Business RadioX ®

  • Home
  • Business RadioX ® Communities
    • Southeast
      • Alabama
        • Birmingham
      • Florida
        • Orlando
        • Pensacola
        • South Florida
        • Tampa
        • Tallahassee
      • Georgia
        • Atlanta
        • Cherokee
        • Forsyth
        • Greater Perimeter
        • Gwinnett
        • North Fulton
        • North Georgia
        • Northeast Georgia
        • Rome
        • Savannah
      • Louisiana
        • New Orleans
      • North Carolina
        • Charlotte
        • Raleigh
      • Tennessee
        • Chattanooga
        • Nashville
      • Virginia
        • Richmond
    • South Central
      • Arkansas
        • Northwest Arkansas
    • Midwest
      • Illinois
        • Chicago
      • Michigan
        • Detroit
      • Minnesota
        • Minneapolis St. Paul
      • Missouri
        • St. Louis
      • Ohio
        • Cleveland
        • Columbus
        • Dayton
    • Southwest
      • Arizona
        • Phoenix
        • Tucson
        • Valley
      • Texas
        • Austin
        • Dallas
        • Houston
    • West
      • California
        • Bay Area
        • LA
        • Pasadena
      • Colorado
        • Denver
      • Hawaii
        • Oahu
  • FAQs
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our Audience
    • Why It Works
    • What People Are Saying
    • BRX in the News
  • Resources
    • BRX Pro Tips
    • B2B Marketing: The 4Rs
    • High Velocity Selling Habits
    • Why Most B2B Media Strategies Fail
    • 9 Reasons To Sponsor A Business RadioX ® Show
  • Partner With Us
  • Veteran Business RadioX ®

BRX Pro Tip: Ship Every Week

February 25, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: Ship Every Week
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: Ship Every Week

Stone Payton: And we’re back with Business RadioX Pro Tips, Lee Kantor and Stone Payton here with you. Lee, I’ve come to regard it as a Lee Mantra, but it wouldn’t surprise me if you picked it up from one of the folks that you really try to follow and learn from, but you’ve said it more than a few times, ship every week.

Lee Kantor: Yeah, I think you got to get into a rhythm, especially if you’re an entrepreneur, especially if you are building a business that you have to ship every week and you have to measure your KPIs as you iterate. Too many people are waiting until everything is perfect before they put something out there, and I think that is just a fundamental mistake.

Lee Kantor: I think a better approach is to ship something every week, measure what happened. It doesn’t have to be perfect. It just has to be out there where people can see it, they can respond to it or not. And then, you can take action based on what you learn.

Lee Kantor: So number one, decide what you’re going to ship this week. Is it a piece of content? Is it a new offer? Is it an outreach campaign? Whatever it is, it doesn’t matter. Just make sure it gets out there. Number two, pick one, two, three KPIs to measure. Are they going to be conversation started? Is it going to be response rate? Is it conversions? Is it engagement? It doesn’t matter what it is. Just get in the habit of doing this over and over. And then at the end of the week, look at your numbers, make one adjustment for next week.

Lee Kantor: And remember, as Stone always says, speed beats perfection. You need higher velocity. The faster you iterate, the faster you learn what actually works. And you can take that information and move forward in the next week. So, ship something this week.

Navigating Virtual Trust: Leveraging Emotional Intelligence for Business Growth

February 25, 2026 by angishields

SIP-James-Castleberry-Feature
Scaling in Public
Navigating Virtual Trust: Leveraging Emotional Intelligence for Business Growth
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Lee Kantor and Stone Payton, along with coach James Castleberry, explore how business founders and coaches can build stronger virtual relationships. They discuss interpreting emotional intelligence assessments, overcoming challenges of trust in remote environments, and leveraging personal strengths. The team experiments with new onboarding strategies, emphasizing visibility, empathy, and real-time collaboration. James offers practical advice on fostering connection and psychological safety online. 

LeaderEI-logo

James-CastleberryJames L. Castleberry is a retired U.S. military officer and the founder of Castleberry Coaching & Consulting and CEO of LeaderEI, a firm specializing in leadership development through emotional intelligence (EQ) strategies. With more than 25 years of leadership experience across the military, government, and private sectors, James helps organizations achieve measurable business results through customized coaching, training, and consulting solutions.

James is a recognized authority in the application of emotional intelligence in leadership, utilizing tools like EQ-i 2.0®, EQ360®, and MSCEIT® 2.0 to assess and develop emotionally intelligent leaders. In addition to serving executives and teams, he certifies HR professionals, consultants, and coaches to become EQ-i practitioners—building leadership pipelines focused on empathy, communication, and self-awareness.

In his conversation with Trisha, James reflected on his transition from military intelligence to executive coaching and discussed the critical role emotional intelligence plays in leading across generations and managing complex team dynamics. He highlighted the LeaderEI certification program, emphasizing how EQ can be learned and applied to improve leadership effectiveness, retention, and organizational culture. Known for his practical, research-backed, and people-first approach, James continues to impact leaders globally through in-person and virtual programs.

He holds certifications as a Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR), Certified Executive Coach, and Master EQ-i Trainer, and is a graduate of Harvard’s Leadership Coaching Strategies program. Based in Florida, James lives out his values of humility, service, and sustainable leadership impact.

Connect with James on LinkedIn.

Episode Highlights

  • Leadership clarity and emotional intelligence (EQ 20 assessment)
  • Leveraging personal strengths in business growth
  • Challenges of building trust and intimacy in virtual environments
  • Importance of visibility and personal storytelling in virtual communication
  • Current onboarding and interview processes for new partners
  • Experimenting with joint virtual sessions to enhance relationship building
  • Balancing optimism with skepticism in client interactions
  • Strategies for fostering enthusiasm and addressing concerns in conversations
  • Streamlining processes to avoid overwhelming prospects
  • Commitment to continuous learning and refining engagement strategies

Transcript-iconThis transcript is machine transcribed by Sonix.

 

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: Broadcasting live from our flagship studio in Atlanta, Georgia. This is scaling in public. The next 100 Business RadioX markets, featuring founders Lee Kantor and Stone Payton, along with some of America’s top coaches, helping them grow the network with real strategy, real lessons, and real accountability all shared in public. To learn more about the proven system that turns podcast interviews into a perpetual prospecting pipeline through generosity, not gimmicks, go to Burks Intercom and download the free Business RadioX playbook. Now here’s your host.

Stone Payton: Welcome to another exciting and informative edition of addition of scaling in public. Lee Kantor Stone Payton here with you. Please join me in welcoming to the session our coach today, James Castleberry. How are you man?

James Castleberry: Doing great Stone. And thank you. Thank you both for having me this afternoon.

Stone Payton: Well, it’s our pleasure. All right, man. Help us grow this thing.

James Castleberry: All right, so basically, what we do is, is help with clarity. Wherever that clarity may go, wherever that clarity may take us. Sometimes it’s an individual leader and and how they interact with their teams. Sometimes it’s helping a team understand where their challenges may be and their strengths may be. And then aligning, uh, what we can from those strengths and from those challenges to whatever their, uh, strategic goals are, what their missions are to help them move forward. And so, uh, with us, this is a little different than, than most of what we do. You guys have already had debriefs concerning the QE 2.0. That is the, um, the valid and reliable assessment that we use and the tool that I use to help teams and, and executives grow. And so, uh, I guess I would like to understand a little bit about what your impressions were of your results.

Stone Payton: Uh, well, I can go first on, on that one. I wasn’t terribly surprised at the the highs and the lows, the the outliers, if you will. And I gotta say, I think if my wife read the report and I think I may give her a chance to read it, I don’t know that she would be surprised, uh, either. So, you know, it’s all for me. It’s good to self-reflect. Think about that. I try to be self-aware, but what I’m really thirsty for is, okay if this is my nature or this is my behavior pattern. Where and when and how do I need to adapt, do some things differently that will that will help us grow this business. You know, better and faster. So I’m I’m thirsty for that. That next step with this.

Lee Kantor: Yeah. I would agree with Stone in this regard. It was interesting to go through it. And it was uh, a lot of the results were things that I thought were, you know, pretty accurate. But then how do you take that next step of taking that information and that intelligence and making it work to help us achieve our goal of growing the network? Like, how can we, you know, amp up our strengths, either develop or hide our weaknesses? Uh, to help us get to the objective we have.

James Castleberry: Yeah. And so one of the things I do want to mention now, for those that are, um, are, um, accustomed to using B-level psychometrics is both Stone and Lee have consented to the use of this, uh, in coaching and, um, and so where we would normally keep this at a confidential level, they both, uh, have agreed to this and this, uh, scaling in public coaching forum. So I just wanted to make sure that that was out there so that our listeners understand that this is coming from a place of consent for their their mutual growth. And a.

Stone Payton: Good disclaimer. James, I don’t blame you. You don’t you don’t do a radio show out of everybody’s session.

James Castleberry: No, no, absolutely. Just just the opposite. Usually it’s one on one. Or if we’re talking about it in a group session, then everything is anonymous. And so, um, you know, these results are, are typically confidential. And then coaching sessions are typically confidential. And so this is uh, this is a little bit different forum that we’re using. And it’s the purpose uh, for you guys in scaling in public. And so based on your individual results and what you saw, um, as your strengths, how were you using those already to help you, uh, to scale the business?

Lee Kantor: I mean, I’ll take this first since, um, one of the outliers for me was, uh, interpersonal relationships. And this whole business was built and was created to shore up that side of my personality. I’m not a people person. Uh, I don’t get a lot of energy from, uh, being around people. I’m an introvert more than an extrovert. So I created this system and the Business RadioX platform to help myself, uh, have an easier path to meeting people and from maybe changing the frame of me seeking them out to them, wanting to be part of what I was doing. So the whole business is built basically on Probably the biggest outlier I had in the results of my assessment, which was interpersonal relationships.

James Castleberry: And how do you think that’s going for you, Lee? If that’s the whole reason that we’re into this and one of your reasons for it. Uh, what what steps have you made, uh, in improving this, that you’ve seen, uh, that, uh, that’s visible as a business result?

Lee Kantor: I mean, what has occurred as a business over the 20 years we’ve been doing this is that there has been people out there who have partnered with us and have, um, tried this on themselves and for a variety of reasons, not, uh, in fact, probably not. I would say the minority of them are introverts. The majority of the partners we have thus far are more extroverted, who see other ways to leverage the platform than what I initially did. But for me personally, I think that it has been validated that this is a great way to build more relationships faster with more of the right people. So from that standpoint, I think, um, it was it was doing exactly what I had set out to do.

James Castleberry: What do you still find challenging about it?

Lee Kantor: Um, what what is the it you’re referring to?

James Castleberry: Um, well, you you speak about being an introvert, and, uh, one of your other interviews, I, I heard, um, mention of. How do you get the same feeling in the studio that you can get virtually. And, you know, we deal this with, uh, with globalization. It’s one of my areas of study. And so we deal with this and and the way that people perceived virtually even their own emotional intelligence is a little bit different, because you can’t feel that, that same emotion research tells us we can feel emotions 6 to 10ft away. You can’t feel that as good virtually. So, um. What what are we doing? Uh, to be able to try to get that same feeling virtually out there in this platform that we, we otherwise might get if we’re in the studio in person.

Lee Kantor: Uh, that’s an area that we’re working on, is to try to create some sort of a virtual experience that can capture some of the magic that happens face to face in a studio. So that is an area that we haven’t figured out yet, and we’re working on to better create those that kind of level of intimacy and sharing and, um, the visceral feeling that occurs in a studio that just doesn’t occur as easily or as elegantly virtually.

James Castleberry: Yeah, I think there’s ways that you can do that. Most of that is wrapped around, um, uh uh, the, the the psychology of people feeling comfortable, uh, and and building that trust and understanding how you can build that trust. Um, virtually, I think.

Lee Kantor: So what are some examples? How how could you share some examples of ways that we might not be aware of or haven’t considered in order to build that level of intimacy and trust? Is there some things you’ve learned from doing your kind of work virtually, that maybe we could borrow and put into our playbook?

James Castleberry: Yeah, a lot of it is visibility, right? And we say, okay, we’re doing this virtually. Um, there is a difference in a meeting if people have their cameras on or if they don’t have their cameras on. And this can be challenging. But we read so much and we hear so much virtually from body language and people’s expressions and, and trying to understand, just like we would in person. We might not feel it the same way if we’re not in person, but, uh, that’s one, uh, method where we can really see it. I the advantage of being the intelligence field when I was in active duty. And so for years and years we had top secret, uh, teleconferences, and you could, uh, regardless of who you were talking to and how far away they were, um, you got a different feeling from that leader. Not not based on the typical things that we build trust on. Typically it’s consistency. It’s transparency. Um, but and professionalism, uh, all those things count too, in a virtual environment. But you can add to that in the way, um, that there’s you try to develop a personal connection and you keep that even if it’s virtually. And some of that’s understanding a little bit more about the people that you’re talking to. Uh, Stone, stone example of yours might be the the recent hunting trip that you talked about and just sharing a little bit. And you have to have your boundaries, but sharing a little bit of that personal background so that people can say, okay, he’s like me in this way, or he’s like me in that way, and that helps build those interpersonal relationships. Uh, it helps him understand that you have empathy. It helps them understand that if you do some of the same things, you might find some of the same things mutually satisfying. Um, and so, uh, for you, do you feel closer, even if it’s virtually, uh, stone, if you’re talking to someone online with, uh, if the camera is on, if the camera is off or if you relate a personal story.

Stone Payton: So would the camera on for me, like, uh, built into our core system anyway is often a pre-call to help someone get ready for a Business RadioX interview. And and of course, that’s the you know, the coaching version of that is, is a discovery call, which is one of the reasons this worked so well for coaches. But I have found in doing those pre calls that and I do some not with Cameron, like if I, if I’m out at the archery range and it’s a 430 afternoon call, I might not be on camera, but if I’m in the, in the office or in the local studio here, when you’re on camera, I can pick up on body signals. I think they can see my enthusiasm. So I think it does add a a layer of trust and does add to the dynamic more often than not. If, uh, if we’re on camera during those during those phone conversations. Yeah.

James Castleberry: Do y’all typically do those as a team together because they’re going to see you as a partnership taking this forward, do y’all typically do discovery calls together?

Stone Payton: Uh, no. Typically I’m doing the discovery calls okay.

Lee Kantor: But historically, before the pandemic, we would be together in person, right?

James Castleberry: Oh.

Lee Kantor: Virtual occurred beginning after the pandemic, when we had to go virtual when we no longer could meet in in the studio. We had to pivot to virtual. So that was the beginning of that of being on camera or not being on camera.

James Castleberry: So do you think there could be a difference? Uh, when you met in person, you both met in person instead? I think that’s what I’m hearing is that you both met in person, but, uh, most of the discovery calls now were done by, uh, Stone. Do you think there’s a difference in your comfort level and maybe a potential clients, um, comfort level with both of you? Um, when you participated together versus just a discovery call, being with one person.

Lee Kantor: Um, well, I, I do, I mean, I think it was more powerful when it was both of us together. Um, and I think it was more powerful in person, so. So, yeah, I agree that it was together was better than individually.

James Castleberry: So how how might you be able to maybe because this has been successful in the past, how might you be able to implement that, uh, to where, um, you, you can work toward? I’m not going to say it’s going to be the same as in the studio because you don’t feel that emotion, but, um, uh, could you see a way, uh, what might it look like if you were able to do those, uh, the same way, except. Except virtually now. So to hear from both of you.

Lee Kantor: At some point in the relationship, we do kind of join forces, but it hasn’t been on the initial call lately. I mean, how would you when do when do I typically get inserted into this stone?

Stone Payton: Um, more often than not. And again, this is with the scaling effort. As we’re talking to somebody. I’m just making a market up like San Diego. I might have that initial conversation with them, help them get prepared to come on a show. And then more often than not, there are some exceptions. Lee is the one that’s actually conducting the interview, so he’s building some rapport with them at that point. Um, although he’s probably not on camera during most of that, I suspect. And then, um, they schedule a follow up call to help them get the most out of their interview. And that’s usually with me. And then depending on the time of day and the day of the week, uh, you know, most of those would be on, uh, on camera. That’s the that’s the current methodology for trying to cultivate business and markets where we are not now at the local level, the way we’ve done it for 20 something years. It worked then, and it works now. I mean, that that recipe is, you know, locked and loaded. That’s a well baked process. It works. It always works. It never doesn’t work. But this going to markets where we don’t have physical representation yet and, um, trying to move a potential studio partner, uh, along that process. Um, we’re definitely struggling with that. And I think virtual is this virtual dynamic is is part of the challenge.

James Castleberry: Um.

Lee Kantor: So just to reiterate, the path right now is stone does the what we do some sort of outreach where the person agrees to come on a show? Stone does the initial kind of pre-interview. Uh, he’s usually on camera. He hands it off to me. I do the interview. That’s usually off camera. Then it goes back to stone. They agree to a follow up to see how best to leverage the content and how to get the most out of their interview experience. And that goes back to stone. And that’s in on camera interaction. And then from there, if it turned into, uh, a deeper conversation, whether they wanted to do this or not. And we could use Trisha as the example of how it could work then, because Trisha went through all of those steps, she I believe she had the pre-interview with Stone. She had the interview with me off camera. Then she went back with a post interview with Stone. And then at some point we all three, um, had an interaction and Trisha is usually on camera. So I would imagine she was on camera. I would imagine Stone was on camera. And to date Trisha and I have never been on. She’s been on camera, she has never seen me on camera.

James Castleberry: So I find this so fascinating that, uh, both Stone, you and Lee, you talk about how that engagement together was so very successful, uh, before Covid and then Covid changed the way that we all communicate. Um, so, uh, I wonder and, and some of coaching is experimenting to see if we can grow, if we can develop in certain areas. Um, could y’all see a way that if you went back to that methodology virtually that was so successful, uh, for you doing it together in the studio that it might have an impact?

Lee Kantor: Yeah. I mean, we’re open to trying lots of things so that we’re definitely open to that. And what would be your recommendation of of when to insert both of us together into the process?

James Castleberry: Well, my recommendation, I guess, would be what’s worked for y’all in the past. And and Lee, we talked a little bit about, um, knowing success from the past. And Stone, we talked about some of your, uh, your strengths in communication and optimism and, um, and then um, and problem solving and so that there’s a reason that y’all work together. Uh, there’s a, there’s a reason that for so long, it worked together, even in the studio, it’s even more challenging. And we’ve acknowledged that it’s even more challenging communicating virtually. So rather than it be sequential being a new process that started out of Covid, would there be a possibility that combining it again, but doing it virtually might have the same impact?

Lee Kantor: I mean, we’re up for trying it virtually. I just don’t I’m having trouble figuring out how to do that. So I don’t have an answer on, um, Um. Do we do it together at every step? Do we do it together at a certain step? At one point, then it becomes together, um, because we’re no longer in the same place. So we’re all we’re at different points in our lives and with our efforts here. So. And before we would cut, both of us come into a studio physically together. And we haven’t done that in, I don’t even know how many years, seven years. It’s been over well over five years.

Stone Payton: Right.

Lee Kantor: Um, so I, I’m just having a hard time coming up with a system that does that in, uh. So that’s where I’m. I’m looking for what you your recommendations are on a way to even test it.

James Castleberry: Yeah. So so I think it would be. I think it would be no different. I think you would do the, the initial calls because there’s such value of you guys participating together, the the systematic thinking that you do. Uh, the problem solving that you do, Stone, and that combined interaction with a person, even for a discovery call, I think. And that’s no different than how they used to meet you in the studio first.

Lee Kantor: Well, it is different because that’s not how the process in the studio was in the studio. They would get invited to a show, then they would come into the studio to have the interview experience, and that was together. So they we didn’t have a pre-call in the studio. The the show was where we first met them so that they would come in and maybe a few minutes we’d do a little mic check and just get started. And then after that we would sometimes, uh, kind of organically. It would just lead to them having questions and then us being able to either answer them right there on the spot or schedule a follow up.

James Castleberry: Okay. No thank you. That’s helpful. So so stone drawn on your problem solving, seeing this and knowing that we’re facing kind of this virtual challenge right now in scaling and in scaling visibility will be important. Personal connection will be important. I had the opportunity to be a program manager for 100% remote AI company. So you had a lot of people in that company that were, uh, more introverted. They were coders. And then you had some that were in business development that were more extroverted, and they were outgoing. Uh, but they did have a kind of a battle rhythm schedule where we’d get together and we’d talk to folks and, and so I guess, I guess what I’m wondering is, um, in this virtual environment, how can we we use the strengths that you both have, uh, to look at this challenge of, of the same, uh, getting the same results out of our virtual meetings that you guys had in the, in the, in studio meetings.

Stone Payton: No, it’s a great set of questions. I will say that the the pre-call conducted by me individually certainly isn’t, um, keeping anybody from wanting to come on air. Um, and they would come on air even if we didn’t do the pre-call. But it is a marvelous relationship building moment. But there’s also this set of logistical questions or concerns about, oh, now, is Lee going to have to get involved in all the pre calls? But I’m wondering at this point of the conversation, can we kind of keep that in place. Stone has that pre call. Then they get the interview with Lee. But if once the conversation reaches the point where they are interested in hearing more about what we do, um, and and and even maybe even on the ones that just overtly express. Yeah. I’d like to at least get some input on how to get the most out of the interview that I did. So, you know, in that post interview call, if maybe a place to test this a little bit is once they get to a certain point in the process, bring Lee in and maybe even see if we can get Lee to come on camera, but at least bring him in to to that spot. That’s where my mind is at the moment.

James Castleberry: Yeah, I think I think that that leads to that, um, improving with the interpersonal communication. I think that it helps that visibility helps with trust. Um, that, that, uh, that maybe a little bit of personal connection, sharing a little bit of something. Um, you know, I didn’t learn about your family reunions or anything, stone, but I did find out a little bit about what you were doing, and I think that creates that that comfort level. And I think that builds a little psychological safety and trust. And so, um, in this, in the way that it’s being done sequentially. It sounds a little bit maybe like a job interview, right, where you’re screened by the HR person, and then you go to the the job interview and you meet with the hiring manager. Um, do you all think that there and you mentioned it a little bit stone, but do you think that there could be value? And I know that we have to, uh, conserve time. So maybe it’s a, a 15 to 30 minute call versus an hour call for, for both of y’all. But could there be value in y’all doing some of that together so that we can start working toward building that, that trust, that psychological safety, uh, in, in interpersonal relationships from the beginning?

Stone Payton: I mean, yeah, I mean, maybe I’m a little skeptical about it and a little reluctant to to jump on it with all fours just because of the time commitment, the dynamic. If I know I can get them with me and I can get them with Lee. And if I can adjust something about what we do when I’m with them and adjust something with them, when Lee’s with them and then and I guess it doesn’t completely bother me that it’s a little bit like a job interview if if what I’m doing is trying to bring them through a process and to some degree vet them as a candidate to be a studio partner. But I’m just so I’m a little reluctant and skeptical candidly, about getting Lee and I, both of us in the process all the way through. But I can see me doing something better and more in my conversation with them. Lee doing something better and more. Maybe when he does the interview, maybe he spends a little more time up front doing some of that rapport building, and then from there forward, if it’s someone we want, if it’s not someone we want to pursue as a studio partner, then I say put them through the regular process. But if it’s someone that we want to pursue as a studio partner, then, then maybe that call is definitely Leanne Stone with him. But maybe I’m being too resistant to your idea, I don’t know.

James Castleberry: No, no, no, Stone, I hear what you’re saying. And it’s about time management and and, uh, work life harmony. I totally get that. Um, but I also hear, uh, a little bit, uh, excitement about how, um, there may be ways to to make it a little bit more personal, to share a little bit more for for both y’all in other parts of the process that that might work. Um, Lee, can can you, uh, can you share a way that that that might be possible? Uh.

Lee Kantor: I don’t know. I’m the more we’re talking about it, I don’t see where the. I don’t think the problem thus far in the system, our system that we’re doing with Stone having the pre-call me doing the interview, stone having a post call that has Generated quite a few conversations with people of which none of them have have bought anything. So I’m very aware that it’s not working to the finish line, but I just can’t. I don’t know if the reason that’s the case is that because I’m not on camera with them? I mean, I’m not. I’m open to that might be a possibility and I’m willing to test that as a possibility, but I just don’t see thus far what we’ve been doing that that is the reason that they haven’t gone all the way to the finish line.

James Castleberry: Um, yeah. And I and I and I’m not saying that that is the reason I’m saying that. That’s one of the ways to build trust, right? I don’t want y’all to take that from that, y’all. Y’all have been successful. The challenge is getting to that that finish line. We’ve got these discovery calls from Stone afterwards. I’ve heard you say, uh, Lee and the other interviews that you want to get, uh, more knows the discovery calls are probably trying to figure out, um, you know, why we got the. No. And so I’m trying to help you all figure out a way that, um, we could use both your strengths and challenges that we learn in emotional intelligence, uh, to to try to get that close that you’re seeking.

Lee Kantor: Well, I mean, an area that I. That has come up that I think that I would like your opinion on as an EQ expert is that somebody mentioned to us that when, uh, when a potential buyer shares with us a level of enthusiasm and also skepticism, that we tend to focus more on the skepticism and less on the enthusiasm just because Stone and I are both from a sales and marketing background that we’re trying to, you know, eliminate objections and manage objections. So when we’re getting a combination of enthusiasm with skepticism, we have to be able to read those signals better and have better, um, a better way to move them more towards the enthusiasm side and maybe focus less on the skepticism side. So I’d like to get your thoughts on how to better read those signals and to deal with those signals to help move the prospect forward.

James Castleberry: Okay, so I think, I think this is one place where you think, uh, Lee, more systematically and, um, Stone’s going to come at this with a lot of positivity and problem solving, too. And so, um, you know, I would try to look at the trends that that you’re hearing in those calls and, and the direction that the call took. So do they talk to you about those, um, those things that they are in agreement on the things that they’re excited about? Um, and, and, and can those be used to help with those things that they’re skeptical about? And instead of diving right into the problem solving on what? Skeptical, um, are there ways that you can build on those things that are positive that might help them overcome the skepticism?

Stone Payton: We’re not on video, so you can’t see me grinning. But, um, in my in my as I continue to gray a little bit, I’m finally getting I’m finally learning that when Holly expresses my wife’s name is Holly, when she expresses frustration with something or something’s not quite going her way a what came out and was articulated as a strength. Optimism for me, obviously, apparently can really be a real weakness. So that combined with me jumping in and trying to solve the problem when all she really wants is somebody to shut up and listen, I’m thinking there’s probably some business application for some of that too, huh?

James Castleberry: No, no. Absolutely, absolutely. And you know, it’s sometimes it’s that Brene Brown helps us with a different sense of sympathy and empathy. And a lot of times, people that are low in empathy and they’re, they’re higher in optimism, optimism to the to the effect that may be impacting reality, testing that, um, we’ll find that they’re highly sympathetic. Oh, man, that’s really bad. Yeah. That’s bad. And then if you mix that with high problem solving, you want to go help them solve that problem when really they just kind of want to want you to sit there and feel it with them. And uh, and to kind of go through it with them a little bit, you know, rather than saying, uh oh, that’s pretty bad down there. Crawl down in the hole with them and sit a while, you know.

Stone Payton: Well, and those are my outliers, right. That was my most positive, highest score was optimism. And my lowest was empathy. And, um, and so no, this is very this is very helpful.

James Castleberry: Yeah. So, so so for you, Stan. What what happens with your optimism is that as soon as you do listen and they start coming up with their own solutions, now you’ve got problem solving and optimism to work with. Right, right. But but it’s first that that listening. Um, and and so yeah I think how do we take those, those strengths uh, how do we take the, the systematic way um, to more to Lee’s question of of about how, um, um, how do we not focus so much on, uh, the things that are skeptical about, uh, to the point that, um, maybe that becomes more of the conversation than what they’re excited about. And so, you know, maybe validate those things that they’re excited about. Could you see how how, you know, we could use some of the same things that you’re talking about with Holly Stone? Um, in this area where we’re listening to those challenges and we validate those things and maybe ask questions about, um, could some of those things, if we’re talking business, could some of those things that they’re so excited about, how could we use those things, uh, to help them overcome some of those things are more skeptical about.

Stone Payton: Yeah. And at a tactical level, what kind of questions can I ask or prompts can I deliver that will get them talking about what they’re excited about, as opposed to only what they’re skeptical about?

James Castleberry: Yeah. And then and then let them get to that conclusion. So you say, okay, so you’re so excited about this. So how, um, how would you feel better about these other things, uh, and balance that with what you’re excited about here. They’re gonna solve their own problem. And it might be something that you could jump on and go with to get them to the close.

Stone Payton: Right. Yeah.

James Castleberry: Lee, what do you think about that?

Lee Kantor: Uh, I’m on board. I think that that makes a lot of sense and that. I think there’s definitely a place for using emotional intelligence in these types of closing conversations. So, um. Yeah, I’m on board.

James Castleberry: Yeah. So I think, you know, you each have individual goals, uh, that came, uh, from our conversations. And so if you think about those goals, you think about the accountability of those. Um, are there ways in the business that you could use, uh, those goals, uh, together, uh, to move forward, to move from the discussion where we’re not focusing as much on. Let me just ask you the question as to tell you, how could you use the goals that we set for both of you, uh, to move that, that, um, that challenge forward where the focus is not as much on, um, problem solving for them, but working with them in their strengths.

Stone Payton: I don’t know that I have the answer for that, but I think we need to find the answer for that. And and it could be as simple as now that Lee and I have this, um, yeah, it’s always helpful to have, like, a common language, right? Like a common nomenclature. So we know what to call some things, and we know a couple of the, um, the things that were surfaced through going through the assessment and the debrief with you. So there’s always power in this, uh, this accountability partner kind of thing. Um, and to try to keep each other in check on that or at least, at least bring that up, um, but also working hard in all of our messaging and all of that stuff to take the best of, of both of what we bring to the table and get it folded into those communications. I’m thinking.

James Castleberry: Yeah, I heard in another interview that y’all were talking about the the frequent writing and, uh, and then putting things in people’s, um, inboxes as, as quickly as possible. Um, uh, what what what is the greatest strength that you guys bring together, uh, to a client that they may not see in just the writing?

Lee Kantor: I think part of, um, what we bring to a client or a prospect together is that both John and I have similar values, but we both have a different kind of way about going about things. So it’s like you mentioned it, stone has a level of optimism, and he has a really, um, kind of enthusiastic personality. And all of that comes across where I’m more quiet and I’m more introspective, but I’m also good at analyzing things and maybe seeing things that neither one of them saw. So together, it’s pretty powerful when, um, we’re both together with somebody and they have an issue and we’re able to really tag team and get to the heart of the issue that maybe they didn’t see, or a way to achieve the outcome that they hadn’t thought about before. So they can get on board pretty quickly because we’re seeing it through two different lenses and together it becomes very powerful.

James Castleberry: Yeah. So but right now, what I think I’m hearing from y’all is that those strengths that you have, and even the way you balance one another because, you know, it’s like my wife, uh, my, uh, as an analogy, um, I, I things get blurry far away. Uh, for her, it’s hard for her to read, uh, the ingredients on a bottle that’s close to her. I said. So, you know, between the both of us, we’ve got one person that has perfect eyesight. So in this business, I think y’all balance really, really well based on what I see in your results and what we’ve talked about. Um, and so, uh, do you think that you could see value in, um, in when you’re both having this conversation with someone that you may be bringing on board. And this will this will be even more important as you, as you scale is to, uh, to focus in rather than the problem solving in those, those areas. Look at what they’re enthusiastic about. Look at what they’re positive about, what they enjoy about it, and then talk to them. Uh, because y’all can both problem solve together, bouncing off of one another with, uh, with a client. But think about how that stuff can be, um, uh, how they may be able to use. And sometimes maybe y’all go into the coaching mode that you both can do in business. Really well, go into the coaching mode there of asking them, well, these things that you enjoy, how can we use that to overcome some of some of these challenges that that you’ve brought up? Is there a way that you can see how we can overcome some of these challenges that you’re bringing up?

Stone Payton: I do think there’s power in that. And then I also just wrote down, and this is beginning to address my logistics, my skepticism and all that or my hesitation around logistics. We have this process with the with me doing the Pre-call lead, doing the interview, me doing the the post interview call. And it is overtly framed and always includes helping them use things that we have seen and done over the last 21 plus years. On how to fully leverage the fact that you’ve invested the time and energy to do the interview. And then there’s there in some of those conversations, there has been from me, um, opening up the conversation about exploring the idea of being a studio partner, you know, in Pittsburgh or San Diego or whatever. And now what I’m thinking is the if it’s someone that I really think should explore, that I should tell them that give them like the the easy next step, but then the next step is this fourth step that we don’t have built in officially. And that is a conversation with with me and Lee and the person so that we get to bring everything you’re describing. We get to actually bring it into the equation. And that is worth Lee’s time and my time together. To have that, to have a conversation in that fourth step, is that make sense?

James Castleberry: Perfect sense for me. What do you think, Lee?

Lee Kantor: Um, I think a way to address that might be maybe when you’re doing that, call the third step. Write the follow up. Yeah. Is that I am. You only do it when I’m available so that you can say, you know what? Let’s call Lee. And and it’s just part of that system in terms of I’m available. So like I’m booking myself for that call, and I’m available if needed so that I can jump on the call immediately. So it looks like it’s a hey, that’d be great if we got Lee’s input. And then you’re like, let me text him. And then I jump on the call so it doesn’t turn into a fourth. Let’s logistically, you know, try to schedule a fourth conversation. It just becomes part of the third conversation.

James Castleberry: So I love that. And I’ll tell you why. And then I’ll get both your thoughts on it. But I love that because part of building trust is that visibility and that availability. And you guys are partners supporting this new client and and them knowing it’s sort of like having an open door policy that you can use in real time.

Stone Payton: And choose not to use if, if, if.

James Castleberry: Circumstances don’t if you don’t need.

Stone Payton: It. Right, right, right right, right. Okay.

James Castleberry: What do you think.

Stone Payton: Well, at first I was.

Lee Kantor: I well I think it’s about trying to shrink this, like like you said, um, uh, James, about the. This feels like an inner. Now, I got to go to a fourth conversation with these people, like I, you know, I just was on a show, like, what’s happening here? So if they’ve already agreed to three, let’s see if we how much stuff we can squeeze in those three. Um, and this might be the thing that puts him over the edge because to your point about this shows how important this is. We’re demonstrating. Oh, this is important. I’m going to call my partner. He’s going to jump on the phone right now on camera, uh, to, uh, you know, continue this conversation that is elevating the importance and demonstrating that we’re, you know, delivering on what we’re promising. I.

James Castleberry: I think I think toward building trust. Y’all see how that can be? If it was you and you were about to join with someone and you’re having a conversation? You said. And someone just tells you, well, let me get him on the phone. And, uh, and, you know, this is important to to all of us. So. So let me get on as far as your trust, as far as your personal connection with the people that you’re about to go into business with. Uh, how do you think that would feel for you?

Stone Payton: Well, now that we’ve talked it through, I feel like I think it would feel good when when when the idea first surfaced a few moments ago, it felt a little bit like, um, a little bit of trickery or subterfuge or like, misdirection. But it’s not if legitimately Lee is scheduled for that time. And at some point in the conversation, based on the conversation, I make the decision to bring Lee in, you know? So so I’m feeling better about it now. Yeah.

Lee Kantor: How would you feel, James, if that happened? It.

James Castleberry: No. So so I think, you know, I think I’d feel good about it. I think I’d be like, okay, they’re dedicated. They’re working with me. We’re problem solving together. Uh, you’re already starting to team at that moment. Uh, and you’re demonstrating, uh, again, in a virtual environment, it’s more difficult. And so, you know, I’m studying some of the cues that are different in a virtual environment because you can’t feel that emotion like you can in person. You can’t feel that a person is at ease, you can’t feel tension if something’s going the wrong way. But virtually, with that type of availability, well, let’s hop on a call. Let’s bring so and so in. We’re on the camera. Hey, I’m happy to help. What’s going on, guys? Um, that type of openness, that type of availability that that helps with trust, that helps with psychological safety, that helps build a team.

Lee Kantor: I mean, it’s definitely an experiment we should pursue. Yeah, I don’t see a negative of of trying this for the next handful.

Stone Payton: I don’t either, and we could do it in such a way that the it could be a calendar that is specifically for that type of call. It could be tied to your availability and mine. And then you would know because it’s on that colored calendar, you know, in your calendar it’s colored orange or something, whatever. And then you know that that you’re there doing your all your stuff. You always do. And I can text you and say, hey, join this call. And then other times I won’t text and you’ll be doing whatever, you know, um, back office stuff you’d be doing during that time anyway, right?

Lee Kantor: Right.

James Castleberry: And then some of it, uh, so so I think what I hear y’all saying is that it’s worth trying. I think, Lee, it goes right along with what you’ve said before about, um, getting to the nose because from each. No, it’s not as useful if you don’t learn anything. You know that sociology teaches us that, uh, it’s faster to the production line. If you bust a hundred, uh, cups or pots than it is to try to make the perfect one. And so that’s where we get this idea about hearing nos. Um, but from every pot that we break, we need to understand why it didn’t work for us. And so I think things like this, in learning from those nos, uh, and in, in building more interpersonal relationships, virtually being visible, um, being responsive, um, and coming at it from a, okay, this is what you’re really happy about, about the business. And so how can we use those things to make you more comfortable with those things that you might be more skeptical about in a, in an approach?

Lee Kantor: Yeah. I’m I’m with you. I think this is definitely, Um. Um, a great next thing to experiment on.

James Castleberry: And I know this is this is not. And I know that, um, your systematic thinkers, one of you is a very systematic thinker. One of you is a big problem solver, but you both are high in optimism. And so you can be optimistic about trying the process, but also skeptical of of making a change to a process that you believe is working. Um, but what I think I’ve heard is that some of the challenges is not getting to closing.

Lee Kantor: I mean, I think some of our challenge is that we’re not in front of enough people, and the people that we have thus far are not evangelizing enough. So we’re not choosing the right people to be evangelists, and we’re not getting the volume of people to know about what we’re doing. That combination, I think, is what’s, um, kind of slowing down our growth to 100.

James Castleberry: Okay. So, um, to, to get to at least, um, you know, for our conversation today to get to one, one process that that maybe you could experiment with, uh, drawing on both your strengths and, and your challenge, individual challenges to try to help the business grow, uh, especially in this virtual environment where there are some challenges, even greater challenges. What is one thing that we could, um, we could grow, develop in our process, change a little bit that that we think might, uh, might yield a different result?

Stone Payton: Well, for me, Lee’s right about the other things he said. But within the context of this particular conversation, to me, an actionable set of steps is to is to rework the way we do Three relationship building moment three that that post-interview call where it’s tied to a calendar, where Lee’s going to be doing office work or whatever anyway, he’s going to and and I may even say something in my pre-call we’ll see. I might adjust that a little bit, but in that call and then make it where it’s organic, perfectly appropriate when it’s when it makes sense to bring Lee into that conversation. If it starts to go down, you know the desired path with somebody we think we might want to work with.

James Castleberry: Yeah, even the name of the call was relationship building. Right. And so this is where drawing on that, that interpersonal relationship, um, and, and then building trust virtually by being available, being visible, uh, anything that we could do that would contribute to that when, when you get, um, a hint of and I’ll ask this question and I’ll continue a thought. Did you all share your results with one another? Did you want to?

Stone Payton: We did like, vaguely, but like I didn’t send him my report. I don’t think he didn’t send me his. But we we talked about it a little bit like the high, the high points. And we probably will put it, put them both in a shared folder. But no we really hadn’t.

James Castleberry: Okay. So so if you’re thinking about targeting that rbm3, uh, and the first two words are relationship building, think about your emotional intelligence results and what you’re both strong at and where you both may have challenges so that y’all can leverage that with this client. That may have questions.

Stone Payton: Right. And again, some of that, yes, we should definitely put some planning and forethought in it. And based on our history together, especially in the olden days when we were together in a studio, uh, some of that might be a little bit like riding a bike. We, we, we were able to do that pretty darn effectively back in the day, weren’t we?

Lee Kantor: Yeah, I mean, that’s one of I think the thing that makes us a good team is that we complement our strengths and weaknesses.

James Castleberry: So I definitely see that. I could see that, y’all. Uh, as far as, uh, business partners, as far as going forward, I can see the balance. And, you know, we talked about achieving balance, being what was most important. And so if you put both of your, uh, reports together, y’all achieve a great deal of balance here. Um, like my wife and I, you know, having perfect sight, you know, mine being, uh, farther away, hers being shorter. Uh, and so this could be a part of the business that that, uh, that could, could take you farther. Um, and, uh, just by doing what you used to do, uh, and do. Well, and that you actually enjoyed, y’all. Yeah, yeah. What do you think?

Stone Payton: I like.

Lee Kantor: It. Yeah, I think it’s definitely, um, a great outcome for this call. And thank you so much for being part of it. And, James, if somebody wants to learn more about your practice or, um, do you have a website, is there a best way to connect?

James Castleberry: Yeah, it’s really simple. Uh, it’s a leader e a emotional intelligence is AI, but the website is leader e.com, and all of my information is there. We, uh, we help, uh, businesses, uh, we do team workshops, we do executive coaching. And I’m also able to certify people in emotional intelligence tools.

Stone Payton: Well, James, you have definitely lived up to your advance press. Man, thank you so much for investing the time and energy to work with us. I’m sure we’ll get a chance to talk quite a bit more, but, uh, we can’t thank you enough. Man, this has been fantastic.

James Castleberry: No, no, thank you for having me. I sure appreciate being here. And I know, uh, I can tell already that the, uh, the wheels are turning and how y’all might be able to, uh, at least go after this. Uh, rbm3 goal. I can’t wait to hear how it works out.

Stone Payton: Well, we will definitely keep you posted, man. Thanks again.

Speaker1: Thanks for listening to Scaling in Public the next Business RadioX 100 markets. Are you ready to enjoy a steady stream of discovery calls? And finally, stop being a best kept secret? It’s time to step out of the shadows and watch your coaching business grow. Let’s fill your calendar ten discovery calls in a month, guaranteed. Go to Birr to download the free Business RadioX playbook.

Breaking the Chains: Revolutionizing Addiction Treatment for a Healthier Tomorrow

February 24, 2026 by angishields

ALR-NAATP-Feature
Association Leadership Radio
Breaking the Chains: Revolutionizing Addiction Treatment for a Healthier Tomorrow
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

In this episode of Association Leadership Radio, Lee Kantor interviews Marvin Ventrell, CEO of the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers (NAATP). Marvin discusses NAATP’s 47-year history, its mission to support and professionalize addiction treatment, and the evolving landscape of the field. Topics include the medical nature of addiction, industry growth, the impact of insurance reforms, regulatory standards, and ongoing challenges such as stigma and funding. Marvin also highlights NAATP’s advocacy, educational resources, and efforts to ensure quality care, encouraging listeners to access trusted treatment through accredited providers.

NAATP Logo

Marvin-VentrellMarvin Ventrell was named CEO of the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers (NAATP) in 2015, continuing his decades long year career as a practicing attorney, professor, professional association director, and addiction treatment executive.

Mr. Ventrell’s career has been devoted to advocating for populations in need and building legal and health care system responses to meet those needs. In addition to serving in executive leadership roles in several national social welfare and justice agencies, he has authored two textbooks on law and social justice, book chapters and peer reviewed articles on law, medicine, social services, behavioral health, and addiction treatment and recovery.

He is a frequent commentator in the national media and lecturer at treatment programs, conferences, universities, and agencies.

Prior to joining NAATP, Mr. Ventrell served as Program Director at Harmony Foundation and as a consultant to CeDAR at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, both Colorado based addiction treatment programs.

He testified before the United States Congress and has served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. He is the recipient of numerous distinctions including the American Bar Association National Advocacy Award, the National Council of Juvenile Court Judges Meritorious Service Award, the University of Colorado School of Medicine Kempe Award, and the Ashley Innovator Award given for impact in the field of recovery through innovation, commitment, and dynamic thinking.

Mr. Ventrell’s focus while leading NAATP has been to secure the place of addiction treatment in health care through the establishment of treatment program ethics, professionalism, integrity, and evidence-based efficacy.

NAATP, founded in 1978, is professional membership association of addiction treatment providers whose mission is to provide leadership, advocacy, training, and member support services to ensure the equitable availability and highest quality of addiction treatment.

NAATP has prospered under Mr. Ventrell’s leadership and in 2020, the association created the Foundation for Recovery Science and Education (FoRSE), an unprecedented effort to collect and measure patient treatment characteristics and outcomes on a global scale.

Follow NAATP on LinkedIn.

Episode Highlights

  • Overview of the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers (NAATP) and its history.
  • The mission and role of NAATP in supporting addiction treatment providers.
  • Evolution of addiction treatment practices over the past 47 years.
  • Types of addictions addressed in treatment, including substance and process addictions.
  • The impact of the opioid crisis and the ongoing prevalence of alcohol-related issues.
  • Business models of addiction treatment providers, including non-profit and for-profit structures.
  • Trends in consolidation within the addiction treatment industry.
  • Standards and regulations in addiction treatment and the importance of accreditation.
  • Financial challenges faced by treatment providers and the significance of fair reimbursement rates.
  • Efforts to reduce stigma surrounding addiction and improve public understanding of addiction as a disease.

Transcript-iconThis transcript is machine transcribed by Sonix.

 

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: Broadcasting live from the Business RadioX studios in Atlanta, Georgia. It’s time for Association Leadership Radio. Now, here’s your host.

Lee Kantor: Lee Kantor. Here, another episode of Association Leadership Radio. And this is going to be a good one. Today on the show, we have the CEO of the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers, Marvin Ventrell. Welcome.

Marvin Ventrell: Thank you. Lee. Glad to be here.

Lee Kantor: Well, I’m excited to learn about your association. Tell us about the NAATP. How you serving folks?

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah, well, we’ve been serving them for 47 years. I just finished before we jumped on a letter to our members thanking them for 47 years of service. So what NAATP is the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers is our country’s professional membership society and trade association for treatment programs. So our members, thousands of them across the country, are sometimes referred to as rehab, although I don’t love that term because it really doesn’t mean much because really what treatment providers are is healthcare. Addiction is a disease. But we, uh, for now, for 47 years, have been serving, uh, those folks, helping them be successful, helping them improve their practice, helping them be visible and ultimately helping people recover from the deadly disease of addiction.

Lee Kantor: So can you talk about 47 years ago, how did this even come about? What was kind of the genesis of it?

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah, yeah. Well, it’s very different marketplace now than it was 47 years ago. You know, we we exist as a substance use disorder is the technically appropriate and medical term for addiction. Addiction has kind of a pejorative, kind of a negative sound to it. We use it all the time. In fact, it’s in our name. But sud substance use disorder is really the medical term. It’s a disease centered in the brain with biological, psychological and social manifestations as how we talk about it in, in medicine and in social science. So these days we deliver health care. But in 1978, when we were founded, addiction treatment was really still in its infancy. You know, we had some programs like Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation, and there were a handful of treatment providers around the country who were doing this work and wisely said, let’s not do this independently of one another. Let’s come together, share our best practices, and increase the proliferation of of treatment centers in the country. There are there are there are millions of people suffering from the disease. And everybody will benefit if we come together as a trade association and society. So I believe, and I think there’s plenty of evidence to back this up, that professions need professional societies. I’m a lawyer also. Right. So lawyers have have the American Bar Association and its various tenants. Doctors have the American Medical Association engineers, accountants have professional societies. These professional societies are the glue that hold a profession together, support it as a whole, increase its importance and let the public know how valuable these services are. So. So that’s, uh, that’s what happened. A handful of of people who were running treatment centers said, let’s get together. And they had a meeting in California and formed the association with, you know, a few dozen members. Um, and we’ve been growing ever since.

Lee Kantor: Now, were the original addictions that were being treated. Were they ever alcohol or was alcohol kind of seen as something separate than than the drugs or the the afflictions that you’re dealing with or we’re dealing with then and now.

Marvin Ventrell: No. Well, you know, if there’s one constant in addiction or substance use disorder, it’s alcohol. So in those days it was primarily alcohol. We, you know, we treatment was thought of primarily as treatment for alcoholism. And, um, but there were other substances. Drugs have been around for a long time, you know, all kinds of drugs, um, benzodiazepines, uh, stimulants, heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine. You know, these kinds of drugs have been around. Well, meth came later, but these kinds of drugs have always been around. But but predominantly in the early days, it was treatment for alcoholism. Now. I mean, the country knows about the opioid crisis, which has, uh, killed millions of, of Americans. And, um, it became a national crisis. But I’ll tell you, even though it is imperative that we address it and other drugs. Alcohol remains the biggest killer. People don’t know that. But ultimately, the the the substance that harms Americans the most is alcohol. And um, and so, you know, I always try to make that point. Alcohol is a painful alcohol disorder is a painful disease. It kills you slowly. It makes you sick slowly. It kills you slowly. That’s very different than the lethality of a drug, like, uh, like heroin, um, which can kill you in one bad use. So, you know, all our work treatment centers deal with all of it, and we call it, you know, these are, uh, co-morbid substances, poly substances. Most people who come to treatment Lee are not one thing. They typically have an alcohol disorder, but they also typically have another drug that is harming them. And and more frequently than not these days it is an opioid. Um, so yeah.

Lee Kantor: Now, when it comes to addiction, you also include like gambling addiction or sex addiction that don’t really, uh, tie itself to a substance.

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah. I mean, that’s a really good question. And it depends on the treatment program. Treatment programs need to be good at what they do. So when you look at our membership, for example, at Net-A-Porter, you’ll find this, uh, directory, it’s called the ID, the addiction industry directory. And it will list all of the treatment providers, the treatment providers around the country. And it will indicate what they, what they, what they, uh, cover. So you will have programs that that are just focused on alcohol use. Um, most programs will will focus on most of the dangerous substances. But some of our programs, in fact, many of our programs also, um, focus, um, on what we call the process disorders, because they are addictive by nature and they’re, they’re included as, as as addictive disorders in the DSM. That’s the manual that mental health uses to diagnose things. And so gambling and sex addiction absolutely are at the top of those lists. Um, and gambling has proliferated since um, sports gambling became legalized across the board. I mean, I love ESPN, I’m a sports fan. I watch it all the time, but I, you know, every five minutes there’s another ad for how to gamble on a sport. And it’s it’s, uh, it’s ruining people’s lives. I’ll just say it as plainly as that. It is ruining people’s lives. And, um, you know, uh, folks are making a lot of money from it.

Marvin Ventrell: You know, it. So you put at the end of the ad, you know, if you have a gambling problem, please, please seek help. Well, okay. That’s good. I guess it’s better to have that on there than not, but but frankly, I wish this, uh, this proliferation of gambling hadn’t happened. One of the things I like to tell people, whether it’s a process disorder or, um, a substance, the more of a harmful thing you put in front of the human population, the more harm there will be. So when there’s a proliferation of a certain drug, that drug becomes, uh, more and more dangerous. Marijuana, for example, legalized in in many places, medical marijuana legalized in almost almost all places. Um, uh, addiction, uh, marijuana psychosis has, has been significantly on the rise because of the potency of, of marijuana. And, you know, sometimes when you talk about marijuana, people are thinking, you know, this sounds like an old, um, uh, conservative sort of, um, you know, uh, uh, abnormal fear of marijuana. Look, everybody has smoked some weed in college, that kind of thing. But that’s not what we’re talking about. We’re talking about people, especially young brains, who get who, who don’t develop properly or later in life who become like, literally experienced marijuana psychosis. So, um, I’m not sure what I was going with all that. Lee, but but that’s, uh, that’s a piece of it as well.

Lee Kantor: Now, how do you kind of draw the lines of what addiction merits a treatment providers help like? Because you can make a case for, well, obesity and I’m addicted to junk food or I’m addicted to I mean, cigarettes, um, is a substance. Like, how do you decide what substances warrant a treatment for and what substances are just like, well, you know, you’re a human, so eat what you want, you know, sure, obesity is an issue, but you know, we’re not going to cover that. As you know, we’re not going to have treatment for that.

Marvin Ventrell: Well you know. Yeah, that’s this is a really interesting point that you bring up. So. Eating disorder is a medical disorder. It is a disorder again in the, in the DSM.

Lee Kantor: Right. But eating disorder like a bulimia or anorexia. But what about just the person that is 100 pounds overweight right.

Marvin Ventrell: Or the 15 that I can’t seem to lose for that for that matter. As you get a little older, the gut doesn’t want to go away. No. That’s right. So here’s a way to think about it. Let’s use alcohol as an example. Addiction or substance use disorder? Let’s say it that way. You know, when we just say addiction, we think, well, is a person an addict or is or is the person not an addict? As if that’s just one thing. That’s an artificial way to talk about it. What we should talk about is a continuum of disorder. So on a continuum of substance use disorder, using alcohol as an example, there are many people who have no issue with it. Right? And and never will. Now, there’s a lot of reasons for that. One of which is, is, um, an individual’s makeup. Um, for example, um, uh, diction is heritable. Uh, if, if an individual has parents who have suffered from substance use disorder, they are much more likely themselves to suffer from a substance use disorder. So there’s a lot of there’s a lot of biology in all of this. Remember I said it’s a biological, psychological and social disorder. So the brain science, you know we can literally see addiction in the brain. So part of your answer is we can literally see addiction in the brain. The choice mechanisms in the frontal lobe of of a human’s brain are interrupted, literally interrupted, so that they can’t and don’t make good choices relative to substance use. Once the addiction takes hold, takes hold. Okay, so set that aside for a second and let’s talk about this continuum.

Marvin Ventrell: Um, some people have no problem with it. Others develop a problem. Right. So, I mean, and how do you know you have a problem? Well, you don’t feel as well physically. You probably don’t feel as well emotionally. You might start experiencing some depression or anxiety. And most people will have a small substance use disorder that they can address, maybe on their own by by just good practices. That happens a lot. Maybe a little help from family members or friends, maybe seeing a therapist, right. Who can help one recover from a mild form of disorder. That is a substance use disorder. That individual probably does not need to go to residential addiction treatment at all. But on the other end of the spectrum are people who, if they continue to drink for another week, they’re going to die, right? It’s going to kill them. That person needs to go to treatment. So where in in the line of all of that, uh, do we do we fall? Well, that’s why a professional has to do a clinical assessment. There are substance use disorder. Physicians and counselors have the ability to assess an individual’s problem with drugs or alcohol, and determine the appropriate placement. There is a colleague organization of ours called Asam. That’s the American Society for Addiction Medicine. And they are the docs, and they are the docs who work in the treatment centers. And they have what are called the Asam placement criteria. And those are the the technical rules by which we determine the level of someone’s, uh, disorder and where therefore in the treatment context, to place them.

Lee Kantor: Now, you mentioned earlier that addiction’s been around forever. Um, does everybody is this just inherent in humans that everybody kind of has a drug of choice and that they could be susceptible to, you know, taking it too far and it becomes disruptive in their life, you know. Um, like you mentioned, the 15 pounds you’d like to lose, like, you know, just because you like cookies, you know, once in a while, you know, and obviously you’re not eating cookies at every meal, you know, 24 over seven. But some people may be they behave in that manner. Is that just inherent in in being human, that there is something that could we could, um, turn into an addiction if we’re, you know, if we let it or if it’s available or it’s in our face.

Marvin Ventrell: Another really good question. We’re learning more about that. So first of all, I need to stay in my own lane. I’m not a doctor or a clinician. I’m the I’m the I’m the CEO of the provider association. I know a lot about this field, but I’m not qualified to render certain kinds of opinions. But what I will tell you is that we are learning more and more through such things as gene markers that people do indeed have a propensity to become addicted to a substance. There are people who, if they, you know, uh, use cocaine once, will never be able to put it down. There are people who use cocaine once and say, I didn’t. I don’t get what all the fuss is about. I didn’t really like that. Well, it’s the same thing. I mean, let’s put it in a clinical context and assume that it’s that they used exactly the same thing at the exact same time and place. Those two individuals, uh, biology and brain chemistry, respond to that drug differently. Um, it doesn’t call for more. There are folks who, as soon as that substance is ingested, the brain calls for more. And it wants to prioritize that above calling for other things, ultimately including your own health and even caring for your your your children. You know, we say things like, how could that mother possibly, uh, choose drugs and alcohol over her child? Well, this is a horrible thing, but at some point, literally, the brain is incapable of, uh, making those choices. So, um, human beings seem for as long as, as as we have known, human and substances have been available.

Marvin Ventrell: Human beings have suffered from them. In the 19th century, think about in the 1800s and early 1900s, um, alcoholism was rampant. And by the way, people don’t know this, but cocaine was widely used in the 1800s by typically by sort of aristocratic society in America. So this is not like some crazy thing that just started in the 1960s and 70s. It’s been around for a long, for a long time. Um, but, uh, it does seem that human beings, there’s something about the human condition that makes us us tend toward the abuse of substances. About 50 million people aged 12 and over in the United States qualify or meet what we say meet the criteria for a substance use disorder. So I guess, in a layman’s way of answering your question, um, there does seem to be something in the human condition that makes us prone to to substance use disorder. But again, at the same time, some people aren’t. Most of us know folks like this. You know, you think about your your youth, your high school or your college days and you went to parties. You could almost, you know, can you think back at like, that guy was drinking a little differently than everybody else, right? That woman was drinking a little differently or using a little differently. The rest of us grew up and put it down, but some people didn’t. What’s that all about? Well, it it’s it’s about a lot of things, but it’s certainly about about their biological makeup as well.

Lee Kantor: Now, in the way that you serve your members, um, are these members, are they like, what’s the business model for a treatment? Um, provider? Like what? What is their are they going about this as the medical profession, trying to help folks or is there a business like are there franchises of this. Like what is the business around treatment?

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah. Yeah. Um, well, it’s a business and it, it exists as a for profit business. In some instances it exists as a not for profit in some instances. Historically, what you what you had like back in the 70s and mostly in the 80s were a lot of very small, typically nonprofit, um, residential treatment programs. So there would be a program that had, let’s say, 50 beds. It had a small budget, maybe of somewhere from 5 to $10 million in gross annual revenue. It was probably founded as a nonprofit 500 1C3. And it had a tiny profit margin. You know, one, two, you know, it was 4% back in the day. If you had a profit margin of 4% in this business, you were killing it. But look, if your job was simply to keep the doors open and keep good treatment coming, it wasn’t about profit sharing. That’s fine. You’re right. You just got to stay in business. But, um, as as the work continued and as it became more and more possible to to make money. This is America. This is what we do. This is capitalism. As it became more and more possible to make money by providing treatment. And there’s no reason why a for profit doesn’t provide excellent treatment. Um, uh, then the business models began to develop in much more sophisticated ways.

Marvin Ventrell: So, so these days, um, look, NAATP is a microcosm of treatment in the country. There are probably as many as 30,000 treatment programs, recovery programs of some kind that purport to do something. Well, that’s 30,000. You know, NAATP is about a thousand, right? It’s a voluntary membership association. Our members are comprised of that little small member that I talked to you about a minute ago, with $5 million all the way to our highest category, which is which is gross annual revenue in excess of 50 million. And even that pales in comparison to the large behavioral health companies that have now come along. So, um, as is typical, what has happened in this economy as it happened in other health care economies, is we have a field that has consolidated through mergers and acquisitions, and there are fewer of the little guys and more of the big guys. When you produce scale, you know, when you go from 50 beds to um, uh, 15,000 beds. When you produce that kind of scale, if run properly, there can be considerable revenue. We have seen in recent years the advent of Wall Street money, private equity has come into addiction treatment in a big way.

Marvin Ventrell: Um, there’s a couple of reasons for that. One is the Affordable Care Act, what we think of as Obamacare. The Affordable Care Act created a revenue stream for addiction treatment by making substance use disorder one of the ten essential health care benefits that must exist in policies traded on the exchange. So boom, we’ve got now we’ve got a revenue source. So if a, uh, commercial insurance, uh, payer covers addiction, uh, and trades on the market, they have to cover, uh, addiction. And according to the law, they have to cover it with parity. That is to say, uh, on par with other disorders. They can’t have special rules for addiction. So between this parity law and Affordable Care Act, there’s a revenue stream that didn’t used to exist. And so that that brings investors um, and entrepreneurs. And so we see all manner of treatment programs now that range, as I say, from these, from these small ones to large behavioral health companies. And the trend, uh, has continued toward consolidation, um, now probably going on 20 years. So, um, our association doesn’t look like it used to look, it’s not a bunch of these small providers. It’s it’s a lot more large behavioral health companies that do all kinds of things, including substance use disorder.

Lee Kantor: So now, as part of your organization, are you do you have kind of standards that have to be upheld, or is there something from that standpoint like kind of, um, a way of doing business or their do’s and don’ts. Like what is kind of because like you mentioned, it’s kind of the wild West out there to some degree.

Marvin Ventrell: Well, yeah, I think we’re taming the Wild West a bit. Addiction is, as I said, back in the 70s, it wasn’t even thought of as part of healthcare. It wasn’t generally understood that this was a this was a brain disease. But as it as it developed into healthcare, um, and it became more professionalized, you know, in the early days, it was kind of like institutionalized Alcoholics Anonymous. I should step back. Our country’s response to alcoholism, uh, that ultimately become substance use disorder, really very much begins with the good progress made by the founding of Alcoholics Anonymous in 1939 and into the 1940s. That’s a social program, right? Aa is a social program. It’s a good social program. Helps millions of people. Um, early treatment was kind of an incorporation of Alcoholics Anonymous within a residential setting. What happens from there, though? Is it professionalizes? Right. We recognize the science. We recognize pharmacology can help with all of this. And so it professionalizes into a profession that needs standards. So back to your question. The answer is yes. First of all, there are accrediting bodies. We’re not an accrediting body. We’re the professional membership society. But there are accrediting bodies. We require all of our members to be accredited by by one of the accrediting bodies.

Marvin Ventrell: The the primary accrediting bodies are to the joint what’s called the Joint Commission. And another one is called Carf CRF. And they accredit and they have standards. You can’t be accredited unless you meet certain operational standards. So their concern is primarily quality and safety. So we here at Natpe are primarily concerned with proper operations. And so we have a document called the Quality Assurance Guidebook. The Quality Assurance Guidebook, which we just published the second edition of, and it identifies the 12 core competencies of operating an addiction treatment center. Um, you know, ranging from, you know, proper workforce to, um, billing practices, um, uh, you know, ratio of, uh, patients to counselors, all of those kinds of things. So. So, yes, I would say that addiction medicine and addiction treatment has not quite gotten to the level of other, more long standing medical practices. We don’t have the rigor of, I don’t know, orthopedics or, you know, um, uh, cardiology, but we’re getting there. And, um, and folks should not go to treatment programs that don’t have that accreditation and follow things like the quality assurance standards.

Lee Kantor: So what, um, in what kind of ways are you helping your members? Like, is there, uh, chapters around the country, or do you have, uh, annual meetings? Like, in what ways are you kind of serving your membership?

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah, we don’t have chapters. You know, off and on. We’ve toyed with having local affiliates, but we just exist as a as a national, uh, entity. And we do a number of things. We have an educational program that includes frequent educational seminars. We mostly do those through webinars. These days. We have a major national conference every year. Our 47th will be in May this this year in, in, um, uh, in Florida, uh, Amelia Island, Florida. And the nation’s providers will come together for that conference and learn and share information. And we put on that meeting. So we do we have these educational programs, educational resources. Um, another thing we do is advocate for our members in the political sphere. So, um, we have a dedicated public policy advocacy component of our work, where we go to Washington and fight for programs that help treatment centers be effective and thereby help people recover from the disease. So funding is hugely important, and we always have to be advocating for for that. We also want to get our folks paid. And so the primary way in which, you know, rich people will always be able to afford treatment, they can write a check, but it’s expensive. You know, it’s a $50,000 to stay at a good treatment program for a month. And that’s that might sound like a not a lot of money, but it’s relative to health care. It’s not. Think what it would cost you to stay in the hospital for 30 days. It’s a lot more than than $50,000. I mean, a test could cost $50,000. So what we need to do is ensure that this funding streams from our public money.

Marvin Ventrell: Medicare and Medicaid continue to flow, but also and our members are mostly commercial insurance providers. Also that that commercial insurance the big the big providers, what we think of as the providers, um, the four major payers in addiction treatment and they, you know, Aetna um United uh, Optum, those, those, those folks are reimbursing treatment providers at fair rates. And that’s really a tough a tough thing because rates by and large are not adequate. And so we fight to get our members paid at the level that they ought to be paid. And we argue with the insurance, uh, payers that the better the treatment, the more you should pay. Right? We measure our work and, and um, and pay us accordingly. The there’s actually a very significant natap program that’s happening happening right now. It’s called the tick program tick. It stands for Transparency and coverage. Some years ago this is a little known piece of legislation, but some years ago, Congress passed a law that requires insurers to disclose their reimbursement rates on in a national database so that we could have transparency, understand what we’re what we’re looking at, and create appropriate competition and and quality. So all the insurers did this, but they did it in such a way that the the average person cannot possibly dissect and figure out this information. They’re what are called machine readable files. So a human can’t do it. Right. You got to have sophisticated machine readable file, um, technology. So. All right. Well then then that’s what we’re going to develop.

Marvin Ventrell: So NAATP in combination with a company called Third Horizon. Um, uh, pulled the data, uh, sorted the data. And just for the first time in 2025, we produced a report that discloses what the major national insurance companies are paying, and that is designed to democratize the field. It’s designed to create fair competition and to give the, um, give the treatment provider a fair shot at, um, uh, negotiating for good rates. If you don’t know what the it has been traditionally against the, the, um, rules to communicate your rates with another provider. Um, and in fact the, the reimbursement contracts typically prohibit that. Well, now, because of this law and our ability at NAATP And nobody else has done this, to my knowledge. To pull this data, we now give our our members the opportunity to look at this report and say, hey, this is what you’re paying us. We provide the same service as this guy across the street. How about we equalize those those those rates as opposed to it just being willy nilly? There’s a saying in our field regarding payment from an insurance company that if you’ve met one payer in one state, you’ve met one payer in one state, meaning that it is all over the board. It’s different from payer to payer, from state to state, um, even within states. Uh, and it’s very different. So it’s I would say that the payment reimbursement payment is, is more Wild West than anything still. And we need to we just need to make it fair.

Lee Kantor: Now what do you need more of? How can we help? Do you need more treatment providers that join, uh, your association? Do you need more consumers to kind of know, to go to your website or to choose one of your providers, like.

Marvin Ventrell: I would say, if you hadn’t given me those two examples, those are the two examples that I would have given you. So one of the things we want to do is help people understand that a substance use disorder, addiction is a disease. It’s not a moral failure. It’s not a failure of the will. It doesn’t make you a deficient human being. It makes you sick. And if you have diabetes, you go to the doctor. And if you have, you know, a traditional medical disorder, you seek help. And that’s the way we need to look at addiction. We talk about it as stigma. There’s so much stigma surrounding the disease that the public doesn’t seek help. Most people who need treatment don’t get treatment. Well, here, let me give you this statistic. Approximately 80% of the people who need addiction treatment don’t get it. Only 20% get it. Take diabetes. I use that as an example 80. It’s just the converse. 80% of the public who has diabetes gets diabetes treatment. So what? And why is that? A big piece of it is stigma. Um, people not seeking care. People not wanting to seek care. We say addiction is a disease that tells you you don’t have a disease. And that’s kind of true. You know, it sneaks up on people and and they don’t seek care. So we want to get rid of this stigma. Uh, we want folks to know that they can come to NAATP. Um, uh, a lot of our resources are for our members, but we also have educational materials for the public, and we have the Ade, the Addiction industry directory, which is where I would want everyone to go to find treatment.

Marvin Ventrell: Because you can’t just be in a Tap member. You have to qualify. You have to meet licensing and accreditation standards. Um, you have to follow a strict ethics code, and you aspire to the guidelines of the quality assurance guidebook that I talked about earlier. So stigma, education, all of that. Um, and then the other piece is we need to, um, elect politicians who understand that, um, we’re looking at as many as 800 people a day in this country dying from some form of addiction, and that’s unnecessary. We can treat this. And so if we fund it properly, frankly, if we get fair insurance reimbursement rates, we can, you know, we can make a proper dent in this and address it as we have other, other areas. So, um, uh, get educated, seek assistance. And if you’re an operator or you’re thinking of becoming an operator and you want to invest in this, come to us. Come to us first so that you can, you know, look, I want good providers to be members, but mostly I don’t want people to get into this work not knowing what they’re doing, because there’s too much harm that can be caused to, to the public. So, you know, um, those are the things I would stress.

Lee Kantor: So one more time, the website, if somebody wants to learn more or connect with you or somebody on the team.

Marvin Ventrell: Yeah. It’s easy. Natasha n um, and, um, you can contact our staff. We’re headquartered in Colorado. I work out of DC for for political access. Um, uh, but we’ve got lots of folks available to help, and we’re a nonprofit organization. Our job is to help people get treatment and to help that treatment be good treatment.

Lee Kantor: Well, Marvin, thank you so much for sharing your story today, doing such important work. And we appreciate you.

Marvin Ventrell: Appreciate you. Take care.

Lee Kantor: All right. This is Lee Kantor. We’ll see you all next time on Association Leadership Radio.

BRX Pro Tip: Signs Your Networking Has Become Not Working

February 24, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: Signs Your Networking Has Become Not Working
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: Networking Has Become Not Working

Stone Payton: Welcome back to Business RadioX Pro Tips, Lee Kantor and Stone Payton here with you. Lee, we have some luxuries and kind of a unique approach to this whole idea of networking, but I could see us and our people in the Business RadioX system falling into this trap too. But what are some signs that your networking may have become not working?

Lee Kantor: One of the signs that your networking isn’t paying off is that you’re meeting a lot of people, but you can’t remember their names two days later. You’re showing up to events just because you’re supposed to show up for events. You’re asking, what do you do, what do you do, what do you do, and you’re never kind of going deeper and really getting to know the people.

Lee Kantor: And the bottom line is you focus too much on quantity over quality. And real networking isn’t a competition on how many people you can meet. It’s about building relationships with the right people that can move the needle in your business and actually following through with them.

Lee Kantor: So number one, I would recommend if you’re getting into this kind of rut where you’re going to a lot of these events, you’re meeting tons of people, but you’re not really building the quality relationships that you’re hoping for, the first move to make is just cut your networking in half and double down on your follow up. I mean, the relationships are built through follow up, not by the initial meeting. So, spend less time meeting new people and more time building deeper relationships with people you’ve already met. So, I would start there.

Lee Kantor: Number two, get specific of who you’re trying to meet. Stop going to every event. Start going to the places where your ideal clients and the partners you want to interact with actually are. And number three, create value before you ask for anything. Make an introduction. Make a connection. Share an insight. Send the person something useful. Give them a reason to remember you.

Lee Kantor: And if your networking isn’t generating real conversations, real relationships, real opportunities, you have to do something different.

Lee Kantor: And then, as Stone mentioned, Business RadioX is your cheat code. If you want to be better at networking and you’re frustrated by the lack of results your networking is giving you, then definitely check out Business RadioX. Our platform is proven to help people network with the right people and deliver actual green dollar ROI.

BRX Pro Tip: The Danger of Optimizing for Super Users

February 23, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: The Danger of Optimizing for Super Users
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: The Danger of Optimizing for Super Users

Stone Payton: And we’re back with Business RadioX Pro Tips, Lee Kantor and Stone Payton here with you. Lee, it sounds a little counterintuitive, I think, but there really is some risk and maybe some danger in optimizing your products, your services, your whole approach for the super user.

Lee Kantor: Yeah, this is one of those things where your super users, big fan, they love you, they can’t get enough of you, and they ask a lot of you sometimes, sometimes they want more and more and more. Because they’re your super user, they’re your most active user, so you start kind of incrementally adding some bells and whistles for them because, you know, the squeaky wheel gets the grease.

Lee Kantor: So, they’re like always telling you it’d be great if you did this or it’d be great if you could also do this. And then, all of a sudden, your core offering is getting more and more complicated. Your core offering is getting more and more expensive. So the average person, the new person who becomes exposed of your service or your product is not thrilled with it anymore because it’s too hard. And it only works for people that have been immersed with your service or product for a period of time.

Lee Kantor: So, things to keep in mind that keep you from falling into this trap are, number one, separate out these power features from your core features. Keep your main experience simple and move more advanced offerings or stuff into an optional menu or an add-on.

Lee Kantor: And it’s important to really talk to kind of the newest customers and not just your oldest veteran customers. Understand what makes a new person come into your circle, and ask those people what it is that attracted them to this, what it is that they like. Because if you keep them happy and you have a flow of those people, then they’ll eventually become veteran people too.

Lee Kantor: So, make sure you’re talking to kind of the newbies as well as the veterans, and measure how many people are using all of these features that the power users are demanding. If it’s only a handful of people, maybe just say, sorry, we can’t do that. If barely anybody’s using it except for one client, it’s probably not useful for everybody. It’s only useful for this one individual. And don’t let that clutter up the experience for the vast majority of the other people that you’re trying to serve.

Lee Kantor: So, you want to make it easy for new people to get value fast, that’s critical, and you can always add complexity later for the people who want it. You know, if they pay for it, make it a premium offering. It doesn’t have to be part of kind of your core offering.

Steve Morris: When the Operating System That Built Your Success Stops Working

February 20, 2026 by angishields

HBR-Steve-Morris-Feature
Houston Business Radio
Steve Morris: When the Operating System That Built Your Success Stops Working
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

steve-morris-coaching

steve-morrisSteve Morris is an entrepreneurial guide and business coach who helps leaders transform their businesses—and their lives—through clarity, focus, and intentional growth.

He began his career designing multi-million-dollar racing yachts and leading elite teams to victory in some of the world’s most demanding yacht races. He later managed a small business and oversaw million-dollar budgets as a certified PMP for the U.S. Navy, experiences that shaped his disciplined yet people-centered leadership style.

Drawing on decades of work with world-class teams, Steve now supports entrepreneurial leaders using the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS) and Positive Intelligence (PQ) to overcome obstacles, fuel sustainable growth, and build cohesive, high-performing teams. His mission is to help leaders get unstuck, regain momentum, and create businesses that support the lives they truly want to live.

Based on his 31-acre farm in Colorado, Steve offers clients a rare space to reconnect, recharge, and gain perspective. As a trusted navigator, he helps leaders chart clear paths through uncertainty, providing steady guidance, practical tools, and unwavering support as they elevate their leadership and achieve extraordinary results.

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenamorris/
Website: https://stevemorriscoaching.com/

Transcript-iconThis transcript is machine transcribed by Sonix

 

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: Broadcasting live from the Business RadioX studios in Houston, Texas. It’s time for Houston Business Radio. Now, here’s your host.

Trisha Stetzel: Hello, Houston. Trisha Stetzel here bringing you another episode of Houston Business Radio. Today’s guest is Steve Morris, an executive coach and certified implementer who helps high agency leaders navigate a specific moment when the operating system that built their success stops working for the life they want. Now we’re going to talk more about that. Steve brings an unusual mix of engineering level clarity and human transformation work, blending Eo’s structure with identity, presence, and mental fitness so leaders can make cleaner decisions, stop overfunctioning and build businesses that don’t run on pressure. He started his career designing multimillion dollar racing yachts. Sounds like fun. We may have to talk about that too. And coach high performance teams then moved into a program management, uh, supporting US Navy ship launches before building his coaching practice today. He guides founders and executives through what he calls internal OS design for the next chapter. Steve, welcome to the show.

Steve Morris: Thank you very much for having me, Trisha. It’s great to be here.

Trisha Stetzel: It’s been a long time coming. As we were talking about before we got here. So I’m very excited to have you on today and to dig into, uh, some of the amazing work that you’re doing. So, Steve, tell us a little bit more about you.

Steve Morris: Thank you very much. Yeah. So, um, as you said in the introduction, I started my career designing multi-million dollar racing yachts. And as you can probably start telling from my accent as I start talking, I’m not from around these parts originally. Um, I came from New Zealand and that’s where I grew up, and, um, studied engineering in college. But my very first job right out of college was working on a professional sailing team and helping get that team and the boat ready to go race around the world. So I went from studying engineering to being in the gym at 6:00 in the morning, you know, trying to get fit enough and strong enough to be able to participate with this team. But it really formed a really solid initial foundation for my entire career that has now sort of come full circle as I as I am a leadership, um, and executive coach because I saw an experienced, you know, viscerally day in and day out, you know, what it took to build a really great team and a group of people coming together, bonding together. Um, and then ultimately, you know, some of those people succeeding on the team and others, you know, not. Ultimately, you know, gelling and being part of the team, but really sort of seeing, you know, a group of individuals coming together to go and do something, you know, incredibly lofty, like trying to win a round the world yacht race. Um. So, you know, it was a foundation for my career. And I’ve, um, for the last 35 years have been just obsessed and passionate about what it takes to build a really great team and look at the individuals, the developing, the individuals that are a part of that team.

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah, absolutely. I love how you’ve been able to take that past experience of being on a team. I’ll call it a sporting team because it is definitely a sport. You had to get in the gym, and you also had to learn how to work with others to meet the goal, and the goal would be to win or place or finish, right? Whatever that goal happens to be. And I love how you’ve been able to take that and use that experience in the work that you’re doing today. So, um, I in your bio, I talked a little bit about the high agency leaders at the crossroads. So what is that crossroads actually look like in real life? And what are the signals that you see when you’re working with people?

Steve Morris: So I work with a lot of very successful, um, yes, we call them high agency, high achieving founders, business owners. And, um, a few years ago, I really started seeing that, um, as I work with them, with EOS, the entrepreneurial operating system, and we’re building a really strong leadership team and a strong business, um, when that work is successful, oftentimes the the founder. The owner gets to a place where they’re kind of like, okay, business is running great. Everything’s, you know, the trains are all running on time. Um, and but they sort of get to some point where they’re kind of like, well, what now? Um, what’s my purpose in life now? Now that the business is running great? Um, you know, typically, of course, if it has been successful, the business is generating some cash and some, um, wealth for that original founder. And so they’ve now got possibilities and things that they can do, um, with their life. And I really find that, you know, when you’ve been working with your head down, running like heck in the business day in and day out, week in and week out, month in and month out, year in and year out. You know, that’s been an all consuming part of their lives. And then when the chaos is now tamped down and things are running in a more orderly fashion. It’s kind of like now we’ve got some time to think. And then that’s when the thoughts start coming up, like, okay, well what now? Um, and so I really sort of find that that’s, uh, quite a common thing that I’ve seen and have now, you know, more recently in the last few years, stepped into, um, having more conversations and coaching those leaders, um, really sort of double clicking on what is your purpose in life? What’s the larger purpose in life now that the business is running great, what do you want to do next? You know what lights your fire?

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah, I love that. That’s fantastic. I would like to visit this topic of EOS because I know that you use that as, uh, a set of tools that you’re using with your clients. So I, a lot of people who are listening, I’m sure are familiar or have heard EOS, but they may not know exactly what it is or what it does as a system inside of these businesses. Can you tell us a little more?

Steve Morris: Absolutely. So EOS stands for the entrepreneurial operating system, right? So it’s just a simple set of practical tools that really help a business owner and a leadership team get three things that we call vision, traction, and healthy. So vision from the aspect of figuring out like what is the vision for the business, where are we going and how are we going to get there? Oftentimes when I start off working with a team and I’ve got six people around the table, I’ve got six different ideas about where the business should be going long term. Um, so we get everybody on the same page about a single unified vision. Um, and then the traction is getting more disciplined and accountable, like becoming masters of execution and bringing that vision to reality. Because sometimes people can talk about a vision and can have, you know, the dreams, but they remain dreams if we don’t actually do something about it. Right. If we don’t have the discipline and the accountability to take action in the business. And then the third component, which is almost my favorite part, is what we call healthy, which is coming together as a healthy, functional, cohesive leadership team because sometimes they’re not. Um, and this really brings me, as I was saying before, back to sort of full circle in terms of, well, you know, I worked on some really amazing teams, and I know what it feels like when the team comes together and people have got each other’s backs and they’re there for each other.

Steve Morris: Uh, unfortunately, I also worked on some teams that didn’t make it, you know, despite having the resources. That we needed and didn’t gel together as a team. So I experienced the the heartache, the pain, the suffering, the disappointment of years of effort and millions of dollars. You know, ultimately not being successful because the people couldn’t come together in the way that was useful and healthy. So that’s what I love coming and helping my clients, you know, figure out what their vision is, get on the same page with that, put the actions in place in the business, but ultimately have some more fun work together as a healthy, functional, cohesive leadership team and take the business to where they want to go. So that’s what EOS is, and it’s a journey. Um, I don’t have a magic wand. There’s no silver bullets. Um, it’s a journey that we go on because we’re all human. And, um, um, you know, development, things like this take time. We put the reps in. Things work. Things don’t work. We, you know, tweak things, change things. Ultimately, my goal is an EOS implementers to help this system, this this set of tools work for the company, right, for the leadership team, uh, ultimately for the greater good of that business.

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah, absolutely. And these, these teams, when you get them on all on the same page, rowing in the same direction for the same goal, they’re they have greatness right now, but they’re always evolving. So one of the things that you talk about is the operating system. And I don’t mean the software, but the operating system that built their success today. Isn’t always the same as they move into the future. So talk to me a little bit about this evolution of where you begin and how you get to the end. And the evolution of that team as they move through the process?

Steve Morris: Yes. No, it’s it’s a very important work. And I, um, as you’re sort of talking about, it’s an evolution. And of course, when we when we start, people tend to sort of be very, sort of heads down with sort of more of a reactionary team, um, playing whack a mole. Um, but then as we mature, right, and we put the systems in place and we grow as a team, um, you know, we’re creating openings for people to kind of step up into and elevate, uh, in the business. And that’s when I really start seeing, um, it’s, you know, the inner journey of the leader becomes more important. I mean, it always is important, but it sort of comes more to the forefront. And so one of the places where I start with this, um, on an individual level, is what I’ll call the I’ll be happy when syndrome because a lot of us, and we’re all human, right? Uh, it can very easily crop up in our language, which comes from our thinking of I’ll be happy when I’ll be happy when I get the new client. I’ll be happy when I get, you know, the new pay raise. I’ll be happy when I get the new job. Um, because then I’ll have some more money, and then I’ll be able to buy a car, and then I’ll be able to go for a drive in the mountains.

Steve Morris: Right? I mean, you’ve heard it, right? I mean, it’s like I’ll be happy when some future event happens. Um, but ultimately, what we sort of really find, of course, with that is, you know, and the research is all there. If you give somebody a pay raise, it lasts for about 2 or 3 weeks. The bump, you know, the, the good feelings from that. And then people sort of come back to, um, you know, the status quo. So, um, Um, ultimately what we see is it’s much more effective if, if we can sort of backtrack from those things that we want to have in life, um, to, to some more meaningful, um, things. And so, you know, the things that we have in life ultimately come from the actions that we take in the world. Um, I, you know, and a lot of people believe in manifesting, but I, you know, to me, being an engineer, I’m a little more pragmatic and practical about manifesting. I don’t believe you can sit on the couch eating Doritos and manifest $1 million, right? If you get up off the couch, if you get up out of bed in the morning and, you know, put your running shoes on and go get after it and do the things that you need to do in the world. Then you set yourself up, you know, for the best chances of manifesting ultimately what you want.

Steve Morris: So I have a, as I say, a very sort of pragmatic view of manifesting. But then ultimately, you know, when we start sort of peeling the layers of the onion, like, why do we do the things we do? Like what makes us, you know, if we’re in sales, like, you know, picking up the phone and calling prospects or if we’re an operations manager having those difficult conversations. Um, you know, some people are easier to sort of lean into those things. Other people shy away from them. Right? And so the actions that we take in the world come from, um, our thinking. Right. And ultimately, what I really see is, um, the most effective thing is to, to really sort of see that. Well, you’re, you’re thinking and the way you sort of see the world comes from your identity, your being, like who you are and who you see yourself ultimately inside. Um, and so when we can create. At that identity level, they are much more effective at being able to change thinking or to create more useful ways of thinking. Um, I’ll put it that way. You know, I think when you the alarm goes off in the morning and, you know, you get out of bed in the morning, you know, without intentional sort of, uh, practices in place. You know, if you pick up your phone and start scrolling the emails or, you know, heaven forbid, getting on the news and on TikTok and the headlines.

Steve Morris: Well, then your mind goes down that path, right? And there’s there’s just nothing good on, you know, scrolling the headlines because they are there to get your cortisol level up and to be in a place of fear and all of this sort of stuff. So, so what I’m really talking about and about. What I’d like to work on with my clients is, you know, like instead of just blindly going off down some path every morning when you get up that the, you know, the headlines and the media people would like you to go down. How about choosing a more effective path? How about putting some practices in place, um, for you to start your day, you know, off on the right foot and just get off that old rocky path and to get on a more effective path as a person, you know, so that you show up, uh, you know, for yourself, your family, your friends, and also in the workplace more effectively, um, in terms of how you see the world, how you see other people. And that ultimately will affect the things that you do and say to people and ultimately, you know, affect the results that you get in life. So that’s the whole big thing that I end up seeing.

Trisha Stetzel: Well, thank you for sharing that. It’s so important to be thinking about the balance between the work that we do and the human that we are. And I want to come back and revisit that right after you give us your contact information, because I suspect that there are some folks listening that already want to connect with you or learn more about the work that you’re doing. Steve.

Steve Morris: Yeah. Thank you. So the best place to get a hold of me is through my website. So that’s Steve Morris coaching. Com um, there’s contact forms there, my email and other contact details. So keep it simple Steve Morris coaching. Com is a great place to start.

Trisha Stetzel: Okay fantastic. Thank you very much for that. And as you guys know put that in the show notes. So if you’re sitting in front of your computer, uh, watching us on video or even listening to the audio, there will be the links for pointing and clicking so that you can get in touch with Steve right away at Steve Morris calm, uh, before we jump back into the deep stuff, I would be remiss if I didn’t ask you about your experience with Navy ship launches. You have to tell me just a little bit more about what you were doing on that project.

Steve Morris: Sure. Yeah. Well, it’s a very interesting part of my career. So, you know, I spent many years designing, you know, sailing boats, um, multi-million dollar racing yachts. Um, and as I was talking about, I was on some really great teams. I was on some teams that didn’t make it. So I was sort of had that curiosity about how do we build a really great team, you know, back at those earlier stages in my career. So I had this opportunity to, um, move out of the sailboat design world and get into supporting the US Navy. Um, and ended up, um, on some teams where we were supporting the whole huge government acquisition system when it takes, you know, the government says, hey, well, the Navy says we need a new ship. Um, it takes a lot of time, a lot of people, a lot of effort, and of course, a lot of money to be able to get that ship into the water and really being able to navigate, you know, to bring a team together, to be able to navigate that whole process, um, is incredibly complex. So, um, I worked on a couple of different projects, but, um, principally doing program management. So bringing together a team, um, I was working as a contractor and supporting, um, my government customers and, you know, just figuring out what do we need to get done, you know, this year, what do we need to get done this month? What do we need to get done today? Right, to be able to move the project forward. And it was a huge education for me just in terms of stakeholder management, you know, like team management at much larger scales. I mean, ultimately some of these programs are, you know, billion dollar programs. So, um, re being in the middle of all of that and just seeing, you know, how do we lead and manage these groups, how do we continue to to drive the accountability? Um, an environment that, you know, is very challenging. Um, there’s a lot of let’s say there’s a lot of cooks in the kitchen getting a Navy ship in the water.

Trisha Stetzel: I can imagine I’m sure many of my listeners are probably cringing right now saying, you you actually decided to do that. That was not your service calling. Well, thank you for being a part of the US Navy and helping us launch. Um, I don’t know how many ships you were engaged with, but it sounds like an amazing, uh, fun experience for you, so I’d love to come back, see if it’s okay, and revisit this idea of, um, business and leadership, whatever position people are in and the human aspect of that. Uh, what I pick up from you is, although you’re an engineer and very system forward, you also have a lot of soft skills and ways that you can talk with people about both. All of the parts of them being human, running a business, being a leader, but also the things that maybe pulling on them. I’m going to call it work life integration. I know some people don’t like that. Maybe they do, maybe they don’t. But I’m getting my point across here. Right where. Yeah, it it is all encompassing. So how do you help your clients balance this idea of being a leader in a probably in a high pressure position, and also finding time to do the things that are important to them as a human being.

Steve Morris: Yeah. No, it’s a it is a complex thing to, to get that integration. And I love the fact that you use that word, um, integration because of course, the work life balance, you know, people normally talk about balance, right? And yeah, um, I think, you know, for me, balance, uh, I feel like when somebody is saying, hey, I want more work life balance. Um, they often have what I’ll call like a static view of, I’m going to get all of the work things over here, and I’m going to get all of my life stuff over here, and it’s all going to like just, you know, hang out together. And it doesn’t work like that. In my experience with my clients and even for myself, when you’re in a small business and you’re wearing a lot of hats and things change. And so it’s a great point to say it’s about integration because frankly, these days they they are not separate things. You know, we have these phones beside us. We’re always on people are messaging at all hours of the day and night. So how do we, you know, get this integration.

Steve Morris: And this is where I feel like initially one of the sort of core ideas for me is, um, it’s not a static thing. It’s a dynamic thing. In other words, we’re going to sort of shift as we go through phases. Sometimes we just might have to roll up the sleeves and dive into the business and put the hours in. Right. And, and, um, some of the, you know, other things we’d like to do in life aren’t getting done this week, right? Because we’ve got to dive into the business. But my, Um. My hope and my aim in working with my clients is if we can create the right sort of systems, then that will allow the space and the time when it’s appropriate to, you know, go off in the other direction and to take a week off and to around here in Colorado, go up to the mountains and, um, you know, or go sailing or something where you are. I mean, but it’s about being able to create that the systems that can then allow things to dynamically shift backwards and forwards. Um, it’s not just a static thing.

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah, absolutely. Thank you for that. I, um, heard through the grapevine that you’ve got a really neat project happening on your farm in Colorado. Can you tell me more about it?

Steve Morris: Yes, absolutely. So, you know, sort of it all links back to this, taking this more sort of holistic view of, you know, being a leader and, you know, showing up effectively as a person. Right. Um, for your family, for your friends and for your business. And so, um, you know, I’ve been a great believer in, um, maintaining good health. I follow a doctor, Peter Attia, who’s just in Austin, not too far away from you, uh, who talks about this concept called the Centenarian Olympics. And it’s imagining, um, you know, it’s a thought experiment, but imagine, you know, you’re 100 years old. And what would you like to do when you’re 100? Would you like to still be able to put your bag in the overhead bin on the airplane as you’re going off on, on a vacation? Would you like to be able to bend down and pick up your great, great great grandchild as they come barreling into your shins? Right. Um, all of these things. And then with that vision, right. As we’re talking about visions in business, you can have your own personal vision. What would that look like? You can sort of backtrack. I mean, we are going to decline through age. No one’s managed to to beat that yet. Um, but his point is you can affect, uh, you can influence the starting point of, you know, of the decline, and you can influence the rate of decline through exercise, nutrition, um, a lot of other aspects.

Steve Morris: So we’ve been very passionate about that. And of course, it’s all linked together with the work I do with my clients as well, because, um, you know, people who are being very successful and growing their businesses, as we talked about at the beginning, might have some other desires and dreams in their life. And if you’re not maintaining, you know, the more holistic good health. I don’t just mean physical but also mental emotional health. Um, you’re not going to be able to enjoy the fruits of your labor. Like what? You know, it’s it’s not an uncommon thing that people can work their whole lives and get to retirement, and then they’re not in a great shape to enjoy their retirement. Right. So long story. But ultimately, um, we moved here to Colorado, um, over four years ago now, and ended up buying a farm and learning how to grow our own food, um, healthy food and, um, and then also starting to sort of create a space where I’m going to bring my clients in and really be able to help them, like, get reconnected with themselves and each other, like to create a little bit of, you know, silence in many ways to allow, you know, those deeper connections to, to resurface, um, and to create a space where people can kind of get really grounded about what’s going on in their lives and their business.

Steve Morris: And it’s a beautiful property we have here. We’re so lucky. I’m very grateful for it. There’s a 14,000 foot mountain up keeping watch over us. We’ve got lakes and cornfields all around. But as I’m saying, it’s about creating a space to sort of allow, um, some of these more important things to come up for people to really look at, you know, how am I doing with my life? Am I really in alignment? Do I know where I’m going? Um, because as I talked about at the beginning of the podcast, if you’ve been head down running like heck for the last ten years building this business, you know, have you also been able to keep sight on what are the other, you know, meaningful and important and purposeful things that you want to do? And as I’m rediscovered, have discovered with my clients. That’s sometimes been lost because we’ve just been head down running like heck in the business. So the farm is really about creating some spaces, some experiences. We want to start doing some retreats this year, feeding people healthy food where they can see where you know the ground that it came from. Um, and but also, as I’m saying, sort of creating the space for more deeper and meaningful, um, reflections and thoughts and experiences to come up.

Trisha Stetzel: Wow, this is amazing. And I see a trip to Colorado in my future. Please. What an amazing. Thank you. What an amazing project. And you’ll have to keep us posted on, uh, any events that you may have in Q and let me know. And I’m happy to get that information out as well. Okay, so we’re at the back end of our conversation. I know the time went by so very fast. Would you tell us one more time how to reach you? Steve, if people are interested in having a call with you or simply connecting.

Steve Morris: Yeah. Thanks. Trisha. It’s I’m I’m always happy to have a conversation with people so they can reach out through Steve Morris coaching comm. You know, if this what we’re talking about resonates in terms of, you know, you’re at a crossroads, a turning point, wondering what’s next. Maybe you’ve lost a little bit of connection to what was deep and meaningful to you and looking for, you know, what’s coming next. Um, I’m always just happy to have a conversation and see what arises out of that.

Trisha Stetzel: Beautiful. Thank you for your time today. This has been wonderful, and I really appreciate you coming on the show and being a part of getting great Information, and even just the feel good part of knowing that there are people out there looking at leadership holistically. Thank you.

Steve Morris: Well, thank you for everything you’re doing, Trisha, and thank you for having me on the podcast.

Trisha Stetzel: Thank you Steve. All right, you guys, that’s all the time we have for today. If you found value in this conversation that Steve and I had today, please share it with a fellow entrepreneur, veteran or Houston leader ready to grow. Be sure to follow, rate and review the show. Of course, it helps us reach more bold business minds just like yours and your leadership, your business and your legacy are built one intentional step at a time. So stay inspired, stay focused, and keep building the business and the life you deserve.

Kevin Ruelas: From Service to Calling — Building AI That Serves Justice

February 20, 2026 by angishields

BTU-Raptr-Feature
Beyond the Uniform
Kevin Ruelas: From Service to Calling — Building AI That Serves Justice
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Kevinheadshot-JanesparksKevin Ruelas is an experienced international executive known for balancing hands-on leadership with high-level strategic vision.

Equally comfortable rolling up his sleeves in operational environments or operating in the boardroom, Kevin brings a results-driven approach to scaling teams, strengthening performance, and charting sustainable growth paths for organizations.

With multi-disciplined management experience spanning Professional Services, Business Development, Operations, and Logistics, Kevin has built a reputation as a leader who elevates teams while executing clear, forward-thinking strategy. Raptr-Analytics

He holds an MBA from a top-20 business school and combines analytical rigor with practical execution to drive measurable business outcomes.

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevin-ruelas-98810a/
website: https://www.raptr-analytics.com/

Transcript-iconThis transcript is machine transcribed by Sonix

 

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: Broadcasting live from the Business RadioX studios in Houston, Texas. It’s time for Houston Business Radio. Now, here’s your host.

Trisha Stetzel: Hello, Houston. Trisha Stetzel here bringing you another episode of Houston Business Radio beyond the Uniform series. Today’s guest is Kevin Ruelas, founder and CEO of RAPTR Analytics, a geospatial intelligence and AI company transforming how law enforcement analyzes complex data. Kevin is a seasoned serial CEO whose career spans global operations, national security, and advanced analytics. Early on, he helped scale a major Middle East contracting operation from 0 to 4 billion in just six years. Operations across Iraq, Turkey and Kuwait. He later founded Synectics, developing cell phone tracking technology now used by US federal agencies. RAPTR analytics was spun out of that work. An AI driven SaaS platform that helps law enforcement analyze massive data sets, identify patterns in real time, and turn intelligence into courtroom ready evidence. Kevin, welcome to the show.

Kevin Ruelas : Thanks, Trisha. I’m happy to be here.

Trisha Stetzel: I’m so excited to have you. And I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that Derrick Zoller was the one that introduced the two of us. And by the way, if you haven’t seen his podcast, you guys, it dropped December 2nd. So go out and take a look at that. All right, Kevin, before we even get started, I’d love to if it’s okay, just ask you to tell us a little bit more about you.

Kevin Ruelas : Sure. Well, I actually grew up in California until I was 12, when my dad, who had retired from the Foreign Service and retired from the Foreign Service, and we went to live in Honduras and El Salvador and got to start my international life, I guess, at an early age of 12. Um, and then later, uh, came back to California and went to school, where I met a bunch of guys playing with this thing called Army ROTC, decided it was the right choice for me and jumped right in. Uh, became an infantry lieutenant. Many, many moons ago, uh, and unfortunately blew out my knee and only served for six years in uniform. Uh, had, uh, well, three knee surgeries and eventually separated. Uh, in the early 90s. I went off to do logistics for ten years in the private sector, uh, until the second Gulf War kicked off. And somebody asked me or a CEO at the time that I was working for, to go to college And figure out what was going on with port as it was melting down as the cargo couldn’t get in. So I went over and I started working with a local Kuwaiti company, and eventually they asked me to join them and started division working on military and logistics and and defense work. And to be honest, you know, I worked at that logistics company for about ten years and was getting really kind of tired of the corporate grind and the growing of a company or not growing a company, but being part of a cog in a company and the opportunity to start a new company that was focused on military and defense was super exciting and super, uh, back to my roots. It really made me understand that I was missing being in uniform. I missed the sense of purpose.

Kevin Ruelas : I missed part of being part of that bigger, uh, brotherhood. And so leaving that company after ten years and joining basically a company with no employees and starting from scratch, as you said. And we scaled. We did, you know, two guys and I had 20 then I had 200, then I had 2000 and I had 20,000. We just kept growing and growing and growing. We’re the right place, right time. I mean, the Gulf War obviously right at the beginning in oh seven or sorry, oh two. Um, and we’re the boots on the ground that needed to be there. And I was supporting, like I said, the military, not just Army, but of course Navy and Air Force. And we started supporting international partners. We had contracts with UK, France, Japan, etc.. And so that’s how it scaled and it grew and it grew and grew. Uh, unfortunately, I didn’t I didn’t own it. Uh, I was working for the Kuwaitis. Uh, after a number of years, I took that company global, uh, as you said, over a it was actually a billion and a half in revenue and moved the headquarters to D.C.. I got kind of frustrated and decided it was time for me to move on. And it was then that I took over another company for another, uh, family business and eventually sold that for them. Bought my own company, which you referred to as synthetics, started another company called Defense and Government Services and eventually spun out what is now RAPTR Analytics from all of that. And we can get into that again in a minute, uh, as I connect the dots for you. But that’s kind of how I ended up here after, uh, I guess 20 now, 30 years, uh, since I was in uniform. Wow.

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah. So, Kevin, you really have led, like, some of the most complex environments imaginable. Uh, how did those early experiences shape the way you think about leadership and risk today?

Kevin Ruelas : I think the thing that really stuck with me the most was that rocket ship ride and growing of that company in Kuwait, in that I had to kind of imbue my little cell. Like I said, I literally had two guys to start and then I had 200 and eventually it just, you know, kept scaling. But in order to properly lead that organization and, and make it into what I wanted it to be, I had to really create an ethos, a dedication, and then empower those employees at the time, um, to take what I was trying to create and take it to the next level and then create another level and then create another level. And you know, the the typical kind of like pyramid hierarchy structure is pretty typical, where it all eventually bubbles up to the top, but you still have to push down through all those layers, you know, two reporting to four, four, reporting to eight, eight, reporting 12, whatever that number ends up being, and getting them all to understand what we stood for and what we stood for was military, defense, logistics. And that’s what our mantra was, and that’s what we had everybody kind of rowing in the same direction to do. So the the early scaling really taught me how to lead by example, lead through others, and lead all the way to the bottom line or the bottom of the where the rubber meets the road.

Trisha Stetzel: It’s so important. So how do you think your military experience. I know that’s what led you back to do this. Was that that want or need for the brotherhood that you were missing? But how did your military experience and background really teach you or give you the skills that you needed to get that rocket, that first rocket ship off the ground?

Kevin Ruelas : I definitely think, um, I was actually at a kind of a crux when I got out of the Army as an infantry officer. You know, a lot of the your listeners are ex-military as well, and they can probably relate, depending on what their MOS or what their branch of the service was. A lot of those have a civilian counterpart, for example. Had I been a transportation or logistics officer in the Army, that would have been a natural transition for me to go into transportation and logistics in the civilian sector or if I was an MP. A lot of those go into law enforcement, etc., or I have a cousin who got out of the Navy as a radar technician. So now he works on radar, right? Unfortunately for infantry, there’s not that one for one. Like, what do you do with infantry? Well, I learned how to shoot guns, and I learned how to shoot mortars and a lot of the security type stuff. So there’s that aspect. But more importantly, what I learned most was how to lead troops. I like to say my favorite job ever in the army was an infantry platoon leader.

Kevin Ruelas : Those 40 guys, they were my, you know, wake up every morning and go to bed every night. Team that I that’s all I thought about. How to lead them, how to motivate them, how to get them to go the extra mile. How to get up at 4 a.m. when I didn’t want to get up at 4 a.m.. How to do night operations after night operations after night operations when I didn’t want to do it either. But you had to leave. You had to motivate and you had to inspire. And I think it’s that aspect that I was able to put into my resume as a, um, I guess, first lieutenant that I’m getting out of the Army saying, you know, here’s what I bring to the table, I bring leadership, I bring, uh, inspirational leadership, and I and I can motivate. And that’s how I got my first job. And I think it was that that eventually led me to keep going and become a ever bigger and bigger leader of of people. Um, it’s going all the way back to that infantry training I had way at the beginning.

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah, absolutely. I like to say all of us veterans, we just get stuff done sometimes the middle s I use a different word, but today we’ll say stuff. We know how to get out of bed. We know how to GST.

Kevin Ruelas : Yeah. And you know, you referenced Derek earlier and I gotta give Derek kudos because he’s always been that get it done kind of guy. And that’s why we get along so well because I know if if we’re on the phone and he says I’m going to do something, then he’s going to go get it done and vice versa. It’s get stuff done.

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah, absolutely. Gst, GST. All right. I want to roll a little forward if that’s okay. And let’s really jump into uh, RAPTR Analytics. It was born out of real operational needs as I mentioned earlier. So what problem were law enforcement agencies struggling with that really pushed you to spin this out into its own platform?

Kevin Ruelas : Yeah. So I actually acquired synthetics 11 years ago, and I was very attracted to it because it’s a very unique technology. There’s no other company in the world that does what synthetics does, which in a nutshell is find and track cell phones in real time. So Synectics has devices that we can’t get into all the technical aspects of it here, but essentially they’re honing in on the cellular, uh, radio frequencies or cell signals and allowing the operators to track that cell phone to its origin. Uh, over the years, we’ve now gotten to the point where we can integrate that into our mapping systems. Uh, some of the veterans may be familiar with attack, uh, for example, where we can put dots on a map now and we can say, okay, that’s where the phone is. If you have two of our trackers where those lines of bearing intersect, that’s where the phone, uh, target is. And so when, when I acquired it and based on my military background, I really focused on my military customers. So special forces, whether they’re Army or Navy Seals, uh, even a, uh, afsoc. They all use our equipment to find bad guys. And so that’s what I really delved into or dove into, because that’s what I knew. Right? That was the uniform I had worn. And at the beginning, it was very much a hey, law enforcement, if you want some of this, you know, we have this for for your use as well. It’s, you know, military rated. It’s, you know, used by our brothers in arms in the military side.

Kevin Ruelas : But you’re welcome to use it on law enforcement side. And I didn’t really focus on them as a customer initially, but over time, they obviously are a lot bigger in terms of all the police departments around the country. There’s 8000 different police departments, sheriff’s departments, agencies, federal agencies. And once you start to aggregate all those and they’re all looking for bad guys too, it starts to become a very large customer set with a little bit different problem where they’re prosecuting the people that they’re pursuing. They’re looking for, uh, the legal aspects of what they’re doing and making sure it’s admissible in a court of law. They’re building up a case against somebody who did something wrong, and they need to know. Where was the phone last week? Where was it when the crime was committed? Where was it when or what are the phones were near when they were doing their bad deeds? So the use case started to shift to not just today’s intelligence. Go find the bad guy today, but more of the historical information that we can derive from cell phones now. Um, so we started working with them to help them get essentially with a warrant that data from AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, etc. and get the information that is available from the carriers about the cell phones with their time, date, stamps and locations and all these important aspects. But it’s a lot of raw data, raw data that needs to be analyzed, raw data that needs to be then overlaid over a map, and then start to look for those industry dependencies and similarities.

Kevin Ruelas : And the more we kind of went down this rabbit hole of how do we connect the dots for law enforcement, the more I started to realize, okay, this is a totally different solution. We’re not now creating a box to find a phone. We’re creating a software solution that is geospatial intelligence. It’s looking for dots on a map and looking at them over time and then looking for inferences. And how do they interrelate and what can we glean from all of that? And then the more I started going down that road, the more I created or started thinking, okay, we need to create a separate company that just focuses on this because it’s a different problem. And once I went that way, I also started thinking as AI became the new buzzword of the day, how do we apply artificial intelligence to this? And the more I started to understand that, the more I realize that, well, what the police are doing is doing the same analysis over and over and over again that a computer can do faster and more efficiently looking for those inferences, looking for those probabilities, looking for all the dots that connect. That’s what artificial intelligence is really all about. So I said, okay, let’s create RAPTR analytics with AI as its base. Let’s get all the data into it from the, um, AT&T and Verizon. And then we start adding in Facebook and metadata and all the information that’s out there. And then let’s start applying artificial intelligence. And RAPTR was born.

Trisha Stetzel: Wow. Well, we could sit here for like another hour and talk about all of the stuff that’s so exciting. We’re about halfway through our conversation, and I’ll bet that people are very interested, either in connecting with you or learning more about what it is that you’re doing. Where’s the best place that folks can go and find out more? Or read more about the work that you’re doing? Kevin?

Kevin Ruelas : Definitely, yeah. As as most companies, we have the typical WWE analytics or analytics. Com. I’m in LinkedIn, of course, and we also have the other companies that I have which is synthetics. Com. I think I’m actually wearing a synthetic shirt today. Um, so um, synthetics is where again we have the hardware wrapper analytics is on the software. And then my name, Kevin Ellis at LinkedIn. Uh, all those three are great places to go looking for more information. And all of those websites will have info at. Or you can always reach out to me directly. You can say, you know, I saw you on Trisha’s show and I’d like to connect with you and that would be okay. At Synthetics Cross at RAPTR Analytics. So I’m also like like I said, LinkedIn where you can connect through there.

Trisha Stetzel: Okay. Fantastic. And as you guys know, I’ll always include, uh, the links in the show notes so you guys can point and click if you’re sitting in front of your computer. If you aren’t, then you’ll find probably easiest. Kevin rules on LinkedIn. His last name is spelled r u e l a s so that you can find him there. Okay, so, Kevin, um, I want to talk a little bit more about AI because you led to that. The base of, uh, RAPTR Analytics is really wrapped around this idea or this this real thing. It’s not an idea. This real thing called AI. I’d love to know how that really plays into, um, our our law system. Uh, accuracy. Transparency. Accountability. So how is that working now inside of. Our law system?

Kevin Ruelas : Yeah, that’s that’s a great question. And and I really have to kind of be careful to when I’m explaining how AI is being used for our law enforcement customers, that a lot of the customers and a lot I guess the public first go to the movies like Minority Report or some of these other things where like, oh, AI is going to start trying to predict who’s who’s who’s a criminal, who’s doing bad things. And I have to say, no, no time out, time out. We’re not we’re not doing that. We actually are using it very methodically to look for, as I mentioned earlier, dot connections or connecting the dots or look for inferences or look for similarities. Ai is not going to be saying that’s the bad guy, or at least my, uh, use of AI. So for RAPTR Analytics, what we are creating is the. I like to think of it as a detective that is going to give suggestions by saying, go look over here. You know what this actually is, is a cause for concern because we see a pattern or we see AI. Ai sees a pattern, or they see or we have seen this pattern enough that we think that there’s something that you should go look for further. And allowing the detectives to be, um, the decision makers in the process of what they’re going to, uh, get more information about what they’re going to dive deeper into. So, uh, so within RAPTR Analytics, there are, uh, color codes, uh, you know, your typical red, yellow and green where, uh, if something pops up red, you want to go and get more information about what the what’s going on with the red? Yellow? There’s some connectivity here. We’re not quite sure if that’s going to be relevant. And then of course, green is like 90% of the data is going to be not really relevant to what we’re looking at.

Kevin Ruelas : But that’s going to save law enforcement time because they’re going to spend those 90%, uh, error minutes not wasting their time. So there’s that aspect of it. Um, but that’s I say that’s kind of the middle tier. There’s actually a pre tier, which is the investigation side. And um, trying to figure out all of the, um, the warrants and the information and getting that data in and out. A lot of that can be automated through artificial intelligence. Um, where, like I said, you have 8000 police departments. Each of them are trying to figure out how to do a warrant to AT&T or Verizon or now Tesla and all of the other data, uh, vehicles that we can get. All of them can be automated using AI for the warrants. Delivering warrants. Receiving the warrants. Receiving the information. So there’s a whole front end of the investigation that can be artificial artificial intelligence. The middle part of the investigation I was referring to. And then on the back end, which is the court and the admissibility aspect of it, where, um, within RAPTR, we’re creating reports, standardized reports, where artificial intelligence can pull out, um, data that is court admissible to show charts and graphs and pictures and, and by using the computer system to do everything. You’re now also having a chain of custody. All these things you hear about on, you know, the FBI files, etc., you’re connecting all the dots for the law enforcement customer from the initial investigation, through the actual investigation to the courtroom delivery of the information. And all of that can be done within RAPTR Analytics and all. Sorry, all of it as part of artificial intelligence.

Trisha Stetzel: Wow, that is amazing. And picturing as you’re talking through that, uh, you know, in the movies when they’ve got all the photos and the strings with the tax in between, like, the AI is kind of helping put those strings where they go so that they can go and take a look at all of these other options. Right. Uh, based on the data.

Kevin Ruelas : Yeah. I’m going to start using that analogy, because everyone’s seen one of those boards with the strings and the pictures I love it.

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah. Great. Look. Look how good I am.

Kevin Ruelas : I like it.

Trisha Stetzel: So thank you I. Well, and I love this conversation. It’s so, um, it’s really interesting. And I think it’s also important to know that we’re able to use technology in such a way that we’re saving time, uh, in the law enforcement space, right, where the our first responders can go and do the things, and detectives can go and do the things that they need to do without sitting in front of stacks and stacks and stacks of paperwork. Uh, like we see in the old movies.

Kevin Ruelas : And you hit the nail on the head. That’s the last part of the equation that that I didn’t really, uh, hit on, which is, um, part of our sell to law enforcement is time savings. And how much more time they can get back and be out doing police work versus the analysis, report writing, creating the charts and the graphs on the back end, the writing of warrants on the front end and the analysis in the middle. All of that takes time and energy that law enforcement obviously cannot spare at this juncture.

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah, absolutely. So maybe a hard question, but just thinking into the future, looking five years ahead, how do you see AI and geospatial analytics changing law enforcement and public safety?

Kevin Ruelas : Well, I like to think that it will become smarter and it will start to learn more and more. One of the things that we have to be very careful of, again, with, with, you know, chain of custody and court records, etc., is we have to be careful that we’re disaggregating the data that, you know, Trisha’s phone is this phone number. I don’t necessarily need that for all the police departments to know, but they need to know the inferences of what the phones do or what the data does. Um, so we have to be very careful to separate that and make sure artificial intelligence is using only the, um, disassociated data and looking for the inferences and then learning from each other so that LAPD can learn from NYPD, for example. And again, it’s not Trisha’s phone number. It’s the data’s, uh, intelligence that we’re learning off of. So it can get way smarter, and it can learn way faster than we can. And it can learn from each other over time. We just have to be careful how we set that groundwork. And, you know, create those platforms to to do it properly.

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah, absolutely. I know our time has flown. And I have one more question for you. And it’s about the responsibility that comes with this kind of power. So talk to me about or talk to us about leaders for leaders building technology that carries real human consequences as what we’ve been talking about here today. What responsibility comes with that kind of power?

Kevin Ruelas : Well, I think most people now are very wary of artificial intelligence or are learning to become very wary and not taking everything that they get out of the computer. When you ask Google, Gemini or ChatGPT or all these different platforms for an answer, everybody’s starting to understand that you’re going to get ghosts. You’re going to get references to data that’s actually false or I’ve seen them, you know, give you this report says this and that and said, okay, well tell me more about that report. And that report was actually made up by artificial intelligence. So everybody has to really understand that no matter what the detective or the analyst needs to be reviewing everything and making sure that there is not a ghost in the machine, there’s not something untoward in there. Um, all throughout the process, they can’t just press a button and boom, we have the bad guy. Uh, I don’t think we should ever get there. We need to be, like you said, very wary, and be very careful of what the future could bring so that we don’t end up in that Minority Report movie that we were joking about.

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah, absolutely. Kevin, this has been such an amazing conversation. I appreciate you joining me today. What would you leave? You know that most of my listeners are veterans, and a lot of them are in the entrepreneurship space. What would you leave them with today, just based on your service and the success that you’ve had in, um, outside of the service?

Kevin Ruelas : I like to say that, um, well, there’s a very interesting book that I don’t know if you’ve ever heard Chip Conley describe it as a, um, a pyramid or a hierarchy where at the base you have a job. And then for most people, there’s a career. And then the pinnacle of it is called is a calling. And I feel like a lot of us who wore the uniform and continue to serve had a calling. And if you can marry your calling with a job or with a company, then you’re going to hit. It’s not work as they say, right? Then you don’t feel like you’re working every day. You’re you’re satisfying your calling and hopefully making some money doing it, and that that’s all you can hope for.

Trisha Stetzel: Yeah, absolutely. What beautiful advice, Kevin. Thank you again for being with me today and sharing your time.

Kevin Ruelas : Thank you. It’s been a pleasure.

Trisha Stetzel: That’s all the time we have for today. If you found value in this conversation, please share it with a fellow veteran, entrepreneur or Houston leader ready to grow. And be sure to follow, rate, and review the show. Of course, it helps us reach more bold business minds just like yours and your business. Your leadership and your legacy are built intentionally at a time. So stay inspired, stay focused, and keep building the business and the life you deserve.

BRX Pro Tip: The Influencers Influencer

February 20, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: The Influencers Influencer
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: The Influencers Influencer

Stone Payton: And we’re back with Business RadioX Pro Tips, Lee Kantor and Stone Payton here with you. Lee, talk a little bit about the role, the application of influencers, at least in your world.

Lee Kantor: Yeah. As somebody who has a few people that I lean on for thought leadership and has kind of shaped my thinking in a lot of areas, people like Seth Godin, like Rory Sutherland, like Ryan Holiday, Viktor Frankl, these are people that I read and follow, and have really had an impact on my life. I was reading some of the their work recently, and I noticed that they start talking about their influences, and I thought that that’s an area that’s interesting for people to mine when they are, you know, looking for places to get more knowledge, and wisdom, and thought leadership.

Lee Kantor: So, everybody has people that influence them. The people you look up to didn’t become that person overnight. They had people who shaped them along the way. And to really understand them, it’s a good idea to kind of dig a layer deep and maybe find out who influenced them. So, who do they quote? What books are they reading? Who are the thought leaders that they follow? I think that this tells you a lot about how they think and what they value.

Lee Kantor: And I think it’s a good exercise for everybody who has favorite influencers or favorite thought leaders that they follow is to just kind of start researching one of your favorite influencers influences. You know, start reading their work, start watching their YouTube videos. This will kind of give you a greater understanding of what makes your favorite influencer who they are by tracing some of the steps of how they got there.

Lee Kantor: So, that’s your assignment today. You know, go to one of the influencers, your favorite blogger or author talks about and just learn about them, read one of their works, watch one of their videos, and see if that helps.

BRX Pro Tip: Training is More Than Shadowing

February 19, 2026 by angishields

BRXmic99
BRX Pro Tips
BRX Pro Tip: Training is More Than Shadowing
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

BRX-Banner

BRX Pro Tip: Training is More Than Shadowing

Stone Payton: And we’re back with Business RadioX Pro Tips, Stone Payton and Lee Kantor here with you. You know, Lee, I spent quite a few years in the training and consulting arena, and I observed that we had a little different definition of what training really was. People had preconceived notions. What’s your take on training, and maybe some of the ways that people maybe don’t have the best definition or frame for what training really is and can be?

Lee Kantor: Yeah, I think a lot of people think that a shortcut to training is just have the person follow them around or shadow them. And that, I think, is really a mistake. A lot of people think that if you just shadow somebody, and they sit on some calls and they watch somebody who’s good at it do their thing, and then you go, okay, now just do what I just did. I don’t think that’s enough. And I don’t even think that that’s training. I think you’re just hoping that these people are going to figure it out.

Lee Kantor: And I think that real training requires structure. I think it’s important to have people actually do the thing you’re training them on while you watch. After they shadow you, then put them in place, watch them and give them feedback in real time on what they’re doing. Because just watching someone do it isn’t kind of that knowledge transfer you’re hoping for. Because a lot of times when they’re watching you, you have shortcuts and you have things you already understand because you’ve been doing it so long and they don’t have that context that you have. They don’t have kind of the repetitions and the experience that you have.

Lee Kantor: So, break down the why behind the what. Don’t just show them your process, explain your thinking, explain the decisions you’re making, and what you’re listening for in order to be effective. And then, create kind of safe practice scenarios. Let them mess up in a safe environment before doing it with real clients or real stakes. Training takes much more time upfront, but it saves you so much time on the back end. When people are actually trained, they don’t need you to constantly fix their mistakes or answer the same questions over and over. So, invest in real training. Your team and your business will be better for it.

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • …
  • 1333
  • Next Page »

Business RadioX ® Network


 

Our Most Recent Episode

CONNECT WITH US

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Our Mission

We help local business leaders get the word out about the important work they’re doing to serve their market, their community, and their profession.

We support and celebrate business by sharing positive business stories that traditional media ignores. Some media leans left. Some media leans right. We lean business.

Sponsor a Show

Build Relationships and Grow Your Business. Click here for more details.

Partner With Us

Discover More Here

Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy

Connect with us

Want to keep up with the latest in pro-business news across the network? Follow us on social media for the latest stories!
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Business RadioX® Headquarters
1000 Abernathy Rd. NE
Building 400, Suite L-10
Sandy Springs, GA 30328

© 2026 Business RadioX ® · Rainmaker Platform

BRXStudioCoversLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of LA Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDENVER

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Denver Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversPENSACOLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Pensacola Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversBIRMINGHAM

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Birmingham Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversTALLAHASSEE

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Tallahassee Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRALEIGH

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Raleigh Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRICHMONDNoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Richmond Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversNASHVILLENoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Nashville Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDETROIT

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Detroit Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversSTLOUIS

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of St. Louis Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCOLUMBUS-small

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Columbus Business Radio

Coachthecoach-08-08

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Coach the Coach

BRXStudioCoversBAYAREA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Bay Area Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCHICAGO

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Chicago Business Radio

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Atlanta Business Radio