. I truly mean that with no sense of humility whatsoever, that is as factual an assessment as I can offer.

Michael Blake: [00:02:29] But, you know, especially in a market where you have loose credit, you have banks that very much want to lend. And frankly, you know, we are, especially in Atlanta, a real estate town. America’s a real estate society in terms of investment. The allure of buying real estate can have a very strong pull, but I’m not sure that that’s necessarily the right thing to do for many companies. And so, that’s what I want to talk about this day.

Michael Blake: [00:02:57] Because I’ll bet in the sound of my voice with someone who is listening to this podcast that somebody right now is looking at, they’re either looking at buying real estate or they’re going, “Why the heck did I buy that real estate? Now, I’ve got this albatross around my neck.” You know, “What made me do that and how do I get out of that?” And like I said, I’m not an expert on this. And for those of you who have been listeners to this podcast, you know that I know not a lot about much. And so, I bring in subject matter experts to help us figure that out. And helping us today is my friend James Pitts, who is CEO of Fractional Real Estate Development or FRED. That has-

James Pitts: [00:03:39] Fractional Real Estate Department.

Michael Blake: [00:03:40] Department, sorry. Department, FRED, a corporate real estate services firm designed to serve middle market companies that don’t have a real estate department, but need one. FRED’s team is made up of former heads and managers of corporate real estate for Coca-Cola, Ernst & Young, Wells Fargo, and AT&T with 30-plus years of experience in each. FRED doesn’t do real estate transactions but rather, they provide analysis, strategy, and manage the client’s process and brokers on behalf of the business. They get paid on a per project basis, cost savings or retainer, and provide real estate expertise that can be trusted.

Michael Blake: [00:04:18] Now, James himself has a 20-year corporate real estate professional with Jones Lang LaSalle, Grubb & Ellis, Johnson Controls Global Workplace Solutions, and Sheraton Hotels. Most notably, James worked as solutions development director at JCI Global Workplace Solutions, where he was responsible for the design of global and regional corporate real estate outsourcing solutions for companies such as Motorola, Barclays, HP, SunTrust Banks, and HSBC with annual spends of $50 million to $500 million. So, yeah, he’s an expert. James, thanks so much for coming on the program.

James Pitts: [00:04:54] Thanks, Mike.

Michael Blake: [00:04:54] And in spite of my botching the name, I think that the name itself is just awesome. FRED. And nobody’s ever called a Fred anymore, right? You don’t meet very many Freds, right? But it’s sort of just short and to the point and sounds very authoritative. Now, did you have Fred in mind and then, you built the words around it or did you just put those words in papers, “Hey, that spells Fred.”.

James Pitts: [00:05:17] The latter.

Michael Blake: [00:05:17] Is it really?

James Pitts: [00:05:19] Mm hmm.

Michael Blake: [00:05:19] So, my guess is both parts of your brain are working at that point and then, sort of put it down a piece of paper for you. So, well done. Frankly, it’s easier to remember than Brady Ware. So, you’ll get more mileage on this podcast than I will most likely. So, James, you’re obviously the resident expert on this, not just here, but just about any place you go. Why do companies want to buy real estate when they’re not in the business of real estate?

James Pitts: [00:05:45] Well, they typically want to buy it as an investment. Some see it as a hedge against risk. Some don’t like the idea of paying rent and they want to build equity. All valid points, but just not that simple.

Michael Blake: [00:05:58] And how compelling is that argument that real estate is an investment?

James Pitts: [00:06:04] Real estate in the nature of itself is an investment. The question is whether it’s a good investment, depends on the goals and the needs of the investor and what their alternative investment options are. It’s a good investment if the company doesn’t have a better alternative for investing its money. Also, a company has to ask itself if it’s in the real estate business or if it’s really going to be in its core business because real estate can really be a distraction to the core business.

James Pitts: [00:06:31] And I’d like to give you a quick example. We had a client that we worked with for years, lost contact with. They went out and bought their own real estate, built a building, overpaid for land, went through a business downturn, suddenly, couldn’t use all of the real estate. They were upside down in the building and the land that they bought. And they were trying to lease out the space and they had other businesses in their space. And the CEO literally said, “I can’t get any work done because I have all of these tenants.” So, suddenly, their core business was being distracted by the real estate business.

Michael Blake: [00:07:06] And, you know, I think that’s important because on the outside looking in, if you’re not in real estate, it must look easy, right? You buy a property, you own it. You just sit back and you let the income roll in or let the savings roll in. And then, at some point, you sort of dispose of it. But as a homeowner and not a very good one, by the way, it’s amazing I still have all of my fingers, frankly, owning real estate, even very basic real estate is an effort and there’s further costs in upkeep, right? So, that doesn’t go away just because now, you own a factory or a warehouse or an office building, right?

James Pitts: [00:07:46] Well, yes. And so, when the roof has a leak, that’s on you. When you have the HBC system go out, that’s now on the business. So, suddenly, instead of making a phone call, you’re managing that, paying for that, checking on that, and just dealing with that.

Michael Blake: [00:08:02] So, we talked a little bit about what are the reasons for wanting to own real estate. What conditions typically lead to a company finding that real estate ownership is beneficial to them? What does a company kind of look like that is a good candidate for that?

James Pitts: [00:08:19] Well, for example, you have a specialized use. So, maybe you need land or maybe you need a certain building that unless you own it, the landlord will not let you perform your operations at a core to your business. Let’s say there’s a specialized use of land or buildings that may require large capital outlay to construct. For instance, a movie studio with a purpose-built sound stages, water stage, back lots, et cetera, will want to own the real estate.

James Pitts: [00:08:49] We had a client from South Korea that needed to test its rubber treads on a proving ground. Imagine a Jeep obstacle course, three acres next door. Industrial buildings aren’t designed to have like a three-acre playground next door. So, they literally had to buy a building actually and then, buy the land next door, and build their proving ground. Otherwise, they wanted to lease. They didn’t want to get into the ownership. But because of their use, no one would let them do that.

Michael Blake: [00:09:24] Right. So, at some point, you got to be the person that gives yourself permission to do it, right?

James Pitts: [00:09:28] Exactly.

Michael Blake: [00:09:29] So, you have to own it in that case.

James Pitts: [00:09:29] Exactly.

Michael Blake: [00:09:30] Right? So, you know, in home ownership, there’s a rule of thumb, the basis, unless you’re going to be in the property for five, six years, don’t buy because by the time you factor in all the transaction costs and so forth, it just doesn’t make any sense, right? Keep on renting. Is there a similar rule of thumb time frame in the commercial business area?

James Pitts: [00:09:56] Well, real estate cycles are typically seven to 10 years long. If you want to talk about that cycle, you have declining prices, rents and construction, then that leads to absorption of excess supply, that leads to low vacancy, which leads to increasing prices and rents, which leads to accelerate new construction. At some point, as you go around the circle, you get to oversupply and then, you have high vacancies, which is typically when you want to buy at that lower end of the cycle. Right now, in Atlanta, we’re at the high end of the cycle. So, it’s really a landlord and sellers market. So, from a real estate cycle, if you’re going to be in it, at least seven to 10 years. And we’ll really talk about that probably and some of your other questions about the life cycle of a business as well.

Michael Blake: [00:10:44] So, I’m going to go off script a little bit, but I know it’s a question I want to get out and I think it’s going to be of a lot of interest, which is, you know, as you walk in as the Fractional Real Estate Department for your clients, how much of that work is taking over the management of their properties and how much of it is reversing buyer’s remorse and helping them kind of liquidate, you know, “What have I done?” And sort of get rid of that. How often do you encounter that latter scenario?

James Pitts: [00:11:14] We’re working with a client right now that the previous CEO leased three times as much space as they need. They are actually laying off people right now while they spend an extra $250,000 a year in excess real estate costs. So, sometimes, the first thing you have to do is come in and do an analysis and then, come back with a strategy of how do we fix what you’ve inherited. And the previous CEO signed an eleven-year lease, so they still have eight years of pain.

Michael Blake: [00:11:44] And so, I’ll continue off the script, but I’ve got to follow that question up. So, you know, in some cases, can you then lease that out to try to get a—you know, or sublease, or something like that?

James Pitts: [00:11:56] You can sublet it. You can sell it. You can try to work with the landlord to get out of it. The goal for FRED is to keep people from making these sorts of costly mistakes.

Michael Blake: [00:12:07] Yeah.

James Pitts: [00:12:07] And then, reduce the expense, increase EBITDA, and reduce risk. But what you find, and I used to manage some of the Fortune 500 real estate portfolios when I was at JLL, is that real estate’s the hidden dragon on earnings. And people just don’t realize it. And that even big companies make huge mistakes. And then, that gets multiplied across portfolios. And then, everyone says, “Well, why are we doing this?” “Well, because everyone else did it.” And that’s what it’s always been. We’ve been in this position, in this location for 20 years. And it doesn’t really match anything that the business is doing today.

Michael Blake: [00:12:41] And do you find that businesses may think they know more about real estate than they do because they’re good at the business, but real estate is just different animal? Like I said, I’m a business appraiser, but I’m not a real estate appraiser. Is real estate just fundamentally a different animal?

James Pitts: [00:12:55] Everyone other than you believes that because they bought a house that they’re a real estate mogul. So, they believe that they know a lot more about real estate. It’s something they don’t deal with every three to five years. And when you think about it, real estate is one of those commitments that a company makes that goes three to five years out. Most businesses can’t see that far. And who knows what your strategy or your operations or your sale is going to be in three to five years. And the real estate does not care.

Michael Blake: [00:13:21] No, it doesn’t, right? I’ve never seen the real estates, “Oh, man. I’m sorry”, you know.

James Pitts: [00:13:26] Yeah, the landlords-

Michael Blake: [00:13:27] We’ll just let you out.

James Pitts: [00:13:28] Oh, yeah. Yeah. “Sorry, you guys had a downtime.”

Michael Blake: [00:13:30] Have to reset.

James Pitts: [00:13:32] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:13:32] So, getting back to the primary conversation. So, we’re in a cheap money cycle right now. Feds just lowered interest rates three times in the last three or four months or so. How much should that be a factor in driving the real estate purchase decision? I mean, on some level, obviously financing is cheaper, but is it that simple or does that need to kind of be mixed in with some other considerations?

James Pitts: [00:14:00] So, great question. Depends on the cycle. Even before you get to that, you really have to look at, does a company have excess cash that it can’t really invest back in its operations? Are they stable? Like have they grown to the point where they aren’t going to outgrow the space that they buy? Because why buy it if you’re gonna outgrow it? Now, suddenly, you’re in the real estate business. And, you know, are you in some type of low-margin business where you get a greater return by putting your money in the real estate?

James Pitts: [00:14:32] But let’s talk about cheap money. So, the cheap money of the late 2007s and 2008s actually caused the real estate bubble. So, that led to that balloon. People who bought early in the cycle did well. People who came at the end with that cheap money and bought at the height of the cycle, like we are now, when prices were inflated, got hurt. After the crash, money tightened considerably and people with cash came back and bought things cheaply. Sold as the market was coming back up. And now, we’re back toward the top of market. So, I’d say that the cheap money is there, but it could lead you into bad decisions.

Michael Blake: [00:15:13] Yeah. So, the cheap money could be a sign, right, that maybe the timing is off. And again, I think that that requires a specific real estate expertise to really understand and read the market, right? Certainly, I can’t do it. So, now, there’s an argument out there that companies make that they want to own their real estate because it’s a hedge against risk. How do you respond to that? Is that often a reasonable argument or is that just somebody talking themselves into doing a real estate deal?

James Pitts: [00:15:44] The latter.

Michael Blake: [00:15:45] Is it?

James Pitts: [00:15:45] It could be. So, it depends on what risk you’re worried about, right? So, there’s investment risk and there’s business risk. So, if you have a basket of equities, fixed income, cash alternatives, alternative investments, and real estate, you are diversified. Real estate typically lacks business downturns by six to eight months. So, if there’s a general drop in the economy, then the real estate will eventually fill that. And if the company bought the high of the market, you can suddenly be under water with regards to the value of your property in which you paid for it.

James Pitts: [00:16:18] The mortgage payment is still the same. The company may have to downsize, but your costs are still the same for your real estate portfolio. And it’s hard to sell asset in the downturn as well. So, if you’re trying to use—real estate does follow business cycles. So, it’s not necessarily a risk against that. And you also have to say, “If buying real estate makes your business operations riskier, you shouldn’t do it.” But if you’re at a point where purchasing the real estate, you know, lessens risk or doesn’t impact your risk profile, then you can look at that as a separate investment.

Michael Blake: [00:16:53] And I think what you’re talking about is the operational risk-

James Pitts: [00:16:56] Exactly.

Michael Blake: [00:16:56] … of the company, right?

James Pitts: [00:16:57] And correct me if I’m wrong, but the way I interpret what you just said is that one of the dangers is a business can undertake gymnastics that they would not normally undertake in order to get into the real estate game just because there’s cheap money and they feel like that there’s sort of a momentary opportunity. That sounds like a path to trouble.

James Pitts: [00:17:20] We see it a lot where once people get into their brain, “I’d like to own something and build equity”, they will do unnatural things to accomplish that that may not be in the best interest of the business. So, for instance, we had a service company growing rapidly up to 60 people. They were leasing 2,600 square feet. People were literally on top of one another. The owner said, “I want to go out and buy something.” And we said, “Well, you’re still growing. So, let’s lease 13,000 square feet for five years. That gives you plenty of room to grow. And then, once you get to a point where you’re stable and you’re not growing, maybe that’s when you buy a specialized site for your business.” And I said, “Plus, you’re at the top of the cycle. So, why would you buy now? There’s no equity in it.”

Michael Blake: [00:18:07] Right. Buy high, sell low is not a successful business strategy for most, right?

James Pitts: [00:18:12] Exactly.

Michael Blake: [00:18:13] And, you know, that gets to something that I encounter a lot, which is, as you know, I do a fair bit of work in the emerging tech sector, right? And, you know, to me, buying a building when you think you’re going to grow, right? And tech companies grow rapidly. They don’t add two or three people, right? If they don’t catch fire, it doesn’t matter. But once they catch fire, they’re adding people at a hundred a time, right?

James Pitts: [00:18:37] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:18:37] I wouldn’t say you can’t, but, boy, it’s got to be hard just to buy your way out of that problem every time through.

James Pitts: [00:18:46] Exactly. It’s like buying a 15-year old boy a pair of $400 sneakers. Right. You’ll be out of them in two months.

Michael Blake: [00:18:54] Right. Right.

James Pitts: [00:18:56] So, why do it?

Michael Blake: [00:18:56] Right. Yeah. Now, that’s fair. That’s fair. So, let me ask this a little bit off script. But what about the lease-to-own deals? Do you see a lot of those? And if so, do they change the dynamic at all?

James Pitts: [00:19:12] Oh, lease-to-own. I don’t see a lot of that. Not at a corporate level. You see that more so in a residential level-

Michael Blake: [00:19:21] Okay.

James Pitts: [00:19:21] … who would do a lease-to-own. But now, some people may lease and they’ll have an option to purchase later.

Michael Blake: [00:19:28] Yeah.

James Pitts: [00:19:29] You know, if they think that they’re gonna really like the space. But you don’t see too many of those.

Michael Blake: [00:19:35] Okay. What are some of the hidden costs owning the real estate?

James Pitts: [00:19:40] Oh, so those are capital improvements that you weren’t expecting. If you’re in a building and you decide you don’t need all of it and you have a vacancy, so now, you’re inefficient. Maybe you did a floating rate loan or a swap loan and rates are changing on you, and they’re not going in your direction. We actually had a client that the rates right now, like if they were to sell the building that they’re in, they’d owe $200,000 versus if the rate stayed where they used to be, they’d get a check for $300,000 of repairs and maintenance.

James Pitts: [00:20:17] We did a project for a large nonprofit here in Atlanta that owned the building with very little debt. They had about $5 million in deferred maintenance on the property. They were trying to figure out what they would do with the building. They were in about half of it, in 40,000 square feet with three tenants. They weren’t getting any new tenants. And we did a study and looked at what their other costs were, including the maintenance people that they had on staff. And they didn’t realize all the hidden cost in it.

James Pitts: [00:20:47] And we ended up selling the building for them, reducing their space. They got $2 million above what the market was offering. And then, by reducing their space and making them more efficient, we save them $3 million on their lease. So, they were like, “How did you make leasing a building cheaper than owning a building and put $5 million in our pocket?” Like, you know, it was a lot of financial engineering. Just looking at—that the real estate didn’t match your needs, you know, financially or even their people.

Michael Blake: [00:21:18] Well, and that goes to knowing the real estate market, right? And knowing what the market will bear and kind of what the terms are, and, you know, being able to use that as a negotiation point, right?

James Pitts: [00:21:30] Mm hmm.

Michael Blake: [00:21:30] I mean, again, you know, real estate is one of those things, it bears repeating, it looks easy, but it ain’t.

James Pitts: [00:21:38] It is really not.

Michael Blake: [00:21:40] So, how much should an opportunity to acquire real estate is sort of like as a good deal? How much does that drive or should it drive the discussion? You know, maybe your building is just going to be sold. Maybe there’s an estate situation, divorce situation, like that, and the son has got to sell, so it’s going to—if you can kind of do the deal quickly, it’s going to go for below fair market or market value, how much should that play into that lease-versus-buy decision?

James Pitts: [00:22:13] And I think we have to make sure that if your core business is your priority, as long as you check all the boxes and purchasing the building does not impact your core business, which is really your bread winner, then you can consider it, if it’s a great deal. I mean, if it’s a deal that if, for some reason, you need to sell it or lease it out and you could lease out, say, maybe 70 percent and that would easily cover your mortgage, you should consider it. You know, but if it’s an arbitrage opportunity, you should consider it. If it’s a great deal, you should always consider that.

Michael Blake: [00:22:49] Okay. And what about the argument that real estate can be used as a way to diversify the assets of the company or sometimes, the assets of the owner that is not necessarily that clearly separated from the company because it’s sort of one of the same? How compelling is that argument?

James Pitts: [00:23:08] So, that can be a sticky wicket. It can also be a great strategy. Some owner, company owners purchase building and lease it back to the company, and let the company expense the rent payments while paying off the mortgage on the property, then the owner can personally tap the built up equity in the property without taxation. If the owner expects to sell the company, then they may have to unwind or restructure their intertwined real estate in their business to make it attractive to the buyer.

James Pitts: [00:23:38] We were talking to a private equity firm out in California and the owner sold—they bought a business, the owner sold it to them, and it was 150,000 square foot warehouse. They only need 50,000. He had them as part of the deal, signed a 10-year lease for 150,000. So, they were suddenly stuck with three times as much space as they needed. And they were lamenting that they didn’t make him unwind that. So, you have to be clear, if you’re trying to exit your business and you now have some real estate obligations, it could affect your valuation.

Michael Blake: [00:24:14] Now, we tussled on this a little bit before, but I want to make sure that we address this explicitly. How important is the decision whether or not you need to kind of build your own custom real estate? We talked about customizing a building that you own. But now, I want to kind of move kind of, you know, a step further. What about kind of building your own real estate versus buying something that may or may not suit you on the existing market? How often do you encounter that? Does that build versus buy change the business discussion at all?

James Pitts: [00:24:48] So, it can. If your movie studio is custom-built, then it’s really important to buy and build your own. Back to that one client of ours who built their own building, they bought the land too expensive. Right now, construction costs are really high in Atlanta. But they’ve done that in 2010. Much better deal, cheaper land, cheaper construction costs. So, what we found is that given the costs of construction right now with the steel tariffs and just the land costs, there’s a lot of existing buildings that you can buy that are actually cheaper than in building right now in this particular part of the cycle.

Michael Blake: [00:25:31] And-

James Pitts: [00:25:32] And it just depends on where you are in the cycle-

Michael Blake: [00:25:33] Sure.

James Pitts: [00:25:35] … basically.

Michael Blake: [00:25:35] Okay. And I guess to some extent, too, if you can actually find someone to build the building, right, at the top of the cycle-

James Pitts: [00:25:40] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:25:40] … it’s-

James Pitts: [00:25:41] Everybody’s busy. Right.

Michael Blake: [00:25:42] Everybody’s busy. Right. So, you don’t even get out of radar screen unless you have a big job to begin with.

James Pitts: [00:25:47] And for one of our South Korean clients, we actually did a study of, do you buy a building or do you build it? And it came out, it would be easier to buy a building, existing building, renovate it, and do what you needed to do next door than to just build from the ground up.

Michael Blake: [00:26:08] I wonder if there’s kind of a conceptual benefit there, too. You know, my parents built a house and the thing that I learned from that process, I’ll never build a house because it seems to me that if you’re trying to imagine a structure from the ground up, there’s just nothing there today. And then, a year from now or two years, you know, there’s going to be a building. Just seems like so many things can go wrong and there’s not going to be the way that you visualized or to make them the way that you visualize them is going to be prohibitively expensive along the way.

James Pitts: [00:26:42] Depends on where you are in the cycle.

Michael Blake: [00:26:43] Yeah.

James Pitts: [00:26:44] But you have architects for that.

Michael Blake: [00:26:45] Yeah.

James Pitts: [00:26:45] Architects and civil engineers, and they can deliver exactly what you want.

Michael Blake: [00:26:49] So, are there any rules of thumb around a company’s finances in terms of how much cash to have in the bank or how profitable they are or how, I don’t know, sort of reliable their profitability is that maybe goes into your calculus as to whether or not you advise a client to buy versus lease?

James Pitts: [00:27:08] So, in general, real estate as an investment, I’ve read somewhere, returns about 7 to 8 percent of the long-term as an investment. If the business return—if your margins on your business are 20 percent, and why wouldn’t you invest that in your business, if you still have the opportunity to grow? So, people get, “Oh, I want own real estate and I’m gonna build up equity.” But if you can put that money into your people, if you can leave the risk of ownership of real estate to a landlord so that if you shrink or grow, you can go elsewhere versus now, I have a building and I have to do the capital improvements. And I have to pay the taxes on it and if I grow or shrink, it stays the same. So, there’s a business risk there.

Michael Blake: [00:27:59] You know, I want to come back to that or stay on that, actually, because I think that’s a very important point. You know, many of the drivers I see for buying real estate lie in something else other than directly operationally imperative to the business, right? Sometimes is. And I think we’ve covered that. You know, rule number one is make sure that that decision is driven by the operational imperative-

James Pitts: [00:28:24] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:28:24] … not because of something else that you want to do. And, you know, there’s no law that says, if you have excess cash or even excess borrowing power that you have to buy real estate with it, right?

James Pitts: [00:28:36] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:28:36] Or if you want to buy real estate, you know, buy into a read, right? You can get real estate exposure that way.

James Pitts: [00:28:42] Or buy an actual investment property that’s not attached to your—if you have extra cash, maybe you go and buy another real building that has tenants in it.

Michael Blake: [00:28:54] Yeah.

James Pitts: [00:28:54] And you manage that as a separate investment. But now, you sort of linked your business to your real estate and they’re intertwined. Let’s say you have partners in your business, there’s three or four partners, and Ted decides to leave the company. And now, you know, you have to unwind the real estate side of it and the business side of it. And maybe Ted didn’t want to get out of the real estate side or, you know, you have to make sure all the interests are aligned on the real estate side as well.

Michael Blake: [00:29:22] So, one other question I want to ask as we move towards wrapping up here is, a company can accidentally acquire real estate through an acquisition, right? And although I’m confident in most cases, a company isn’t necessarily surprised that it owns real estate, but I think that I’ve certainly seen the case where the acquirer spend so much time performing due diligence in the company that they feel that the real estate is a sort of a side gig or a throw away or something. And then, all of a sudden, you wind up owning it and maybe they should have done due diligence on that or sometimes, you’re even forced to buy the real estate. The seller will not sell unless you take the whole thing, business and real estate. How often do you see that? And if you do see that a lot, in your mind, is that a complicating factor in the M&A process?

James Pitts: [00:30:15] I definitely think it’s a complicating factor. Part of what FRED services we offer to come in as a part of that M&A process is to look at the real estate and say, “Here are you trailing obligations from a real estate perspective and here’s how you need to account for that, because either you’re going to end up with some excess cost or some real estate that you don’t need, and maybe, you should make that a part of the negotiation” versus “You take this”, and suddenly, you basically paid the seller twice. And that you paid them for the business, you paid them for the real estate. Now, you take the loss on the real estate. And that’s not a choice that you make. You actually came there for the business.

Michael Blake: [00:30:56] So, if somebody wants to learn more about this process, they have a question about their own real estate decision they’re looking at, how can they contact you?

James Pitts: [00:31:05] Please feel free to e-mail me at james.pitts, P-I-T-T-S like in Pittsburgh, @fred, F-R-E-D,-solution.com. And love to hear from you.

Michael Blake: [00:31:19] All right. And that’s going to wrap it up for today’s program. I’d like to thank James Pitts so much for joining us and sharing his expertise with us and telling us about his company, FRED, Fractional Real Estate Department. We’ll be exploring a new topic each week. So, please tune in so that when you’re faced with your next business decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy these podcasts, please consider leaving a review with your favorite podcast aggregator. It helps people find us so that we can help them. Once again, this is Mike Blake, our sponsor is Brady Ware. And this has been the Decision Vision podcast.

Tagged With: CPa, CPA firm, Dayton accounting, Dayton business advisory, Dayton CPA, Dayton CPA firm, Decision Vision, diversification, diversification into real estate, Fractional Real Estate Department, FRED, hidden costs of real estate, lease to own, Michael Blake, Mike Blake, real estate

Global Chamber: Trade Agreements and Global Business Issues with Melissa Sanderson, Jeffrey Garza Walker, Joshua Rodriguez, Kevin Hull

December 5, 2019 by angishields

Trade Agreements and Global Business Issues

Melissa Sanderson with Freeport McMoRan and Jeffrey Garza Walker with Cresa speaking on Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, Arizona

Melissa Sanderson with Freeport McMoRan, Jeffrey Garza Walker & Joshua Rodriguez with Cresa, Kevin Hull with BMO Harris Bank broadcasting live from the Valley Business RadioX studio in Phoenix, Arizona
Valley Business Radio
Global Chamber: Trade Agreements and Global Business Issues with Melissa Sanderson, Jeffrey Garza Walker, Joshua Rodriguez, Kevin Hull
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file


This episode of Valley Business Radio is brought to you by the Global Chamber, a unique, growing and collaborating community of CEOs, executives, and leaders taking on global business in 525 metro regions around the world. The Global Chamber provides information, connections, and mentoring for leaders to capture global business opportunities. Connect with their resources and tens of thousands of members and followers worldwide to accelerate your success and improve your business, our region and the world.

Follow the Global Chamber on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Get tickets for the Global to Local Innovation Summit: Sustaining Growth on December 10, 2019 in Scottsdale, AZ


Melissa Sanderson, Freeport McMoRan

Melissa Sanderson with Freeport McMoRan in the studio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, ArizonaMelissa Sanderson is Vice President, International Affairs with Freeport McMoRan, a leading international mining company with headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona. Freeport is the world’s largest publicly traded copper producer, the world’s largest producer of molybdenum, and a significant gold producer.

Before joining Freeport, Mel enjoyed an unusually diverse 21-year career as a a Foreign Service Officer in the US Department of State, working on a variety of issues including arms control, anti-narcotics, anti-terrorism, and business promotion (helping US companies abroad). In her first assignment in Mexico, she was involved in attracting US businesses to the then-fledgling maquiladora industry, and she subsequently worked briefly with the US team negotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Mel is Co-Chair of the Phoenix Committee on Foreign Relations and serves on the boards of the Arizona Mexico Commission, the Arizona Council for Economic Education, and the Global Advisory Board of the Greater Phoenix Economic Council.

To hear more, listen to Mel’s previous appearance on Valley Business Radio in July 2019.

Connect with Melissa Sanderson on LinkedIn, Facebook, follow Freeport McMoRan on LinkedIn, and follow the Phoenix Committee on Foreign Relations on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.


Jeffrey Garza Walker, Cresa

Jeffrey Garza Walker with Cresa in the studio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, ArizonaJeffrey Garza Walker is Senior Vice President with Cresa, the world’s largest commercial real estate advisory firm that exclusively represents occupiers and specializes in the delivery of fully integrated real estate solutions. Jeffrey focuses on expanding Cresa’s capabilities in global portfolio services through key industrial clients with requirements in Latin America. He also assists companies in Latin America that seek to place operations within North America. With a background as a Senior Director of Corporate Real Estate in North/Latin America of a top tier 4PL logistics company, Jeffrey provides a capable skill set and 15 years of experience in commercial real estate brokerage/development.

Jeffrey currently serves on the ASU MRED Real Estate Council, as well as the MRED and ASU W.P. Carey Business School Mentor Programs. He has previously worked with Habitat for Humanity, the YMCA and served on the Salvation Army Board of Directors. Jeffrey was selected as a presenter on how to facilitate CRE for companies located within Latin America which seek to place operations within North America.

Jeffrey received his Master of Real Estate Development (MRED) degree from Arizona State University in the inaugural year of the program, an MBA in Global Management from the University of Phoenix, and a BA in Spanish from Montana State University. He is a US Armed Forces Veteran and Phoenix Business Journal 40 under 40 recipient.

Connect with Jeffrey Garza Walker on LinkedIn, and follow Cresa Phoenix on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.


Joshua Rodriguez, Cresa

Joshua Rodriguez with Cresa in the studio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, ArizonaJoshua Rodriguez is Vice President with Cresa. He focuses on expanding the firm’s capabilities in global portfolio services with key industrial clients that have requirements in Latin America, while assisting foreign companies seeking to place operations in North America. Joshua brings over 7 years of experience in advisory services to at-market clients and the Spanish monolingual market.

Joshua currently serves on the ASU MRED Real Estate Council and the ASU MRED Alumni association. In addition, he serves on the Greater Phoenix Economic Council’s Ambassador program to provide assistance with the organization’s efforts to attract corporations and talent to greater Phoenix. He received a Master of Real Estate Development (MRED) degree from Arizona State University and a bachelor’s degree in Business Management from Grand Canyon University.

Connect with Joshua Rodriguez on LinkedIn, and follow Cresa Phoenix on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.


Kevin Hull, BMO Harris Bank

Kevin Hull with BMO Harris Bank in the studio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, ArizonaKevin Hull is Vice President and Team Lead / Manager with the Commercial Banking team for the Arizona market at BMO Harris Bank. He has been with BMO Harris for a total of 17 years: 10 years in Chicago and 7 years in Arizona. During this time, Kevin held various Business Development and Sales Management roles with Metropolitan Banking and Commercial Real Estate. Also, while with BMO Chicago, Kevin formed the Homeowner Association Banking Group. Kevin has been in banking for a total of 29 years. With BMO Arizona, he focuses on acquiring new client relationships with manufacturing, distribution and service companies. He also targets companies who have “cross-border” banking needs as well as international banking needs.

Kevin earned his Bachelor’s degree in Finance from Drake University and attended Dalhousie University’s joint MBA program with BMO’s Institute for Learning in Toronto. In 2015, Kevin earned the “Registered Global Credit Professional” designation from the Association of International Credit and Trade Finance Professionals. Over the years, Kevin has served on boards and committees for various non-profit and trade groups. Currently he is a member with the Global Chamber and serves on the organization’s Advisory Board and served as Chairman of the Events & Programs Committee. Other past positions include becoming a Certified Ambassador with the Greater Phoenix Economic Council and a member of the International Leadership Committee for the Council. Kevin volunteers for the non-profit group Canadian’s In Arizona Benefitting Exchange and Education.

Connect with Kevin Hull on LinkedIn, and follow BMO Harris Bank on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.


Get tickets for the Global to Local Innovation Summit: Sustaining Growth on December 10, 2019 in Scottsdale, AZ

Jeffrey Garza Walker and Joshua Rodriguez with Cresa on the radio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, Arizona

Jeffrey Garza Walker & Joshua Rodriguez with Cresa, Kevin Hull with BMO Harris Bank on the radio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, Arizona

Melissa Sanderson with Freeport McMoRan, Jeffrey Garza Walker & Joshua Rodriguez with Cresa, Kevin Hull with BMO Harris Bank visit the Valley Business RadioX studio in Phoenix, Arizona

Global Chamber: US-Mexico Business Opportunities with Indira Jeffrey, Gabriela Castro, and Eduardo González

November 27, 2019 by angishields

US-Mexico Business Opportunities

Indira Jeffrey with EKATAR USA, Gabriela Castro with Trade in Motion, Eduardo González with 258 Consulting in the studio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, Arizona

Indira Jeffrey with EKATAR All In One Marketing, Gabriela Castro with Trade in Motion, Eduardo González with 258 Consulting broadcasting live from the Valley Business RadioX studio in Phoenix, Arizona
Valley Business Radio
Global Chamber: US-Mexico Business Opportunities with Indira Jeffrey, Gabriela Castro, and Eduardo González
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file


This episode of Valley Business Radio is brought to you by the Global Chamber, a unique, growing and collaborating community of CEOs, executives, and leaders taking on global business in 525 metro regions around the world. The Global Chamber provides information, connections, and mentoring for leaders to capture global business opportunities. Connect with their resources and tens of thousands of members and followers worldwide to accelerate your success and improve your business, our region and the world.

Follow the Global Chamber on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Get tickets for the Global to Local Innovation Summit: Sustaining Growth on December 10, 2019 in Scottsdale, AZ


Indira Jeffrey, EKATAR USA

Indira Jeffrey with EKATAR All In One Marketing in the studio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, ArizonaIndira Jeffrey is a partner and business development consultant with EKATAR All In One Marketing, a 360° marketing company headquartered in Guadalajara, Jalisco Mexico. A banking and finance professional and passionate entrepreneur, Indira’s 22-year business and academic career has spanned the US, Mexico, Latin America and Europe. She has launched two successful start-ups focused on Economic Development that serve corporate, non-profit, start-up, SBO, and entrepreneurial clients across a spectrum of industries such as education, food & beverage, and aerospace.

Founder of iGlobal Business Consulting and partner with EKATAR USA, Indira is also the Adjunct Director for the Global Chamber Guanajuato Chapter, in the state of Guanajuato, Mexico. Previously she spent 16 years in banking and finance with Fortune 500 companies (Charles Schwab, JP Morgan Chase, and HSBC Mexico), where she held several roles ensuring compliance with department policies, procedures, objectives and strategies, as well as adherence to applicable State Federal and US Regulations including OFAC, FDIC, AML and the Bank Secrecy Act.

In August 2017, Indira participated in the Arizona-Mexico trade mission whose goal was to create bridges not walls between the state of Arizona and Mexico. The group of 70 people, including 35 Arizona government representatives and 35 business owners, met with Mexico City and the state of Guanajuato key representatives, and Secretary of International Relations, among others. On April 2018 Indira Jeffrey organized the first binational International Trade Masters Series event in Mesa, AZ. The goal of this event was to present to the public the different areas of the international trade, and to promote the commerce relations between Mexico and USA.

Indira is an active member of the Global Chamber, Phoenix Minority Business Development Agency, Thunderbird Alumni Association, and Toastmasters. She holds a Global MBA from Thunderbird School of Global Management & Tecnologico de Monterrey, Bachelor’s Degree in International Business (University of Guanajuato), Certificate in Business Affairs (Group Sup in France), and an Arizona State University Small Business Leadership certificate. She speaks English, Spanish, and French.

Connect with Indira Jeffrey on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Instagram, and follow EKATAR All In One Marketing on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram.


Gabriela Castro, Trade in Motion

Gabriela Castro with Trade in Motion in the studio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, ArizonaGabriela Castro is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Trade in Motion, a business development consulting firm that specializes in assisting and supporting small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs) to enter or expand into the Mexican, American and Canadian markets. Incorporated in Arizona, the firm offers integrated services ranging from initial market research through personalized meeting assistance. Some areas of expertise managed are international business development, business support, business contacts, personal business assistance, and specialized outsourcing of technical services.

Trade in Motion prepares and trains the companies which are not market ready to do business in Mexico, the United States and Canada; drafting business plans and creating a market entry strategy for them. Trade in Motion identifies opportunities for companies and their relevant sectors and supports companies who would like to open shop in North American countries utilizing TIM’s different partners who are experts in their fields, including a law firm, accountants, technicians, etc. The sectors that Trade in Motion manages in the North American market are mining, advanced manufacturing, automotive, aerospace and clean technologies. The sector in which they have the most expertise and experience is the mining sector.

Gabriela Castro has extensive experience in business administration, commercial affairs, foreign and international trade, research and analysis, and market development, focused on client service. She has fifteen years of experience developing new business ventures and cultivating relationships with clients and contacts in the private sector and Federal and State governments. During her tenure at the Embassy of Canada to Mexico, Gabriela worked in various sectors such as mining, automotive, infrastructure, manufacturing, construction, energy, oil and gas, information and communications technology, and education. She supported Canadian companies to enter the Mexican market, providing services such as market intelligence and profiling, key contacts as well as market potential assessment.

Fluent in Spanish, English, and French, Gabriela holds a Post-Graduate Diploma in Management and Administration from Hautes Études Commerciales/Montréal University in Canada.

Connect with Gabriela Castro on LinkedIn and Twitter, and follow Trade in Motion on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.


Eduardo González, 258 Consulting

Eduardo González with 258 Consulting in the studio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, ArizonaEduardo González is President at 258 Consulting, a Phoenix-based firm that helps companies on both sides of the US-Mexico border to find solutions for their sourcing, manufacturing, and sales expansion goals. 258 Consulting takes its name from the 258 stone monuments or obelisks that were placed in the mid-1800s to mark the border between Mexico and the US. These monuments lined the boundary from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific Ocean. Before there were walls and fences, the only thing marking the border were these stone monuments. 258 Consulting believes that walls and fences are not the solution while recognizing that the two countries are business partners and that together they can continue being a great force that can strive in the ever more competing international markets.

258 Consulting provides manufacturing in Mexico and supply chain development solutions for foreign companies seeking to establish a manufacturing presence in Mexico. Their target client base includes:

  • US or foreign Manufacturing companies
  • US or foreign companies that do not necessary manufacture themselves but outsource their products from Contract Manufacturers Partners (CMP)
  • Service providers in the US looking to source software development, call centers, or other services from Mexico
  • Established US companies that currently manufacture or have their supply chain in China, outside the US, or in the US
  • Manufacturing companies looking to move or expand where we can provide site selection services
  • Mexican companies looking to explore the US market for their products or services

Eduardo has an extensive experience of more than 20 years in business development and supply chain support, assisting Mexican companies with their international sales and helping foreign companies to identify new suppliers, assisting in contract negotiations with manufacturers and finding solutions for their supply chain needs. He has helped also foreign companies establish manufacturing operations in Mexico and find suppliers to source their manufacturing needs or services, in the advanced manufacturing sector (aerospace, automotive, medical device), as well as in the other industries, such as: food processing, fresh food and meat, retail sector, tourism and IT, among others.

Eduardo served as Deputy Trade Commissioner of ProMéxico in Phoenix, AZ from September 2015 to March 2019. ProMéxico was Mexico’s agency responsible for coordinating strategies aimed at strengthening Mexico’s participation in the international economy, supporting exporting firms from Mexico and coordinating activities aimed at attracting foreign investment. (The agency and all of its international offices were closed at the end of 2018, effective March 2019).

Additionally, he has vast experience in international markets. Before his appointment at the ProMéxico office in Arizona, Eduardo served as State Director for ProMéxico in the Mexican state of Baja California and had several responsibilities while working for Mexican Export Development Bank (Bancomext) in The Netherlands and in Mexico.

Connect with Eduardo González on LinkedIn and Twitter, and follow 258 Consulting on LinkedIn.


Get tickets for the Global to Local Innovation Summit: Sustaining Growth on December 10, 2019 in Scottsdale, AZ


Indira Jeffrey with EKATAR USA and Gabriela Castro with Trade in Motion on the radio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, Arizona

Gabriela Castro with Trade in Motion and Eduardo González with 258 Consulting on the radio at Valley Business RadioX in Phoenix, Arizona

Indira Jeffrey with EKATAR USA, Gabriela Castro with Trade in Motion, Eduardo González with 258 Consulting visit the Valley Business RadioX studio in Phoenix, Arizona

Frazier & Deeter’s Business Beat: Carter Barrett, Affinity Bank and Dime Capital

November 20, 2019 by John Ray

Carter Barrett
Business Beat
Frazier & Deeter's Business Beat: Carter Barrett, Affinity Bank and Dime Capital
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Roger Lusby and Carter Barrett
Roger Lusby and Carter Barrett

Show Summary

Carter Barrett of Affinity Bank and Dime Capital joins host Roger Lusby, CPA to discuss how to make small businesses more valuable in a sale, the value of investing in relationships, the importance of great advisors, and much more. “Business Beat” is brought to you by Alpharetta CPA firm Frazier & Deeter.

Carter Barrett, Affinity Bank and Dime Capital

Carter Barrett
Carter Barrett

Carter Barrett is the Market President of North Atlanta for Affinity Bank as well as a Founding Partner of Dime Capital.

Carter has almost 30 years of commercial banking experience in North Atlanta serving in different roles, including Forsyth County Executive for Wachovia and as the Senior Lender for Regions Bank in Forsyth County.

In December of 2006 he and two associates made a decision to start their own bank and over the next year they wrote a business plan, recruited a management team and Board of Directors, raised $16.8 million in capital, and obtained the necessary regulatory approvals to open.

Community Business Bank (CBB) was opened in January of 2008, with Carter serving as the original President, Sr. Credit Officer, and member of the Board of Directors. Within 8 months he was named CEO of the organization.  Barrett led the bank during a tumultuous time for the industry and oversaw all aspects of day to day operations for the bank’s entire existence.  He negotiated the sale to Community and Southern Bank in May of 2015, delivering a solid outcome for his shareholders.

After selling the bank, he and two friends started an investment company called Dime Capital, which has consulted with companies to help them improve operations, profitability, and enterprise value. Dime makes strategic investments in real estate and in small businesses.

Today Carter serves as the Market President of North Atlanta for Affinity Bank, which is headquartered in Atlanta and is especially gifted at serving professionals, small to mid-sized companies, and real estate investors.   Carter and his associate, Andrew Bell, have been charged with planting a flag for Affinity Bank in North Atlanta and will focus on the GA 400 corridor.

Carter is honored to have served the community on various Boards of Directors including: United Way of Forsyth County; the Greater North Fulton Chamber of Commerce; and the Forsyth Chamber. He is a graduate of Leadership North Fulton and Leadership Forsyth, has served as President of the Lanier Forsyth Rotary Club and as Membership Chairman for Rotary District 6910.  He currently serves as Co-Chairman of the Advisory Committee of The Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the University of North Georgia.

Carter Barrett is a 9th generation Georgian from Augusta.  He went to high school in Rome, Italy and has a BBA in Finance from the University of Georgia. He has been married to Jamie Harden Barrett since 1995 and has two daughters, Eleanor and Cornelia.

Frazier & Deeter

The Alpharetta office of Frazier & Deeter is home to a thriving CPA tax practice, a growing advisory practice and an Employee Benefit Plan Services group. CPAs and advisors in the Frazier & Deeter Alpharetta office serve clients across North Georgia and around the country with services such as personal tax planning, estate planning, business tax planning, business tax compliance, state and local tax planning, financial statement reviews, financial statement audits, employee benefit plan audits, internal audit outsourcing, cyber security, data privacy, SOX and other regulatory compliance, mergers and acquisitions and more. Alpharetta CPAs serve clients ranging from business owners and executives to large corporations.

Roger Lusby, Partner in Charge of Alpharetta office, Frazier & Deeter

Roger Lusby, host of Frazier & Deeter’s “Business Beat,” is an Alpharetta CPA and Alpharetta Office Managing Partner for Frazier & Deeter. He is also a member of the Tax Department in charge of coordinating tax and accounting services for our clientele. His responsibilities include a review of a variety of tax returns with an emphasis in the individual, estate, and corporate areas. Client assistance is also provided in the areas of financial planning, executive compensation and stock option planning, estate and succession planning, international planning (FBAR, SFOP), health care, real estate, manufacturing, technology and service companies.

You can find Frazier & Deeter on social media:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/frazier-&-deeter-llc/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FrazierDeeter
Twitter: https://twitter.com/frazierdeeter

An episode archive of Frazier & Deeter’s “Business Beat” can be found here.

Carter Barrett 

Tagged With: Dime Capital, Frazier & Deeter's Business Beat, Frazier and Deeter, Frazier Deeter, investing in relationships, relationships, Roger Lusby, Roger Lusby CPA, small business investing, Thrive Coworking, trusted business advisor

Decision Vision Episode 40: Should I Align My Business with a Cause? – An Interview with Mollye Rhea, For Momentum

November 15, 2019 by John Ray

Decision Vision
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 40: Should I Align My Business with a Cause? - An Interview with Mollye Rhea, For Momentum
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Mike Blake and Mollye Rhea

Decision Vision Episode 40: Should I Align My Business with a Cause? – An Interview with Mollye Rhea, For Momentum

Does cause marketing really help my business? What factors should I consider in selecting a cause to align with? Answers to these questions and much more come from Mollye Rhea, For Momentum, on this edition of “Decision Vision.” Mike Blake is the host of “Decision Vision,” presented by Brady Ware & Company.

Mollye Rhea, For Momentum

For Momentum unites companies and brands with nonprofits in a way that benefits both organizations. Benefits include enhanced visibility, high-touch relationships with employees, customers and donors and significant social impact. Within the industry, this is referred to broadly as corporate social responsibility (CSR) or more concisely as cause marketing. At For Momentum®, they call these carefully designed partnerships strategic cause alliances.

Mollye Rhea

Founded in 2003 by corporate marketing and nonprofit executive Mollye Rhea, For Momentum has emerged as a leading cause marketing agency that helps companies and nonprofits prosper through partnership. Corporate Responsibility Magazine has recognized For Momentum as one of the top five cause marketing firms in the United States. Their work has been featured in the books Cause Marketing for Dummies and Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause as well as in numerous other industry publications.

While many factors set For Momentum apart from other cause marketing firms, these are the top five unique selling points (USPs) mentioned most often by their clients and industry experts. For Momentum is 100 percent focused on strategic cause alliances versus offering cause marketing as one service among many public relations, marketing and advertising options.

For Momentum’s accomplished cause marketing consultants possess a deep understanding of national/local dynamics—both corporate HQ/franchise and national nonprofit/chapter affiliate relationships.

For Momentum maintains a hiring criterion that each staff member has experience in both nonprofit and corporate environments, which equips them to provide valuable “translator” skills. Experience on both sides of the table allows them to link shared values and mutual challenges cohesively and meaningfully, leading to strategic, integrated cause marketing programs that achieve nonprofit mission objectives while delivering marketing, sales and PR benefits to the corporation.

No other cause marketing agency offers For Momentum’s proven system of identifying partnership prospects, conducting partner outreach and negotiating corporate partnerships. They customize each strategy and cultivate each pipeline for the specific client or project. With For Momentum, you won’t find cookie cutter plans, stale templates or impersonal outreach using the same tired list of prospects.

For Momentum provides a fresh, outsider perspective to help clients realize strategic priorities and adds a depth of experience and actionable plans that enable agencies, companies and nonprofits to meet their goals more quickly and efficiently.

For more information and to access resources mentioned in the show, go to the For Momentum website.

Michael Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of “Decision Vision”

Michael Blake is Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

“Decision Vision” is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the “Decision Vision” podcast. Past episodes of “Decision Vision” can be found here. “Decision Vision” is produced and broadcast by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Visit Brady Ware & Company on social media:

LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/company/brady-ware/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bradywareCPAs/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BradyWare

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bradywarecompany/

Show Transcript

Intro: [00:00:02] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions brought to you by Brady Ware & Company. Brady Ware is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality.

Michael Blake: [00:00:20] And welcome to the Decision Vision, a podcast giving you, the listener, clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision making on a different topic, rather than making recommendations because everyone’s circumstances are different. We talk to subject matter experts about how they would recommend thinking about that decision. My name is Mike Blake and I’m your host for today’s program.

Michael Blake: [00:00:41] I’m a Director at Brady Ware & Company, a full-service accounting firm based in Dayton, Ohio, with offices in Dayton; Columbus, Ohio; Richmond, Indiana; and Alpharetta, Georgia, which is where we are recording today. Brady Ware is sponsoring this podcast. If you like this podcast, please subscribe on your favorite podcast aggregator and please also consider leaving a review of the podcast as well.

Michael Blake: [00:01:02] So, our topic today is should my business align with a cause? And I was brought to thinking about this topic because it was in the late last year, early this year, I think it was late last year, you know, I observed Nike pretty much going all in with the Colin Kaepernick scenario with the NFL. And I’m not going to comment specifically on that matter, but I did make an observation on social media that, it struck me that if I were a shareholder of Nike, I would at least like to know in advance if a company in which I was invested was going to take a polarizing or potentially polarizing position like that.

Michael Blake: [00:01:52] And I think I was kind of motivated in that viewpoint by the fact that there was a pretty demonstrative response by what turned out to be a very small minority of customers. I know that the massive response is everything from burning shoes to tearing up sweatshirts and wherever it is else that Nike sells. And, you know, quite frankly, most people who looked at that on social media said, “Blake, you’re dead wrong.” And I said, “We’ll see.”.

Michael Blake: [00:02:28] And you know, to a couple of my friends’ credit, they actually went out and bought Nike stock. So I got to give them credit, they put their money where their mouth was. And, well, you can see the history for yourself. Nike is still around. They are doing fantastically. Their stock has never been at a higher level, I believe. I think they had one of their best years ever in terms of return on that stock.

Michael Blake: [00:02:51] And clearly, I was wrong about that. And I owned up on that on social media. Imagine that, somebody saying they were wrong on social media. But, you know, the facts are the facts. And as Bill Gates likes to say, “Success is a lousy teacher.” So I had a great teacher in failure there. But it led me to sort of think about, you know, what goes into the process of a Nike when they decide that they’re going to support, in their case, a polarizing cause?

Michael Blake: [00:03:18] Not all causes are polarizing. There are many cause we can all get behind, whether it’s the United States Olympic movement, whether it is fighting cancer, whether it is stopping human trafficking, right? Not every single cause that people believe in is a polarizing one. But nevertheless, there is also a viewpoint, and Warren Buffet, I think, would agree with us because he’s written about this, that, you know, it’s really not company’s business to engage in causes at all, that business should be in the business of generating return for its shareholders.

Michael Blake: [00:03:51] And if shareholders then want to take their returns and use that to support a cause, then they should do that. And that’s how the economics should work. And again, I’m not going to necessarily debate that directly, but I want to put that out there that that is a widely held view by a person who’s been pretty successful at this whole business thing. And so, that kind of sets the stage as a platform for today’s discussion, because my bringing this on social media showed me very clearly that there’s, you know, something more that I can understand.

Michael Blake: [00:04:22] And many of you who are in business may be thinking the same thing about, you know, is there an opportunity for me to align with a cause, an organization of some kind? Is that the right thing to do? How do I kind of figure that out? And I’m not qualified to talk about that, but I have somebody here in the studio who is very qualified to talk about that. And joining us today is Mollye Rhea, founder and president of For Momentum, a cause marketing agency here in Atlanta.

Michael Blake: [00:04:54] When Mollye founded For Momentum in 2003, she recognized that she was leading one of very few agencies that specialized in cause marketing. I think that’s still true today. Since then, as cause-related marketing and corporate social responsibility have grown to a $2.6-billion industry, For Momentum has grown into one of the leading cause marketing firms in the United States. And they’re doing fantastic.

Michael Blake: [00:05:18] Through work in nonprofit development, brand marketing, and cause marketing, Mollye has acquired a unique 360-degree perspective of what fosters success and strategic cause partnerships. In her over 25 years in the field, she has created and executed cause engagement and marketing programs, strategic fundraising campaigns and organizational development strategies with dozens of nonprofit organizations and hundreds of brands, including the American Cancer Society, Boys & Girls Clubs of America, Habitat for Humanity, International—InterContinental Hotels Group, Lane Bryant, and Novartis to name a few.

Michael Blake: [00:05:53] She is a graduate of the Leadership Atlanta Class of 2012. And by the way, that’s the second best class ever. You had to be an insider of Leadership Atlanta to get that joke, but I was class of 2014. And I did not know that about you. She sits on a bunch of nonprofit boards and holds a bachelor’s degree in economics and psychology from William & Mary. Mollye, thanks so much for coming on the program.

Mollye Rhea: [00:06:18] Well, thanks so much for having me, Michael. I’m excited to be here. And wow, what a provocative promotion you started the discussion with.

Michael Blake: [00:06:26] Well, yeah, you know, you got to do something attention-grabbing to get attention on social media, right?

Mollye Rhea: [00:06:31] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:06:32] And what’s nice about that is that I learned something and it made me think more about this topic. So, thanks for coming in to talk. I don’t think I’m the only person that’s thinking about this question, right? The fact that you have the thriving business you have, I think, is Exhibit A that this is a topic that’s of a lot of interests, but it’s not a cut and dried one. So, why don’t we dive into it? So, what I like to do with a podcast is to sort of set our vocabulary. When we talk about cause marketing, what does that mean?

Mollye Rhea: [00:07:05] Well, I’m really glad you started with that, because so many people, in my experience, come to that term with a different point of view. And so, I think it’s really important to lay that groundwork right from the get go. So, I’ve been doing this type of work for a very, very long time. And back in the olden days, it was called corporate relations or something like that. And it’s really the practice by which a company is supporting a nonprofit as a part of their business practices.

Mollye Rhea: [00:07:35] And I really encourage the listeners today to take a more open-minded viewpoint to realize that that can bring many different—that can come to life in many different ways. So, some of the terminology that you hear, you know, bandied about, you know, corporate relations, community relations, cause marketing, strategic philanthropy. But these days, a really popular term, which kind of plays off of the story you told is social impact marketing. And so, companies today are looking to really engage in generating impact into our society as a side part of their business, but as a primary part of their business as well.

Mollye Rhea: [00:08:18] So, some people think of cause marketing as, you know, I’m going to buy this bottle of water and 10 cents is going to go to a charity. That is one type of cause marketing. It’s a very specific type called commercial co-venture. And we can talk about that more later. But also, different types of cause marketing, I would argue, would be, you know, the Nike program that you talked about. Other campaigns, even in employee engagement these days, in terms of really getting your employees involved in making a difference on a social issue. So, it’s a very broad landscape that we’re talking about.

Michael Blake: [00:08:54] So a question comes up, and I apologize, I’m going off the script right away, but I think it’s—I just got to get your answer on this, because I think it’s so interesting. You know, in recent months, we’ve seen a number of companies pull back in terms of their willingness to sell firearms and firearm ammunition supplies, and so forth. Is that a kind of cause marketing in your mind?

Mollye Rhea: [00:09:21] In my mind, yes.

Michael Blake: [00:09:22] Okay.

Mollye Rhea: [00:09:22] I mean, I put those into the same landscape.

Michael Blake: [00:09:27] Okay.

Mollye Rhea: [00:09:27] Right? So, again, cause marketing itself might be one term within this landscape, but it’s the most commonly used term.

Michael Blake: [00:09:35] Okay.

Mollye Rhea: [00:09:35] So, I think, in fact, I was going to bring up that example based on what you said, you know, about the Colin Kaepernick Nike campaign. You know, there are a variety of societal issues where companies are starting to make a difference through their business decisions, whether to sell something. There’s a local firm called Kabbage that makes business loans and they will no longer loan to anybody who’s in ammunitions-

Michael Blake: [00:10:01] Oh, really? Okay.

Mollye Rhea: [00:10:03] … type of business.

Michael Blake: [00:10:03] Okay.

Mollye Rhea: [00:10:04] So, there’s things like that. So, I think those sorts of deep integrated business decisions are more of the recent trend we’re seeing in this landscape, but you do have to be very careful. And I want to say that I think that we can continue to use this Nike example as a grounding case study, if you will. They did lose a segment of their customers. You know, their overall numbers went up, but there was a segment, just like there was a strong segment who spoke out against it and burned-

Michael Blake: [00:10:34] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:10:35] … things. And then, there was, you know, on the other end, strong, you know, affiliation with it. You have to really understand your customer base and not make those decisions based on your personal opinions, but really take into account the community that you serve if you want to make sure that you aren’t having that, you know, the tail wag the dog, so to speak, you know.

Michael Blake: [00:10:57] Yeah. And that’s a great point that I think we’re going to get back to. But it does it does bear emphasizing that, you know, cause marketing for its own sake may or may not be a great thing, but it sounds like an integral part of that notion is make sure you understand who your target market is, right?

Mollye Rhea: [00:11:15] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:11:16] And it may not be necessarily the target market that I, as a CEO or board or a decision maker, chief marketing officer, thinks as the right cause, right?

Mollye Rhea: [00:11:25] Mm hmm. That’s right.

Michael Blake: [00:11:26] So, again, using the Nike sort of the platform for this discussion, there was some risk there, I think. That turned out well for Nike, great for them, right? But, you know, because of that risk, why should a company consider taking that risk in embarking on a cause marketing campaign?

Mollye Rhea: [00:11:47] Yeah. And you know what? I think I want to interject here a different example, because I don’t want the listener to think of that as the guiding light of an example-

Michael Blake: [00:11:57] Yeah, please.

Mollye Rhea: [00:11:57] … because it’s an extreme example.

Michael Blake: [00:11:59] Yeah, please.

Mollye Rhea: [00:12:00] So, you know, there are many, many ways that companies can support nonprofit’s, you know, strict sponsorship of events or activities, things like that. They can get behind a campaign that is going to raise funds or awareness for an issue that isn’t controversial. And it doesn’t change their business model, but it’s more of a programmatic way that they can support. So, let’s talk about some of those more standardized types of campaigns, because I don’t want the listener to be frightened that, oh, it’s got to be this big extreme-

Michael Blake: [00:12:33] Yeah, good.

Mollye Rhea: [00:12:33] … you know, thing. So, let’s talk about the business benefits of a company supporting a social impact or a nonprofit mission. You know, either space. Often, they’re very interlinked. There are clear and documented benefits to a company for this type of marketing behavior. And they are things like increased sales, heightened PR, heightened awareness of the company and positive awareness of a company. So, there are a lot of great business benefits. But what I also want listeners to know is that, you know, in the trends in this space, an increasingly important target audience is your employee base. Because today our unemployment rates are very, very low.

Mollye Rhea: [00:13:21] The cost of finding a good candidate and retaining a good employee are real cost that we have to be very careful about. And there’s a mounting amount of evidence that cause marketing or a company’s support of the local community is a positive differentiator for job selection. And that when employees join a company that they feel is doing good things in the community, they’re more likely to be engaged and they’re more likely to stay employed with that company. So, why should a company consider cause marketing? Lots of different reasons. It could be PR, it could be HR.

Michael Blake: [00:13:58] You know, and I want to underscore that point as well. You know, marketing, when many of us think of marketing, frankly, myself included, we think about an outward message, right? How do we get more customers? How do we get the customers we have to love us more, buy more from us, and so forth. But you’re right, there is a marketing element internally, right, to make your employees and your associates feel great about where they are. Because at the end of the day, raising salaries can only take you so far.

Mollye Rhea: [00:14:30] That’s right. Yeah. You know, part of the overall compensation package is psychic income, right? And so, you want to feel good about the work you’re doing and you want to feel good about the company that you’re working for. And this is becoming—you know, we hear a lot about millennials, you know, we’re starting to hear now more statistics from the Gen Z population.

Michael Blake: [00:14:51] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:14:53] But these younger cohorts are absolutely motivated by community impact. And so, you know, it’s becoming more and more important as companies want to attract those younger talent.

Michael Blake: [00:15:07] And that’s been something of an adaptation for Gen X’ers like myself, right? The Gen X’ers are the, I think, last of the kind of the old school workforce where just put your head down, getting your hours, do your thing, and, you know, get in and get out. And that’s an adaptation outlook that my generation has had to change, right? Because if we try to treat our workforce in a Gen X way, we’re not going to have a workforce very long or at least not one with which we’re very happy.

Mollye Rhea: [00:15:44] Mm hmm. I think that’s right.

Michael Blake: [00:15:45] So, it sounds like you’ve segued again very nicely into the next question, which is it sounds like there’s evidence that cause marketing does have a positive impact on company performance.

Mollye Rhea: [00:15:55] Absolutely. You know, there are an increasing number of studies out there. The most common are from an agency called Cone, C-O-N-E. And if readers are interested, you can certainly Google that and you will find all sorts of different studies on this topic. But I like to cite more resources than just the primary one, because I think sometimes we can get into a rut or a routine and I think their work is fantastic. I’m not dissing that at all.

Michael Blake: [00:16:23] Right.

Mollye Rhea: [00:16:24] I follow that. But, you know, we’ve been able to find many, many other sources of information that point to the validity of this notion. I also want to point out that there are increasing numbers of corporate associations focused on this topic. One of those is the Committee to Encourage Corporate Philanthropy, CECP. And they are a group of CEOs of large organizations that very much track the benefits of this type of investment, because this is not just a, you know, flash in the pan idea.

Mollye Rhea: [00:16:59] This is something they realized they have to pay a lot of attention to. And according to CECP, 87 percent of companies are now measuring and tracking societal outcomes and using that data to inform their program development. And 80 percent of those same corporate leaders think that, they believe, it is enhancing customer loyalty and 89 percent of them feel that it’s enhancing collective purpose amongst their employees.

Mollye Rhea: [00:17:27] So, those are just some of the types of statistics. I could go on and on. I don’t want to do that because probably, a lot of your listeners are driving. And I don’t want them to fall asleep. But, you know, on our website, at For Momentum, we have a variety of resources. We compile this type of research all the time because we’re in it, you know, 365. So, free downloadable tidbits are there if your listeners want to go and download those.

Michael Blake: [00:17:53] Well, yeah, perfect. It’s all about data nowadays. So, let’s shift gears in a little bit. So, let’s say that one of those driving listeners now is saying, “You know what, this cause marketing thing is something I ought to pay more attention to.” I think the next obvious question to my mind is, is my company a good fit for it, right? Is there a profile of a company that has a good or a best fit for cause marketing as opposed to maybe a company that isn’t as good with that?

Mollye Rhea: [00:18:22] Yes and no. I mean, I think that there are some companies that, you know, have an easier footprint into the community. So, like a retailer, you know, where they can really, you know, engage, “Would you like to add a dollar? Would you like to make a donation and get a bounce back coupon?” Things like that. They have a natural affinity. But what I like to say is that when you, whoever you are as a company, are looking at putting your toe in the water on this, think about what companies—or what nonprofits, rather, what social impact mission is going to advance your business and what is the right footprint for you.

Mollye Rhea: [00:18:59] So, if I am a local company based in Atlanta, Georgia and my footprint is 100 percent Atlanta, Georgia, I probably want to pick a comparative nonprofit that impacts that same geographic space. So, you know, I need to find someone who’s like-minded, like-sized, you know, and find the right match for me. So, I’m not, as my company is not going to compete with what Nike is doing.

Michael Blake: [00:19:28] Right.

Mollye Rhea: [00:19:29] Because I don’t have the same profile or footprint.

Michael Blake: [00:19:31] Right.

Mollye Rhea: [00:19:33] So, I really think it can be any type of company, but with the right connection to a cause that makes sense. And another thing I want to point out about that is that sometimes, companies fall into a natural rut, where they just want to pick something that they care about individually. So, you know, I’m going to support, you know, something that matters to me individually, but it has no tie to their brand, whatsoever.

Mollye Rhea: [00:19:58] That’s confusing to the consumer and confusing to the employees, frankly, because it needs to be a charitable choice that matches, I call it, the three-second rule. It’s like, “Oh, I understand why this restaurant is supporting hunger issues because they’re both about food”, you know, or something basic like that. But that can really enhance the validity of the campaign when there’s a natural fit between the brands.

Michael Blake: [00:20:23] It’s almost like a joke. The second you have to explain it, you’re done.

Mollye Rhea: [00:20:26] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:20:27] Right? The joke is just never going to have the impact.

Mollye Rhea: [00:20:30] That’s right.

Michael Blake: [00:20:31] So, one thing that kind of strikes me about cause marketing is that you’re trying to find a partner. You need a partner, probably, in some constraints. I guess you could have a completely unidirectional cause marketing campaign, but I don’t think that’s what you’re all about. What is the role of the partner, the nonprofit or philanthropic partner in the cause marketing relationship?

Mollye Rhea: [00:20:56] Yeah. So, actually, I want to go back and talk about what you’ve just said.

Michael Blake: [00:20:59] Okay.

Mollye Rhea: [00:21:00] Which is that, you know, it doesn’t make sense for it to be unidirectional, but in fact, that is one of the trends we’re seeing, which I am really sad about. You know, I think there are a lot of companies that have decided to do their own—they’ve picked their own issue and they’re going to create their own solution to it. You know, and some companies can do that. I mean, they have enough wherewithal to really, you know, go in there.

Mollye Rhea: [00:21:25] I’m a big proponent that if there is a nonprofit that is working in that issue space, find a way to work with them because it does help to bring multiple voices to an issue and not later get maybe accused of self-dealing or, you know, something that’s self-serving. There are many, many benefits that the nonprofit can bring to the partnership table. And you have to have a really robust business discussion about that. So, it’s really important to find a partner who is going to match your business objectives.

Mollye Rhea: [00:22:02] So, for example, the nonprofit partner brings, first of all, an expertise into the issue space that you are wanting to address. They live in this space 24/7, so they should be bringing some special expertise. With that comes connections with stakeholders and opinion leaders in the space. They bring a level of awareness, a level of authenticity. They can bring marketing benefits. They have followers and they may have social media following or they may have, you know, donors, constituents. So, they do have their own audience that they can bring to the marketing equation.

Michael Blake: [00:22:39] You know, that unilateral element brings to mind something that just came up in the news. Apple just announced they’re going to put, I think, $2 billion into building housing in Silicon Valley because California has a massive housing problem. Basically, their own employees cannot afford to live in the state.

Mollye Rhea: [00:22:57] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:22:58] Facebook is doing something similar. And what struck me about that was, you know, I don’t know that necessarily building houses is the answer. And I hope—it wasn’t clear from what I read that they’re partnering with anybody. But, you know, perhaps, they should be. I certainly hope that they are, because Apple is not in the multi-family real estate business, as far as I’m aware, right? And simply building houses may not be the issue, right?

Michael Blake: [00:23:28] In my view, I think the issue is most likely zoning or something of that nature that prevents homes from being built where they ought to be built. And it would be interesting to see how the Apple initiative unfolds, right? Because they’re clearly targeting a cause somewhat self-serving. But that’s okay, because there is a collateral good that’s coming out of it. But it would be interesting to see if that winds up being part of a partnership or not. Right now, it’s not clear.

Mollye Rhea: [00:23:55] Yeah. And I don’t know because I haven’t studied that particular topic. But I do know of many nonprofit players that could be excellent in that space. You know, I think it’s called Community Enterprise Partners that we did some work with few years ago, whose mission is to talk about the fact with the increasing amounts of rent in key cities and how people can’t afford to live in the places where we need them to.

Mollye Rhea: [00:24:19] So, they obviously are working in this space 24/7 and at least could bring thought leadership to that process. So, that’s a great example, Michael, where I hope that whatever the issue is, I think it’s imperative that companies look to others in the space to see what they can learn before they go running down a path, you know, without all the information available.

Michael Blake: [00:24:42] So, let’s say we go through some process, we identified that nonprofit partner, you know, what are some of the typical contributions a nonprofit partner makes to that relationship?

Mollye Rhea: [00:24:53] So, again, it depends on the nature of the relationship. It can be extremely directed. It could be that the company is funding a specific project of the nonprofit and they are literally delivering, you know, the project. But many times, nonprofits can bring—you know, as I was saying earlier, people are aware of the nonprofits, so they’re bringing awareness to the topic. They are bringing constituency. They are bringing, you know, increase. I’ll give you an example. So, one of our clients is Habitat for Humanity, and they do a program called Home is the Key. And they’re a variety of corporate partners that engage in that campaign.

Mollye Rhea: [00:25:35] And in that case, what Habitat is bringing to it is, you know, obviously, the expertise on the issue. But they are also bringing celebrities to the floor, right? So, the Property Brothers are celebrity spokespeople for this event. They are investing in a big PR campaign that then the companies receive the spotlight of as a part of that initiative. So, instead of building the whole program from scratch on the corporate shoulders, the corporate can engage in a program that the nonprofit is bringing to the marketplace. And they are tremendous amounts of marketing and sales benefits, you know.

Michael Blake: [00:26:11] Okay. So, often, the nonprofit brings their own infrastructure-

Mollye Rhea: [00:26:15] Yes.

Michael Blake: [00:26:15] … basically. And the benefit there is, yeah, you could do it unilaterally, but why are we reinventing the wheel, right?

Mollye Rhea: [00:26:21] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:26:22] And especially in that case, you know, they’ve got celebrities, which, you know, most companies want to line with and so forth. And it sounds like—and I appreciate that it sort of depends. You know, it could be as simple also as simply using, you know, doing co-branding logos, trademarks, things of that nature.

Mollye Rhea: [00:26:41] Absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:26:41] So, as I understand it, there’s really a sort of a whole spectrum of the sky’s the limit. And of course, another function of that is going to be, you know, how big the nonprofit itself is, right?

Mollye Rhea: [00:26:50] Yes.

Michael Blake: [00:26:50] The united way can do more than, say, you know, the local Chamblee chapter of St. Vincent de Paul, which is a thrift store that, you know, helps people in poverty in the Chamblee area.

Mollye Rhea: [00:27:04] Yeah, but that’s a good example of if I am a company based in Chamblee, you know-

Michael Blake: [00:27:10] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:27:10] … St. Vincent de Paul is gonna be more attractive to me-

Michael Blake: [00:27:12] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:27:13] … because there is an authentic connection between my business and that nonprofit’s mission. So, just to kind of tie that back to what I was saying earlier about, you know, finding the right partner, don’t forget those local ones-

Michael Blake: [00:27:27] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:27:27] … if you’re a local company.

Michael Blake: [00:27:27] Is it hard to mix the for profit and nonprofit cultures? Are there any issues with them sort of having being able to talk the same language? Because there are probably cases where their goals are not 100 percent aligned all the time.

Mollye Rhea: [00:27:43] Yes, absolutely. 100 percent of the time, they are not 100 percent aligned.

Michael Blake: [00:27:48] Okay.

Mollye Rhea: [00:27:49] I can tell you that. They may come together for a common objective in, you know, a particular program or initiative. But it’s very important to take into account the respective needs of each of the partners and their business realities, their business resource mixes, their stakeholders and who they’re reporting to. I would say that you could make the same argument in any business to business relationship building. Whenever you bring two partners together, they’re going to have different goals and different missions. But I will say the nonprofit environment is more starkly different from a corporate environment, you know, just given the fact that it’s a nonprofit.

Mollye Rhea: [00:28:28] However, where you can really bridge that gap is by having very straightforward communication and collaborative planning and really authentic clear conversations. So, you know, Business A wants this set of benefits and the nonprofit needs be able to say, this is what I can do and this is what I can’t. And some of those are regulatory-related. You know, like, for example, a nonprofit can’t overly promote a corporate entity or it becomes unrelated business income tax. There are implications for EBIT. So, you know, the company needs to respect the nonprofit’s, you know, boundaries and vice versa.

Michael Blake: [00:29:08] Okay. And to that end, I believe that some companies will actually create a role inside the company for somebody to be their, in effect, cause marketing ambassador, their person that represents the company for the nonprofits with whom they cooperate. And I suspect that model can work well because then, that person is fluent in both languages, basically, if you will. Is that a necessity in your mind? Is that best practices? Can you live without it? Can you talk a little bit about, you know, how important that role is?

Mollye Rhea: [00:29:43] Yeah. So, I don’t think it needs to be someone’s full time job, but there needs to be someone who’s put in charge, if you will, of managing the relationships. And so, I guess I want to answer this in a couple of different way. So, it doesn’t have to be—you know, I don’t want to dissuade companies that can’t afford a full-time position because you can certainly do this. You can have effective partnerships without it being a full-time role.

Mollye Rhea: [00:30:08] In fact, some of the largest companies that we work with as customers only have a couple of people and they’re doing billions of dollars, sometimes, of good. So, you don’t have to have a full-time person to get engaged in cause. The other thing I want to say is that we’ve been doing a piece of research. We’ve now completed our third cycle of this research with corporate partnership decision makers. And, you know, in the trends and in the way that the landscape changes, there came a time where there was this individual who was responsible. And what we’re seeing now is that that’s not the case, that it’s actually a shared responsibility across many different departments.

Mollye Rhea: [00:30:50] And so, we asked the question in our research, who from your corporate structure is involved in the decision making? And we found marketing, PR, HR, Community Relations, C-suite and sometimes, a special committee. So, I think that the company needs to make those decisions about where the most natural fits are and don’t work in a silo. Recognize that you need to engage counterparts from all those departments that I just mentioned in your planning process or you will end up with a silo, and that’s not good.

Michael Blake: [00:31:24] Okay. So, I want to switch gears a little bit. What are some trends you’re seeing out there that are, for lack of a better term, hot in terms of cause marketing? What are some emerging things that a lot of companies are looking to do? Whether it’s practices, nature of the cause themselves. What are you seeing out there?

Mollye Rhea: [00:31:40] So, let’s go back to your first topic of the morning, which was the, you know, Colin Kaepernick, you know, taking on a social issue. That is a trend. It’s not for everyone. It’s for a select few of brands that have an avant-garde element to their brand personality. But increasingly, we are seeing some companies taking this very strong stance on a particular social impact issue. So, that is a trend. And we actually have some resources on that, if anyone’s interested. But sort of to the more broad-based approach, actually, a trend is that the United Nations came out with some sustainable development goals. And I think it was 18 different areas of impact, where, you know, United Nations members from around the globe identified 18 common areas that any country needs to be sustainable.

Mollye Rhea: [00:32:34] So, poverty, education, hunger, water, you know, et cetera, and health. And what I’m seeing is an increasing trend as that companies are identifying from these sustainable business goals, development goals from the United Nations, they’re identifying we’re going to impact, you know, area 2, 8, and 12, whatever their numbers are that they pick. And companies are starting to speak in lingo, in that lingo of, “Well, in, you know, goal 12, we’re making this, you know, headway, this much headway. So, it’s a way of really working collaboratively across different corporate segments towards mutually beneficial goals. Does that make sense?

Michael Blake: [00:33:19] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:33:19] And so, that’s a trend. And then, the other trend that I want to highlight sort of as a top three trend is the increasing incidence of digital. So, as our society becomes more and more digitally focused, we are seeing lots more partnership activations in the digital realm.

Michael Blake: [00:33:39] Okay. And actually, to that end, is there a risk to defy, embark on cause marketing? And, you know, I’m not doing it yet. Is there a risk of it being somehow disruptive to my existing conventional marketing efforts? I imagine there must be some integration issues because I think that’s the expertise that you lend. So, if that is true, can you talk about kind of what some of those challenges might be?

Mollye Rhea: [00:34:08] So, how cause could be disruptive to the rest of your business plan?

Michael Blake: [00:34:12] Yeah, or, you know, cause marketing is a different kind of marketing, just like digital marketing has become disruptive to more conventional analog methods, right? I guess I’m posing a hypothesis that cause marketing has the potential to be similarly disruptive because I think the way you have to go about, the skill sets required, the stakeholders are different, right? And so, I guess my question is, is it fair to characterize this cause marketing as somewhat disruptive? And if so, is that something that needs to be actively thought about, managed by a company that is thinking of pursuing it?

Mollye Rhea: [00:34:52] So, I guess where this takes my mindset, Michael, is to think about, you know, all good things in moderation, right? So, if you were to abandon, if a company was to abandon some of their traditional marketing methods toward strictly cause, I think they could lose themselves, frankly, in it, because they need to—it needs to be a piece of your overall communications or employment objectives, not the only thing you do.

Mollye Rhea: [00:35:22] So, that’s something that I think you have to like integrate it into a bigger plan as opposed to, like, for instance, if a company suddenly went 100 percent digital and forgot all their other kinds of marketing, those repercussions will be clear. I think anybody can understand that analogy. So, I’m saying the same thing would happen if you went too top-heavy in cause. And maybe I’m honestly just a little too close to it, but I don’t see it as a risk, in general.

Michael Blake: [00:35:53] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:35:53] Here’s another example of where it could be risky. It could’ve been risky with Nike. You know, if they don’t understand their audience or if they choose a cause activity that doesn’t resonate with their target audience. That could become disruptive because they’ve suddenly changed their brand personality, probably unintentionally.

Michael Blake: [00:36:15] Right. And another example, we’ve talked about Nike, but Gillette with their “Me too” ad about a-year-and-a-half ago, right? That had some ramifications as well. In some cases, somewhat stronger, I think.

Mollye Rhea: [00:36:26] If you’re thinking of the ad where it was like the gentleman that they were trying to encourage men to be, it wasn’t “Me too.”

Michael Blake: [00:36:37] Well, but they sort of aligned—okay, you’re the marketing expert.

Mollye Rhea: [00:36:42] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:36:42] I’m not. I’ve heard it referred to as that.

Mollye Rhea: [00:36:44] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:36:45] So if it’s not, then I stand corrected. But I’m referring to the ad where they try to redefine a sense of what it means to be a man.

Mollye Rhea: [00:36:54] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:36:55] Which is a different relationship with women, which is a different relationship with other men, which is different relationships with people who are vulnerable. And I think that—is that a fair characterization?

Mollye Rhea: [00:37:06] Well, you know, it’s interesting. I think that your perception of it is a great example of where it can get dangerous, right?

Michael Blake: [00:37:11] Okay.

Mollye Rhea: [00:37:12] Because the campaign, in its essence, was designed supposedly to educate men to make more responsible choices that consider other people’s feelings more, like, you know, the way they raise their sons or the way that they talk to women or whatever. That is a great example of a campaign that had a really positive and negative reaction in the marketplace. I think they’ve—I haven’t seen it lately, so I don’t know if they’ve withdrawn or gone back to the drawing board or exactly where they stand on that, but I don’t think they expected that big of a reaction on the negative side.

Michael Blake: [00:37:51] Right.

Mollye Rhea: [00:37:52] So, that’s a good example of really needing to understand your target audience. And if a portion of your target audience resonates with that, you know, that could be a strategic decision. It could have been a mistake. And I don’t know because I wasn’t involved. And so, I don’t know the inner workings.

Michael Blake: [00:38:09] Right.

Mollye Rhea: [00:38:10] But I’ll give you another example and I don’t feel comfortable saying who it is because it was a business-to-business conversation.

Michael Blake: [00:38:16] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:38:17] But it was a, again, company that targets men and they had decided to, in their own way, try to redefine how men relate to their emotions. This was, you know, the stance that this brand took was, “We’re going to teach men that it’s okay to be in touch with their emotions.” And they did some, you know, post-campaign research and their audience didn’t like it. Like, “Don’t tell me how I’m supposed to feel.” So, you really do need to understand your audience. And especially if you’re going for something that’s provocative or brand changing, potentially could have people have a different perception of your brand, those are good examples of where it can be very disruptive. So, what could they have done differently? They could have picked a—those are also cases where there was no cause. There was no nonprofit partner. They’re just stating like, you know-

Michael Blake: [00:39:15] I hadn’t thought about that. Yeah, that sounds exactly right.

Mollye Rhea: [00:39:18] So, if they wanted to generate something, maybe that would have been a good time to find a partner that has a mission that they could say we’re supporting their mission, not we are changing who we are.

Michael Blake: [00:39:29] Interesting. Okay. And to that point about picking partners, I would imagine not all partners are created equal, right? And even if you identify with the partner’s potential cause, they may not be the right partner for you, right?

Mollye Rhea: [00:39:46] That’s true.

Michael Blake: [00:39:48] And sometimes, there can be a size mismatch. You know, an interesting story, you know, one cause I paid some attention to is Lou Gehrig’s disease research, ALS Society—ALS Association. And, you know, as everybody knows, it had the ice bucket campaign, which I did, and boy, ice water’s cold.

Mollye Rhea: [00:40:12] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:40:13] But an interesting thing about that was that all of a sudden, the ALS Association of America came into a windfall, about $130 million. They just did not have the infrastructure-

Mollye Rhea: [00:40:23] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:40:25] … to manage that kind of cash, right? Their organization had to completely reorient to make sure that that money was used well, right, and wisely. Can that be an issue in the cause marketing space, too? Maybe there’s a size mismatch or just fundamental characteristics of certain nonprofits that may not make it a good partner, even if you agree with the cause?

Mollye Rhea: [00:40:49] Yeah. So, I just want to go back just to clarify for a moment about the wonderful, fabulous ice bucket challenge phenomenon.

Michael Blake: [00:40:56] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:40:58] That was not cause marketing.

Michael Blake: [00:40:59] I understand.

Mollye Rhea: [00:40:59] Okay, okay. I just want to make sure your listeners understand that that is an example of a movement that caught wind. And I think every nonprofit in the world dreams of having that problem-

Michael Blake: [00:41:11] True.

Mollye Rhea: [00:41:12] … of creating that magic in a bottle, you know, where they can create something. Another beautiful example of something that was a game changer was cystic fibrosis.

Michael Blake: [00:41:22] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:41:22] So, they literally invested in research and the research paid off. And so, they became a part-owner of a pharmaceutical product that serves cystic fibrosis. I might not be getting this 100 percent right.

Michael Blake: [00:41:37] I think that sounds right. I’ve read that.

Mollye Rhea: [00:41:39] And it created just a tremendous amount of income. So, I think it’s incumbent on the nonprofit board to be prepared with, “This is our plan and this is our plan if we grow this much and this is our plan if we grow that much”, you know, so that they are strategically staying aligned to their mission and bringing that to life. In terms of a cause program that just has taken off and changes the direction, I think—I can’t think of a real example.

Mollye Rhea: [00:42:07] But I can tell you that, you know, if the nonprofit or if the message of the campaign was focused on a tiny issue and then, you had too much funding and you couldn’t spend all that on the issue, I think it’s really important to make sure that the focus area is broad enough that you’re not going to get into that topic. So, it gives me the chance to say this, many times companies decide that they want to create impact on a particular subset of a bigger issue. And sometimes, it’s better just to help the broader issue and not get so singularly focused on this small little piece.

Michael Blake: [00:42:45] Sure. Yeah. Because even if, say, Coca-Cola decided there is hook of the firehose and dumped, you know, $10 million into that St. Vincent de Paul charity in Chamblee, right? They’d be overwhelmed.

Mollye Rhea: [00:42:58] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:42:58] Most likely. And it wouldn’t work very well for everybody. So-

Mollye Rhea: [00:43:02] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:43:02] … you know, pick not just the cause, there’s a bullet point I want to kind of tease out, I think we’re doing that, is that picking the partner for a match is just as important as picking the cause. Is that fair?

Mollye Rhea: [00:43:14] Picking the partner that is delivering into the mission space that you’re interested in?

Michael Blake: [00:43:21] Correct. That’s right.

Mollye Rhea: [00:43:21] Yes. Yes, I do agree with that. And an example that I wanted to share, you know, when you think about that, so let’s say that your organization, you know, one that many of us know is breast cancer, right?

Michael Blake: [00:43:33] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:43:33] So, lots of people want to support breast cancer. And, you know, you really need to do homework on your nonprofit partner because, you know, there’s one breast cancer organization that works, let’s say, on funding research. And there’s a different breast cancer organization whose mission is to serve people who currently are dealing with breast cancer and make it easier for them, make it—help them get to their doctor’s appointments or things like that. And yet, a third breast cancer organization is all about prevention messaging and warning signs and things like that. So, really look at what it is you’re trying to accomplish within the mission space and make sure that you’re finding the right partner who will help you with that particular goal.

Michael Blake: [00:44:11] All right.

Mollye Rhea: [00:44:12] Not all nonprofits focus on exactly the same things.

Michael Blake: [00:44:15] Yeah.

Mollye Rhea: [00:44:16] Even if they’re all about, say, breast cancer.

Michael Blake: [00:44:18] Yeah, that’s true. I mean, many of them are new ones and that the cause itself is so big that there are subsectors of that cause and effect.

Mollye Rhea: [00:44:26] That’s right.

Michael Blake: [00:44:27] Well, Mollye, we’re running out of time but this has been great, I’ve learned a lot. And if I’ve learned a lot, I’m confident at least some of our listeners have learned something. So, thank you for doing this. There’s a lot more we could talk about. I’ve only gotten through about half the questions I want to talk about today, but that’s a good thing. How can people contact you if they want to find out more about this and explore maybe this for their own business, their own nonprofit?

Mollye Rhea: [00:44:52] Okay, great. Well, so, you know, I have been working in this space for a very, very long time, so I’m hyper interested in it. And as a part of our return to the community, we conduct research every year into different factors of how to bring a cause partnership to life, what sorts of benefits can you seek and things like that. So, I would hope that some of your listeners might find it of interest to go to our website, to our resource page and download some of our free resources.

Mollye Rhea: [00:45:20] So, that’s For Momentum, formomentum.com/resources. If you have specific questions for us, there’s a Contact Us page. We’d love to hear from you. Be more than happy to help direct you to resources or point—answer questions, things like that. That’s just a part of our giving it back to the industry practices kind of things. But I do want to shout out to a couple of others in the cause landscape that I think produce excellent resources for the listeners. So Engage for Good is the association of people in this profession. And they do a fantastic job of constantly bringing, you know, information to light.

Mollye Rhea: [00:46:00] They have research resources, they have free webinars, they have newsletters for free that listeners can sign up for. And a third one that I would mention is a newsletter called Selfish Giving. And it’s produced by a guy out of Boston named Joe Waters, who’s a pal of mine. And he is really funny. And so, most of his, you know, articles have some entertainment flair to them as well, but really, really great examples. And he tends to focus a lot on small companies. So, you know, some of your listeners, if they’re not the Nikes of the world, but they’re a more moderate-sized company, they might find Joe’s content very realistic.

Michael Blake: [00:46:37] Very good. All right. Well, that’s going to wrap it up for today’s program. I’d like to thank Mollye Rhea so much for joining us and sharing her expertise with us. We’ll be exploring a new topic each week, so please tune in so that when you’re faced with your next business decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy these podcasts, please consider leaving a review with your favorite podcast aggregator. It helps people find us so that we can help them. Once again, this is Mike Blake. Our sponsor is Brady Ware & Company, and this has been the Decision Vision podcast.

Tagged With: CPa, CPA firm, Dayton accounting, Dayton business advisory, Dayton CPA, Dayton CPA firm, Decision Vision, Employee Engagement, employee retention, Enterprise Community Partners, Facebook, For Momentum, Gen X, Habitat for Humanity, Michael Blake, Mike Blake, millennials, Mollye Rhea, Nike, Non-Profits, social impact, St. Vincent de Paul, sustainable development, United Nations

Decision Vision Episode 36: How Do I Recession Proof My Business? – An Interview with Wes Gipe, Aileron

October 17, 2019 by John Ray

Decision Vision
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 36: How Do I Recession Proof My Business? – An Interview with Wes Gipe, Aileron
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Host Mike Blake and Wes Gipe, Aileron

Decision Vision Episode 35:  How Do I Recession Proof My Business? – An Interview with Wes Gipe, Aileron

How do I manage my business so it’s able to withstand (and maybe even thrive in) a recession? In the edition of “Decision Vision,” host Mike Blake discusses this question with Wes Gipe of Aileron. “Decision Vision” is presented by Brady Ware & Company.

Wes Gipe, Aileron

Wes Gipe

Wes Gipe works with business owners and their teams as a trusted facilitator, business advisor and coach. Known for his enthusiasm and high-energy approach, Wes’s willingness to boldly approach tough issues and go the extra mile have gained him loyal clients who look to him for help with strategic planning, leadership and culture development, and conflict resolution.

Wes started his journey as an Aileron client in 2008. After applying Aileron’s Professional Management principles to build a self-managing company, he now spends much of his time helping other organizations—big and small—build a strategy that endures. Through this work, he has logged over 9,000 coaching hours with more than 500 individuals throughout North America and Europe. His work has been featured in Forbes as well as other national media outlets. Wes resides in Miami County, OH with his wife and three rambunctious boys.

For more information, go to the Aileron website.

Michael Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of “Decision Vision”

Michael Blake is Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

“Decision Vision” is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the “Decision Vision” podcast. Past episodes of “Decision Vision” can be found here. “Decision Vision” is produced and broadcast by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Visit Brady Ware & Company on social media:

LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/company/brady-ware/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bradywareCPAs/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BradyWare

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bradywarecompany/

Show Transcript

Intro: [00:00:02] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions, brought to you by Brady Ware & Company. Brady Ware is a regional, full-service accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make vision a reality.

Michael Blake: [00:00:21] And welcome to Decision Vision, the podcast giving you, the listener, clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision making on a different topic. Rather than making recommendations because everyone’s circumstances are different, we talk to subject matter experts about how they would recommend thinking about that decision.

Michael Blake: [00:00:38] My name is Mike Blake, and I’m your host for today’s podcast. I’m a director at Brady Ware & Company, a full-service accounting firm based in Dayton, Ohio, with offices in Dayton; Columbus, Ohio; Richmond, Indiana; and Alpharetta, Georgia, which is where we are recording today. Brady Ware is sponsoring this podcast. If you like this podcast, please subscribe in your favorite podcast aggregator. And please, also, consider leaving a review of the podcast as well.

Michael Blake: [00:01:03] So, our topic today is how can I recession proof my business? And, you know, in one respect, recession proofing sounds like the holy grail. It sounds like something that’s so great that it can’t possibly be done. I think we’re going to dispel that myth fairly quickly today. But you know that as business owners and business leaders, we are so involved in the day to day granular nature of our operations. And if you happen to be a business owner or a leader that truly can take a big picture view as often as you would like, congratulations. Let me know. I’d like to have you on the podcast. You can tell the rest of us how you do it.

Michael Blake: [00:01:44] But for most of us, you know where we’re—you know, for most of us, a week ahead of our calendars, the other side of our lives. And the fact of the matter is that our economy is not recession proof. Now, I think the data would show that our periods of expansion appear to be getting longer. And it’s unclear yet as to whether or not that means that when our recessions do happen, there’ll be that much more severe or if ’08, ’09 was simply an aberration.

Michael Blake: [00:02:14] But we do know that just as in gravity, whatever goes up must come down. And so, having a business that is able to weather a downturn that may be somewhat prolonged is an important way to establish that company’s value. Because if it’ s only viable during good times, then by definition, you know that your runway is finite. So, I think everybody is going to find this a fascinating and useful topic.

Michael Blake: [00:02:39] And joining us today to talk about this by phone is Wes Gipe of Aileron, a management consulting firm at Tipp City, Ohio. Wes works with business owners and their teams of trusted facilitator, business advisor and coach. Known for his enthusiasm and high energy approach, Wes’ willingness to boldly approach tough issues and go the extra mile have gained him loyal clients who look to him for help with strategic planning, leadership, and culture development, and conflict resolution.

Michael Blake: [00:03:07] Wes started his journey as an Aileron client in 2008. So, I guess he’s like Victor Kiam. He liked the Razor so much; he bought the company. After applying Aileron’s professional management principles to build a self-managing company, he now spends much of his time helping other organizations, big and small, build a strategy that endures through. Through this work, he has logged over 9000 coaching hours as one in 500 individuals throughout North America and Europe. His work has been featured in Forbes as well as other national media outlets. Wes resides in Miami County, Ohio with his wife and three rambunctious boys. Wes, welcome to the program. And rambunctious and boys sounds kind of redundant, doesn’t it?

Wes Gipe: [00:03:47] It does. It’s a loud house.

Michael Blake: [00:03:48] Loud house and probably with with increasingly unbreakable things.

Wes Gipe: [00:03:57] Indeed. Indeed. We just—we’ll have nice things sometime in the future.

Michael Blake: [00:04:02] So let’s jump into it and let’s talk about, you know, when you talk about a recession proof business, what does that mean? What—and is any business truly recession proof?

Wes Gipe: [00:04:16] Well, you know, a mentor of mine said that there’s no normal environment, only the one that you’re in and the one that you should be preparing for. So, I think there’s no one who looks up and says, gosh, my business is just totally recession proof. And if you do, I would suggest you take stock of where you really are. But there are those who do a good job of recognizing that things will not always be as they are today, whether they’re experiencing good times or challenging ones. And there is still work to be done if they are to adequately prepare for that next environment. I don’t think it’s as much about a destination as it is a continual awareness of the weaknesses and the strengths of the businesses and a reaction to that.

Michael Blake: [00:05:00] So, when a business owner thinks about, let’s call it being recession ready.

Wes Gipe: [00:05:06] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:05:06] Does that mean for most business owners, surviving a recession, just sort of making it to the next expansion limiting the damage of a recession or maybe even in some cases thriving in a recession?

Wes Gipe: [00:05:19] Yeah, it’s a great question because—and I think the answer is somewhat subjective. I think it depends, which is, of course, any consultant’s best answer, it depends. There are certainly-

Michael Blake: [00:05:32] Talking about business code.

Wes Gipe: [00:05:33] Right, yeah. And so—but what the observation I’ll make is there are certainly kinds of businesses that take harder hits than others when the economy changes. I mean, for example, the automotive market responds very different than the healthcare market, but both respond at the end of the day.

Wes Gipe: [00:05:52] And the good news is in that reality that all of your competitors that are in the same space as you are experiencing the exact same thing. You can’t control it. What you do control, though, is what you do while you wait for those external factors to recover. I think there’s always opportunity in a recession because everything goes on sale. People go on sale. Property goes on sale. Equipment goes on sale. Services go on sale. Nearly everything can be had at a discount and sometimes a huge discount. So, the question becomes, you know, what should we and can’t—what can we and should we buy now? What should we invest in that would be difficult or expensive to buy during the recovery?

Michael Blake: [00:06:32] So why aren’t all businesses making those kinds of plans? I mean why doesn’t every business kind of have that mentality?

Wes Gipe: [00:06:42] Well, I think it’s interesting. Well, the first thing I might point out that comes to mind is that some businesses actually boom with a recession. You know, we don’t necessarily think that way, but quick service restaurants, for example, what we might call fast food, they generally will see revenue growth during a recession because people are re-prioritizing their dollars. They have less disposable income. That sort of thing. So, I think, it depends. In some cases, things are pretty good when things are going well and they’re great when things go south.

Wes Gipe: [00:07:20] But I think while there are certainly outliers like that, I think those who endure the greatest harm from recession are those who acted as if the good times would last forever. If you know what I mean. The killer in a recession is not necessarily revenue decline, but it’s a failure to build a cost structure that’s able to scale down as a revenue declines without compromising the core competency of the business. Cutting fat but not muscle, if you will. And that kind of planning, I would point out, is far easier to do and is done with far more clarity when the economy is strong. Those are way to plan that way until we start to see the turn and we have the stress of revenue decline. We have the stress of those difficult conversations with our people and with our customers are far more susceptible to emotional and therefore far more risky decision making.

Michael Blake: [00:08:15] You know, essentially, you bring up McDonald’s. You know that’s a classic example of an economist would call so-called inferior good, that when the economy is doing badly, that the customers switch from whatever higher end restaurants, which they used to dine, you know, to a fast food kind of place. And interestingly, I credited the ’08, ’09 recession with launching the electric vehicle market, because back then the notion that you could drive without having to fill your car with gas, that was extremely attractive. And as we’ve emerged from that recession, you know, environmental concerns, whether you believe or not, they’ve not changed. But what has changed is now you know I was concerned about filling up your Ford F-150 with 25 bucks of gas or 25 gallons of gas.

Wes Gipe: [00:09:03] Yeah, yeah, it is fascinating to me as well, because I think we all see—to some degree we’re programmed to see the downside to something that the media and economists would paint a really negative light. I would go so far as to say that economists exist so that weatherman can be proud of their profession. I don’t think that they know anything more about where our economy going—is going than a business owner that’s got his or her head—ear to the ground and head—looking out ahead.

Wes Gipe: [00:09:38] But there is some truth to that. There are opportunities created. The truth that is perhaps not as obvious when it’s happening but no less true is that there are real opportunities created during recessions. You know, I focused earlier on the cost control and investment in things when they go on sale. But the other reality is that the business opportunities are created. Interestingly enough, my own journey in 2008, when 2008 hit, I had a mentor that came to me and said, you know, what you need to do here is spend while others are scared. And it was sort of a different take on Warren Buffet’s perspective in his letter to the shareholders some years ago, where we would do well to be cautious when others are greedy and greedy when others are cautious or something to that effect.

Wes Gipe: [00:10:34] And you know, what was interesting is we took that advice. And fortunately, in my case, we had a number of outsiders that were committed to being part of a board of advisors. And so, they helped me to maintain a focus on investing wisely during that time. And what was fascinating is that customer account grew. Consistently, revenue shrunk. And so you start looking at those numbers and most of this with any sort of rational thinking ability would say this is a terrible situation. But what was also true is people were spending emotionally. And so, there was pent up demand that was being created, particularly in the businesses that I was in that had to be released eventually. And so, that wave of revenue came but it didn’t come for two years after we spent the money, the time, and the effort on capturing those customers while they were being ignored by our competitors.

Michael Blake: [00:11:32] Well, yes, because when your competitors retrench, right, they’re leaving a vacuum in the market. And you know, you’re right. If you have kind of that dry powder, there’s tremendous opportunity to capture market share, to capture mind share, frankly, and also attract great talent because not just the employment, unemployment being higher, but also, you know, don’t you want to work for the company that’s on offense? Playing defense stinks is why we admire teams that do it. Playing offense and scoring is always more fun. So, if you’re playing offense in a defensive environment, you know I think that tends to attract aggressive, more successful business people.

Wes Gipe: [00:12:12] Yeah, I think that’s true. I think it’s also true, though, that it is very difficult to endure two years of that and just trust that the wind is going to come. And I think that’s where I found the outside board to be tremendously helpful. People that weren’t emotionally attached to the decision making, people that were older, wiser, had seen a few more cycles like that than I had, I think that’s what gave me the confidence to continue on when it seemed like we had done this for a really long time and I’m just trusting that this is all going to work out. But in the end, it does, because you’re caring for customers in a way that maybe your competitors can’t.

Michael Blake: [00:12:53] So, you know, let’s talk about the good old recession. It’s hard for me to believe it’s been over 10 years now since Lehman Brothers collapse.

Wes Gipe: [00:13:01] I know right.

Michael Blake: [00:13:01] Seems like two days ago. But it sounds like you’re of the mind that you know companies can position themselves to be successful even in a recession that was pretty profound. Not just financially but I think from a psyche perspective.

Wes Gipe: [00:13:18] Yeah. Yeah. So, I think they can. I think they can. There are certainly—now, what I don’t want to discount is there are certainly industries that just got decimated with that recession and through no fault of their own. I mean, the best laid plans and there were industries that just got hit so hard that it was very, very difficult, if not impossible, to recover. But those really, if you step back and look at the full picture of the economy, those were really, in my opinion, the exception rather than the rule. Most of the folks—there was a prediction made here at Aileron, interestingly enough, when we were in the throes of like I’ll say early ’09. And that was that we believed that there would be more companies actually fail on the upswing or in the recovery than did in the recession itself.

Wes Gipe: [00:14:11] And the reason for that thinking was that most people cut bone. They cut too far out of fear and out of emotional decision making. Or perhaps they cut just a little further than they should, failed to cast a vision, and the real talent and the best customers get nervous and leave. And that is—we saw some version of that come true. I won’t say that was universally true but we did see some version of that come true that we saw a lot of people, if not fail outright, really suffer. And I’ll say grow in fits and spurts as a result of having to rebuild core infrastructure before they could even think about scaling the business to take advantage of the recovery. So, I do think all that to today, I do think there’s a tremendous opportunity when the chips are down to think rationally and in an intellectually honest way about the business and look for opportunities.

Michael Blake: [00:15:11] You know what? One industry that comes to mind that really took it on the chin and serves I think as a missing object lesson is the legal industry.

Wes Gipe: [00:15:21] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:15:21] You know. For the first time that anybody can remember, firms on mass are not just cutting staff. They were cutting partners and even equity partners.

Wes Gipe: [00:15:31] Yeah, right. Yeah, long time. Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:15:31] They certainly (inaudible) bone. And what’s happened since then is the fundamental business of law has changed in that, you know, now there’s a recognition that every lawyer who’s an equity partner must be a revenue generator in a profit center. If you’re not, you’re just never going to be a partner that’s going to be cut the next recession in the first place. So what they’ve done is although they’ve de-emphasize a technician and that’s been a tough pill to swallow for the technician because that work is becoming commoditized, the business of law itself is probably more resilient to the next recession because their model now is able to scale up and down much more easily than it did 10 years ago.

Wes Gipe: [00:16:16] Yeah, yeah. Well, and I think—I mean that’s sort of what I was referring to when I said that—when I made the comment about the issue not being declining revenue but the inability to scale cost with that change in revenue. And, you know, I think in law firms, that’s a labor heavy model. It’s a model that needed innovating. And what’s interesting, I was just sitting here thinking, as you were talking about the law space, I was thinking about Thomas Friedman in The World is Flat. I think that book was written in roughly 2000, something like that.

Wes Gipe: [00:16:55] And it’s interesting to me that it’s only now becoming really, really true. You know, we’ve now seen real examples of what he was positing back in 2000 that, you know, if you’re the middle accountant that never has any contact with customers, you’re in real danger of finding yourself outsourced versus if you’re in the business of relationship management or something that’s much more difficult to outsource to a nameless, faceless entity somewhere else in the world, that your job is not only going to be secure, it’s going to actually grow in value. And I think that’s what we saw in that industry and we’ve seen it in a lot of industries otherwise as well.

Michael Blake: [00:17:37] So let’s start talking at a more micro level. You know, in your experience, what are typically—what are companies typically lacking that makes them more recession vulnerable? And why do they need help from somebody like you to help them remediate those issues?

Wes Gipe: [00:17:56] Well, I often say, you know, [indiscernible], here is a client. And what I got at Aileron that I was unable to get anywhere else was the truth. The objective, they’re hard, harsh truth. Someone to look me in the eye and really challenge my thinking, not—of course accountants are good for this. Attorneys are good for this. But there are limits to the truth that they’re going to give you. And candidly, there are limits to what the scope of the sort of issues that they’re going to typically approach.

Wes Gipe: [00:18:38] And so what I got here at Aileron was not a replacement for any of those things but really someone to look me in the eye and help me think about my business and the decisions that I was making in an intellectually honest way. And I think those who are lacking something that makes it difficult to recession proof themselves, most often what I see is they lack the ability to be intellectually honest. They lie. And that only comes in my experience with an outsider that only has your best interests at heart. And so that’s what I got here. I’ve had this distinct memory of leaning against a post in the cafe, downers, coffee and snacks. And my business adviser sort of looked me in the eye and he said, how much money are you willing to spend to prove that you’re right?

Michael Blake: [00:19:37] That’s a question. That certainly puts your cards on the table kind of question, isn’t it?

Wes Gipe: [00:19:43] Oh, wow. Right. And I remember thinking after I considered running out of the building, what—where else could I get that? You know, they’re one of the precious, precious things that you learn. One of the things that you learn is very precious as a leader is those few people whom you deeply respect that are willing to look you in the eye and challenge the best of, even the best of your ideas. And some do it. You know, sometimes some do it in a very direct way. They call the baby ugly. Other cases, I’ve had situations where people were really good at pointing out all the pretty babies around mine and by virtue of that, letting me draw my own conclusions.

Wes Gipe: [00:20:30] And—but the net of it is it’s the truth, right. And you look at someone like Blockbuster, right. Man, I mean I would love to have been a fly on the wall in that boardroom, in the conversations that must have unfolded as that whole model was changing around them and they just doubled down on what they had already done.

Michael Blake: [00:20:58] That quote or that conversation reminds me one of my favorite quotes from an economist, John Maynard Keynes, who’s one of the architects of modern economics and was also, in his own right, one of the fathers of modern investment management as well. And he said that the market can remain irrational longer than you can stay solvent.

Wes Gipe: [00:21:21] Oh, that’s profound.

Michael Blake: [00:21:22] Isn’t it though?

Wes Gipe: [00:21:23] That’s just profound, right. And in—the other thing that’s true about that, what I love about that is there is always margin. Regardless of the economic reality, there is always margin where there is mystery. Always.

Michael Blake: [00:21:43] Yes.

Wes Gipe: [00:21:43] And yet what we tend to do when things get uncertain is to control the things we can and just hunker down and make ourselves unique just like everybody else. And so that’s profound. I haven’t heard that quote before but I love it.

Michael Blake: [00:22:00] Well, I wish I had said it, but all I can do is parrot it too. But—so when we look at recession proofing or making companies recession resilient, in your experience, is that more often involve making maybe a small number of massive changes or maybe a larger number of smaller changes? Or is there some other way to kind of think about the scope and depth of change that needs to occur in order to achieve that recession resistant property?

Wes Gipe: [00:22:32] Yeah, yeah, I think it is, again, I’ll use my favorite answer, it depends. I think it is somewhat situational. But in more cases than not, the big changes are simply changes that should have happened in most cases a long time ago. And the only reason they’re evident now is because we’ve got no choice. You know, sales growth causes—it covers a multitude of sins. And you want to—and so when that stops, particularly high growth, when that revenue curve inverts or leveled off plateaus, since they weren’t visible before become visible very quickly.

Wes Gipe: [00:23:19] Businesses that we’re in that we have no business being in, lines of business or customer relationships that are just plain unprofitable. Some of those are really big decisions like we got to get out of the line of business. Some of those are—or even perhaps part ways with a large client that we thought was more profitable than they were. Many of them, though, are small decisions. So, I would say the majority, the big decisions are just decisions that I have to make and should have, you know, a year, five years or maybe even longer ago. And they’re only now visible.

Wes Gipe: [00:23:57] But the things—and those have to happen to stop the bleeding, to keep the company solvent, that sort of thing. The path to recovery, though, often is a series of very small, intentional, low risk experiments, all of which, if coordinated appropriately, add up to meaningful and sustainable change.

Michael Blake: [00:24:20] So, it sounds like that, you know, for the most part, the changes a company makes are not sort of one-time fixes, but there are things that need to be consistent. I guess the way to best describe it would be of a structural nature.

Wes Gipe: [00:24:35] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:24:36] That’s superficial and cosmetic, but they’re really fundamental to how the company does businesses or even makes decisions.

Wes Gipe: [00:24:43] Yes, certainly. And I think the, you know, because you’ll get a couple of big wins. I mean, with any recession, things will stand out. Revenue curve inverts, things will stand out that have never—that haven’t stood out in the face of revenue, you know, significant revenue growth. But the things that, you know, those come and go pretty quickly and you get the win. The things that keep on giving are the things that make a $500 a month difference here, and $100 a month difference there, and $70. I mean many times, it’s really a lot of really, really small things that add up to monumental differences.

Wes Gipe: [00:25:24] And I think that’s hard to—it’s hard to remain disciplined in looking for those things when the world around is crumbling. And that, again, is where I would just really encourage people to think about, well, how can I surround myself with people who are not as emotionally attached to this thing as I am?

Michael Blake: [00:25:45] So, it’s sort of seeing sort of a psycho-graphic profile sort of coalesce here that, you know, being able to be cold and calculating is kind of critical to making the right decision in a high stress environment. So, I guess, in retrospect, it makes sense. But like so many things, when you’re, kind of, in the weeds, you don’t necessarily see the entire picture.

Wes Gipe: [00:26:08] Yeah. Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:26:09] So are there businesses and certain kinds of industries that are easier to make recession proof than others? You know, for example, I would imagine the companies that have high operating leverage really would struggle because like you said, they just can’t scale the way that, ultimately, you’d like to. They’re kind of built—they’re built entirely to capture upside.

Wes Gipe: [00:26:32] Yeah. You know, it’s interesting. But even in those scenarios, there is substantial opportunity if you’re willing to step back and think logically and rationally and think about all right, where’s the margin? Where’s the mystery? And therefore, there’s got to be margin there. And how can I leverage that margin? Even if it’s something I’d rather not do in the long term, how can I leverage that margin to cover that high fixed cost if you are high capital cost, depreciation cost?

Wes Gipe: [00:27:00] What do I got to do to make it work to get through the other side of this thing? So, an example I might give you is I worked for a number of years with one of the largest egg producers in the world, 15, 16 million chickens, which is hard to even get your head around to begin with. And every one of these things lays an egg every 26 hours. Things you don’t think about unless you’re in this business, right? And so that’s 15 million eggs a day that come whether you want them or not. And 90—or excuse me. I think it’s a high 70 percent, 80 percent of the cost of that egg is in feed but yet you’ve got animals. It is a very complex industry and it is a feast and famine industry. You know, you’ll make a killing one year and then you’ll just lose your shorts for a couple of years. It’s an industry that takes a tremendous amount of resilience to be in.

Wes Gipe: [00:27:58] And so if you’ll recall, some number of years ago, we had the avian influenza epidemic and so bird flu hits. I mean, it’s something it’s—totally beyond your control. You can’t cover every pan. If you get 15 million chickens, you can’t physically enclose them. And so, duck flies by, goose flies by with AI, with avian influenza, lands in a flock, infects that flock. That flock comes into contact with the other flock. And pretty soon, you can find yourself in a situation, in this case, they lost half of their production in a series of very short period, around a couple of months. So, we go from, all of a sudden, 15, 16 million chickens to 8, right. So, we got all this incredible capital overhead.

Wes Gipe: [00:28:50] Now, you don’t just run down to the true value and say, hey, I’d like to order eight million, you know, layers. That’s just not how that works, right. So, all of a sudden, now, we’ve got rid of what we got in a safe way. We’ve got to sanitize all these environments. Now we’ve got to think about where do we get eight million birds and very quickly, because the bills keep coming, regardless of whether we have eggs to pay for them or not. And very, very, very difficult time.

Wes Gipe: [00:29:21] Fascinating. This leader at one of the best I’ve come into contact with just refused to see that as anything other than an inconvenience. And as a result, for a period of time, they actually became a government contractor that went to their egg, cleaned up their own mess, you know, euthanize the birds, turned them into actually, you know, product, either fertilizers, some other product that was actually salable. And they did so for their competitors.

Wes Gipe: [00:29:53] So while their competitors were freaking out over what are we going to do, they had pivoted. And was it pretty? No. Was it difficult? Absolutely. Was it stressful? It was ridiculously stressful. But you know what? They didn’t lay anybody off. And so, after they got over the hump, gotten, you know, they contracted with somebody to raise eight million more birds and got things cleaned up, they were back at it before their competitors were. So, they saw—again, they just refused to look at that as anything other than an inconvenience. It’s a factor. It’s not an excuse. And I think it’s that mindset, you know, that makes someone recession proof or recession resilient rather than any one thing that you can do.

Michael Blake: [00:30:40] So, you know, this segues nicely to the next question then, which is, I’m curious if you have a view, what’s harder about addressing or confronting a recession, knowing what to do or actually carrying it out?

Wes Gipe: [00:30:54] Yeah. Gosh. Yogi Bear, I love, gosh, I love that guy. If there’s somebody I could go back in history and beat, it would be—there’s a couple of people. I think him, Mark Twain, some other folks. But he famously quipped, you know, if you don’t know where you’re going, you’ll end up somewhere else. And so, I think they’re both hard. But if you don’t know what to do, chances are you’ll do something else. And the best time to decide what to do is not after the economy shift, it’s now. But I got to say, I think—I like to poke fun at economists, but I think there’s a fair consistency in the belief that the recession is not going to happen in the next three months.

Wes Gipe: [00:31:43] And I don’t think anybody believes it’s going to be on the order, the magnitude of 2008 barring some major world event or something to that effect. So, we’ve got some time. That’s the good news. And so, my incursion, we do something with that time. Don’t just sit here and think about it. You know, I think about even people like, oh, remember Captain Sully Sullenberger?

Michael Blake: [00:32:11] Sure.

Wes Gipe: [00:32:11] That guy saved 155 lives when he successfully landed a disabled plane on the Hudson. And I’ll guarantee you that he did not wait until that bird strike to start planning for the emergency. He already knew what to do. It’s just a matter of remaining calm and executing a plan. He had practiced that over and over and over and over. What are the chances that you lose two jet engines with some of the most reliable machines in the world that have ever been invented? You lose two of them that soon after takeoff, but nonetheless, remain disciplined. All right. No normal environment, there’s one I’m in, there’s one I should be preparing for. And he knew in that phase of flight that he should be preparing for that reality. So, he knew what to do. It’s just a matter of remaining calm executing the plan. And in keeping with that analogy, the best possible scenario if people listen to this podcast and don’t need it, right, they know what to do and they never even have to do it.

Michael Blake: [00:33:09] So, you know, I’m glad you brought up kind of this time because there’s a growing belief that a recession is likely between now and the end of next year. And so, you know, if that’s the case and let’s say I’m listening to this podcast and I’m convinced that A, recession proof is feasible and B, it’s something I should do. Is there enough time to do things and execute them for most businesses that, you know, can make a difference? Or do they kind of have to wait until the recession after that to really gain benefit?

Wes Gipe: [00:33:38] Oh, I absolutely think there’s plenty of time. And again, barring, you know, something major happening, some world event, or something that just wasn’t on the radar. I think there’s more than enough time, you know. And if you want to start to think that way, just take some real disciplined time, time that we would probably argue in this employment environment and just how hard it is to operate right now that we don’t have and model a scenario where you lose 20, 30, 40 percent of your revenue in a short time.

Wes Gipe: [00:34:10] Model that avian influenza, you know, your version of that avian influenza plan, could you survive? Would you still make money? If not, why not? And those questions are a great place to start, both to identify, as we were talking about earlier, you know, the big one hit things that might be really painful but, gosh, they provide a lot of, you know, a lot of benefit as well as you have a list of prioritized items that we would do. Again, all of which we might not enjoy, but build on those plans. Now, I think if you just model some sort of revenue correction that will reveal, start to reveal where you should start, I don’t think it has to be any more complicated than that.

Wes Gipe: [00:34:54] Because I will say—I’ll go there for just a second. I see people that get fixated and driven by fear. And I would just offer that that’s counterproductive. There’s these plans that I’m talking about, you know, as you build plans for what you might do in the case of emergency are, you know, a matter of a page or two or three maybe. We’re not talking about some, you know, a full execution manual or anything to that effect just because the reality around us is changing all the time. And so, if you try to make this too precise, chances are, you know, it will just end in frustration.

Michael Blake: [00:35:44] So let me ask this, just one or two more questions and we’ll let you get back to what you’re doing.

Wes Gipe: [00:35:50] Sure.

Michael Blake: [00:35:50] But can recessions offer kind of an—I guess we kind of talked about this a little bit, but I want to hit upon it because that fear that you talked about, I think is really important to master because I’ve read that people’s decision making, their effective IQ, decreases by as much as 30 percent when they’re in a state of fear, right, as they react to crisis. I don’t know if you read anything similar to that, but the benefit of having some sort of recession proofing is I think that it puts you in a place where more intelligent decision making can take place because your fear is kind of amped out a little bit. Does that make any sense to you or am I all whacked?

Wes Gipe: [00:36:33] No. No. I think I’ve read similar things. I hadn’t read that specific statistic, but it makes total sense given, you know, how I’ve seen some of the clients here. They don’t even respond to what I refer to as industry specific recessions that I’ve seen the last five or six years. And it is really interesting. The ability to think rationally is severely hampered by stress, uncertainty, fear, uncertainty, doubt.

Wes Gipe: [00:37:04] And that’s why I think there’s always opportunity. Shoot. We’ve got the bank coming at us. I happen to still remain a partner in the company that I founded back in 1997 and the bank recently said we’d like you to borrow some money and buy a business. And I said, you’ve got to be out of your mind. I mean, why on earth what—there are people demanding multiples as high as 50, 60, 70 percent higher than is even rational right now and you want me to borrow money from you likely based upon some sort of revenue model that makes absolutely no sense. Yes, you’re crazy.

Michael Blake: [00:37:50] What I’d rather do is—what conversations do we have—need to be having now so that when our financials don’t look as strong, when the outlook doesn’t look as rosy this year, as willing then to give me the money as you are now, what sort of indicators do you need to have from me to show you that we’re being responsible while we do have capital and access to capital so that you’ll trust that we’ll be as responsible or more so when the real opportunity exists?

Wes Gipe: [00:38:23] And so there are people around us making noise and all kinds of very candidly unhelpful—pushing us in unhelpful directions. And I think it comes down to, again, outside influence, whether it’s a board of advisors, whether it’s people that you rely on. And it can be people like your accountant—that aren’t—I mean, don’t discount that. You know, people that you may already be in conversations with. It’s just a matter of slowing down and asking them for real feedback, real and honest feedback, because that’s the intellectual honesty that will ultimately reveal the opportunities that exist.

Michael Blake: [00:39:05] Well, Wes, this has been great. And I realize that I’m probably one of your last to do things of the week here so I want to wrap up. But I do want to give some direction or some opportunity for our listeners to maybe follow up. If someone wants to talk to you about maybe making their business a bit more recession proof and have that conversation, what’s the best way for them to reach out to you?

Wes Gipe: [00:39:27] Yes. So, our website is www.aileron. That’s A-I-L-E-R-O-N.org, aileron.org. And if you just search discover session, we—actually business advisors or team members from our staff will actually sit down with a business owner and help explore where they are. And we’re not a fit for everyone but that’s the goal of that initial meeting. It’s just to sit down, ask a bunch of questions, learn about where they are, and connect them with anything here that they might find helpful. So, it’s been a delight and a pleasure to be a part of the program today. Thank you very much.

Michael Blake: [00:40:07] Well, thank you for coming on. And that’s going to wrap it up for today’s program. I’d like to thank Wes Gipe so much for joining us and sharing his expertise with us today. We’ll be exploring a new topic each week. So, please tune in so that when you’re faced with your next business decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy this podcast, please consider leaving a review of your favorite podcast aggregator. It helps people find us so that we can help them. Once again, this is Mike Blake. Our sponsor is Brady Ware & company. And this has been the Decision Vision podcast.

Tagged With: CPa, CPA firm, cutting expenses, Dayton accounting, Dayton business advisory, Dayton CPA, Dayton CPA firm, Decision Vision, economic recession, economic recovery, Michael Blake, Mike Blake, recession, recession proof, recession resistant, revenue decline, Wes Gipe

Decision Vision Episode 35: Should I Hire a Business Development Coach? – An Interview with Rod Burkert, Burkert Valuation Advisors

October 10, 2019 by John Ray

Decision Vision
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 35: Should I Hire a Business Development Coach? – An Interview with Rod Burkert, Burkert Valuation Advisors
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Mike Blake and Rod Burkert

Decision Vision Episode 35: Should I Hire a Business Development Coach? – An Interview with Rod Burkert, Burkert Valuation Advisors

Why should I hire a business development coach? What are the most important aspects of marketing my professional services? In this interview with “Decision Vision” host Mike Blake, Rod Burkert of Burkert Valuation Advisors answers these questions and much more. “Decision Vision” is presented by Brady Ware & Company.

Rod Burkert, Burkert Valuation Advisors

Rod Burkert, CPA, CVA, and his wife, Amy Burkert, CPA, CFA, with their dogs Buster, left, and Ty, stand in front of the RV that serves as their mobile office and their home.

Rod Burkert is the Founder and President of Burkert Valuation Advisors.

In one way, shape, or form, Rod has performed valuations since the late 1980s. In July 2000, he started Burkert Valuation Advisors in Philadelphia where he ran a “traditional” valuation practice for 10 years that focused on tax purpose valuations for manufacturers and distributors.

Based on that experience, in 2013 Rod began coaching BVFLS (business valuation and forensic legal services) professionals to mentor them in the marketing and positioning skills they need.

In March 2010, he began traveling full time throughout the US and Canada in an RV with his wife and dogs. Today his mobile consulting firm includes his valuation practice and a coaching business, all of which he built by leveraging his professional network, social media, and hiring virtual assistants to make the available technology work for him.

For more information, you can email him directly, go to his website, or you can find him on LinkedIn.

Michael Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of “Decision Vision”

Michael Blake is Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

“Decision Vision” is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the “Decision Vision” podcast. Past episodes of “Decision Vision” can be found here. “Decision Vision” is produced and broadcast by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Visit Brady Ware & Company on social media:

LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/company/brady-ware/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bradywareCPAs/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BradyWare

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bradywarecompany/

Show Transcript

Intro: [00:00:02] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions, brought to you by Brady Ware & Company. Brady Ware is a regional, full-service, accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make vision a reality.

Michael Blake: [00:00:20] And welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast giving you, the listener, clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision making on a different topic. Rather than making recommendations because everyone’s circumstances are different, we talk to subject matter experts on how they would recommend thinking about that decision.

Michael Blake: [00:00:39] My name is Mike Blake, and I’m your host for today’s program. I’m a Director at Brady Ware & Company, a full-service accounting firm based in Dayton, Ohio, with offices in Dayton; Columbus, Ohio; Richmond, Indiana; and Alpharetta, Georgia, which is where we are recording today. Brady Ware is sponsoring this podcast. If you like this podcast, please subscribe on your favorite podcast aggregator, and please also consider leaving a review of the podcast as well.

Michael Blake: [00:01:03] So, our topic today is, should I hire a business development coach? And I’ve picked this topic because, as most of you know, I’m a shareholder inside an accounting firm. And one of the hard—one of the struggles that almost every accounting firm faces is, how do we motivate people to develop business? How do we train people to develop business? Because at the end of the day, in the 21st Century economy, it’s all well and good to be a great technician, but if all you have in a firm is technicians, it’s like trying to win a baseball game with great pitching only, you wind up having zero to zero. And you can’t win that way. So, you’ve got to have people and a culture that drives the ability to generate revenue. And the accounting industry, in particular, is not one that is necessarily known for its outgoing, gregarious nature. And so, that’s a particular area that that we focus on.

Michael Blake: [00:02:08] And, for me, as a leader of a valuation and strategic advisory practice, at least 70% of what I do has something to do with business development. And I can tell you that the things on the mind of our partners all the time is, how do we get people excited, and not just excited, but also trained to generate revenue? Because it’s not fair to send a bunch of kids out there, or sometimes not kids say, you know, “Go back, get us some business. Go get them.” That’s not going to produce an outcome, except for the occasional outlier. There needs to be an important support system for that.

Michael Blake: [00:02:46] And I say this is not somebody to whom sales necessarily comes naturally. When I started my career in investment banking, I was the clock guy. I was the guy they locked into a room, and shoved in front of a spreadsheet, and left them with the textbooks, and just made sure it never ever got in front of the client because that was my role. We had other people that were much more comfortable than I. And then, over a number of years, working with coaches, including Rod, for a time, I’ve managed to become slightly below average, which doesn’t sound a lot, except when you understand the disaster I was when I started. And, actually, it’s quite a long way.

Michael Blake: [00:03:25] And joining us today by phone is is Rod Burkert, who is, I think, the best in the business when it comes to this kind of topic in the business valuation arena. And I’m proud to say that I was actually a client of his when I had my own practice for a little bit under a year, and I fired him for the best reason possible, is that I was generating so much business, I could not handle all of it. I had to turn off basically. And I give him a lot of credit for that, as well as another coach sort of earlier in my career. And I can’t think of a better endorsement than that. And it happens to be true.

Michael Blake: [00:04:03] But Rod is the founder of Burkert Valuation Advisors, a business valuation and litigation support firm. His assignments focus primarily on income, gift, and estate matters, specializing in closely held companies and private investment partnerships. He also provides report, review, and project consulting services to assist attorneys and other practitioners with their engagements between 1996 and 2025. Rod was a member of an elite instructor for the National Association of Certified Valuation Analysts – just rolls off the tongue – Consultants Training Institute. Missing the classroom environment, he rejoined the NACVA’s teaching circuit in 2011, championing the subject of Report Writing, another topic near and dear to my heart.

Michael Blake: [00:04:42] He is a recipient of various instructor awards, including the Circle of Light and Instructor of the Year. He is a past chairman of NACVA’s executive advisory board and education board, and has been named one of NACVA’s outstanding members. He is also a regular contributing author to Business Valuation Update, the Value Examiner, and Financial Valuation and Litigation Expert. If you’re not in valuation, you don’t know what those are, but those are basically the Sports Illustrated of the Valuation World, the New York Times of the valuation world. Rod is leveraging social media to build a mobile valuation consulting practice, allowing him to travel full time in an RV throughout the United States and Canada with his wife, Amy, and their two dogs. And Rob, thank you for taking time off the road to talk to us today.

Rod Burkert: [00:05:26] Hey, thanks, Mike, for having me. I appreciate it. I—gosh, until you read my bio, I didn’t realize how much I’ve done, but it sure sounds like a lot, doesn’t it?

Michael Blake: [00:05:38] Well, as I tell people, one of the benefits I see for myself having gray in my beard and two arthritic ankles is, at least, when you look behind in the rearview mirror, there’s some interesting stuff.

Rod Burkert: [00:05:49] Exactly, exactly.

Michael Blake: [00:05:51] So, you started out, I think, as did I, as a practitioner, giving out the work. Why did you decide that you’re going to develop, if you will, this persona or this new vocation of practice development training?

Rod Burkert: [00:06:13] Well, one of the things that you said in the beginning kind of struck me as pretty close to home is back in the day, when I started doing valuations, if someone said to me, “Describe your ideal day,” I would have said, “Sitting in front of a computer building an Excel model to help a client accomplish some—you know, or solve a valuation problem.” So, I was very much the nerd sitting in front of a computer as well, but I had my own practice, and I had to bring in work in order to build those kinds of models.

Rod Burkert: [00:06:50] And so, I’m kind of an outgoing person. I don’t mind getting out there. And I actually found that the more I did it, the more I enjoyed it. And then, I turned 60. So, I’m 63 now, but when I turned 60, I’m thinking my health is really good, I’m having a great time, I’m not thinking about retiring, I’ve got a long road ahead of me, and I have an opportunity really to embark on a second career. And for me, that second career piggybacked on what I know and what I do best, which is doing business valuation work. But instead of doing the work, I’m actually, as you said, helping people get the work because there is a lot of information out there that’s of a very technical nature. It tells us how to do the work, but nobody tells us how to get the work.

Rod Burkert: [00:07:47] And the last piece of why I’m doing what I’m doing, as you mentioned in the introduction two days ago, my wife and I officially crossed 9.5 years that we have lived full time in our RV, traveling throughout the United States and Canada with our two dogs. There’s no home. There’s no storage facility. Everything is in the RV. And I want to give that RV equivalent experience to other people in our profession. So, I don’t expect everybody to think that they’re going to pull up stakes and live in an RV like Amy and I do. But rhetorically speaking, Michael, what is your RV equivalent experience? What is it that you would like to do in tandem or in parallel with the business valuation work that you do? And one of my—kind of one of my success stories is a client that I am working with, and he really had a previous life as a painter and an artist. And we’ve restructured her practice to give that life back to her again.

Michael Blake: [00:09:00] So-

Rod Burkert: [00:09:00] That’s why I’m doing this.

Michael Blake: [00:09:02] Okay. So, yeah. And obviously, you’re helping a lot of a lot of people with it. So, before we go, I’m going to define a term because what we’re going to be talking about here is business valuation because that just happens to be my world. But I want to emphasize that Rod, also, helps people that are in the forensic and litigation services area, which generally means expert witnesses. And that that’s not an area which I play in. I’m on record saying that’s not my strength, to put it mildly. But a lot of what Rod does is he works with professionals like that as well.

Michael Blake: [00:09:38] So, when I say business valuation, because I don’t want to say that entire mouthful each and every single time, just imagine to yourself out in the audience that we’re also talking about forensic and litigation services. So, with that in mind, the question then is, can anyone do this? Can literally anyone who decides that, for whatever reason, for career development, or for survival, because they’ve got to eat, and they’ve got this practice, can anyone develop a business valuation practice?

Rod Burkert: [00:10:11] I think, to an extent, the answer to that question is yes with a huge but caveat. And that caveat is simply this, it’s that you have to be willing to keep showing up to try new things and always keep moving forward. And I think that’s the problem with many people in our profession. They don’t have that dedication to the consistency and persistency that’s required for the marketing that you need to build a practice.

Rod Burkert: [00:10:46] So, one of my coaching clients coined a really cool term. He’s been accused by his friends and colleagues of dolphin marketing. And what is dolphin marketing? Well, dolphin marketing is when you need work because everything in the pipeline is done, you come up for air, you breach out of the water, you grab a few new clients, and then you disappear under water, and nobody hears from you again until you need more work. That’s dolphin marketing.

Rod Burkert: [00:11:18] Anyone in our industry who we might call an industry titan, the seasoned professional, will tell you that you need to be out there marketing, if not every day, at least every week. And I think, given some of the mentality in our profession, we don’t want to do that. We convince ourselves—to me, we convince ourselves, “I’m a person that was never good in math,” and I had convinced myself that I will never be good in math. When actually, it’s a learned skill like anything else that we do. You can learn to be good in math, and you can learn to be good in marketing and practice development if you don’t talk yourself out of it.

Michael Blake: [00:12:05] What you talk about resonates with me. A podcast to which I listen fairly frequently is the Rosen Institute. You might have heard of it.

Rod Burkert: [00:12:14] Oh, yes.

Michael Blake: [00:12:15] Yeah. I mean, Lee Rosen is very much a kindred spirit of yours, except he goes global. And one of the things he says is that almost any marketing activity you do will be successful as long as you stick with it, and you’re consistent.

Rod Burkert: [00:12:31] And yes, I agree with that. And related to that, Michael. You have to like it. I mean, one of the things is what works for others may not work for you. And what works for you may not work for others. But the important thing is to play to your strengths. I would never advise a coaching client that they need to be out there speaking constantly if they didn’t really like speaking, or writing, or doing videos, or anything like that. You have to pick a marketing skill that you are halfway good at, so that you can learn to get better and enjoy doing or else, you won’t stick with it. And that goes back to being consistent and persistent.

Michael Blake: [00:13:14] So, why isn’t just being a great technician good enough? I mean, the little voice in my head that says the world in America is a meritocracy. Tell us. And maybe this is a rationalization that the marketing and sales are just fluff, but I’m a professional of substance, and I’m really good at the business valuation, et cetera, world. Why is that not good enough?

Rod Burkert: [00:13:39] Yeah. I mean, I used to think being a technician would be good enough. And then, I read Dale Carnegie’s book, How to Win Friends and Influence People. That book was written back in the 1930s. So, 80 some years ago, Dale Carnegie had this observation about the finance, about the success of the people that he was coaching. And he says, basically, it’s by observation that if you look at anyone who has achieved some level of financial success, 15% of that success is due to technical skills, and 85% of it would be due to what we would call today people engineering skills, the soft skills like good listening, having empathy, being patient. That has—I think, many times, we gravitate to somebody who can capture our imagination and tell us what they can do for us without, actually, supplying the mathematical solution for what they can do for us.

Michael Blake: [00:14:56] Now, sales, for people who don’t do it, and for me, I surprisingly found to my to my astonishment, really, that I get a big endorphin rush from it, but not everybody does. And some people—I think a lot of people still look at sales with a certain amount of apprehension, even dread. And I’m sure it comes across people’s minds, “Maybe I could just hire a salesperson or maybe partner up with a salesperson.” Is that. Is that a model that could work for a small firm, or is that just sort of putting a Band-Aid on a gunshot wound?

Rod Burkert: [00:15:32] Well, there are firms out there, even in our business valuation space, that have a team of salespeople only. They do not do valuation, or forensic accounting, or litigation services work at all. They go out and their job is to sell the work. And they have built an incredibly successful practice. I think they are five or six offices. They’ve been around for like 80 years, and they have used that model to some success.

Rod Burkert: [00:16:09] Rhetorically speaking, though, if you’re the prospect, at that point, because you haven’t signed on, this isn’t a widget that we’re selling. We’re selling a solution to an acute problem that could be the death of a family member, and their interest in the business needs to be valued for estate tax purposes. It could be the sale of your business, something that you’ve built over the course of your lifetime. And now, it represents the largest asset that you own. When it comes to interviewing somebody that’s going to help you solve that problem, do you want to meet somebody who’s selling the solution or somebody who is going to be preparing this solution?

Rod Burkert: [00:16:56] So, I’m not saying that the sales model where you’re wanting to hire somebody to outsource the sales piece of your practice development won’t work. But I think where we really fail most often is the people that do the work that we do, we don’t put ourselves in the shoes of the client. And how would we feel if we were going to have our problems solved by a salesperson as opposed to a person that’s going to actually do the work?

Rod Burkert: [00:17:27] You go to a doctor, there’s no salesman selling you the procedure that you need to have performed. There is the doctor that’s telling you the what, the why, and the how that this procedure needs to be performed. And I think with a professional service like ours, to me, prospects and clients want to meet with the person that’s going to be doing the work, not the person that’s just going to be selling the work.

Michael Blake: [00:17:57] Now, one of the objections, I’m sure, you face, and I certainly see with somebody who is confronted with the need to develop a business development mentality and business development practice, if you will, is a lack of time. I don’t have time to sit. I don’t have time to do X, Y and Z. And I’m curious, I would imagine that—I know this for a fact, as I’ve been a client of yours, is that it’s not a free ride to kind of jump on board the Rod Burkert training and become a coaching client, is it? I mean, there’s a there’s a time commitment and not just inside of school, if you will, but outside as well to prepare and build those skills, and build those business development muscle, isn’t there?

Rod Burkert: [00:18:45] There is. And I think, a big factor in all of this in what you said, Michael, is really how—first of all, well, how successful of a practice do you want? What does success mean to you? Because there are some people, you and I both know them, that have a successful practice simply by sitting in their office and aggressively waiting for the phone to ring. That’s a term that I used in coaching with you. And they are perfectly happy with that. They’ll never make high six figures doing that or it would be unusual to think that they could, but if they’re making a low six figure billing revenue and however you want to look at it, that may be all they need, and they’re not going to invest time with a coach like me.

Rod Burkert: [00:19:38] And on the other hand, there are people who want more for different reasons. And they’re not just necessarily saying more income. I’m saying more time, more money, more freedom. You have to put some systems in place to realize those things. And that’s what I would like to think that my coaching helps people do, not just more money but more money with more time and more freedom to use that money to, again, have that RV-equivalent experience.

Michael Blake: [00:20:12] And one of the time investment required by a coaching client of yours, let’s say, in a given week? How many hours do they expect to invest in their education that’s being led by you?

Rod Burkert: [00:20:25] I would say that there is a ramp up. In the beginning, it may be a few hours a week tailoring down. I mean, there’s two things, if you can bear with me here, Michael. Number one is it depends on when you come to me, how much authority, how much awareness that you have because there are people in the profession that don’t do marketing per se. They’re not out there networking like we think that they might do. Their networking is speaking and writing. And so, for them, they’re not investing any time in marketing, again, per se. They’re just doing what they like to do, which is speaking and writing.

Rod Burkert: [00:21:07] The other part of what this is, of what I teach, is something that you should be doing anyhow to build your practice. Let me give you a great example. I’m at a speaking event, someone says to me, “I’m a tax person. I would love to get a valuation practice up and running. And I just don’t—but I just don’t have the time.” And I was kind of blunt, and that’s my style. And my first question out of my mouth was, how much television do you watch a week? And he was all proud of the fact that he was a Cubs fan, and that during baseball season, he’s watching every game somehow streaming on television. And I said, “So, to me, an average baseball game is like three hours a week, three hours a game. And you’re watching multiple games a week. And now, you want to tell me that you don’t have time for marketing.”

Rod Burkert: [00:22:02] So, that enters into it as well. Meaning, how badly do you want this? Do you just want to gripe about your situation, or do you actually want to take time from other activities that really don’t contribute any value to get you to where you say you want to end up, and invest it in coaching time, and learning how to market and build a practice?

Michael Blake: [00:22:30] I remember reading that story. You put it on your mailings, at least, once. And it’s—yeah, it is a great story. And television is one of styles, sort of, t sucks too. You don’t realize how much time has gone until you—sometimes, you do wake up, but you look up, and you say, “Oh, my gosh. My whole evening is gone. I could have written an entire article in the four hours I just spent watching that TV.”.

Rod Burkert: [00:22:57] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:23:00] So-

Rod Burkert: [00:23:00] And if I can say, one of the last things—well, one of the things that I teach people is how to automate certain processes. Now, I don’t have a sales system or anything like that. But given what I know, given what I can teach people about platforms like Facebook and LinkedIn, there is a way to automate your connection requests. There’s a way to automate your scripts and use conversations on LinkedIn Messenger or Facebook Messenger to make it seem like you’re actually having a conversation until you get to the point where you find out that the person really does want to buy from you whatever they’re buying, and you take that conversation offline, and have—and call them, reach out, and phone, and have them have that real discussion.

Rod Burkert: [00:23:51] But there’s a lot of automation that can go on at the front end that you don’t have to be sitting at your computer to do or it happens for you. You’ve got to invest the time to set the system up. But man, once it’s running, it really works.

Michael Blake: [00:24:09] So, what about the duration of an optimal coaching relationship?

Rod Burkert: [00:24:14] And I’m supposing some of them may not be true. So, I’m likely going to learn something, but contrast with, say, a therapist, where—and I think part of what you do is therapy, good therapy, but there are some people that have lifelong relationships, or certainly years or decades-long relationships with therapists, is there ever a point in a coaching program such as the one that you run where your clients graduate, or is this something that you think that it’s a long term, maybe ideally a semi-permanent commitment to that relationship?

Rod Burkert: [00:24:51] Yeah, good question. And tongue in cheek, I think you stay with a coach as long as the return on investment is greater than or equal to the investment. And I think what really pivots people here is that our average engagement could be anywhere from at the really low end if you’re competing on the basis of price, maybe you’re doing work for $5000. But our engagements could easily go up to $25,000, $30,000, $50,000. $100,000 if you’re doing litigation support work, and it’s a big case. I mean, that happens.

Rod Burkert: [00:25:29] So, if I can teach you something that helps you get those kinds of—that kind of case work at those kinds of fees, and let’s say my coaching is $10,000 for an entire year, or that’s what it comes out to, because it’s close to that, but I’m helping you get three, four, five engagements at a multiple of $10,000, or $15,000, or $20,000 that you would not have otherwise gotten as a result of the coaching. Why wouldn’t you stick with me or any other coach, for that matter, that can help you develop that kind of a return on your investment?

Michael Blake: [00:26:08] Well, okay. So, yeah. So, there you go. So, I’d like to jog down to that a little bit because we’ve talked about the skill set that you help your clients acquire. And that’s a big part of what you’re offering. But my sense, also, is that’s for some people, you’re also just offering an accountability partner, so that people do, in fact, stay engaged, they stay motivated, they stay on task. (A), is that a fair characterization? And (B), if you had to guess, in many cases, is that accountability contribution even of equal value to the technique and skills contribution that you make?

Rod Burkert: [00:26:52] Yeah, it’s interesting that you put it that way, Michael, because if you think about it, we know – we know what we need to do to be successful because what it takes to be a success in an industry like ours hasn’t changed in generations. Quite frankly, it hasn’t changed in centuries. You get known for what you know by a combination of speaking and writing. And perhaps, in this day and age, video or podcasting. So, you see, you know what you should be doing. So, one of the big reasons people come to me is that accountability because they know that we’re going to have twice monthly meetings, and I’m going to ask them what progress that they’ve made towards the goals that they set for themselves to have the practice that they say that they want to have.

Rod Burkert: [00:27:48] So, accountability is a big thing. It’s not like I can’t teach you some things about, for example, something has come out in the last couple of weeks that has really changed the game about how people should be using LinkedIn. I can teach you that, but it doesn’t take away from the fact that you know you should be using LinkedIn in some way, shape, or form to help build your practice. Now, are you going to do it? Are you going to set aside 10 or 15 minutes every morning and every afternoon to use it? Well, that’s where accountability comes in because you know, as a coaching client, you’re going to have to report back to me about what you did and didn’t do in the last two weeks.

Michael Blake: [00:28:35] So, you’re a big proponent of your clients making themselves visible experts. And it’s important to note, there are there other marketing opportunities or channels available if you choose to. But you’re very much on the visible expert train. Why exactly is that as opposed to other potential marketing channels or approaches?

Rod Burkert: [00:28:59] A great question. And I think the answer is simple. If you put yourself—if we’re—if we put ourselves in the client’s shoes when we have a problem, we want a visible expert to solve it. I mean, if there’s something going on in your family, in your household, in your home, and it needs to be—and by that, it could be a medical emergency, all the way down to a plumbing emergency, do you want to call somebody that nobody has never heard of to solve your problem, or do you want to call somebody that you know of, or that your friends can highly recommend because they know that that person can successfully solve your problem? And I think we would agree with the latter. I mean, we want somebody who has solved our problem multiple times successfully.

Rod Burkert: [00:29:51] And the way you do that is to have—first of all, you have to have the skills and knowledge. So, you have to be an expert. You have to have expertise. But no one’s going to know about your expertise, or your authority, or what you’re known for if you don’t get out there because we need to be where the buyers of our services are when they need us. And so, if you’re not out there constantly priming the pump with speaking engagements, writing articles, again, whatever is your strength, doing videos, how’s anybody going to know to call you?

Michael Blake: [00:30:30] Well, yeah. That’s true. And, of course, as a presupposition, and I think an important one, that you don’t want to be a commodity. One thing you could do is the alternative, is you could adopt sort of a Yellow Pages model, put yourself in directories. Believe it or not, I actually do a case. I get an email from appraisers.org. I never landed a client or even came close, but at any rate—and you can sort of go that route, but by making yourself a visible expert, you are elevating yourself and making yourself, I think, a much more obvious fit to solve that problem too, right?

Rod Burkert: [00:31:06] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:31:07] So-

Rod Burkert: [00:31:08] Exactly.

Michael Blake: [00:31:09] I want to switch gears a little bit and talk about the the the nature of the coaching relationship itself. Somebody is looking for a coach like you, and they may have a view as to what an outcome, desirable outcome would be. Can you talk about what are some—what are realistic expectations of a coaching relationship? I’ll just have you talked about you because I don’t want you to speak for all other coaches, but what are realistic expectations of a relationship with you? And maybe what might be some unrealistic expectations somebody might have in a relationship with you?

Rod Burkert: [00:31:47] Sure. You’ve heard the expression, “You can lead a horse to water,” right?. And I think the an example of an unrealistic expectation and a coaching relationship is that me imparting knowledge to you is going to solve your problem because information is dramatically different than implementation. And the coaching client in any field is going to have to take the information from the coach and implement it. So, I can give you what you need to do. I can tell you why it’s important that you do that. And as a coaching client, I will even show you how to go about doing it. So, I will give you the what, the why, and the how. But if you don’t do anything with it, if you don’t do the work, if you don’t implement it, your situation is not going to change.

Rod Burkert: [00:32:47] You just may—you may learn more, you may be more knowledgeable, but if you don’t do anything, nothing’s going to change. If you don’t get out there on LinkedIn, if you don’t get out there and write, if you don’t get out there and speak, even though, again, you know these are the things you should be doing, nothing’s going to change. And quite frankly, Michael, when I see that happening in a coaching relationship, I will terminate the relationship because I’m not—I don’t want to take people’s money. If I see that they’re not implementing, we have a come-to-Jesus conversation, and I give them a little bit of time after that, and if they’re not working it, then I’m not helping them.

Michael Blake: [00:33:28] And look, I think, to be perfectly candid, too, it’s a self-defense mechanism for you as well. And I know how you coach in groups. So, if a person is not engaging, it means they’re not contributing to the other people who are, sort of, in your study group, if you will. And also—and I fired clients for similar things where I don’t want a client paying me, not taking my advice, have it not worked out, and then run around telling everybody what a moron I am because they didn’t take my advice.

Rod Burkert: [00:34:02] Right, exactly. I mean, there’s there is something in your reputation that you want to preserve out of all this too.

Michael Blake: [00:34:08] I think absolutely. What you talk about reminds me of a running joke my wife and I have. So, years and years ago, I used to be a tournament chess player. And one thing that my wife could always count on was whenever I came home from a tournament, I’d come home with, at least, three chess books. And they looked great, and they make you sound so smart. But there’s a problem with chess books, and this is the spoiler alert. They’re really boring to read. And so-

Rod Burkert: [00:34:38] I can imagine.

Michael Blake: [00:34:38] Right? They’re just not a page turner. Even though I was, in my day, a pretty strong player, they’re not boring. They look great on the shelf. And at some point, I had to stop stop myself from buying them because only in the books did not magically create this energy field that made me a stronger chess player. They just took up space on my bookshelf and made free space in my bank account.

Rod Burkert: [00:35:07] God. Yeah. Again, the difference between information and implementation.

Michael Blake: [00:35:14] So, one issue practices have, and I face this in mine, not urgently, but it’s something I think about a lot is training kind of the next generation. Many practices, as you know, sort of have a patriarch at the top of the practice, right? It could be Chris Mercer, who I know you have a good relationship. It could be Shannon Proud. It could be Jim Hitchner. And then, they have people that are working for them and are professionals in their own right. And all of those people know what it takes to build a successful and valuable firm, that if it’s going to have value, better not be entirely dependent on one person doing all the rainmaking. Do you think there’s a role for coaching in some capacity to help address the problem or the challenge of raising the next generation of visible experts? And if so, do you have any idea of what that may look like?

Rod Burkert: [00:36:16] Yes and yes. I think, to get to the heart of your question, it sounds like, well, is there a problem in training the next generation? And I think you’ve got to look at it from the origin of marketing. I mean, again, we came into this profession, Michael, many, many years ago, where there was no expectation that we needed the market. We were going to be those technicians and succeed solely on that basis. And then, things got tough.  We started to realize that if we really did want to get anywhere, we needed to do marketing.

Rod Burkert: [00:36:55] Just as a quick aside, I had a managing partner and accounting firm come to me when I was running a valuation practice in an accounting firm, comes into my office one day and says, “Damn it. The problem that I’m having is I can always find people to do the work. You can’t find people who can get the work.” And so, I suddenly realized, that was like a big aha moment for me that if I wanted to get anywhere, I needed to get the work. And so, begrudgingly, my generation – again, I said I was 63 at the top of the podcast – I happen to be what I consider a baby boomer trapped in a millennial body, or, I’m sorry, I’m a millennial trapped in a baby boomer body, the other way around. But we’ve begrudgingly learned these things that we have to do to bring in more work. We have to network. We have to have lunches, and breakfasts, and coffees with attorneys. We have to do it this way.

Rod Burkert: [00:37:54] And that patriarch at the top of the firm is saying to the younger generation, “This is how you have to do it,” and it doesn’t work that way because generations change. And the patriarch grew up with a certain generation of colleagues and referral sources for which networking events, for example, worked for them. But I hate to even say the millennial generation because it sounds like we’re maligning them, but I don’t mean to, they’re growing up with a cohort of similar-minded people who saw the damage of being away from your family all the time create. So, going out and networking every night of the week is not something that you’re going to convince the millennials the right thing to do. They’ve grown up with all sorts of phone apps, and texting, and that is how they communicate with each other.

Rod Burkert: [00:38:54] And these millennials, if they’re professional service providers, they’re going to get work from attorney and CPA referral sources who are their own age, who grew up with the same technology, and have the same shared experience of wanting to be with family and wanting to do a good job. So, I think when there’s a breakdown between trying to train the younger generation, it’s because we’ve already approached the relationship that these people are lazy, and they spend too much time on their phones, and they don’t want to get out there, and we make them bad and wrong because we want them to do it our way.

Michael Blake: [00:39:37] Yeah. And darn it, we want them to pair the same horrible price we had to pay, regardless how much sense it makes.

Rod Burkert: [00:39:43] Exactly. I mean, think about it the other way around. What if patriarchal generation grew up with texting as a way to bring in new work, but the younger generation didn’t like that? They don’t like texting. They want to have real conversations with people. They want to go out and meet them in person. They want to go to networking events. Would we, the older generation, be yelling at millennials if they didn’t want to stop texting to get business, and instead wanted to go out and do networking events? Would we be yelling at them because they want to do networking and not rely on something more technology related?

Michael Blake: [00:40:23] Yeah, and I see that. I see that in my practice because, as you know, I do a lot of work in the tech space. So, my demographic tends to skew a little bit younger. And I’ve actually not met about half of my clients in person, and it doesn’t matter, right? Even if I did a site visit, I wouldn’t even see servers anymore. I would see a bunch of Macbooks, and iPads, and a couple of conference rooms. If, they might even be in a coworking space. But they’ll respond to a text, they’ll respond to a tweet. I can read some through Instagram. And as you have often said, in a way, that millennial generation has it right because if you think about the investment you have to make, meeting one person at a time, breakfast, lunch, drinks, whatever it is, right, in the time you spend doing that over the course of a month, you could have reached 100,000 people over social media.

Rod Burkert: [00:41:19] Several times. Several times over. That’s exactly right. And just try and say, “Hey, we don’t care so much.” What we’re really saying as the patriarch, we don’t care about the results as much as we care about your methodology.

Michael Blake: [00:41:38] Right.

Rod Burkert: [00:41:38] And I think that’s wrong.

Michael Blake: [00:41:39] Yeah. Clearly wrong, right? That is just—that’s no longer a business solution. That’s a psychological issue.

Rod Burkert: [00:41:47] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:41:48] So-

Rod Burkert: [00:41:49] Again, like you said, we want those people to pay the same price that we had to.

Michael Blake: [00:41:54] That’s right. So, you obviously coach this business valuation forensic area, I think, exclusively. Do these—could these principles—again, could these principles apply in other industries? Law? Digital marketing? Management consulting? Could they be applicable anywhere, or are they strictly useful only and in the field that we’ve chosen?

Rod Burkert: [00:42:21] I think that what I do is applicable to other fields, but  you know from working with me, I’m a big fan of niching. So, I’ve got this minimum viable audience of business appraisers. So, I would be violating my own philosophy of niching if I try to go out and proselytize about how to develop an accounting practice or a law practice. I just—I’m not saying it couldn’t work, but I don’t think I’d have any authority or credibility because I’ve never built an accounting practice, or I’ve never built a law practice, but what I have built a couple of times over different iterations is a business valuation practice. I know what my clients are up against. I know how things are changing because I still run a traditional valuation practice. And I think it gives me the authority and credibility to do and to talk about what I do for similarly situated professionals. I’d have no idea. I wouldn’t really know where an accountant is coming from. I mean, I sort of would, but you get what I’m trying to say.

Michael Blake: [00:43:32] Yeah, sure, sure. And to be clear, I’m not suggesting that you should diversify, but somebody who I—some—it is most likely that the vast majority of people listening to this discussion today have nothing to do or have no interest in the business valuation industry or profession, but they may be wondering, if I could find a coach with a similar approach in my industry, would that be viable? My own answer is it probably would. It’s just a matter of finding the right person who are similarly niche that understands kind of the industry-specific realities that have to intersect with the techniques.

Rod Burkert: [00:44:15] Number one, I would agree with what you said. And number two, I would also like to point out that I think you’d be really hard pressed, Mike, to identify anyone that has achieved any level of success in finance, in industry, in sports, any field of endeavor without a coach or mentor. People say, “Well, why do I need a coach?” And I’m like, “Hey, do you ever watch a basketball game?” “Yeah.” “What’s the objective of the game?” “Score more points than the other team.” “Do you think the five players out on the court know that that’s what the objective is?” “Yes.” “Well, then why did those five players need a coach? Why don’t they just go out and score more points than their opponent? They know what they have to do. They don’t need a coach. right?” And then, there’s a big pause.

Michael Blake: [00:45:07] I’m glad you brought that up because I think the reputation of the professional coach has evolved and elevated significantly, certainly, in the last 10 years. And I think, in particular, in the last four or five. And I think it’s elevated partially because I think coaches have become better, and the coaches themselves are people that are accomplished as opposed to 10 years ago, I seemed to encounter a lot of coaches that weren’t very successful in the actual field. So, those who can’t do teach kind of thing.

Michael Blake: [00:45:42] But I think, also, there’s a recognition that particularly in business development, and I know you don’t like the word sales, so I’m trying to avoid it, but business development, we don’t teach that anymore. And it used to be—you’re a little older than I am, but, certainly, in the baby boomer generation, in most professional services firms of any size, even the smaller ones, there was a notion that the senior people would impart their wisdom, their knowledge, and would participate in the management and development of that next generation of business developers.

Michael Blake: [00:46:16] Now, what I see is just everyone for themselves. They got to meet their billable hours goals. I think to a certain extent, they’re fearful the younger generation will come and take their jobs. They’re certainly not rewarded for developing new talent as much as most firms kind of give lip service to that. And that confluence has created, I think, an opportunity for people like you to fill a very real vacuum that, I think, has occurred and has generally been harmful to most professional services industries.

Rod Burkert: [00:46:50] Yeah, yes. I mean, you’re preaching to the choir. And I know this sounds self-serving, but I think a lot of people might be more willing to embrace a coach, but I think they look at it as a cost instead of an investment. And that goes back to, well, how long should they stay in the coaching relationship? Well, as long as you’re getting a return on your investment, it’s not a sunk cost. If you’re not getting a return on investment, you should find another coach or quit your existing coach, find another coach. But investing in your own personal development, I don’t know where else you should spend your money first if not spending it on or not investing it in your own personal growth.

Michael Blake: [00:47:37] I think there’s plenty of literature out there that is very clear that one of the best investments anybody can ever make is on themselves, right? And certainly, one of the best bets you can make is on yourself.

Rod Burkert: [00:47:47] Correct.

Michael Blake: [00:47:48] So, we’re winding down here, and I want to get you back to your beautiful weather and your scenery. But two more questions I like to ask. One is, can you think about kind of one of your favorite coaching success stories and tell us a little bit about that.

Rod Burkert: [00:48:07] Yeah, yeah, yes. And actually, I’m going to—more than one comes to mind, but let me tell you the one that had the most impact that I feel like I’ve had the most impact on somebody. My biggest success story was somebody who I coached out of business valuation, because one of the things that goes back to, “Well, why don’t we like marketing?”, we realize for this person, for this individual, that she did not really like—the reason she didn’t really want to do marketing is because she really didn’t like business valuations. And actually coached her out of the business valuation world. She went to work for her husband’s business and is, now, focusing on something that she realized that she really wanted to do, which was to become a writer. And so, she’s starting out selling detective stories on Amazon. And I’d like—from a personal standpoint, from my viewpoint, that is like my most successful story.

Rod Burkert: [00:49:17] From another client’s perspective, I have an older client, late 60s, early 70s, who came to me really drained. I mean, emotionally drained of the years of just doing one project after another. And we’ve turned things around. We’ve tried to get away from one-to-one client service. He’s created a one-to-many product that he’s selling—creating one time, selling to his industry niche, and they don’t want to say what it is, what his niche is, but it’s webinar related. And he’s making almost as much money from a one-to-many product, which takes him a couple of days, a month to create, as he was going out there trying to sell and do one-to-one client service engagements. And he’s got a whole new—he feels totally reinvigorated about his practice and the possibilities for his practice.

Michael Blake: [00:50:23] And I do think those are very important outcomes. And at first, I have a similar one. As you know, I do office hours a few times a month.

Rod Burkert: [00:50:32] I think it’s a great idea. Let me—I’m sorry, Michael, to interrupt you, but everybody thinks it’s got to be something so secret saucy, there’s a magic bullet, secret potion, silver bullet that is the answer to marketing. And the simple things that I see you do on LinkedIn, creating the hard candy is an example. Letting it be known that you’re going to be at a restaurant for a certain time, and anybody who shows up during that time, you’re going to help them. I think, sometimes, we get so lost in the trees, and we don’t see the forest. And then, it’s the simple things that if we did consistently and persistently, we wouldn’t even consider it marketing. We wouldn’t hate to do it because we think it’s—you hate going to lunch and having those open office hours? I don’t think so.

Michael Blake: [00:51:21] No, no. And you take one look at my waistline, you know I do not going to lunch and having those office hours. But one of my favorite stories of office hours was I’d call a successful failure like Apollo 13. I had office hours. And this was about eight to nine years ago. And a guy showed up, ran his pitch, his venture pitch by me, and said, “What do you think?” I said, “I think this thing has a lot of holes, and I think that you are risking years in your family’s finances on a very dubious proposition. And it’s most likely going to fail.” And he was so upset that he got up, walked away, stuck me with this bill, and called me a couple of names on the way out. He was not happy.

Michael Blake: [00:52:07] Six months later, I received a handwritten note from him thanking me through the fact that I told him something that his friends and family just didn’t have the heart to do and for having the courage to kind of tell him that he needed to do that. And he sent me $100 gift card hoping that was going to cover his tab, which is more than it did, but that was somebody I held by getting him out of something that just was not going to be successful. So, there’s no nothing wrong with that.

Michael Blake: [00:52:36] All right. So, I’m already going over time for both of us, but I want to make sure I get this last one. And that is, how can people contact you to learn more about business development coaching? And maybe if you’re not the right person because they’re not in business valuation, maybe elsewhere, how can they reach out to you?

Rod Burkert: [00:52:57] Well, I think just saying it over the phone, probably the easiest way is just if you know how to spell my name, you can find me on LinkedIn. I’m there a lot. That is my social media platform of choice. And so, you can message me on LinkedIn. I have a website that outlines pretty much who I am and what I do. And that website URL is rodburkert.com. And my email address piggybacks off of that. You can email me at rod@rodburkert.com.

Michael Blake: [00:53:31] All right. Well, thanks very much for that. And that’s going to wrap it up for today’s program. I’d like to thank Rod Burkert – B-U-R-K-E-R-T, so you know how to spell it – so much for joining us and sharing his expertise with us today. We’ll be exploring a new topic each week. So, please turn in so that when you’re faced with your next business decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy this podcast, please consider leaving a review with your favorite podcasts aggregator. It helps people find us, so that we can help them. Once again, this is Mike Blake. Our sponsor is Brady Ware & Company. And this has been the Decision Vision Podcast.

Tagged With: CPa, CPA firm, Dale Carnegie, Dayton accounting, Dayton business advisory, Dayton CPA, Dayton CPA firm, Decision Vision, dolphin marketing, forensics services, litigation services, marketing, marketing professional services, Michael Blake, Mike Blake, podcasting, professional services firms, professional services marketing, professional services sales, Rod Burkert, Sales, selling professional services, speaking, valuation services, video

Decision Vision Episode 33: Should I Sell My Business? – An Interview with Ed Rieker, Serial Entrepreneur and CEO, Avondale Innovation District

September 26, 2019 by John Ray

Decision Vision
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 33: Should I Sell My Business? – An Interview with Ed Rieker, Serial Entrepreneur and CEO, Avondale Innovation District
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Mike Blake and Ed Rieker

Decision Vision Episode 33:  Should I Sell My Business? – An Interview with Ed Rieker, Serial Entrepreneur and CEO, Avondale Innovation District

What should I be doing to be ready to sell my business when the right time comes? How do I know when that right time is? Find out answers to these questions and more as “Decision Vision” host Mike Blake interviews serial entrepreneur Ed Rieker, a successful seller of multiple businesses he founded. “Decision Vision” is presented by Brady Ware & Company.

Ed Rieker, Serial Entrepreneur and CEO, Avondale Innovation District

Ed Rieker

Ed Rieker is a serial entrepreneur and currently the CEO of the Avondale Innovation District™. Ed was a founder or co-founder of four healthcare software companies. He navigated successful exits for three of these companies, as two were acquired by public companies and another by investors. The fourth is still running.

Two of these software companies were accepted into the Advanced Technology Development Center at Georgia Tech (ATDC), and one is an ATDC graduate.

Ed previously served as an ATDC Entrepreneur in Residence (4x) and an ATDC Executive in Residence (1x). He has served as a Venture Catalyst at ATDC between startups.

In 2004 Ed purchased an online community, built the business up and sold it to a public company in 2011. He has owned and operated a private coworking and technology incubator. Ed is an angel investor in various startups.

Ed was awarded patent #5,832,447 for an Automated System and Method for Providing Real-Time Verification of Health Insurance Eligibility (a co-inventor).

He is the owner and developer of Tudor Square, a community-oriented, quality, dinning, shopping and entertainment venue, supporting small independent business owners in downtown Avondale Estates, GA

Ed is currently the CEO of the Avondale Innovation District™, located in downtown Avondale Estates, a place-based urban development designed specifically to support entrepreneurs and creative professionals, foster open innovation, attract and accelerate new business ventures.

Michael Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of “Decision Vision”

Michael Blake is Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

“Decision Vision” is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the “Decision Vision” podcast. Past episodes of “Decision Vision” can be found here. “Decision Vision” is produced and broadcast by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Visit Brady Ware & Company on social media:

LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/company/brady-ware/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bradywareCPAs/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/BradyWare

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bradywarecompany/

Show Transcript

Intro: [00:00:02] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions, brought to you by Brady Ware & Company. Brady Ware is a regional, full-service accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make vision a reality.

Michael Blake: [00:00:21] And welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast giving you, the listener, clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision making on a different topic. Rather than making recommendations because everyone’s circumstances are different, we talk to subject matter experts of how they would recommend thinking about that decision.

Michael Blake: [00:00:39] My name is Mike Blake and I’m your host for today’s program. I’m a Director at Brady Ware & Company, a full-service accounting firm based in Dayton, Ohio, with offices in Dayton; Columbus, Ohio; Richmond, Indiana; and Alpharetta, Georgia, which is where we are recording today. Brady Ware is sponsoring this podcast. If you like this podcast, please subscribe and your favorite podcast aggregator. And please also consider leaving a review of the podcast as well.

Michael Blake: [00:01:03] So, today’s decision that we’re going to discuss is, should I consider selling my business? And for most people in business, there will never be a bigger decision you ever have to make in your life than whether when, how, and on what terms to sell your business. And selling a business is maybe even more challenging because most people only do it once in their life. There are a few people that are serial entrepreneurs, and we’re going to talk to one in a second, but most people, if they’ve had a good run, they sell their business, they get out, and then they go do something else, particularly if they happen to be good at leisure.

Michael Blake: [00:01:52] And the thing about selling a business, and I’ll be the first to admit this, even though I advise people on selling businesses, and I charge exorbitant fees for helping people do so, is that, actually, when you get right down, it’s not rocket science, but a lot of it isn’t necessarily intuitive. And the process of even wrestling with a decision on whether to sell a business is often such an emotionally entwined decision that has far reaching implications, even outside of the business itself that it can be very challenging to have a clear head when you’re approaching that decision.

Michael Blake: [00:02:33] And, generally speaking, in selling a business, there is no do over, right? Once you sort of sign those documents, and money comes out of escrow, and if you have that kind of business, the keys are turned over if it’s a virtual business, then all the the pass codes, passwords are handed over, that’s sort of it. So, if you have sellers or more, your only real recourse is to start new business and do better the next time.

Michael Blake: [00:02:54] So, it’s an important decision to get right. And it’s one that, like I said, you don’t really get a mulligan on this. And in trying to figure who’d be the best person to talk about this, I’m fortunate that a friend of mine actually is one of those few that has actually sold multiple businesses. So, he’s been through a few of these rodeos. And he hasn’t sold them for other people. They’re actually his businesses.

Michael Blake: [00:03:23] And so, without further doing introduce my pal, Ed Rieker, who has come all the way from Avondale Estates, which if you look at a map of Atlanta should be about a 10-minute drive. But the way our highways are set up at, it paces about an hour and a half. So, I really appreciate him coming into the studio today because he’s also got a 90-minute drive back.

Michael Blake: [00:03:47] But Ed has actually started and sold four businesses, at least, four of which I’m aware. He’ll correct me once he comes on. But he’s currently CEO of the Avondale Innovation District, an Avondale Estate Georgia. He is also the owner and principal of Tudor Square, a community-oriented quality dining, shopping, and entertainment venue supporting small independent business owners in downtown Avondale Estate Georgia.

Michael Blake: [00:04:10] He is the General Manager of the 151 Locust Fund One LLC, which is a fund established for the purpose of providing seed funding to Metro Atlanta technology startups. Ed was also the mayor of Avondale Estates for six years and is an adjunct faculty member in the Emory University Business School’s startup launch accelerator program. Ed Rieker, Your Honor, welcome to the program.

Ed Rieker: [00:04:33] Thanks, Mike. It’s a pleasure to be here.

Michael Blake: [00:04:36] So-

Ed Rieker: [00:04:37] By the way, I took a jet pack here, right.

Michael Blake: [00:04:39] Did you take a jet pack?

Ed Rieker: [00:04:40] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:04:40] I think that’s the best way to get here.

Ed Rieker: [00:04:42] 10 minutes.

Michael Blake: [00:04:42] Really?

Ed Rieker: [00:04:43] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:04:43] Now, thank God for Georgia Tech inventing that stuff, man.

Ed Rieker: [00:04:47] Absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:04:47] So, let’s dive into it. There’s a lot of ground we can cover and hope we can cover all of it. Can you talk to us a little bit about the businesses that you have actually owned and sold?

Ed Rieker: [00:04:58] Absolutely. I’m mostly a software guy. So, the businesses that I’ve founded or co-founded were really about software, about the creation of value through pushing little buttons to make stuff happen. So, when I’ve had the privilege of being on some really great teams and also being able to cash out a few times. So, I started in 1988 when you weren’t born yet.

Michael Blake: [00:05:30] You silver-tongued devil.

Ed Rieker: [00:05:34] Absolutely. And so, what we did was we built a software system that actually worked with hospital systems and large systems to kind of get people in the hospital as quickly as possible. What it turned out to be really was a marketing thing. And so, we built that up, sold that to a group of investors in 1991. And then, I was a minority shareholder in that. I had an angel investor that had put money into that.

Ed Rieker: [00:06:09] Then, the next one, we also was in healthcare. I think once you get to be in a domain, you get to know people, they get to know you, you start to kind of build a reputation. So, health care’s been very, very good to me. And I’ve done four health care startups and sold three of those or two of those to public companies. And then, in 2004, I actually bought an online community, because I’m very interested in community and built-

Michael Blake: [00:06:37] Yes, you are.

Ed Rieker: [00:06:38] Yes, I am.

Michael Blake: [00:06:38] That’s definitely bring your MO.

Ed Rieker: [00:06:39] And both online and in the real world. And it’s just fascinating to see how people work together, and how they don’t work together, and what they need, and how it might be able to help. But we built that online community up and sold that to a public company in 2011. So, that’s kind of the story is the ability to build a solution, a tool that solves a problem, build a team, build it up.

Ed Rieker: [00:07:10] And then, the first one, I think you mentioned, was really difficult to sell because I was a minority shareholder. It was everything to me at the time. And when it got sold, it—here’s the thing though. When you—you talked about the escrow, the cash coming in, and you think about buying the yacht, but you missed a step. And that’s the part where you have to stick around for a little bit and deal with the new owners. So, that was the first time I had done that.

Ed Rieker: [00:07:46] And what happened was, is they kind of put me in a room and ignored me for a while. And then, I watched them kind of do what they wanted to do. So, you can’t make decisions anymore because you’ve sold it. You’re exactly right. But normally, once you sell it, especially like a software business, any other business, you’re gonna be there for a while to watch that transition. So, that can be a difficult thing. And over the years, I’ve been able to kind of look at the idea of building with the end in mind, which is to sell it, so.

Michael Blake: [00:08:24] Now, what was that transition like? I mean, I know you personally. I don’t see you as a very good employee.

Ed Rieker: [00:08:34] I’m a horrible-

Michael Blake: [00:08:34] And I mean that with all the love I could possibly muster.

Ed Rieker: [00:08:37] Yes, absolutely. I  know.

Michael Blake: [00:08:38] But I consider myself, and my firm will tell you, I’m a terrible employee.

Ed Rieker: [00:08:42] Right, yeah. I’m a terrible employee. I will admit that. And I think the first time I sold, I was also a terrible seller because I was so emotionally involved and so focused on what I thought was right for the business, but I didn’t have any say anymore. I didn’t have any vote anymore. So, it becomes very difficult to hang around and see people do things that you probably don’t agree with.

Ed Rieker: [00:09:13] And, also, remember, the alignment I had with the sellers was they had the money, they had an idea of what they thought they wanted to do, and I really didn’t know on that well. And when you start to kind of see the team change and see kind of what they think is right, it can be very difficult for a seller to kind of be in that world. Most of the time, after you sell something, if you look at the statistics, the CEO goes bye-bye about six months, the old CEO.

Michael Blake: [00:09:48] I was going to ask you about that because most sales I’ve seen if the CEO is asked to remain at all, it’s a two to three-year period.

Ed Rieker: [00:09:57] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:09:57] But I don’t think most CEOs actually wind up serving out that term.

Ed Rieker: [00:10:01] They’re usually gone in six months. And that’s the thing you have to learn about in terms of selling. There’s things like earn-outs. So, when you get to the part where you agree on what the value is and what the terms are, part of that term can be the offer of, “Oh, we’ll double the what we’re buying you for if you’ll stay and hit these metrics.” And normally that’s kind of phantom money. That’s really hard to do because you don’t have control over how to reach those metrics anymore.

Michael Blake: [00:10:33] Right. I mean, the special sauce that you brought is now not being used anymore. It’s just sitting in the refrigerator with the label on it saying, “Add special sauce.”

Ed Rieker: [00:10:41] Right. You’re lucky if it’s in the fridge.

Michael Blake: [00:10:46] Right. I can’t shake this vision. I mean, having sort of been put in a room, you sort of watch everybody do the thing with the business after you’ve sold that, and you just sort of have to be at peace with your powerlessness by doing that.

Ed Rieker: [00:11:00] Yeah, and I wasn’t. I absolutely wasn’t. I mean, I think I was probably a bad seller at that point because I looked around, and it wasn’t going in the direction and as well as I thought it could go. And so, I didn’t really stay for the whole six months. I kind of bugged out of there because I had other things to do.

Michael Blake: [00:11:24] Yeah.

Ed Rieker: [00:11:24] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:11:26] Your experience of that sounds like my experience parenting a teenager.

Ed Rieker: [00:11:31] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:11:32] You watch it, but there’s only so much impact you can ultimately have. It’s sort of it’s just going to happen. So, how long did you own those businesses before selling them?

Ed Rieker: [00:11:42] So, I’m looking at my notes here, and I think ’88 and ’91. So, what’s the math? That’s three years. So, I probably worked on that a little bit longer than that. So, probably looks like the average is three to four years.

Michael Blake: [00:11:56] Okay.

Ed Rieker: [00:11:57] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:11:57] That’s not particularly long. Even in venture capital, that’s a fairly quick turnaround.

Ed Rieker: [00:12:02] Well, I like small teams and early stage stuff. And so, I like building it up to a certain point. And one of the things, I think, that if you’re a business owner of any kind of type, what you want to see is that every six months or so, the phone rings and somebody says, “Hey, I’m thinking about doing business with you or transaction with you.” And it evolves in this sort of, “Hey, we’re thinking about buying you.” If you’re not getting that call every six months or that activity every six months, then I feel like there’s something wrong with your business-

Michael Blake: [00:12:38] Huh!

Ed Rieker: [00:12:40] … because that’s one of the key indicators that you’re on to demand is that you get these situations where maybe you’re serving a large customer. and they say, “Well, maybe we should buy you instead of being a customer.” So, you want to kind of see those things happen every six months. If that’s not happening, then there’s something wrong with the business.

Michael Blake: [00:13:01] I’m gonna go off the script because I think that is insightful point that I want to explore a little bit more because I would not have thought of that in a million years, but I think I got it. So, let me tell what I think I get, and you tell me why I’m wrong. And what I think I get is people want to buy you because they notice you, and they’re making an impact, and you’re so important, they can’t afford to not you being available at some point down the road.

Ed Rieker: [00:13:31] Yeah, absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:13:32] Right?

Ed Rieker: [00:13:32] And it’s the noticed part and the can’t live without you part that drives the price up. It could be a strategic or a technology acquisition. And most of the stuff that we did was a technology acquisition because we had found a pocket somewhere in health care that we were serving. And it was important enough to a large corporation that instead of building it, they would try to buy it. And that’s exactly kind of what you’re looking at.

Michael Blake: [00:14:01] So, that’s interesting. So, kind of a bullet point is a lot of business owners will tell me that they get annoyed they get offers to potentially buy and sell. They don’t want to do that. But in a way, if you’re getting those calls, even if they’re not particularly serious, the fact that you’re on somebody’s radar screen means you’re doing something right-

Ed Rieker: [00:14:19] Yeah, that’s correct.

Michael Blake: [00:14:19] … in terms of the market.

Ed Rieker: [00:14:20] And every once in a while, you actually want to follow through with those calls because that’s a great way to to create a valuation for yourself, to kind of figure out, you’re in that business, you’d be a great advisor to call. And it [crosstalk]-

Michael Blake: [00:14:32] “Hey, thank you, Ed.”

Ed Rieker: [00:14:34] … product placement. Was that on the script or?

Michael Blake: [00:14:38] It should have been.

Ed Rieker: [00:14:39] It should have been.

Michael Blake: [00:14:39] It should have. My marketing department is, right now, tearing their hair out, saying, “Why do you make everybody say that?” So, you said that you’re a bad seller when you sold that first business.

Ed Rieker: [00:14:50] Absolutely, yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:14:51] And part of that was because you’re a minority shareholder, so you couldn’t really drive the bus. You could almost sort of grab the steering wheel every once in a while. By sale four, in what way were you a better seller? Were you a better seller?

Ed Rieker: [00:15:03] Well, absolutely, yeah. What happened is that I was so emotionally attached to the first one. It’s not the same thing, and it’s probably a really bad analogy, but it’s like selling your baby or selling one of the things that you love, a family member. It just really was—I was that emotionally attached to it. And then, after I went through that, when I realized that perhaps my career, if I could call it a career, would be building and selling companies. I began to think about it in a different way that the actual in-game was to sell it and to sell it successfully. And by successfully, it meant that they were happy, I was happy, there was a good outcome for both of us, and that the transition part was actually part of building the business that I was able to transition out of the business to be able to go do the next thing.

Michael Blake: [00:16:02] So, the transition was organic. And in fact, they should stick somebody else having to stay with the buyers instead of you.

Ed Rieker: [00:16:08] Absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:16:08] Right?

Ed Rieker: [00:16:09] Absolutely. So, that’s the process, then, is to build a team, so that I was dispensable. And actually they didn’t—why should we keep that guy?

Michael Blake: [00:16:19] Now, I’m curious. And I may be all wet here, but I’m curious if, also, the financial dynamic changes. When you sell your first business, I suspect but do not know that that was a lifestyle changing event for you.

Ed Rieker: [00:16:37] I would say the first one wasn’t.

Michael Blake: [00:16:39] Okay.

Ed Rieker: [00:16:39] When you start getting into the second and third, because the first two, I had to have angel investing to build the business up.

Michael Blake: [00:16:47] Yeah.

Ed Rieker: [00:16:48] Everything else was out of my own pocket, self-funded.

Michael Blake: [00:16:52] Okay.

Ed Rieker: [00:16:52] And the reason for that is that I found out in the way that I work is that I am able to risk my money, but not so much somebody else’s. I’m more careful with other people’s money, so that it hindered the ability for me to actually do the kind of the on-the-edge things that I wanted to do. I can do that with my own money but not necessarily with someone else’s.

Michael Blake: [00:17:18] I can understand that. And I’ve long thought, even though the standard playbook for startup entrepreneurs is hit up friends and family, right? On the other hand, that can lead to some very awkward Thanksgiving dinner conversations if things don’t go great.

Ed Rieker: [00:17:36] Absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:17:37] Right?

Ed Rieker: [00:17:37] And the first one was what I would consider friend who had resources that actually funded the first one. And, of course, we don’t talk anymore. So-

Michael Blake: [00:17:50] Okay.

Ed Rieker: [00:17:50] Exactly right.

Michael Blake: [00:17:51] Yeah. So, that is a risk.

Ed Rieker: [00:17:52] Yeah, that’s the risk. Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:17:55] So, it sounds to me like—well, I’m gonna ask the question for this. That’s why I have you here. To what extent were these sales planned versus opportunistic? They sound like a hybrid to me, kind of.

Ed Rieker: [00:18:07] Well, I think the first one was opportunistic because I really didn’t understand. I mean, I was an idiot on the first one. I really was. And I had a deep desire to create something, and a desire to perhaps bring that into the world and make it bigger. And what I didn’t understand was that through my immaturity, I was not a really good boss. Not only not a good employee, but not a good boss. And so, I think that having that sale hit me and all the emotional stuff that went with that, just reconsider a lot of stuff. At least, I did. And then, as I built teams that actually were the core of the success, you can’t be successful without a great team. I’m just really fortunate to have people that were able to help me, and teach me, and gather the things that we needed to be successful that we’re able to build these businesses up and sell them. So, I think I avoided your question. I am not sure I-

Michael Blake: [00:19:20] No, I think you, eventually, got around the answer.

Ed Rieker: [00:19:23] Yes.

Michael Blake: [00:19:23] Yeah. So, a common thread here is that all of your business is sold within two to three years or so. What did those businesses look like? What did they have in common that made them salable at that three-year period? Why do you—I’m sure it wasn’t luck.

Ed Rieker: [00:19:42] Well, yeah, it is luck. I mean, it’s—there’s a thing called the lucky bus that drives around. And if you’re standing out on the street, and the lucky bus stops in, and they say you’re ready to go, you got your bags packed, and you have your bags packed, and you’re ready to go, you can hop on the bus. And the bags packed is actually the work to be done, the job to be done. If the lucky bus stops, and they say you get your bags packed, and you go, “No, no, wait a minute, I’ll go finish packing,” when you come back out, the bus is gonna be gone.

Ed Rieker: [00:20:18] So, the idea I think we had going forward after the first one was to kind of always be in the way of a larger company. How could we—imagine this giant that’s walking or stumbling around. How can we annoy them enough that they’ll look down, and pick us up, and go, “Oh, yeah. This looks tasty. I’ll eat it.” That was the idea. So, what we did was we developed ways to deploy software and ideas in the world, so that we wound up in front of a large corporate entity that we knew eventually would probably want to do what we were doing, but they weren’t fast enough to be able to do it. And so, they would say, “Okay. Well, it’s just cheaper for us to kind of scoop this up and go with it.”

Michael Blake: [00:21:12] So, what that tells me is that your approach has been always be prepared to be opportunistic.

Ed Rieker: [00:21:18] Yes.

Michael Blake: [00:21:18] Right?

Ed Rieker: [00:21:19] So, yeah, to sell. Right. And to sell. And one of the things I would encourage entrepreneurs and CEOs to do is there’s a thing called due diligence, which is very exciting. And it’s even more exciting if it’s a public company because when they want to buy you, they really come and look at everything.

Michael Blake: [00:21:38] It’s basically a product logical exam without the anesthetic or-

Ed Rieker: [00:21:42] Yeah, yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:21:46] Just leave it-

Ed Rieker: [00:21:46] Yeah, yeah. And at last, not seconds, but hours and days. Yeah, absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:21:51] Just to make it extra fun.

Ed Rieker: [00:21:52] Yeah, extra fun. So, what I learned after the first one was to create. And I’ll make it simple, like these little paper boxes that you put files in. So, when you’re doing things, like you have a contract, you have an employment agreement, or you have anything that’s paper that’s important that they’re going to look at later on, you just make a second copy and throw it in that box. And you know when the due diligence comes around, you can just go point at that box, and go, “All the stuff you want is in that box.” And it makes it a lot easier because when they do come and do due diligence, if you’re not ready, you’ve got to go through all your files and find this stuff. And it’s really time consuming.

Michael Blake: [00:22:34] And distracting.

Ed Rieker: [00:22:35] And distracting.

Michael Blake: [00:22:36] Right?

Ed Rieker: [00:22:36] Yes.

Michael Blake: [00:22:36] And, also, I gotta believe, and I’ve always advised clients about—on this, so I hope I’m right, there’s something to be said for making yourself easy to buy.

Ed Rieker: [00:22:49] Absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:22:50] It doesn’t necessarily make you more or less valuable-

Ed Rieker: [00:22:52] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:22:52] … but just offering that path of least resistance.

Ed Rieker: [00:22:56] Well, what can happen is that, for instance, when you talked about opportunity, one of the purchases that was made on one of the software companies was that the public company had actually issued some bonds. So, they had gotten some cash, and they had a timeline when they had to spend that cash. So, you know.

Michael Blake: [00:23:17] So, that the government-

Ed Rieker: [00:23:19] Absolutely. We’ve got a budget to buy stuff. Let’s go buy stuff. And that’s somebody’s job to be done is to do an M&A.

Michael Blake: [00:23:26] Yeah.

Ed Rieker: [00:23:26] So, somebody at a corporate office is absolutely getting bonuses and pay on buying companies. So, there’s actually people that do that, and they have goals, and they have responsibilities. So, if they had this money, they had to spend by a certain time. So, it gave us a couple of things. It gave us the upper limit of the purchase. It gave us the timing. And then, we kind of—that gives you a leverage that perhaps they might not know that you know and helps you in the negotiations. So, you got to make sure that when you’re getting bought that you’re paying attention to those kind of things.

Michael Blake: [00:24:10] Boy, that’s interesting. That’s a a blog post I’ve been aching to write. But you’re right, there is sort of this moral hazard on the buy side when companies have a dedicated business development from an acquisition perspective or corporate development function, right?

Ed Rieker: [00:24:27] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:24:28] Those are people who are judged based on how much stuff they buy.

Ed Rieker: [00:24:31] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:24:32] And often, whether or not it’s a good acquisition or not, there’s so much turnover. Those people aren’t around-

Ed Rieker: [00:24:36] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:24:37] …  whether it’s a good deal or not, right? And although the prudent thing to do, because we have a pro deal bias, the prudent thing to do may be to walk away from a deal. Nobody ever gets interviewed on Bloomberg or on The Wall Street Journal for someone who walked away from a deal.

Ed Rieker: [00:24:54] That’s correct.

Michael Blake: [00:24:55] It’s never happened.

Ed Rieker: [00:24:56] Yeah, yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:24:56] Right?

Ed Rieker: [00:24:58] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:24:58] So, if you are being approached by someone that’s got that corporate development function, they need wins.

Ed Rieker: [00:25:04] Yeah. They need wins.

Michael Blake: [00:25:04] They just do.

Ed Rieker: [00:25:04] And they need certain dollar ranges that they’re buying in. There are certain ways that they’re buying in terms of how they model their transactions. So, cash, stock, earnouts, what happens to the founders, what happens to the team. All those things are consideration. A lot of us think about the buyout as being, “Oh, it’s a certain dollar amount,” but there’s a lot of nuance that you can create for yourself and your team that you can do in a deal.

Michael Blake: [00:25:35] And I don’t know if you’ve been in this situation because your model for building and selling a business has been so focused on a venture capital type model, but I am going to throw it out there anyway. And that is, are there signs out there where an owner needs to think about actively selling a business as opposed to being opportunistic that you can think of, or maybe you’ve experienced it where we’re at a point now where it’s really time for this business to sell, or it’s time for me to get out, or some combination? Is that something you can speak to?

Ed Rieker: [00:26:07] Yeah, sure. I think that that’s an interesting thing that happens. There’s cycles that we see. We’re in a happy time right now. It’s not going to continue to be a happy time. And that’s just the way the market works.

Michael Blake: [00:26:21] Yeah.

Ed Rieker: [00:26:22] So, I own some commercial real estate now. Now, I’m thinking about it’s time to sell because I think we’re in a pretty good place in the market. And I think that’s also true of a business. There could be things going on with the team, there could be things that you know about the technology and perhaps where it’s going that you may want to try to cash out. So, absolutely. I think an example for that for me was that 2008 was the precursor to a horrible 2009. And we had the online community, and there was a company that was rolling communities up. And they had approached us about selling the year before, and we said no because we were still—revenues were rising, and we were still building things. And I was of a mindset that, “Oh, this is going to continue and go up next year.” And the guy that was wanting to buy us, we’re on the phone, and he’s literally screaming at me on the phone saying, “Take the cash, take the cash, I’ll pay all cash.” And I’m saying, “No, I think we’ll be worth more next year.” Well, guess what? We weren’t worth more.

Michael Blake: [00:27:44] It didn’t work out.

Ed Rieker: [00:27:45] It didn’t work out. It went down, and it took us a couple more years to sell it.

Michael Blake: [00:27:49] Huh! Okay.

Ed Rieker: [00:27:51] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:27:51] So, when you sold your businesses, were these do-it-yourself jobs, or did you kind of put a team around you to help you?

Ed Rieker: [00:27:58] Well, the team part is the CPA and, also, we used the same legal team to do the sell part. The deal structure, the first one, I was a minority shareholder in. And so, I wasn’t as involved in that and progressively got more involved in the other ones and pretty much full on. I think the idea is that you agree on a face to face, usually. You kind of agree with the principles. This is the price, the terms, what happens to the team, what happens to you? Then, you kind of wind up with maybe a one page or a page and a half. And then-

Michael Blake: [00:28:42] It’s called a term sheet-

Ed Rieker: [00:28:43] Yeah, yeah, yes.

Michael Blake: [00:28:43] … for those of us in the audience.

Ed Rieker: [00:28:44] Term sheet.

Michael Blake: [00:28:44] Yeah, term sheet.

Ed Rieker: [00:28:45] Thank you. I knew there was a name for that. And then, what happens is that two pages turns into 30 or 50 pages of mind-numbing legalese fees and schedules.

Michael Blake: [00:28:58] Oh, boy, you’re not kidding.

Ed Rieker: [00:28:59] Yeah. And so, that’s-.

Michael Blake: [00:29:00] Except, it’s only one of the most important decisions in your life, so you have to read it.

Ed Rieker: [00:29:04] You have to read it. And you have to have a team that can interpret it for you. And you have to have, both on the financial side and on the legal side, someone to make sure that what you think is happening in your head is actually what’s in the document. That’s the most important thing. It’s like you can look at the documents, and you can see what the outcome will be if certain things happen. I got tripped up once by one word in a document that was part of an earnout. And, it costs a big bucket of money because we interpreted that word differently than what it actually meant. And that was one word in probably a 40-page document.

Michael Blake: [00:29:53] Whew!

Ed Rieker: [00:29:54] Ouch.

Michael Blake: [00:29:54] Yeah.

Ed Rieker: [00:29:55] And so—yeah, but unless you make those mistakes and see them, you can’t learn from them, so.

Michael Blake: [00:30:01] Well, yeah. And exactly why I think you have such a fascinating and valuable perspective because you’ve had the opportunity to make those mistakes live to fight another day, right? And like you said, most people don’t see four transaction. They don’t see four sales.

Ed Rieker: [00:30:17] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:30:17] We’ll see one.

Ed Rieker: [00:30:18] Yeah. I’ve been lucky. Absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:30:21] So, at any point, as you were considering a sale, were you concerned over what would happen the day after, what would you happen to you the day after you wake up, all of a sudden, there’s no office you have to be in?

Ed Rieker: [00:30:35] Well, that there was never a no office to be in. There is always a time you have to stay with the business. And after the first one, I was able to say, “All right. I know my job to be done in the world is to start them and to sell them.” So, I know when the new people come in, I want to underpromise and overdeliver. But I also want to have a team in place to where the business really doesn’t need me. My job was to think about the really big things. And so, usually, by the time the deal was done or even before that, I would be envisioning the next thing that I would be building. And that’s always been the case is that, “Okay. I know it’s time to sell because I’m thinking about something else.”

Michael Blake: [00:31:22] Did you ever find that being involved in a sale was kind of an emotional roller coaster?

Ed Rieker: [00:31:28] It’s absolutely an emotional roller coaster all the time. And remember, this idea of kind of looking at every six months, someone calls you, and they say, “Hey, maybe we should do a deal.” Well, I would do those to see kind of what the value is, to see how prepared I was, to see if our story was right, and to see if it was a real deal. And sometimes, there are corporations that want to really go to school on you. So, they’ll say, “Hey, we’re interested in buying you.” And you go, “Oh, that’s exciting. Come on in. I’ll tell you everything.”

Michael Blake: [00:32:01] Right.

Ed Rieker: [00:32:03] And then, they go, “Oh, we’ve decided to build it ourselves. Thanks.”

Michael Blake: [00:32:05] You’re totally catfished.

Ed Rieker: [00:32:07] Yeah-

Michael Blake: [00:32:07] Basically.

Ed Rieker: [00:32:07] Absolutely. So, you have to know at what point when you go, “Oh, these guys are going to school,” and then you just kind of shut it down. So, I’ve had those experiences where I’m like, “Oh, okay. Yeah. No, I’m not going to show you that. Thanks.”

Michael Blake: [00:32:26] And how about within? I mean, in my experiences, most deals are called off, at least, once before they ultimately happen.

Ed Rieker: [00:32:36] Yeah, absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:32:36] Right?

Ed Rieker: [00:32:37] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:32:37] And how do you kind of stick with that and keep a level head as opposed to just setting up a YouTube video of yourself taking a baseball bat to a roomful of computers and file cabinets or maybe you do that, and that’s how you sort of keep your head on straight?

Ed Rieker: [00:32:51] Right. That’s-

Michael Blake: [00:32:52] How do you manage that?

Ed Rieker: [00:32:53] That’s why glassware is always in danger when you’re around me. So, please don’t bring me glassware. I think the idea is to isolate it from the team and compartmentalize it in your brand because what can happen, I’ve seen this with teams, where the CEO gets excited about a sale, and they move off the mark of what they’re trying to do with growing the business. And these things can take six months, a year. It can take that long to find out it’s a folly. So, if you’re get pulled off growing the business, what happens is your business dips. So, your next sell gets delayed because you’ve got to build that back up. So, the idea is isolate it from the team until you actually have a term sheet that looks real, and looks doable, and maybe even the first draft of the purchase agreement. And then, make sure that while you’re doing that, you’re continually serving the business.

Michael Blake: [00:33:54] And that’s another great reason to sort of have your due—basically build your due diligence package as you go along-

Ed Rieker: [00:34:00] Absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:34:00] … because, then, you don’t have to bring your team in.

Ed Rieker: [00:34:02] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:34:04] And there’s no sort of smoking gun.

Ed Rieker: [00:34:05] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:34:06] If you’ve hired people that are smart, you start to ask for documents, all of a sudden, they’ll realize that’s why.

Ed Rieker: [00:34:11] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:34:12] Right? But if all of a sudden, you just have this box, you just say, “Here,” then that gives you the option-

Ed Rieker: [00:34:17] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:34:17] … to be able to let more-

Ed Rieker: [00:34:17] If you’re walking around saying, “Can you sign this employment agreement really quickly?” yeah, it’s a little late.

Michael Blake: [00:34:24] Yeah. My lawyer will be back to you with some thoughts on what I’d like in order to sign that agreement.

Ed Rieker: [00:34:32] Yes.

Michael Blake: [00:34:32] And some of the other side to that too is deals die a thousand deaths, but, also, deals are never done until they’re done. And I think I’ve seen, as you’ve probably seen it too, is plenty of businesses die while they’re up for sale-

Ed Rieker: [00:34:52] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:34:53] … because the process of selling a business really becomes a full-time job.

Ed Rieker: [00:34:56] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:34:57] And it can very easily distract you from actually running your business to the point where maybe a deal just doesn’t happen because it doesn’t happen, or I’ve seen—I’ve even seen it where the business has deteriorated so much during the due diligence process that it’s just no longer the valuable asset that prompted the initial proposal to buy in the first place.

Ed Rieker: [00:35:17] Yeah, absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:35:18] Right?

Ed Rieker: [00:35:19] That’s correct, yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:35:20] And that’s why it’s important, I guess, to have those advisors and have that due diligence ready to go because you’ve got to just accept that it’s two full-time jobs.

Ed Rieker: [00:35:29] Yeah. It’s the exact same thing as raising capital, only you’re selling the business. It’s the same kind of process. And so, when you’re raising institutional money, you’re also doing the same kind of things, and it’s the same kind of roller coaster, but it’s the end game.

Michael Blake: [00:35:49] And I’ll share with you a secret that I tell my buy side clients.

Ed Rieker: [00:35:53] Oh, a secret?

Michael Blake: [00:35:53] Yeah, a secret is that many sellers, if they’ve never sold a business before, they start to get what I call Costa Rica syndrome-

Ed Rieker: [00:36:05] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:36:06] … which means that mentally, the second they think that those dollars are coming in-

Ed Rieker: [00:36:11] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:36:12] … they’re already halfway to their condo in Costa Rica.

Ed Rieker: [00:36:16] Yeah, absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:36:17] Right?

Ed Rieker: [00:36:17] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:36:18] And once they’re there, the buyer acquires extraordinary leverage.

Ed Rieker: [00:36:24] Absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:36:25] Right?

Ed Rieker: [00:36:25] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:36:25] And even for [indiscernible], let’s say that initially talked about a $10 million purchase price, well, in our due diligence, really, I only want to pay seven.

Ed Rieker: [00:36:34] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:36:35] Right? And if the seller has exposed themselves where the business is going to be hard to recover but, also, mentally-

Ed Rieker: [00:36:43] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:36:43] … they have to now say—they have to get back from their tropical paradise.

Ed Rieker: [00:36:48] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:36:49] Right? And cocktail drinks and so forth. They come back. They don’t want to do that. Now, they’re just looking at that $3 million difference as a number. But, well, I still got $7 million left. Just let me do this, so I can go to my Costa Rica.

Ed Rieker: [00:37:04] Right.

Michael Blake: [00:37:04] Right?

Ed Rieker: [00:37:04] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:37:04] And I think it confers a tremendous amount of leverage-

Ed Rieker: [00:37:09] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:37:09] … for the buyer.

Ed Rieker: [00:37:11] Yeah. I’ve had stuff happen at closing or right before closing where a buyer will come back and say, “Well, maybe we should do this,” and you have to be prepared to say no.

Michael Blake: [00:37:23] Yeah.

Ed Rieker: [00:37:24] You have to be able to say, “You know what? That’s okay. We’ll pass.”

Michael Blake: [00:37:29] Yeah, that’s right.

Ed Rieker: [00:37:30] So-

Michael Blake: [00:37:30] If you can’t walk away from a deal of any kind, you’re not negotiating. You’re just asking.

Ed Rieker: [00:37:36] Yeah. And that’s the part about the business. If your business is solid enough that you can say no, that’s a great business to have because that means there’s gonna be another buyer. And also, you always want to have a horse race, even if it’s a pretend horse. So, that-

Michael Blake: [00:37:55] The stalking horse.

Ed Rieker: [00:37:56] Yes. So, that when you’re winding up with a single buyer, there’s always this other entity that perhaps might pay more, or do quicker, or be kinder to your employees, that sort of thing. So, a one-buyer deal is really no fun.

Michael Blake: [00:38:12] Well, and even by setting yourself up the way that you’ve described, the other horse is you, as yourself, right?

Ed Rieker: [00:38:19] Right, yeah, you can stick around.

Michael Blake: [00:38:19] I can always not sell.

Ed Rieker: [00:38:21] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:38:22] And because I’m the idea person and not the operational person, my lifestyle is still okay.

Ed Rieker: [00:38:30] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:38:30] Right? And we’ll just sort of reset and wait for the next person. And that makes you pretty much impervious to the Costa Rica syndrome.

Ed Rieker: [00:38:40] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:38:40] And nothing against Costa Rica. I could have just as easily said Tahiti, but a friend of mine-

Ed Rieker: [00:38:44] Yeah, or Macon, Georgia.

Michael Blake: [00:38:46] Or Macon, Georgia, yeah.

Ed Rieker: [00:38:46] Absolutely.

Michael Blake: [00:38:46] But a friend—one of my clients sold a business, went down to Costa Rica, and they love it, so.

Ed Rieker: [00:38:51] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:38:53] Well, this has been great. We’re sort of running out of time here, but there’s a lot of ground that could be covered. If somebody is kind of thinking about maybe selling their own business, could they contact you for a little bit of advice?

Ed Rieker: [00:39:04] Sure, absolutely. Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:39:05] How will be the best way for them to do that?

Ed Rieker: [00:39:07] Send me an email, ed@softlinc.com. S-O-F-T-L-I-N-C dot com.

Michael Blake: [00:39:14] Okay.

Ed Rieker: [00:39:15] Or call Mike. Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:39:17] There you go. But Ed might be free. I know that I’m not.

Ed Rieker: [00:39:21] Yeah.

Michael Blake: [00:39:22] So, that’s gonna wrap it up for today’s program. I’d like to thank Ed Rieker so much for joining us and sharing his expertise with us. We’ll be exploring a new topic each week. So, please tune in, so that when you’re faced with your next business decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy this podcast, please consider leaving a review with your favorite podcast aggregator. It helps people find us, so that we can help them. Once again, this is Mike Blake. Our sponsor is Brady Ware & Company. And this has been the Decision Vision Podcast.

Tagged With: CPa, CPA firm, Dayton accounting, Dayton business advisory, Dayton CPA, Dayton CPA firm, Decision Vision, due diligence packages, due dilligence, earn-out, Ed Rieker, emotional roller coaster, merging a business, Michael Blake, Mike Blake, selling a business, serial entrepreneur, strategic acquisition, technology acquisition, valuation

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • …
  • 81
  • Next Page »

Business RadioX ® Network


 

Our Most Recent Episode

CONNECT WITH US

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Our Mission

We help local business leaders get the word out about the important work they’re doing to serve their market, their community, and their profession.

We support and celebrate business by sharing positive business stories that traditional media ignores. Some media leans left. Some media leans right. We lean business.

Sponsor a Show

Build Relationships and Grow Your Business. Click here for more details.

Partner With Us

Discover More Here

Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy

Connect with us

Want to keep up with the latest in pro-business news across the network? Follow us on social media for the latest stories!
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Business RadioX® Headquarters
1000 Abernathy Rd. NE
Building 400, Suite L-10
Sandy Springs, GA 30328

© 2025 Business RadioX ® · Rainmaker Platform

BRXStudioCoversLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of LA Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDENVER

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Denver Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversPENSACOLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Pensacola Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversBIRMINGHAM

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Birmingham Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversTALLAHASSEE

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Tallahassee Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRALEIGH

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Raleigh Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRICHMONDNoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Richmond Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversNASHVILLENoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Nashville Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDETROIT

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Detroit Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversSTLOUIS

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of St. Louis Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCOLUMBUS-small

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Columbus Business Radio

Coachthecoach-08-08

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Coach the Coach

BRXStudioCoversBAYAREA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Bay Area Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCHICAGO

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Chicago Business Radio

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Atlanta Business Radio