Business RadioX ®

  • Home
  • Business RadioX ® Communities
    • Southeast
      • Alabama
        • Birmingham
      • Florida
        • Orlando
        • Pensacola
        • South Florida
        • Tampa
        • Tallahassee
      • Georgia
        • Atlanta
        • Cherokee
        • Forsyth
        • Greater Perimeter
        • Gwinnett
        • North Fulton
        • North Georgia
        • Northeast Georgia
        • Rome
        • Savannah
      • Louisiana
        • New Orleans
      • North Carolina
        • Charlotte
        • Raleigh
      • Tennessee
        • Chattanooga
        • Nashville
      • Virginia
        • Richmond
    • South Central
      • Arkansas
        • Northwest Arkansas
    • Midwest
      • Illinois
        • Chicago
      • Michigan
        • Detroit
      • Minnesota
        • Minneapolis St. Paul
      • Missouri
        • St. Louis
      • Ohio
        • Cleveland
        • Columbus
        • Dayton
    • Southwest
      • Arizona
        • Phoenix
        • Tucson
        • Valley
      • Texas
        • Austin
        • Dallas
        • Houston
    • West
      • California
        • Bay Area
        • LA
        • Pasadena
      • Colorado
        • Denver
      • Hawaii
        • Oahu
  • FAQs
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our Audience
    • Why It Works
    • What People Are Saying
    • BRX in the News
  • Resources
    • BRX Pro Tips
    • B2B Marketing: The 4Rs
    • High Velocity Selling Habits
    • Why Most B2B Media Strategies Fail
    • 9 Reasons To Sponsor A Business RadioX ® Show
  • Partner With Us
  • Veteran Business RadioX ®

Decision Vision Episode 169: Should I Have My Business Valued Every Year? – An Interview with Doug Marshall, Marshall+Viliesis, LLC

May 19, 2022 by John Ray

Doug Marshall
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 169: Should I Have My Business Valued Every Year? - An Interview with Doug Marshall, Marshall+Viliesis, LLC
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Doug Marshall

Decision Vision Episode 169: Should I Have My Business Valued Every Year? – An Interview with Doug Marshall, Marshall+Viliesis, LLC

Doug Marshall, Partner at Marshall+Viliesis, LLC, joined host Mike Blake to cover the process of having a business valuation done, and whether doing a valuation every year is advisable. They discussed the factors which impact a business’s value, ways it can be valued, reasons to do it annually, whether it should be done in-house or independently, and much more.

Decision Vision is presented by Brady Ware & Company and produced by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Marshall+Viliesis, LLC

Marshall+Viliesis, LLC is a firm dedicated to helping owners Value & Protect their largest and most important asset.

Business Value Protection Planning™ is a proprietary system developed by Marshall+Viliesis to help owners through the planning process with speed and accuracy. It guides them through the four critical areas of Succession, Retirement, Estate and Key Stakeholder. Planning.

Starting with a valuation Business Value Protection Planning™ has the ultimate goal of planning which is Current, Complete and Coordinated. Business owners think differently than the wealthy affluent and deserve a better planning experience designed for them.

Company website | LinkedIn

Doug Marshall, Founding Partner, Marshall+Viliesis, LLC

Doug Marshall, Founding Partner, Marshall+Viliesis, LLC

Doug Marshall is a founding partner at Marshall+Viliesis, LLC. He is focused on helping owners get the planning they deserve to protect the wealth, income, and legacy of their business.

Along with his partner Peter Viliesis he created Business Value Protection Planning™, a system designed to deliver planning that starts with a valuation of the business. Knowing the current value of a business helps an owner make better decisions for the business. It helps the owner make better decisions for growth, decisions for protecting the business value, and decisions to help unlock business value.

Previously Doug has worked with Nationwide, Manulife/John Hancock in the Corporate Products division where he developed and marketed Corporate-Owned and Bank-Owned Life Products. He has been associated with Penn Mutual on the brokerage side as well.

He is located in Seattle Washington where the state is home to over 400 Craft Breweries. Much of his focus is working with Brewery Owners, a fascinating manufacturing industry. If you are ever in Seattle he will be more than happy to take you on a tour!

LinkedIn

Mike Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series

Michael Blake is the host of the Decision Vision podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms, and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth-minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

Decision Vision is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision-maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the Decision Vision podcast.

Past episodes of Decision Vision can be found at decisionvisionpodcast.com. Decision Vision is produced by John Ray and the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Connect with Brady Ware & Company:

Website | LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: [00:00:02] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions. Brought to you by Brady Ware & Company. Brady Ware is a regional, full-service accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality.

Mike Blake: [00:00:21] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast giving you, the listener, clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision making on a different topic from the business owners or executives’ perspective. We aren’t necessarily telling you what to do, but we can put you in a position to make an informed decision on your own and understand when you might need help along the way.

Mike Blake: [00:00:42] My name is Mike Blake, and I’m your host for today’s program. I’m the Managing Partner of Brady Ware Arpeggio, a data-driven management consultancy, which brings clarity to owners and managers of unique businesses facing unique strategic decisions. Our parent, Brady Ware & Company is sponsoring this podcast. Brady Ware is a public accounting firm with offices in Dayton, Ohio; Alpharetta, Georgia; Columbus, Ohio; and Richmond, Indiana.

Mike Blake: [00:01:07] If you’d like to engage with me on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I’m on LinkedIn as myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. I also recently launched a new LinkedIn group called Unblakeable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck, so please join that as well if you would like to engage.

Mike Blake: [00:01:25] Today’s topic is should I have my business valued every year? And this is a topic that I have avoided. It has been suggested to me that I really should be doing more valuation stuff, because at least nominally, that’s the field that I’m in. But to be perfectly candid, I’ve been reluctant to do it, because I didn’t know how to do it in a way that just wasn’t completely self-serving. And those of you who know this podcast, who have hung around and listened to a few of these, you know that I have no interest in turning this thing into an infomercial.

Mike Blake: [00:02:04] We put information out there that we hope and believe is useful to our audience. We bring experts on that can talk about the topic and just sort of let it go at that. But the fact of the matter is that valuation of a business is important, and it’s important for a lot of reasons, whether you’re thinking of selling your business, you’re positioning it to be transferred to a family member or somebody else, there are tax planning implications, all kinds of reasons why you ought to know or at least have some idea as to the value of your business should you decide to sell it or another business should you decide to buy it.

Mike Blake: [00:02:49] But I didn’t want to get on here and basically just do a monologue, and again, be sort of Ron Popeil selling the Ronco Rotisserie Showtime grill, which, by the way, as an aside, is fantastic. I’ve had one for like 15 years. I got one as a Christmas present for my mother, and I thought, for sure, this is going to be one of these things that goes into the attic with like 25 years of fruitcake, but I’ll tell you, the damn thing works. It actually does make the best tasting chicken and turkey we’ve ever had. So, they’re not a sponsor of the show, and as far as I know, Mr. Popeil, I actually think, passed away about 10 years ago. But anyway, that’s a sort of an aside there. If you’re thinking of getting one, go ahead and get one, because I think they’re pretty neat.

Mike Blake: [00:03:34] So, helping me out here to make sure that this isn’t an infomercial, and frankly, just to sort of keep me in line is my friend joining us from Washington State, Doug Marshall, who is a founding partner in Marshall|Viliesis, LLC. He’s focused on helping owners get the planning they deserve to protect the wealth, income, and legacy of their business. Along with his partner, Peter Viliesis, he created Business Value Protection Planning, a system designed to deliver planning that starts the valuation of a business.

Mike Blake: [00:04:03] Knowing the current value of a business helps an owner make better decisions for the business and helps the owner make better decisions for growth, for protecting the business value and decisions to help unlock business value. And I think that second part is very important and is very overlooked, especially when times are good, but protecting value is so important, and I think that it’s not as sexy as growth or profit, but, boy, building resilience into your business, or as Nicholas Taleb would say, antifragility into your business, I think that it is an incredibly important concept that maybe we’ll dive more deeply in another show.

Mike Blake: [00:04:48] Previously, Doug has worked with Nationwide Manulife John Hancock in the Corporate Products Division, where he developed and marketed corporate-owned and bank-owned life products. He has been associated with Penn Mutual on the brokerage side as well. He’s located in Seattle, Washington, with a status home to over 400 craft breweries. Much of his focus is working with brewery owners, a fascinating manufacturing industry. That’s something that we have a guy in our practice who owns Sizemore, does a bunch of as well. If you’re ever in Seattle, he’ll be more than happy to take you on a tour. So, with that, I’d like to welcome Doug Marshall to the Decision Vision podcast.

Doug Marshall: [00:05:25] Thank you, Michael. It’s a pleasure to be here. Really appreciate the opportunity.

Mike Blake: [00:05:30] So, explain to our list, and of course, I know the answer to this question, but most of our listeners don’t, what is a business valuation?

Doug Marshall: [00:05:41] Well, it doesn’t come with a set of steak knives, so we definitely are not doing an infomercial here. But I think that most business owners have a notional value of what their business is worth, because they talk to other business owners, right? Yet, at the same time, very few go through the formal process of getting a valuation, of having somebody take all of their financial data, look at what the business is expected to do over the next few years, and come up with a number that says, this is what your business is worth, and having that knowledge is rather important.

Doug Marshall: [00:06:23] So, in your practice, in my practice, what we will do when we’re working with the business owner is we’ll collect three, maybe five years of historical financial data. We’ll do an interview and we’ll find out what the business owner is about and what’s going on with the business, and we’ll do a projection of what the expected cash flows are to be, and we’ll come up with a number.

Doug Marshall: [00:06:46] And there are a number of different valuation numbers. There’s equity value, and I don’t expect that we’ll go into all of this detail now, but there’s equity value, asset sale value, enterprise value, liquidation value, book value. So, there are a number of different measures and a number of different ways to look at the value of a business, but it’s important for an owner to know. Did I answer the question alright for what we wanted to do?

Mike Blake: [00:07:10] Well, I think so. So, at the end of the day, evaluation, it sounds like, is a third-party, and I think importantly, an independent view as to what the business is, at least, ostensibly worth. Let me ask this. I’m very curious to get your view on this. In your experience, do you think that more business owners are likely to think their business is more than it’s actually worth, what it would likely sell for, or less than what it would likely sell for? In other words, are business owners too optimistic or too pessimistic?

Doug Marshall: [00:07:50] I think it’s 50-50, and I think it also depends on their mood. They could have come off a crappy week, and they could say, well, I’m not that optimistic that anybody’s interested in my business, I don’t know how to transfer it, my kids aren’t interested in it. So, they don’t really know. And then, they’ll be with their buddies. I mean, business owners tend to hang with business owners, and I know this is true in the brewery business, but they’ll say, my business is worth a certain multiple of earnings or EBITDA and there will be this rule of thumb in there, but it’s not necessarily what their business is worth, and I also want to make sure that everybody understands that I can value a business for $10 million and it sells for $13 million, but that was kind of a strategic purchase, possibly.

Doug Marshall: [00:08:42] So, just because I come up with a range of value, you come up with a range of value doesn’t mean that that’s what the business is going to sell for. So, ultimately, if somebody’s looking to sell a business, which is usually why people think that they should get a valuation, they’re in a position where they may or may not get that number, but I think it’s all over the map.

Mike Blake: [00:09:05] Yeah. And I think that that point is very important, in that defining value is actually deceptively hard. And Warren Buffett would say where price is what you pay, value is what you get, we know the technical definitions of value in terms of buying and willing informed seller and buyer, and the fact of the matter is that most of the time, an asset, particularly if it’s not on a liquid public market, an asset trades for, it’s something that can be quite far from what you and I might say is fair value, and that’s because the markets aren’t all that efficient.

Doug Marshall: [00:09:51] Right. Because it’s very limited and people don’t really pay attention to that, but you also might be a minority shareholder, so your value is less. You might not have marketability of your stock, so your value is less. You might have controlling interest, so your value is more. Yeah, but lack of marketability really creates a problem to get a true value for an owner. That’s why I think it’s so important to know the value well in advance of any event that takes place so that you’re not caught off guard.

Mike Blake: [00:10:23] Now, in your practice, what is involved in a business valuation? You talked about reviewing and analyzing historical financial data up to five years, but I imagine it’s much more than that. Can you share with our audience kind of what other processes and procedures enter into a business valuation process?

Doug Marshall: [00:10:45] Well, I know that we’re going to get to this question later, but predominantly, I’m using an online algorithmic system called BizEquity. And the reason for that is that I’m trying to not have the valuation process get in the way of the answer that the business owner really, really needs. And that is approximately, how much is my business worth? And this is well in advance of when they’re looking to sell it, so that the business owner can put in three years of financial data, we can do some projections out, and we come up with a report that will give them insight into the different valuation numbers for them.

Doug Marshall: [00:11:22] And it’s important to know, because if you’re going to do a buy-sell agreement with a partner, you want to know that that business is approximately worth seven-and-a-half million dollars, and you want to know that if I need to buy out my partner, it’s going to cost me three-and-a-half, if that’s what we agreed to. So, our process is relatively simple, because we want fast, inexpensive, and non-intrusive.

Doug Marshall: [00:11:51] Typically, and a lot of the work that you do, Mike, entails a lot of time and a lot of expense, and you’re worth it, but that’s because you’re trying to grind down the numbers so that you can support it legally from a tax standpoint, or you might have a litigation matter, or you’re doing something that’s highly subjective, saying, I don’t know what the future holds, so here’s this range, if anybody knows about your practice and the things that you do.

Doug Marshall: [00:12:20] I think one of the primary reasons, that I think there are two primary reasons why business owners don’t typically get a valuation. And the first reason is time and expense. It’s just like, it’s too much time, and owners, they have drive and discipline to grow their business, they’re not looking to spend time doing this other stuff that’s not directly growing their business. And to be quite honest, since more than 90% don’t keep valuations current, 90% of business owners don’t keep valuations current, business has gotten along fine without having formal valuations done on a regular basis, right? I mean, it’s not like we’re seeing businesses collapse, because they haven’t done these valuations.

Doug Marshall: [00:13:02] You know what I mean? If they need valuations to succeed, the business would be thriving and we’d have more than 10,000 professionals doing valuations throughout the country, but that’s not the case. So, normally, and I think owners also think that the only time that I really need a valuation is when I’m contemplating doing something like a gifting program, which that’s required. Like if I’m going to sue somebody, that might be required. If I’m going to transfer ownership, that’s going to be required. So, they’re only doing it when they’re required to do it, and I think having that knowledge well in advance makes a lot of sense for them, though.

Mike Blake: [00:13:39] And you mentioned the reasons why business owners don’t do valuations, I actually think there’s a third, and I’d love to get your view on it, and that is that I think that our profession has a little bit of a credibility problem. I think that, and for some reason, our profession largely is kind of okay with this. I think we have too much of a sense of humor about it, but I think we’re too willing to cave in to the argument that value is what somebody is willing to pay for it, which I’m not going to off-ramp onto that.

Mike Blake: [00:14:13] There’s a Freudian slip there, because I could easily rant on that for an hour, but I do think that a lot of people don’t know that there are people who do what we do, and I think our profession, frankly, has done a poor job of explaining to people, to the public what goes into a business valuation or appraisal, and I think there’s a distinction there that you’re kind of illustrating very nicely, actually. And I think that our profession hasn’t done enough to say, look, actually, there is some method to the madness here, really isn’t just shaking a magic eight ball, but there is some rigor that can lead you to make better decisions if you allow it.

Doug Marshall: [00:15:03] Oh, by all means. I always talked to owners about if an unexpected opportunity comes along, how are you going to measure that opportunity if you don’t really know the value of your business, for your business? Is that going to positively or negatively impact the value of my business? And should I be keeping—sometimes, what we’ll do with owners is we’ll do what ifs.

Doug Marshall: [00:15:28] We’ll say if you change this cash flow, if you reduce this expense, if you add this payroll, how much additional revenue is that going to create? How much risk is that creating for you, the owner? How much opportunity is that creating for you with growing your wealth? And you have to be really careful with the business, because you mentioned this before, it’s an illiquid and concentrated asset, it’s unlike anything else that somebody owns on the personal side, and that creates a lot more risk. So, knowing the value does make a lot of sense.

Mike Blake: [00:16:05] So, we touched on it, but I want to make sure we hit this clearly, because I think it’s central to the conversation, and that is, what exactly are the reasons why a company would want to have a valuation of their business done on a regular basis, whether it’s annually, semi-annually, biannually? What are the reasons for that?

Doug Marshall: [00:16:27] Yeah. Even if the business is not growing, it’s just pretty steady in sales, it’s doing $10 million of sales a year, its expenses remain relatively the same, I think just the very discipline of going through the process and establishing the value for the business, which might have a little bit of variation because of external factors, the economic climate and interest rates, of course, but just being able to show that this is something you were paying attention to, I mean, it’s not too different from showing that you’ve got good books and you can account for the money over the past 5 to 10 years.

Doug Marshall: [00:17:06] That shows that you are a disciplined business person and that your business has some value based on that. You want to show that you are a well-run business. So, knowing the value also puts you in that position of just being able to make better decisions on a regular basis, and then you also understand what drives the value. Very often, we will talk about, okay, what’s your equity value and what’s your liquidation value?

Doug Marshall: [00:17:33] I think those are two important numbers for a business owner to understand when it comes to protecting the value of your business, and this is a practical matter. So, your business value might be worth $10 million as a going concern, but only 2 or $3 million if you just have to shut the doors, because you haven’t done any proper planning or you become illiquid. So, that’s the amount that’s at risk, and I think facing that risk every year motivates someone to do some planning to make sure that that’s protected.

Doug Marshall: [00:18:05] Our buddy, Chris Mercer, he talks about the 1% solution, and he talks about, you should take 1%, or thereabouts, 1% of the value of your business and carve that off as a budgeted item to pay for your attorneys, and your CPAs, and your wealth advisors, your insurance people to make sure that you are doing the planning that is protecting the wealth, helping to unlock that wealth, ultimately, of that business, and not pay more taxes. There are all sorts of ways in which you can lose money in the ultimate transaction of transferring the value, because you’re paying too much in taxes, you’re not getting as much as you should for the business, because you were disorganized in the process and you haven’t positioned the business correctly to be sold.

Mike Blake: [00:18:58] And I think one of the things you said is really smart, which is I think that in a valuation process, the why is much more important, or at least as important, but I would argue more important than the what. We’re giving you numbers in round figures—giving a client a number, I should say, your business is worth $1,000,000, the end. I mean, yeah, that’s nice, but on the other hand, your business is worth $1,000,000, but it could be worth more, because of these five—if you do these five things, which, by the way, some of them may not be very hard to do at all. That’s easily worth a multiple of the fees that were invested in the valuation in the first place.

Doug Marshall: [00:19:40] Exactly.

Mike Blake: [00:19:42] So, let me get to some of the mechanics here. I think for many people, especially if they’re approaching business valuation for the first time and they may or may not have heard of people like us that do this for a living, they probably will turn to their CPA first. And there’s a rationale to it, right? They’re financially oriented. Some CPAs are, in fact, professional business appraisers or valuation analysts. Some do it a lot, some dabble. And of course, there’s an institutional knowledge of the company, most likely, at least for some period of time. Should the first place or should a company just sort of default to turning to their CPA to do the valuation of the company for them?

Doug Marshall: [00:20:34] Well, one, if the CPA does have experience in doing valuations and has really taken the time to learn how to do it, I would say, sure, that’s not a bad place to turn, yet at the same time, I think getting a secondary objective opinion on the value of the business, the range of value on the business does make sense. Another difficult thing, and this is nothing against the CPA profession, but they’re very seasonal. And so, they go through seasons where they are 100% unavailable because of the workload. And then, there are other times when they’re available. So, it’s not really in their business model to be doing valuations. And in your firm, I mean, you’re not doing tax work anymore, right?

Mike Blake: [00:21:25] No, I never was.

Doug Marshall: [00:21:29] And Owen, so I mean, you have a different side. So, I wouldn’t object to a CPA firm that had a valuation arm in it, I don’t think that’s a problem, but here has to be that relationship and there has to be experience in doing valuations for the particular type of industries, right? So, if you’ve never done a brewery before, you’ve got a learning curve as a valuator.

Mike Blake: [00:21:56] Now, what if the company is large enough that they have a CFO or a controller, is it a good idea maybe to say, hey, you’re a CFO, I’m paying you to do finance stuff, you tell me what the business is worth?

Doug Marshall: [00:22:10] Mm-hmm. I mean, once again, they can give you a general version, the idea of what the business is worth, but then you have to look at, what is the level of objectivity here? I don’t want, as the CPA, to be the person who should be telling the owner, that you think it’s worth 20, but it’s really worth 15. I’m not sure I really want to be put in that position. And then, with people in value, people that do valuations full time, even they’re going to come with their certain set of—they’re going to have bias in how valuation should be done. They’re going to have bias toward industry.

Doug Marshall: [00:22:52] And there are the human factors that you want to get as much out of the human factor as possible. If I wake up on Monday morning and start evaluation and I did not have a very good weekend, that might color my world a little bit to where my process is going to be different. And I think the same thing can happen to a CFO, so it’s better to have somebody to come in and do something objective. I don’t think having your CFO give an estimate is a bad idea, but I also wouldn’t take the CFO off of CFO type of stuff to go through a full-blown valuation, because that is going to take time.

Mike Blake: [00:23:39] And you mentioned something that I think is really important, and that is the independence. In the CPA example, can you really trust your CPA to tell you that your baby is ugly, or are they going to be a little concerned that in doing that, that the fees for their other services might be in jeopardy, or the CFO might be concerned that his or her job might be imperiled if you come back and say, your baby is ugly, this company isn’t really worth very much?

Mike Blake: [00:24:16] And candidly, that’s something that I address here at Brady Ware. When we receive an internal referral from an existing client, one of the first questions I—the first question I ask is, is there any scenario under which the answer that we come up with would make the client mad at us? And if the answer is yes or even if it’s supposedly infinitesimally small, and it probably isn’t, it’s probably bigger than we think it is, then even I’ll refer it out, because it’s just not worth it.

Doug Marshall: [00:24:52] I hear you on that. And I’m not trying to be self-serving for the two of us saying, you shouldn’t use your CPA, you shouldn’t use your CFO, I’m saying, as is good practice, there’s a lot of reasons to look outside to get that information.

Mike Blake: [00:25:08] So, I think the most common or maybe most accessible thesis for this is to have a valuation done annually, because you’re in a mode now where this might be the year that you’re going to sell, either you just decide that you want to throw it in, or this is the year that somebody calls you on the phone and makes an offer that you don’t hang up on them on. Are there other reasons to do it annually other than just be ready for a proposal to sell?

Doug Marshall: [00:25:40] I think it’s going to be easier if you do it on an annual basis. It might not be as costly, because a lot of the information is already there, and you just have to check and see what has changed. I think the habit of it is going to make it easier if you do it every five years. It’s like, you might say, ah, we can wait another year. But doing it every year probably makes the most sense, because then, I can quickly look at a company’s financials, and say, not much has changed here, so we’re probably not going to come up with too far of a different result, but it’s good to know.

Doug Marshall: [00:26:16] And I also might want to ask, why haven’t you grown, or why did your sales fall off, or why did your expenses go higher? What’s really fascinating about a valuation is that when you look at your accounting statements, your cash flow, your net cash flow statement, your gross revenue, your balance sheet, you can kind of pick and choose what numbers you focus in on to make yourself feel better as a business owner, and we’re just human, right? But the valuation puts together all of that stuff and comes out with one number. So, it throws it all in the mix, does all the calculations, looks at the future cash flow, and it acts as a barometer. So, it doesn’t allow the owner to kind of cheat themselves by telling them a story that’s not necessarily true.

Mike Blake: [00:27:12] And you touched on something that I think is worth pausing on for a minute, which is, again, the why, and even if your business likely has remained static in value over a year or two years, whatever, in the financial markets, they have a concept called performance attribution, and I think that applies here as well, in that why the business value has changed or not changed I think is important. Is it because you did something great or not as great, or some function of your company did something great or not as great, or were you bailed out by or were you hurt by simple market movements? And that’s just something that’s environmental and it doesn’t necessarily mean that you did anything right or wrong.

Doug Marshall: [00:28:08] Mm-hmm. And I’ve had owners that have said, “How much cash should I leave in my business?” And I don’t have a specific answer for them, but they say, “If I leave this million, how does that impact the value, as opposed to taking out 750,000?” We can do a quick calculation, so they can see what happens there, and then we can kind of talk about, does it make sense to leave it in the company or take it out of the company and redeploy it in other ways? So, there are forensic things that you can do and pro forma things that you can do in valuation to do what ifs, which helps in planning for future events.

Mike Blake: [00:28:51] Now, as you’ve touched upon, sometimes, companies will need to engage a valuation or an appraisal for something that is compliance-related. It could be for a gifting event, could be for, I don’t know, stock options, 83(b) elections, something having to do with gap, take your pick. Can a client simply take a document like that or a valuation, and then rely on that as the same document for strategic positioning?

Doug Marshall: [00:29:23] Yes and no, and I don’t want to be elusive on that because every valuation has a purpose and a goal. So, if you are doing something for a state planning purposes and gifting purposes, you might want to have to be able to justify a certain value for that gifting program. That might not be the same value that you would want if you were going to go sell the company or you are going to make a strategic decision. So, I mean, the number shouldn’t be that far off, but you have to keep in mind that if you had a different purpose for the valuation, the numbers might be a little bit different.

Mike Blake: [00:30:05] Now, our term of art that we use is something you and I, meaning, and others like us is we apply what’s called a standard of value, which really just means. It’s a definition of value or a context of value. And of course, for most tax things, it’s fair market value. For most accounting things and some litigation, it’s fair value. For transactional work, it might be something called investment value or synergistic value. But when we’re talking about having a valuation done as a strategic planning document, what standard or definition of value do you typically recommend, and why?

Doug Marshall: [00:30:46] I am more going toward the neutral fair market value, because there’s a lot less baked in. Now, I mean, now, what you can do from there is you can say from the fair market value, if the valuation is 10 million, maybe there is a strategic play out there that’s 15 million, but it’s only that 15 million because there’s somebody on the other side that has a different motivation than you do possibly for keeping it.

Doug Marshall: [00:30:46] So, I just kind of stick with the fair market value, because that’s the basic. I also think that one important point that we need to keep in mind is that since there are these different standards of value in a buy-sell agreement, now, this is going a little bit off the beaten path, it is important in your legal documents to establish which standard of value you’re going to use, because those numbers can be widely varied. And if you have not defined those things, then we start to get into the litigation process between business partners, and that’s one thing that we want to avoid by doing the valuations every year.

Doug Marshall: [00:32:06] Chris Mercer talks about having a single appraiser do a—select the appraiser at the beginning of the year, value the business at the beginning of the year, and all of the partners, if there are multiple owners, agree what the price would be for a buy-sell, what the price would be if somebody wanted to get out, rather than waiting for the event, going through the process of hiring an appraiser at that point in time, and then having them come up with a number that’s a complete surprise. So, being proactive on the valuation side definitely makes a lot of sense.

Mike Blake: [00:32:43] Yeah. Let’s pause on that, and for the record, I’m a big fan of Chris Mercer’s work on that. I’ve had his book in my library for years. I’ve expanded a little bit upon what he’s written, at least in that edition, but it really is an outstanding book. And I agree, if you can agree on a single appraiser and get rid of these sort of dueling appraiser things, processes, I think that’s really a fantastic way to go. But interestingly, you bring up a scenario that I have not encountered as much, I haven’t thought of as much, frankly, and that is the business partner scenario.

Mike Blake: [00:33:23] And I want to pause on that because I’ve done my share, I’m working on my share of resolving buy-sell agreements, and as I think through a lot of those assignments, boy, a lot of them could have been resolved much more easily had there simply been a trusted party by both or more, by all stakeholders involved to perform an independent appraisal, and then that number is just sort of there, as opposed to waiting. And then, like you said, the surprise that when you get a surprise valuation that you don’t like, that’s when the next call is to the lawyers, then you’re off to the races.

Doug Marshall: [00:34:01] And now, you’re talking significant money. So, I mean, you and I own a business for $5 million. We agree that the price is 5 million. If something happens to you, I agree to buy out your spouse for two-and-a-half, and if something happens to me, you agree to buy my portion out for two-and-one-half million dollars. And so, we each have to ask ourselves the question, am I satisfied with getting two-and-a-half or having my estate get two-and-a-half million, and am I satisfied with having to pay out two-and-a-half million? But I’m dealing with that ahead of time, rather than at the time that the event occurs.

Doug Marshall: [00:34:37] So, we can—and you and I might decide, well, that’s going to be a little too rich for our blood. I constantly run into owners that do have that situation to say, “Man, our business grew fast, but I don’t think that I have the liquidity to buy out my partner.” And now, they have to plan for, what can we do? And they might structure their buyout over a period of time, because it’s going to take them a period of time. And you can go back and look at the controlling documents and save people a lot of pain if they know what the dollar number is going to be.

Mike Blake: [00:35:18] Yeah. And I also think that perhaps having an independent appraisal done or valuation done regularly on a partnership like that eliminates or greatly reduces partner arbitrage. And what I mean by that is I think, in particular, when you have buy-sell agreements that call for either a formula or a specific price at which a buyout would occur, eventually, it becomes clear to one party or the other that they would benefit very much from being on one side or the other of a buyout. And there’s at least a financial incentive, ethics aside, there’s a financial incentive to manipulate that buyout, because there’s a substantial financial benefit to you. With an independent valuation or appraisal, I think a lot of that goes away and provides for a more kind of transparent and ultimately harmonious partnership.

Doug Marshall: [00:36:24] 100% agree on that.

Mike Blake: [00:36:27] So, when you get the valuation done, who should have access to it? Right? There’s a document, a work product, usually, of some kind produced, who should have access to that?

Doug Marshall: [00:36:45] Well, I think all key stakeholders that are responsible for driving the company. And I mean, maybe that doesn’t go all the way down to the bottom, but anybody that should know and should understand that this is now being used as a strategic document to guide us forward into the future, they need to understand what that is, whether they are an owner or not. So, you could have several key people where the owner says, “I just did a valuation of my company and it’s $9 million, and my goal is to get it up to $15 million in a certain period of time, and we need to work toward that goal.” So, anybody who’s a key stakeholder in that fashion needs to understand, I think the attorney needs to understand, the accountant should have that information, family members should also have that information as well.

Mike Blake: [00:37:44] And probably, the owner’s wealth advisors as well, I would imagine.

Doug Marshall: [00:37:48] Yeah, I meant to say that. Yes, of course.

Mike Blake: [00:37:54] And that work product, is that something that the business owner should be walking these people through? Should the provider be walking people through it to make sure everybody understands? Because despite our best of intentions, some of these documents can be quite hard to read, especially if you don’t have a lot of economics and finance training. Should the owners sort of set aside time to make sure that they understand and all the other stakeholders understand them?

Doug Marshall: [00:38:30] I think it’s worth taking the time. I don’t necessarily think it is the owner’s responsibility to put that together. I don’t think it’s that hard to put together a two-page summary of the valuation, what was done, the conclusions that were drawn, and some of the major factors that influenced the valuation of that, and what it means. So, it shouldn’t be in Greek, in a difficult to explain language, but I don’t necessarily think it’s the owner’s responsibility to do that, maybe it would be the CFO’s responsibility if the company is large enough to have one.

Mike Blake: [00:39:08] Now, I don’t know if you’ve encountered this, but I encounter a number of people who already “know” at least the multiples for being paid for companies in their market. They may get that from industry associations. They may get it from bankers. They may get it from competitors who may or may not be lying to them. They may get on the golf course. With people like that. What do you say to people like that that think that they kind of know their market multiples? What’s the argument that they may want to have a valuation done anyway?

Doug Marshall: [00:39:47] Well, before I answer that question, I would say, if you’re a franchise, you probably have a pretty good idea based on how the franchise works, especially if it’s a large one. So, I think the rules of thumb multiples in those particular situations are fairly accurate. The problem that I have with general rule of thumb multiples is that they end up becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy, and that’s not good, because the valuation is still the economics of the company, how much cash flow is expected to generate, how much discretionary cash flow is available to the owner, and what’s the projected increase in the growth in that cash flow, and what’s the risk that that is not going to happen? Right?

Doug Marshall: [00:40:34] Those are the basics, right, Mike? And so, you could have a rule of thumb multiple that doesn’t make sense as it relates to the cash flow, because over time, that multiple has eroded into a self-fulfilling prophecy. And it may be to the detriment of the owner. It might say—the multiple might be telling the owner that your business is worth less, that your business is worth more. So, I think that the rule of thumb can be used after you understand the value of your company and you have something professionally done.

Mike Blake: [00:41:17] I’m talking with Doug Marshall on the topic, as should I have my business valued every year? One question I want to ask, I want to make explicit, we kind of danced around it, but I want to kind of nail it, and that is once you have a valuation in your hand, as a business owner or executive, what do you do with it? What are the next steps after you have that document?

Doug Marshall: [00:41:47] One, I would say, is, are you happy with the number? I might go to a business broker, and say, this is the valuation that I have, just in general terms, you think I could sell my company for that? That you could go to your attorney, your tax attorney, and say, hey, my business is worth this, is my estate plan in order based on the value of this business?

Doug Marshall: [00:42:19] You could go to your accountant, and say, hey, this is the value of my company, but I think that I could be a little bit more tax efficient, what could we be doing with that? So, I mean, anybody that’s going to help you make decisions about what to do for your personal planning and your business planning, you can use that document as something to stimulate some conversation and also give some insight into the conversation.

Mike Blake: [00:42:48] So, when we talk about an annual valuation, should it be treated as an update of an existing valuation or should it be considered almost a brand new blank sheet of paper kind of valuation every year? And I can see the arguments for both. The argument for one is obviously cost and efficiency, and institutional knowledge. On the other hand, the argument for sort of a de novo valuation would be to reduce the risk of bias materially impacting or influencing the valuation. Where do you fall on that?

Doug Marshall: [00:43:31] I don’t think that you have to do a brand new, clean slate every year, but maybe every five years, I would. Just say, let’s tear it all up and see what we’ve got. Let’s look at this whole thing all over again.

Mike Blake: [00:43:51] Does an annual valuation make sense for everybody? For example, are there cases where you’ve spoken to somebody and maybe they think they want an annual valuation or they’ve been told they should get one, and you sort of say, you know what, no, I don’t really think this is right for you? Has that ever happened, or what is the case—who shouldn’t necessarily have a valuation done every year?

Doug Marshall: [00:44:17] Well, if the business too much depends on one person, I don’t think that you can really get a clean, accurate valuation. And so, you’re talking about a smaller company. But I think once you get into a larger company size, where it is beyond one particular owner, I think having that knowledge is important. And I mean, I’m not trying to do the infomercial here, but I think that there is a legitimate place for the online algorithmic valuations that are kept up to date.

Doug Marshall: [00:44:47] And as long as the operator understands how these things are working and what can possibly go wrong by getting bad data into it, you can have a relatively good piece of information. I mean, you even have large accounting firms that now use independent valuation tools that are online just to confirm the stuff that they do and also to bring the cost of the valuation down for some of their clients that might not want to spend a five figure number to get a valuation on an annual basis.

Mike Blake: [00:45:21] So, here’s part of the hardest question I’m going to ask in the interview, and it’s pretty much coming at the end, if you or I do provide a valuation for a company, and then it sells for a price that’s materially different from what our conclusion was, does that mean that we are wrong?

Doug Marshall: [00:45:45] No, not in the slightest, unless you hired me to evaluate what you could sell your company for in the market conditions that exists today, but I think that’s more the role of a business broker or somebody in the M&A field, because they have connections with those people who might want to buy, who might want to pay a premium or might want to find a value in the marketplace. So, once again, our valuations are going to have a range of valuations that might differ by 20%.

Doug Marshall: [00:46:26] You might say your business is worth between 10 and $12 million. And so, if it doesn’t sell—we had one recently where the company sold for almost a third more, but a lot of that was because it had fully depreciated equipment that with the supply chain problems, they would not be able to replace that equipment. So, the equipment had significant value in addition to the company itself, the company’s ability to generate revenue. Does that make sense?

Mike Blake: [00:47:00] Yeah, it does. And it’s important, I think, and sometimes, I think it’s overlooked that nowhere in the professional standards does it say that the object of what we do is to get the right number, because as a recognition, I think one of the things our profession does well, there’s a humble recognition that there isn’t necessarily a right number to get, but one that’s credible and reliable.

Mike Blake: [00:47:29] But market conditions are idiosyncratic, and you may be selling a company under duress, for example, if it’s under a buy-sell, or there are so many things that can go wrong that aren’t—or right, frankly, that aren’t considered under the laboratory conditions of a conventional appraisal that even under the best of circumstances, I think what we do should be considered a starting point, not necessarily an ending point.

Doug Marshall: [00:47:58] And business owners deal with uncertainty all the time, so delivering them a number that is not necessarily going to be black and white, the same way that you expect their accounting to be black and white, right? I expect accounting to account for every dollar down to the penny, but we can’t do that, because there’s so much uncertainty out there in the world, but there is also a way to kind of predict what is the range of the value that is likely to be there for you at some point in time in the future or right now.

Mike Blake: [00:48:31] Doug, we’re running out of time, this has been a great conversation, but I’m sure there are questions that either some of our listeners wished that I would have asked or wish we spent more time on, if somebody wants to follow up with you about any of the topics we’ve covered today, can they do so? And if so, what’s the best way to do that?

Doug Marshall: [00:48:49] I am always happy to either have a conversation about this, answer any questions, they can email me at dougm, Doug Marshall, M is my last initial, @marshallviliesis.com, or feel free to call me on my cell, talk, text, it’s 206-605-4695.

Mike Blake: [00:49:16] That’s going to wrap it up for today’s program. I’d like to thank Doug Marshall so much for sharing his expertise with us. We will be exploring a new topic each week, so please tune in so that when you’re faced with your next business decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy these podcasts, please consider leaving a review with your favorite podcast aggregator. It helps people find us so that we can help them.

Mike Blake: [00:49:37] If you would like to engage with me on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I’m on LinkedIn is myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. Also, check out my LinkedIn group called Unblakeable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck. Once again, this is Mike Blake, our sponsor is Brady Ware & Company, and this has been the Decision Vision podcast.

 

Tagged With: Brady Ware & Company, business valuation, business valuations, Decision Vision, Doug Marshall, ebitda, Marshall+Viliesis, Mike Blake, valuation

Decision Vision Episode 168: Should I Adopt the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS)?- An Interview with Billy Potter, Snellings Walters Insurance Agency

May 12, 2022 by John Ray

Billy Potter
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 168: Should I Adopt the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS)?- An Interview with Billy Potter, Snellings Walters Insurance Agency
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Billy Potter

Decision Vision Episode 168: Should I Adopt the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS)? – An Interview with Billy Potter, Snellings Walters Insurance Agency

Billy Potter, CEO of Snellings Walters Insurance Agency, joined host Mike Blake to discuss the successful outcomes his firm achieved after implementing the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS). They discussed what EOS is, the role of values, the impact of EOS not only on the bottom line but in one’s personal life, the challenges implementing such a system brings, and much more.

Decision Vision is presented by Brady Ware & Company and produced by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Snellings Walters Insurance Agency

Snellings Walters has been providing honest advice & protecting what you value most for more than 69 years. They are the smartest way to protect your business & family. They identify the critical issues facing your company. Survival of your business requires managing risks. In today’s environment, these risks are rapidly changing and becoming more complex. They have built a customizable platform to provide you with the security you need.

Company website | LinkedIn | Twitter 

Billy Potter, CEO, Snellings Walters Insurance Agency

Billy Potter, CEO, Snellings Walters Insurance Agency

Billy Potter’s career in insurance spans more than two decades. In 2011, he joined Snellings Walters to head the Employee Benefits Division and quickly proved to be an effective consultant. His superior consultation contributed to his winning various awards within the agency, and in 2018, he was nationally recognized as “Broker of the Year” by BenefitsPRO Magazine.

His reputation as both a top consultant and engaged team leader resulted in an invitation to become an owner at Snellings Walters in 2018. As Chief Sales Officer, Potter led his team to produce record sales for the agency. The combination of his knowledge, experience, character, and passion resulted in his transition to Chief Executive Officer in 2022.

In addition to his expertise and technical know-how, Billy’s personal philosophy aligns with the core values that drive the Snellings Walters vision: engagement, accountability, curiosity, and authenticity.

By cultivating and nurturing an agency culture that allows its employees to feel empowered and supported, Billy’s mission is to inspire the next generation of successful business people at Snellings Walters and beyond.

LinkedIn

Mike Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series

Michael Blake is the host of the Decision Vision podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms, and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth-minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

Decision Vision is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision-maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the Decision Vision podcast.

Past episodes of Decision Vision can be found at decisionvisionpodcast.com. Decision Vision is produced by John Ray and the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Connect with Brady Ware & Company:

Website | LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: [00:00:01] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions. Brought to you by Brady Ware & Company. Brady Ware is a regional, full-service accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality.

Mike Blake: [00:00:21] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast giving you, the listener, a clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision-making on a different topic from the business owners’ or executives’ perspective. We aren’t necessarily telling you what to do, but we can put you in a position to make an informed decision on your own and understand when you might need help along the way.

Mike Blake: [00:00:42] My name is Mike Blake, and I’m your host for today’s program. I’m a director at Brady Ware & Company, a full-service accounting firm based in Dayton, Ohio, with offices in Dayton; Columbus, Ohio; Richmond, Indiana; and Alpharetta, Georgia. I’m a managing partner of the Strategic Valuation and Advisory Services Practice, which brings clarity to the most important strategic decisions that business owners and executives face by presenting them with factual evidence for such decisions. Brady Ware is sponsoring this podcast.

Mike Blake: [00:01:09] If you would like to engage with me on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I’m on LinkedIn as myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. I also recently launched a new LinkedIn group called Unblakeable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck, so please join that as well if you would like to engage.

Mike Blake: [00:01:26] Today’s topic is, should I adopt the entrepreneurial operating system or EOS? And according to Wipfli, almost 9000 companies now run on the EOS system that was presented and popularized by Gino Wickman in his book called Traction. And, I have a particular interest in this discussion because you may have – if you’re a long time listeners of the show, you may have noticed there’s a subtle change in the intro of the podcast, whereby we’ve spun off my practice group into a separate company and I was named managing partner. And in doing so, when something like that happens, you are both excited for the opportunity and terrified of the responsibility.

Mike Blake: [00:02:13] And, one of the things that I realized very quickly as this was happening was that I needed to have some kind of operating system, if you will, for my company, because this is my first time in that role. I’ve managed before. I’ve led before, but I’ve never sort of been at the top of the org chart before. And candidly, that’s a very different kind of responsibility and a different kind of opportunity. And, about a year ago, I ran across Gino Wickman’s book. Somebody recommended it to me, and really have fallen in love with it, have studied it, and we’re in the initial stages of implementing EOS in this new company. So, I know a tiny bit about it.

Billy Potter: [00:02:58] And so, to talk about this, and so that I can mooch off of somebody else’s expertise, I’ve invited somebody that’s actually been living the EOS life and has been successful in doing so, also in a professional services context. So, I’m very pleased to introduce to you Billy Potter whose career in insurance spans more than two decades. In 2011, he joined Snellings Walters to head the Employee Benefits Division and quickly proved to be an effective consultant. His superior consultation contributed to his winning various awards within the agency, and in 2018 he was nationally recognized as Broker of the Year by BenefitsPRO Magazine.

Mike Blake: [00:03:37] In addition to his expertise and technical know-how, Billy has a personal philosophy that aligns with the core values that drive the Snelling Walters vision, engagement and accountability, curiosity and authenticity. I think we’re going to hear those words a lot in the next hour. By cultivating and nurturing an agency culture that allows its employees to feel empowered and supported, Billy’s mission is to inspire the next generation of successful business people at Snellings Walters and beyond.

Mike Blake: [00:04:07] Snellings Walters leads complex businesses into safety and security through commercial insurance and employee benefits and they focus on their values of core delivery of process, energy, and growth. For more than 60 years, they’ve been advising clients on business, personal, and life/health insurance. They’re the only commercial insurance and employee benefits company that energizes with a proven process. Growth is personal for them. Billy Potter, welcome to the Decision Vision podcast.

Billy Potter: [00:04:34] Thank you, Mike. Happy to be here.

Mike Blake: [00:04:36] So, not enough people know about the EOS and surely some people who are listening have never heard of it before. So, you’re a guy that’s living and having success with it. How would you describe the entrepreneurial operating system or EOS to somebody else?

Billy Potter: [00:04:51] I think the easiest way to paint a picture of what it does for your business is EOS is an assembly line for small businesses. The assembly line allowed them to be more effective and more efficient with manufacturing product. And, this has the same impact to running your business. A lot of us in small businesses we get to where we’re at because we’re good at our craft, whether it be manufacturing or offering a service. And many of the times, we don’t get an actual chance to work on our business, to make the business – allow the business to have a better impact to our product or our service. And the opposite occurs where we’re incapable of delivering our product or service because we’re so poor at developing structures to run an effective business. So, I like to look at EOS as an assembly line for your organization. And that’s been our experience. In fact, I’m a direct product of EOS. They implemented it right when I got here. So, I’m the benefactor of that efficiency.

Mike Blake: [00:06:09] So, the operating system sounds kind of cheeky maybe to somebody who’s not familiar with it. Is the name apt? Is it truly an operating system?

Billy Potter: [00:06:18] I would say yes, it is. So as, you know, it’s not a sexy term at all, EOS. We commonly refer to it as a language that we all speak, a language of efficiency and smoking out issues. That’s what we commonly refer to. In our L10 meetings is let’s smoke out the issue. So, these are the things that we speak of, or maybe that we know about that we’re not openly sharing, that the operating system has a good way of shaping your conversation so that the issue is a safe thing to address. So, from a communication perspective, which I think is the most powerful component of EOS, it sounds a little cheesy, but it’s true. It allows you to speak with one another. And it also allows you data points that should align with what you’re saying.

Mike Blake: [00:07:15] So, you know, the back story is kind of interesting in that – and if I understood correctly, you walked into EOS. It wasn’t necessarily that you were running a company and chose EOS, but rather you came from one situation, I presume, that was not an EOS organization and you walked into one. As you did so, what were some of the immediate – what were some of the differences that you might have noticed immediately or very quickly after making that transition?

Billy Potter: [00:07:45] Yeah. So, I came to this organization December 1, 2011, and the only thing I brought to the company was debt. And I had to work my tail off to get square of the house. But I would say sometime in mid to late 2012, they decided to implement EOS and we were not a young company at that point. We were 60 years old, but we had a ceiling that we couldn’t get through. And, the owners at that time thought that pursuing EOS was a fix to breaking through that ceiling.

Billy Potter: [00:08:22] The first thing that we saw, and this is going to sound a little negative, but we found people that didn’t want to be in a culture of accountability. And, I don’t know what’s worse, having people that don’t want a culture of accountability in business or not knowing that you have people that don’t want a culture of accountability. That is even worse. So, that was a big shocker.

Billy Potter: [00:08:52] The second thing that I think that really jumped out at us is I believe that this operating system, it provides an environment that protects your highly engaged employees. So, the numbers are somewhere like 30% of your organization is highly engaged. I think, if I remember correctly, 50% is disengaged and 20% is actively disengaged. So, the actively disengaged means these people are trying to ruin your business. So, you’re fighting for the 50% and you’re trying to protect the 30%. The 50% are in the boat without a paddle. The 30% are not in the boat. They’re in the water with a rope pulling the boat, swimming in the river. And then, the 20% are in the back of the boat, rowing in the other direction. That was just a very polarizing picture for us.

Billy Potter: [00:09:49] And, once we started implementing EOS and having some traction with it, we realized that all the metrics that we thought that were valuable, they quadrupled in productivity. It was unbelievable; a 60-year-old firm quadrupled in productivity. We had single people that single-handedly shaped an entire division with how we run service. And these are not like industry veterans. These are rookies just like me that came in, that were highly engaged, that were attracted to a system. And honestly, it kind of unchained them and unleashed their potential.

Mike Blake: [00:10:32] And, I’m curious about that process. How long did it take to start showing results that dramatic?

Billy Potter: [00:10:40] You know, I’m not completely – I can’t completely remember. I’d say that we had some turnover that we experienced probably within the first two years.

Mike Blake: [00:10:50] Which is by design, right?

Billy Potter: [00:10:51] Which is – well, the book said it. The book said you’re going to lose really good people that know insurance. It doesn’t say that in the book, but that know that your product or know your service, they’re industry veterans. We didn’t really believe it.

Billy Potter: [00:11:07] The second thing is, I would probably say that those productivity scores probably jumped up about 2 to 3 years as well, where we were like, holy cow. But I think the squishier, the more the subjective impact, the things that you didn’t see in the scorecard is the harmony that started to create in our leadership team. And honestly, I think that that’s what the biggest plague is in most small businesses. It arrests the ego that’s driving the business.

Billy Potter: [00:11:40] So, if Mike and I are running a company, and Mike wants to do X and Billy wants to do Y, and then your employees can’t serve two masters, and there’s a lot of end-arounds, which is what the book refers to it. It’s an actual thing. It’s like, “I know Mike told you to do this but do that.” And there started to get alignment within our leadership team of what’s your role and responsibility? What’s my role and responsibilities? Let’s be accountable to that, which fostered a greater community.

Billy Potter: [00:12:14] The word conflict is kind of funny. We were implementing Patrick Lencioni’s Five Dysfunctions of a Team at the same time of EOS, which is really a dynamic duo because – we might get into this later – healthy conflict is certainly a part of EOS. It’s not like a fight club. You know, conflict is a positive word. That’s how we look at it.

Billy Potter: [00:12:37] So, when you talk about immediate results, I’d say it opened our mind that conflict is a sign of progress, not a negative for a business if you think about conflict in your life. Probably the greatest conflict I’ve had is with family, maybe my spouse. But it’s because we have trust and we started to seeing more of that in our leadership dialogue.

Mike Blake: [00:13:03] Yeah. And, you know, there’s a thought that conflict is where ideas come from. And there’s a school of thought. I don’t remember who put this forward, but it suggests that truth only comes out of conflict, right, where at some point, there needs to be a conflict of ideas and that needs to be resolved. One of the things you’re kind of getting at, I think you’re getting at, feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, is EOS is sort of the interferon for passive aggression. Like, passive-aggressiveness just cannot survive in an EOS implementation. It’s passive-aggressive killer.

Billy Potter: [00:13:46] Yeah. And Traction, the first chapter of Traction, I believe, is titled Letting Go of the Vine.

Mike Blake: [00:13:54] Yep.

Billy Potter: [00:13:54] And so, you know, I’d like to believe that most issues of most organizations start with leadership. And, you know, we work with a guy that likes to say that you are ridiculously in charge. And I love that. That saying, it just resonates with me that we’re ridiculously in charge. We are ridiculously responsible for employing employees that don’t want to be accountable. You know, that’s on us. That’s a product of leadership.

Billy Potter: [00:14:21] And so, once you drop this model and you start fostering, “Well, Mike, what do you think is best for the business? Why do you think that’s best for the business?” That kind of conflict and that rub. You’re right. That’s what births truth, and perhaps hopefully a better process for your business, which is where we’re both aligned. We both want a successful business. And that allows kind of the ego to be, “Okay, well, maybe Mike’s not attacking me. He’s making a logical argument of the business and what we have a shared goal on.” And that’s what EOS really does a good job of not making it about the person, but making it about the company.

Mike Blake: [00:15:01] One of the things I find seductive about EOS is how it ties in to so many other ideas. And you mentioned the word conflict. I want to stop on that for a second because I think that’s really important. And it ties in with part of my introduction, which talks about how much you value curiosity. Right? And if I’m not mistaken, the EOS, EOS system is about converting the anger of conflict and the threat of conflict into curiosity. Right? Because you can still get to the same place but if you phrase the debate away from you’re an idiot for thinking that to why do you think that, right, and you really listen to the answer, that’s such a much more constructive platform for that conflict to take place.

Billy Potter: [00:15:52] I couldn’t agree more. We implemented it for two reasons. And all of our core values, which was such a fun process that EOS suggests you follow, it was fantastic. It helped bring our leadership team closer together. But we also came up with little phrases to help us be centered on what the core value means. So, for example, curious is seek to understand. And so, the reason we did –

Mike Blake: [00:16:17] [Inaudible] it’s a highly effective people. Right?

Billy Potter: [00:16:18] There you go. There you go. And honestly, that’s one of our favorite values because it’s a little unique too. You don’t see curious as a core value in many organizations but it really does two things effectively. First, it attacks ego. And, I think a lot of the times, I don’t want to listen because I know better, right? And, when I’m forced to think, okay, we’ll seek to understand. Why is Mike bringing this up? And you know what? This is the fourth time he’s brought it up in a meeting. Let’s smoke out that issue. What is the issue behind the issue?

Billy Potter: [00:16:55] And then, secondly, assumptions. How much conversations we have on a daily basis where we assume that we understand and we don’t? Is it George Shaw, George Bernard Shaw, maybe, who has a phrase something along the lines of the most challenging thing about the communication is the illusion that it’s taking place?

Mike Blake: [00:17:18] I don’t know who said it but it certainly sounds wise.

Billy Potter: [00:17:20] It’s brilliant. And it’s like once you start becoming a student of this and realizing I don’t understand, I am assuming what Mike means by that, it’s incredible the dialogue it promotes within your teams and within your community. And it makes it more about someone other than you when your focus is understanding their message. And once you do a good enough job of understanding, I think the really the solution presents itself. I don’t think it’s really hard to solve the issue once you understand the issue, but it’s understanding the right issue, which is the yeoman’s work.

Mike Blake: [00:18:00] And, to me, the flip side of that is that that also requires vulnerability to admit when you don’t understand something and going back to your discussion of ego. And now, there’s sort of – at least people are writing about it. I don’t know if people are doing it. People are writing and talking more about authentic management, vulnerable leadership, and so forth. And it strikes me that that’s really the flip side of curiosity. It has to be, right?

Billy Potter: [00:18:31] Amen. And authenticity, which is another core value. So, you are kind of striking here why are we aligned with those core values. So, curiosity, seek to understand. Authenticity. Authentic is the core value; your true self.

Billy Potter: [00:18:46] Look, we want to create an environment where you’re allowed to disagree. You’re allowed to have an opinion. It’s incredible. Like, when we onboard a new employee and we ask for their candid feedback, they’re like wounded animals. They look at us and be like, “You really want to know? Are you sure?” And, we have to literally position it to the point where if you don’t tell us – if you tell us that everything’s right, we know you’re lying. The only way you’re going to get in trouble here is if you’re a silent sufferer. That’s it. And, we need you to love us enough to tell us when we have broccoli in our teeth.

Billy Potter: [00:19:27] And, new employees are actually really critical because these are uncontaminated people. They have a fresh perspective on what we’re doing. We’re drinking the Kool-Aid, we’re making the Kool-Aid, and we’re swimming in the Kool-Aid. So, having that fresh perspective to create a more vulnerable and authentic environment, it’s crucial. It allows us to not be aspirational.

Mike Blake: [00:19:50] It sounds a lot like something of one of my philosophies for what it’s worth is that I want our frontline people, when we’re delivering work product, everybody can, anybody can stop a work product going out. It can be an intern. If they see something that isn’t right, they don’t like, they don’t understand and they see it going out, I’m not going to kill you for stopping the work product. I’m not even going to kill you if we miss a deadline, if it isn’t too critical. Right? But, boy, what I’m going to lose it over is if you saw something that was wrong and you didn’t mention it to anybody. That drives me crazy.

Billy Potter: [00:20:30] Yes.

Billy Potter: [00:20:30] And that gets to – one of my, what I hope is our core value, is honesty and integrity, not just to our clients and not just to each other but to yourself. And if you don’t have that, then you’re not going to – you’re not going to stop that blunder from going out that everybody else overlooked, even though you’ve read the report four times. Right? Somebody else is going to find some of that fifth time. But the bargain for that is you got to create the safe space for that, right?

Billy Potter: [00:21:00] Yeah. And the way that we word it for a similar reason is accountable. And the tagline is, own your part. So, we don’t want somebody saying, “Well, what was Mike’s report? Mike sent it out. Yes, I did see the flaw in it, but that was Mike’s responsibility.” No, it’s not. Own your part. What is your responsibility in that incorrect report going out?

Billy Potter: [00:21:22] The former CEO of Ritz Carlton, he allowed any employee to spend up to $2000 on the spot to fix the customer’s problem. That’s a lot of money.

Mike Blake: [00:21:35] Yeah.

Billy Potter: [00:21:36] But – I mean, how empowering that is for them to be a part of the solution on whatever they’re touching. And, I’m so thankful for EOS and just forget about the business for allowing them to allow me time to reflect on how important some of these qualities are in my own personal life, in my marriage, with the children I’m raising. What a gift this structure, this operating system has given to help me live a more fulfilling life at work.

Mike Blake: [00:22:09] So, I want to pause on that because I do think that’s a really important facet of this conversation, in that if you’re not familiar with EOS, one might be tempted to jump to a conclusion, it’s just a way to make more money or just a way to squeeze more productivity. Right? Whatever. Productivity hacks, life hacks, whatever you want. But the thing that strikes me about EOS and I think why people such as yourself who have embraced it are so passionate about it is because it’s not just about your job, right? If you do it right, it has a virtuous cycle kind of knock-on effect of every element of your life. That’s what I’ve observed from people who’ve kind of made that journey and why I’m so excited and intent on starting it for our firm.

Billy Potter: [00:23:02] I couldn’t agree more with you. Truett Cathy said if you make people better, bigger is inevitable, and, you know, the whole concept of we’re a for-profit entity. So, just to be clear, we’re in business to become more successful. We want to grow. These are reasons that we want to be held accountable to something bigger than ourselves, and it’s okay to want to make more money. But that’s a lagging indicator, not a leading one. Making more money is a result of something.

Billy Potter: [00:23:32] And it’s almost like, I think most businesses are saying, we want to get an A on the test. Let’s not talk about our preparation for the test, you know. That’s what EOS does. It allows you a study guide to make sure that you get an A. Actually, it allows you to study guide to redefine what an A is. And that’s what all the metrics are that we have.

Billy Potter: [00:23:56] And so, of course, we want to make more money in the end or be more successful. We want to pay employees more money in the end. We want to do all those things. But, you know, it came down to what makes us unique, which again is a product of EOS. And the first one that we have of three uniques is growth is personal. And so, if we are winning at work and we are not winning at home, we’ve lost. We’ve missed the point. We want your personal life to benefit with your professional life. We want both to be enhanced. And, honestly, in the end, we’re going to get a better product, a better result, a better service, a better experience because we are open to improving both. It can’t just be one or the other.

Mike Blake: [00:24:41] And, you know, the way when you say things like the money is the result not the goal, I hear Simon Sinek talking.

Billy Potter: [00:24:49] Yeah. That’s exactly right.

Mike Blake: [00:24:51] People listening to the podcast, now I’m basically a cyberstalker of his. Like, Simon, please come on the show at some point. I haven’t gotten a restraining order yet, but I probably will. But again, another tie-in where the EOS comes in. Knowing your why, I think, is critical to understanding, to successfully adopting an eOS.

Billy Potter: [00:25:08] Mike, I almost feel like you’re stalking us. When you walk into our office, you’re going to see Simon Sinek’s Golden Circle taking up an entire wall.

Mike Blake: [00:25:19] Really?

Billy Potter: [00:25:20] Yes. I swear to you.

Mike Blake: [00:25:21] I may visit. I want to see that and take a photo.

Billy Potter: [00:25:23] You’re welcome. Any time you want, buddy. In fact, part of me wants to take the Zoom call right now and show you the wall. But he says, people don’t buy what you do; they buy why you do it. So, all of these things were coming together at once for us. We had Simon Sinek. It starts with the why. Honestly, the video is really all you need to see, the TED Talk. It’s 18 minutes long. How Great Leaders Inspire Action is the name of the TED Talk. And so, that influence combined with Patrick Lencioni’s Five Dysfunction of a Team and Gino Wickman’s Traction. All of those things came together at once for our organization, which was like bottling lightning, you know,

Billy Potter: [00:26:01] And, my partner, Steve Harmon, went on a trip with other people in our industry and they said, “Why do you do what you do?” And you want to know what he was told? Man, it’s great money. Man, it’s a well-known secret, you know, this industry. It’s just great. The substance of what he was looking for wasn’t being shared by his peers. So, then he came back to us and said, “Hey, why are we getting out of bed in the morning? Why is God waking us up?”

Billy Potter: [00:26:27] His name is Steve Harmon. He’s had a phenomenal impact on our culture and was really one of the thought leaders in inspiring us to go down this journey. And, you know, we do have a why statement from EOS, and it’s “we lead to inspire confidence so we can unleash your potential.” And that’s super important, especially when you’re thinking growth is personal. You know, it has nothing to do with insurance.

Mike Blake: [00:26:54] I was going to say that noticeably absent is the word insurance.

Billy Potter: [00:26:58] Of course. Yes, Chick-fil-A. They want to become the most caring organization in the world. Where do you see chicken in there? It just doesn’t – it’s not there. It’s not Care-fil-A.

Mike Blake: [00:27:11] Yeah. Yeah.

Billy Potter: [00:27:11] So, it’s inspiring. And they were describing all of this, not even EOS. They didn’t know it exist when I was interviewing them in 2011. And as skeptical as I am, I thought, if they deliver on 20% of what they’re describing, this will be pretty cool. And we knocked it out of the park. I mean, EOS has more than quadrupled our business in a decade. We’re a 70-year-old company. It’s more than quadrupled it in a decade. That’s incredible. That’s the lagging indicator that gets everybody’s attention. And what’s powerful about this experience is like, “Oh, wait a minute. How I’m leading the company could lead to better revenue? Like, that’s amazing.”

Mike Blake: [00:27:53] Who knew?

Billy Potter: [00:27:54] Yeah. That’s crazy. I just thought I needed a longer whip.

Mike Blake: [00:27:58] Yeah. And again, another tie-in. I mean, that’s classic good to great, right? That’s classic flywheel stuff, the EOS – before I encountered EOS, I had an inkling of this but it wasn’t – I didn’t – nobody’s buying my book. I didn’t even write one. They wouldn’t buy it if I wrote one. But I did have an understanding or an idea that what really matters is not key performance indicators, but [inaudible] key performance drivers. Right? What I care about is, are you doing the things that you need to be doing consistently and faithfully? Right? And if you do those, eventually the results are going to show.

Billy Potter: [00:28:35] That’s it. You’re right.

Mike Blake: [00:28:36] It may take a while. It may take a while, but, man, if you have the mental toughness and tenacity to do that and the faith that it’s going to work out. Just like a farmer, right, you’ve got to have faith that all that work is going to result in growing things. You can’t just start yanking carrots out of the ground two days after you put the seed in. That’s where the action is, isn’t it?

Billy Potter: [00:28:57] Amen. And, the leading indicators, you know, and the leading and the lagging indicators were a gift from EOS. And it’s fun to even come up. Well, what are the leading indicators? What are the things that we need to report on a weekly basis to let you know that I’m rowing the boat, man? We’re not at the destination yet, but we are well on our way. And, that was a fun dialogue. And it constantly evolves. You know, like once it was no longer an issue anymore or once that habit is formed, we move on to a new leading indicator. And then, suddenly you look back and you’re like, “Oh, my goodness. We’ve quadrupled the business. How did this happen?”

Billy Potter: [00:28:57] When I got here, we were 21 employees and we had a lot of attrition. I mean, this is the valley of EOS. We did have a lot of attrition. Some employees said, “Hey, I love where you’re going. It’s not for me.” And so, we helped some of them find a job. We were sad to lose some of them, but that’s the truth of it. And then, the peak that followed that valley was a level of operational excellence that we didn’t really think was achievable. Our employees helped develop that. That’s what EOS creates, a ground-up movement.

Mike Blake: [00:30:16] So, we’ve talked a lot in this conversation so far about value so I want to come back to that because I think values – I think a lot of people cringe when they hear the word corporate values because they’ve often been abused, frankly, and employees have been abused in the name of so-called corporate values. How do you get – how do you sort of get past that? How did you find, identify and articulate your company values, one? And then, what did it take to establish a credibility that it wasn’t just more PR speak, but there was a real – there is a real substance and authenticity behind it?

Billy Potter: [00:31:03] This is a phenomenal process. We locked the door, the four owners locked the door. And, we said, who are the two people in your life that you could take over the world with? And then, you describe them. What are their adjectives?

Billy Potter: [00:31:20] For me, the two people that I said were my father and a lady named Jennifer Goodwin. And I enjoyed, like, just reflecting on what are all the characteristics of these individuals that I love, that I hold so precious. And everybody in the room does that in their own little space. And then, we come back together and we throw all of our adjectives up on the board, and then you group the adjectives.

Billy Potter: [00:31:47] So, for example, you say honesty and I say transparency. And we settle on a word that encompasses integrity. Okay? And so, we whittled the board down to maybe eight adjectives. So, we started with what? I mean, probably something like 60. Okay? And then, we whittled it down. We paired all the adjectives, grouped them together into maybe eight, and then you evaluate one another round. And, the evaluation of these adjectives, these core values are three grades. A plus, meaning you usually demonstrate; you mostly demonstrate that behavior. A plus-minus, you sometimes do, you sometimes don’t; or a minus, you consistently do not demonstrate that behavior.

Billy Potter: [00:32:34] So, any value that any one of our leaders had a negative in, we threw the value out. You could not do it. Because if you have an owner or a leader or whatever your group is that’s deciding the core values not defend one of those behaviors, then you’re aspirational. And far too often, I think that is what occurs within an organization. They say these things or they have 11 of them, or nobody can remember all the core values. And the truth of the matter is, you shouldn’t have to remember them. You should see them on a weekly basis from your people, and it should be modeled mostly by your leadership.

Billy Potter: [00:33:19] And that was a really fantastic experience and something that you can be proud of. You know, there’s a personal connection within our ownership to each one of those core values, and there’s a beautiful story behind it as well. So, we had fun. It was probably a full-day exercise where we say, “Hey, tell me why specifically your dad. You know, what about your experience with your dad? Did you feel like you could take over the world with?” That was a joy to share. And it brought the team closer together.

Mike Blake: [00:33:52] I want to change – I want to change gears here because I just thought of a question I want to get out because I hope it’s interesting. And that is, I’ve been reading a lot recently about return-to-office and everybody’s talking about return-to-office, but one of the features of return-to-office is that it’s bringing back – it’s bringing back sort of the Peter principle guys, the people that tend to rise to the level of incompetence, the people who tend to get by more because of the relationships they develop with their superiors more than their objective capabilities and accomplishments. There’s probably a catch-all word for those types of people. I don’t know what that is, but I think you know what I’m talking about. And it led me to wonder as I sort of think about U.S. and our organization’s entirely virtual. I mean, you can come to the office if you want, I don’t care. It’s not necessary. And, I wonder if EOS is actually potentially easier to implement in a virtual environment because by necessity you have to be so much more intentional about how you communicate. It offers more opportunities for measurement and it frankly blunts the people that are getting by, by frankly schmoozing, for lack of a more polite better term. Do you think there’s anything to that, or am I smoking something from Colorado?

Billy Potter: [00:35:25] So, I don’t think you’re smoking Twinkies, although they’re not made anymore in Colorado. So, here’s what comes to mind when you ask that question. First and foremost, throughout COVID, everything that’s meaningful in our organization peaked. Record sales year. Record operational efficiency. We monitor tasks and activities within our client management record production of that. So, again, I don’t think that has to do with necessarily like in the office or outside of the office. I think it has to do with being a talent magnet of highly engaged people. Okay? And the truth of the matter is, when you have a highly engaged person, they want to do a good job, not for you but for them. And that’s pretty special. So, that’s the first thing that comes to mind when I think about the impact of working from home and things of that nature.

Billy Potter: [00:36:18] Secondly, I would actually say that there is a negative to EOS. And, the negative is you have a 90-minute meeting that your people sit in and it’s the same day, same time every week. Okay? And, I was a meeting snob. Well, actually, hold on, I am a meeting snob now. If I’m sitting in a meeting now and it’s not an EOS meeting, all I think about is, “Oh, my gosh. This is so inefficient.” So, I’m grateful for that structure and I’m not a structure guy, so I’m more of like a caged animal when you drop a structure on me. So, the fact that I welcome those 90-minute meetings says something about how much I appreciate the process.

Billy Potter: [00:37:00] But here’s the negative, Mike. The negative is of that 90 minutes, 60 of it is spent on identifying, discussing, and solving issues. And, people in America are not welcoming of conflict. That is not something that is, like, second nature. So I do believe there’s value in having face-to-face interaction and developing rapport and trust with your team. That is, it takes longer to do it remotely unless you’re like Simon Sinek.

Billy Potter: [00:37:34] Simon Sinek with his people has a call, like, every Monday where they all get on a Zoom call and the one rule is you can’t talk about work. It’s just to build rapport. It’s that lost time we have in the workplace where I’m going to get a cup of coffee and I’m like, “Hey, Mike, how was your kid’s baptism? How did it go, you know?” It’s that interaction that we lose virtually that we have to be intentional. It’s like a long-distance relationship. You have to be intentional about making it work.

Billy Potter: [00:38:07] And so, if there’s a negative to the effectiveness of EOS, it’s not like it’s less effective. But if you’re going to have juicier meetings, you’ve got to have trust so you can have healthy conflict. And I think the remoteness means you just need to be more intentional about creating that trust. Does that make sense, Mike?

Mike Blake: [00:38:26] Yeah. It does. It does make sense. You talked about sort of a downside of EOS, and one of the things that Wickman talks about in the book is that some companies just aren’t ready for EOS yet. They need to do some work before they’re there. He’s even talked about basically firing people, firing clients that want to do EOS. But once he got in there, he just realized they weren’t ready for it yet. And, I see you’re nodding. What makes a company – what does a company need to do to be ready for EOS? Or what are they lacking when they’re not ready?

Billy Potter: [00:39:03] So, if you have a desire to build a better business, go EOS. Okay? Now, here’s the whammy. You might be thinking that you don’t have a better business because of other people, which is the problem. You’re going to eat some serious humble pie throughout EOS. But you’ll gladly eat it because, in the end, you want to build a better business. And if that’s truly at your heart, building a better business, building a better environment, attracting better talent, making your employees want to be at work, then I would say EOS is for you.

Billy Potter: [00:39:44] But the truth of the matter is if you can’t find your part in the problem, you won’t be a part of the solution. And EOS does that. It helps you identify what the problem is. And if you want to foster an environment where there’s vulnerability and people can feel open and honest in sharing where you’ve let them down or how the process can be better, many times that’s leadership’s fault. And that’s hard to do. That’s why the book starts off with letting go of the vine and delegating and elevating. And what you hope is that I will delegate a duty to somebody else and they will elevate in their seat wanting to do that task or that service or that project on my behalf. But the hard part is letting me let them do it and letting them be better than me at it or letting them fail at it. That’s hard to do. And that’s just the humble pie that comes with operating the system.

Billy Potter: [00:40:43] And I’ll tell you when you’re aligned with wanting to build a better business, it’s like a spoonful of sugar. It helps the medicine go down. But if you’re not aligned with wanting to build a better business, there’s a potential chance that you’re going to take that personally and you will refuse to let go of the vine.

Mike Blake: [00:41:06] There’s so much to unpack there. I mean, number one, it goes – it really gets down to what do you define as a better business, right? If a better business is one that delivers on its mission that delights its customers, that it’s a great platform for people’s careers, etc., EOS may be a good fit. If, on the other hand, the goal is -the definition of bigger, of a better business is to show everybody that I’m right, it’s about as effective as dragging your spouse to marriage counseling for the sole goal of having them lecture your spouse and how they’re wrong about everything.

Billy Potter: [00:41:44] That’s right. That is a great analogy. We’re here, doctor. Could you please tell my spouse everything she’s doing wrong?

Mike Blake: [00:41:51] Yeah. I wouldn’t get so mad if you weren’t just so damn stupid.

Billy Potter: [00:41:57] That’s exactly right. Yeah. You have to look internally first. And so, when you work with an implementer, most of the time, I think they have you work the process of EOS just within your leadership first. I know – I was not a shareholder at the time and they did it for maybe six to eight months. And then, they rolled it out to sales and then they rolled it out to the entire company over the course of like a year or so, but to learn the cadence and get comfortable with how the meetings should be run and really adopt and embrace, you know, implementing this system. And, you know, Gino says that. He says, “You know, even if you don’t adopt EOS, just commit, commit to doing it.” You know, that’s the key. And that means sometimes you’ve got to take your medicine.

Mike Blake: [00:42:45] Yeah. I hope I’m not being too forward with this question, but I do think it’s really important so I hope you’re willing to answer it. But if not, we’ll let it out.

Billy Potter: [00:42:45] Okay.

Mike Blake: [00:42:56] My question is, you alluded pretty heavily to how adopting the EOS not only has helped your professional life but it’s also filtered back into your personal life. Would you be willing to share a couple of examples on how it’s done that? Because I think that would be very inspiring to some of our listeners.

Billy Potter: [00:43:14] Hundred percent. So, the first one that jumps out at me is, you know, EOS has a 1310. So when you create – there’s this thing called a VTO, vision traction organizer, that EOS has you fill out and it says, “Hey, what is your business going to look like in 10 years? What is it going to look like in three years? And then, what do you have to do in the next year to be on track with those goals?”

Billy Potter: [00:43:40] I did it personally for myself. We had our sales team do it personally. How old will your kids be in 10 years? What will be your expenses? What are – what’s the life you want to be living in 10 years? What’s the life you need to be living in three years to marry that 10-year vision? What’s the life you want in one year? And when I looked at my results and I thought about what I was doing, I was like, am I going to make it? I’m recognizing right now how I will fall short on the vision that I want to create for my family. And that was – that stunk. I wasn’t doing enough. I quantified how I was falling short on the Billy I wanted to be.

Billy Potter: [00:44:22] And EOS talks a lot about putting the right people in the right seat, and they have several tools that they suggest in helping you find the right people to be in the right seat. One of the tools that we use, and it came from the book Rocket Fuel, is this system called Culture Index.

Mike Blake: [00:44:43] Yep.

Billy Potter: [00:44:44] And so, the Culture Index kind of, it tells me who I was since I was age 12. And it is unbelievably accurate. It’s incredible. So, long story short, it told me who I needed to be in my prospect engagement with some of the people I was trying to make in clients. And it let me know that I needed to be a little bit more logical. I was too emotional. I would make a sarcastic joke. I’d show a level of humor that was inappropriate to be trusted with millions of dollars worth of their investment. And I was like, “What was that matter?” Well, I listened to it. I listened to the feedback, and I applied it. And, I saw my numbers soar. I smoked my 10-year vision, smoked it. It was incredible. And, it was all because I started finding my part in the problem. And, I’m a very high – I have a high A trait, which can be a big threat to other people.

Billy Potter: [00:45:48] And, I had my wife fill out the same tool that we use in our business. And, I realized in my marriage, the way that I engage in conversation was challenging and hurtful in my marriage. I was speaking to others as I want to be spoken to. And, that’s not appropriate. The golden rule, do unto others as you would have done unto you, doesn’t work with communication. What I’ve learned as a product of this system is I have to speak so that my audience can receive it, not how I want to say it. How do I have to convey my issue or my concern so that it’s appropriately received by my audience?

Billy Potter: [00:46:29] And, when I saw my wife’s results, I said, “Honey, have I been crushing you for 15 years?” And she goes, “It’s been rough.” And I felt so bad because I had a blind eye to it. But on paper, if I looked at how she was aligned to her seat, if she worked for me, I’d have an intervention. And, I’m coming home every day and I’m thinking to myself, she didn’t ask me about my day, you know. And, that was some serious humble pie about the man I could be that I’m not being at home. Now, I would become that man at work because my work was helping me become the man that I needed to be to hit my 10-year vision. But then I would check out at home and think that none of those principles apply.

Billy Potter: [00:47:18] And, look, I have EOS to thank, but growth is personal. It has benefited every relationship in my life and I use that word with great intention, every relationship in my life, solely because I’ve learned more about who I am and who I don’t need to be. Because the way that issues work – and I think about that, IDS, identify, discuss and solve issues – when we uncover an issue about Billy at work, which we have, it’s not like I don’t take that issue in every other one of my relationships. Of course, I do. And so, once we figure that out here, I’m able to solve it everywhere. What a gift.

Mike Blake: [00:47:59] I’m talking with Billy Potter, and the topic is should I adopt the entrepreneur operating system or EOS. So, you mentioned Rocket Fuel. In fact, I got into this, the concept of EOS, backward. Somebody recommended Rocket Fuel to me first and then I figured out, “Oh, this is the sequel. I’m basically watching the Star Wars movies out of order.” I’m not even sure the order they’re supposed to be in anymore, but I guess there is one. But anyway, are you a visionary or an integrator?

Billy Potter: [00:48:28] I’m a visionary.

Mike Blake: [00:48:30] Yeah.

Billy Potter: [00:48:31] Yeah. And honestly, whoever gave you that advice, I think is brilliant. Because now after reading those books myself, I encourage people to read, well, certain people to read the Rocket Fuel first because –

Mike Blake: [00:48:45] Do you really?

Billy Potter: [00:48:46] I do. Because think if you’re speaking to the visionary and/or the integrator, they’ll have a greater appreciation of the impact they can have on their business. And Traction is a brilliant book, but it is the blueprint. It’s not as wonderful of a read as Rocket Fuel. It’s not written in a story format. But I’ll tell you, if you’re a business owner, every issue that’s identified in Traction or that blueprint addresses almost every issue you have in your business. But Rocket Fuel is just a great appetizer, I think, because the most crucial – it only names to seats in your organization, visionary and integrator. And when you look back, just like Jim Collins did, when you look back at every great business in America, more than likely they had a wonderful dance between the visionary and the integrator, just a rock-solid relationship.

Mike Blake: [00:49:36] Yeah. Well, that’s exactly what my appetite and also what it made me realize that even though I’m a visionary type, which means I tend to look much more 5 miles ahead in the road and not necessarily the road that’s 10 feet in front of me and the pothole there, it made me realize I’m not a bad person or a bad executive. It just means that I’m normal and that I need to be paired with an integrator in order to achieve that – to realize my full potential.

Billy Potter: [00:50:06] Not only that, we need to hang scores on it. So, for example, one of my scores is, have I spent 4 hours this week thinking about our business, where we need to go, and what I need to solve in order for us to get there down the road? That is crucial. It’s part of my favorite score. When I actually carve out the time each week to think about growing our business, I love it, and that is using my gifts. That’s where I want to be. And so, you’re costing your business when you’re not in that seat, when you’re not looking down the road.

Billy Potter: [00:50:39] And it’s just so clear and crisp when you see what they call the accountability chart, we define all the roles and responsibilities by seat, and then we tie each role and responsibility to a score, usually a leading indicator. And then, monthly we do, we report on lagging indicators. But I love that. And, I took the test. Are you a visionary? Are you an integrator? All that stuff. And, I’m fulfilled by the work. I’m energized by it. So, your company is benefiting when you are working more out of your strengths, and that’s the key.

Mike Blake: [00:51:13] Yeah. I think that’s right. I read a book by Gallup called Focus on Your Strengths and made a very compelling case that ideally, you’re better off focusing on what you do really well because you can – the sky’s the limit on the things you do well, but you can only overcome the things you’re lousy at to a limited extent. Right? There are just certain things on my best day I’m going to be mediocre at.

Billy Potter: [00:51:40] Yeah. That’s right.

Mike Blake: [00:51:41] That’s an important function that’s going to hold the company back.

Billy Potter: [00:51:43] And it drains your energy.

Mike Blake: [00:51:45] It does.

Billy Potter: [00:51:45] You know. And I could work, you know, not that this is the goal, but I could work twice as many hours. But if I’m working on things that I’m gifted at, I’m fulfilled. Like, I could run home, versus, you know, no offense, but I couldn’t be an accountant. I just I don’t –

Mike Blake: [00:52:03] Neither can I.

Billy Potter: [00:52:03] I don’t have the bandwidth. I don’t have the appreciation or the level of execution on details. Could I do the job? Of course. Of course, I could do the job. But would I be good at it? Would it make me want to do more? That’s not my skill set. And conversely, we have other people that would be in more of a visionary or CEO seat that would be intimidated or not want to do the job. Like, I’d be fearful of making all kinds of mistakes as an accountant. I couldn’t do it.

Mike Blake: [00:52:32] Billy, this has been a great conversation. I could go another hour with you, but that’s not fair to you or your family, for that matter. There are probably topics that either our listeners wish we would have spent more time on or wish that we’d cover we didn’t get to. If somebody wants to ask more, ask you about the EOS and your experience with it, can they, and if so, what’s the best way for them to contact you?

Billy Potter: [00:52:53] Absolutely, they can. I’ll give you my direct line. So, the number is 470-660-8880.

Mike Blake: [00:53:06] That’s going to wrap it up for today’s program. I’d like to thank Billy Potter so much for sharing his expertise with us.

Mike Blake: [00:53:13] We’ll be exploring a new topic each week, so please tune in so that when you’re faced with your next business decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy these podcasts, please consider leaving a review with your favorite podcast aggregator. It helps people find us that we can help them.

Mike Blake: [00:53:28] If you would like to engage with me on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I’m on LinkedIn as myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. Also, check out my new LinkedIn group called Unblakeable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck. Once again, this is Mike Blake. Our sponsor is Brady Ware & Company. And this has been the Decision Vision podcast.

 

Tagged With: Billy Potter, Brady Ware & Company, Decision Vision, EOS, Gino Wickman, Mike Blake, Snellings Walters, The Entrepreneurial Operating System, Traction, values, vision

Aree Bly from Alignment Ally

May 9, 2022 by John Ray

Aree-Bly-with-Alignment-Ally
Inspiring Women PodCast with Betty Collins
Aree Bly from Alignment Ally
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Aree-Bly-with-Alignment-Ally

Aree Bly from Alignment Ally (Inspiring Women, Episode 46)

It could be in a career path, pursuing personal development, or working with a team, says Aree Bly of Alignment Ally. Alignment “allows you to find success, be an effective leader, and show up authentically as you evolve through your career.” Aree joined host Betty Collins to discuss various aspects of alignment on this episode of Inspiring Women.

The host of Inspiring Women is Betty Collins and the show is presented by Brady Ware & Company.

Betty’s Show Notes

My guest, Aree Bly, is all about alignment. What do I mean by “alignment?” As she puts it on her LinkedIn profile, “Alignment is about recognizing where you lead at your best, identifying your next learning and growth opportunities, and exploring how to support those around you. It allows you to find success, be an effective leader, and show up authentically as you evolve through your career.” Here’s what her take is on how the pandemic reawakened our alignment…

Maybe this comes back to like a Leonard Cohen quote of “the cracks are where the light comes in.” The pandemic forcing people to break those routines. Raise the awareness of, “oh my gosh, I did not realize that my 50 hour, 60 hour workweeks were violating my desire to connect with people.” Or “I didn’t realize how much conflict I was feeling until I stepped away and went, OK, this is not working and this is why.” And we can start to see and become more aware of what is and isn’t working.

So how often does she think someone can reinvent themselves?

I think you could do it daily, honestly, depending on how big a change. The reinvention can and should be coming regularly, and it should be something that we’re looking at deliberately as we’re kind of saying, “Okay, where do I want to be going and what steps do I take to move in that direction?” And then it also means looking up occasionally and going, “Okay, I was headed on this path. Is it still right?”

Not only is alignment for you personally, but it can be an alignment change for your team. How does she approach this?

Let’s rearrange things to make sure that we’re setting ourselves up for success by recognizing how people operate. And that helped to clarify some of the decisions because some people were saying, “Well, You just like them better. So you’re moving them to this role” and you’re like, “Well, no, there’s a reason to it.” And once you put it all on paper and let everyone see, you know, and talk about it, it’s like, “Oh, you know, I’m really good at this, but I’m really tired of doing that because I’ve been doing it for years. I’d like to learn something new.”

What is the first step that people can do to make a change?

The first step is awareness, and it’s so hard to see the truth. And then from there it’s activating it.

Here she is from a recent Tedx Talk. Her website to find out more.

This is THE podcast that advances women toward economic, social, and political achievement. Hosted by Betty Collins, CPA, and Director at Brady Ware and Company. Betty also serves as the Committee Chair for Empowering Women, and Director of the Brady Ware Women Initiative. Each episode is presented by Brady Ware and Company, committed to empowering women to go their distance in the workplace and at home.

For more information, go to the Resources page at Brady Ware and Company.

Remember to follow this podcast on Apple Podcasts and Google Podcasts.  And forward our podcast along to other Inspiring Women in your life.

TRANSCRIPT

Betty: Well, welcome to inspiring women today. What a great day that we’re going to have with a really, really guest who is out in Colorado. And she does all kinds of speaking and podcasts and TED talks. And you’re going to really, I think, enjoy her. She has a great company and her name is Ari Bly. And we met because of my women’s conference. And so she and I just connected and I loved her content and I said, Man, would I love to have you on my podcast. And she readily agreed. And she has a company called Alignment Ally and realigning yourself. First of all, I like it just seems positive the whole the whole connotation. But it’s about realigning so you can take your path forward and it’s it’s getting you to be able to navigate challenges and create success. And and on top of that, she gives you so many tools to make sure it happens so that you do it confidently right and to build and conquer and go. So reinvention through alignment is the takeaway for me when I’ve talked with her and gone through some of her TED talks and looked at her information. So, you know, the challenge is for us to be able to evolve with changes while we don’t lose sight of who we are. And I like that because sometimes when we reset or re re change or we realign, we forget maybe who we are in the process or this is really who we want to be. So but she’s going to do all this today. I’m kind of giving you my highlights and my take away. So first, Ari, I would love for you just to talk about you talk a little bit about your passion and what you do and why you do it, all those kinds of things. So let’s just take a couple of minutes to get to know her.

Aree: Absolutely. Thank you, Betty. And it’s a pleasure to be here with you. So my background is very much not as a coach and as a speaker. I went into actuarial work coming out of college. I got my degree in accounting and math and combined the two into the actuarial world. So it was a very. Technical corporate role for 25 years and. It meant leaning on all my skills, right? What do I do? Well, I did well with math. I did well with connecting with people. I did well with strategic thinking. And as I got farther in my career, I started to realize that it wasn’t. Engaging me anymore. It wasn’t as energizing anymore. And when I really started to look at what changed, it was my own evolution of I became someone who was much more focused on the people and the mentoring and the coaching and developing others. And so instead of pushing harder into the skills that I did have, I decided to lean into those values and develop those skills that I wanted to build a little bit more. And what that turned into when I looked back on my own journey was the idea of alignment. It was really about understanding not only what I was good at and what I wanted to be doing, but who I was, what were my natural strengths and what was what were my values today? Because they shift with you over the seasons of your life, and how can I combine all of those to really understand the landscape in front of me and where I could make choices for for how I wanted to move forward?

Betty: Well, certainly for for both people who are accounting degrees and technical skill sets have to be really on there. Yet we both have a lot of soft skills. We both have a lot of things that we are energized by. And it’s probably not technical things, right? I’m sorry. I’m surrounded by people who are so using the right, you know, what am I going to try to say, using the right tools and using the right strengths that you have? Did you struggle with that as an actuary? Because I struggled that as a CPA, because I thought this is who I have to be, because this is my technical skill or this is my industry. Did you struggle with that?

Aree: Absolutely. Because as a CPA, as an actuary, we spend a lot of time building the credibility and going through the exam processes and getting the certification to be the CPA or be the FSA or be what’s attached to our title. And it can feel like. Your failure might be a hard word, but you’re stepping away from all that success that you kind of built. And that’s a hard thing to do because everyone that you work with connects you with that name and with those letters at the end of your your name as well. So yeah, it’s it it takes a little bit of soul searching to say, okay, but we are everybody is so much more than the letters at the end of their name. And the path that you took to get to where you are today has built other skills besides the ones that you deliberately studied for and deliberately went to get a degree in. And those are a lot of the soft skills that when you start looking at it and you realize that, Wow, I really enjoy that.

Betty: Yeah.

Aree: You’ve got to listen to that voice too and say, Okay, so what does that mean? Who am I now? How do I want to show up and how do I want to contribute to other actuaries, to other CPAs in my life? Right. Well.

Betty: And to the audience, we’re not just going to talk to CPAs and actuaries today. This will apply to everybody. But let’s just dig into some some kind of help, the audience kind of get some definition. So what is alignment? You know, when you say that and why is that important?

Aree: Right. The way that I think of alignment is really and again, this because my brain works very much in models, it’s adding another dimension to the skill sets that we have. So we push through and create success with our skills very easily. But when we start looking at our values and our natural strengths and kind of what’s innate to us, that the elements that don’t change very much for us, that creates kind of a two layer of things that we can line up with. So the alignment, if we start thinking about that, I like to think about it as a grid. You could think about it as a Venn diagram, whatever works for you. But where those two overlap, when you’re working within your your values and your natural strengths and with your skills, that’s when you’re really fully aligned to kind of what you’ve got today. But there are other areas that allow you to learn optimally, really effectively. When you’re within your values, you can step out of your skills and you won’t have as much friction. You’ll be able to more efficiently learn what you need to when you’re out of your values.

Aree: You can find yourself working with your skills and kind of pushing through and being a little gritty and getting things done. Supporting your team, maybe. And when you get completely out of both of those elements of alignment, that’s when we really find ourselves in the danger zone, when we don’t have the skill set to do what what the task calls for in front of us. And we’re pushing against all of this friction because we’re violating our current values. That’s when we start seeing a lot more burnout and we feel helpless and we don’t see the the path out. So it’s really understanding how important kind of recognizing your alignment is and being able to intentionally move through the different areas because it’s not about staying aligned at all times. If we were, we would never grow. We would get very complacent in our comfort zone. So it’s about moving through, but doing so deliberately and knowing what’s best for us so that we can kind of choose the path that we want to and find the challenges that we want to along the way.

Betty: So when somebody moves deliberately and they take that where you said stepping out, what do you think the number one challenge for that person is in saying, I’m going to do this?

Aree: Getting comfortable with change. I think that’s what a lot of people struggle with. I know I did because it’s easy, especially when we’re successful in our current role. It’s hard to be a novice again. It’s hard to step in and learn something new, or it’s hard to kind of get outside of where we know we can check the box and we know we can. We can perform. So that change is difficult.

Betty: Yeah, I’m sure there’s it really. When I think of that, I think of fear. I think of what is the fear of of what if I do this and I don’t do it? Well, how am I going to step back?

Aree: Absolutely.

Betty: Absolutely. But, you know, values can change. Right. And what we thought even in this season, we don’t maybe think in this season, but in your mind, what causes your values to change because you’re really trying to align now these values. So what?

Aree: Right, right. And and that’s that part of that is another reason why you can’t just stay in one spot because, you know, your skills change much faster than your values, but your values do shift with you throughout the seasons of your life. For me, connection to people and family and friends has always been a very important value in me. Now, in my early career, when I was living thousands of miles away from my parents and my my family, it looked very different than when I needed to move closer to home to take care of aging parents. And the needs that come with living into those values is very different. So early in my career it was important, but it wasn’t a highlight. It wasn’t demanding as much time, and it could show up differently because I was connecting with other people in my new career right now as I as I got older and my parents got older and I had my own family, that’s kind of shifting some of the needs. And I know women feel this a lot as our ability to play different roles in our careers shifts, our values look different at different points, right? So we need to recognize that maybe learning and ambition is a big value, but it looks different in the first ten years of your career than it does in the Middle Ages of your career. And then it does when you’re stepping back in and pushing harder. Right.

Betty: I know I tell the women of Brady where your twenties are, not your thirties and your fifties don’t look like anything of your forties. And I don’t know what sixties look like. I’m getting close, but it’s what you’re saying. You do your values change. They can even change in your mid-forties. They don’t have to be like, now I’ve hit 50, but seasons are different and all of a sudden what you value or what you what you will put your time into changes. And what did you see with the pandemic? People changed a lot of values during that time. Or not change values. Their values changed. I should say it that way. What did you what did you see when you were, you know, because, like, I really want to be home now or I really don’t need to work this much or, you know, I’m cherishing whatever. They just thought about things through that time.

Aree: Right. I think what happened during the pandemic and you know, maybe this comes back to like a Leonard Cohen quote of the cracks are where the light comes in, like the pandemic and forcing people to break those routines. Raise the awareness of, oh my gosh, I did not realize that my 50 hour, 60 hour workweeks were violating my desire to connect with people. Or I didn’t realize how how much conflict I was feeling until I stepped away and went, Och, this is not working and this is why. And we can start to see and become more aware of what is and isn’t working. Right now I know people that during the pandemic, once they were working at home, some of them just absolutely loved it. They’re like, This is the best thing ever. I can focus. I can eat when I want, what I want. I can go for a walk. And other people were struggling a little bit because they lost the connection. They were more extroverted and they wanted to connect with people. And so it’s not a one size fits all. It’s understanding what is and isn’t working for you and why. So it’s recognizing those those frictions and kind of the inner conflict and what that’s telling you. We can before the pandemic, I think people were much more willing to. Push through those frictions and set them aside and ignore them because I’m using my skills. I can do this. I got it checking the boxes. And I think now they’re starting to see it’s not just one dimensional anymore. It’s understanding and creating the whole life that we want to have.

Betty: Right. And of course, I really did get kind of tired of the word I’m going to have to pivot. I’m going to pivot. I’m going to have to do these things. But but I like where you’re coming from is kind of reinvention, right? Reinvent. And we did a lot of reinventing during that time, but really it should be before that and after that. So how often do you think someone can reinvent themselves?

Aree: I think you could do it daily, honestly, depending on how big a change. Obviously, my I had a huge reinvention when I retired from actuarial work and stepped into consulting or coaching and speaking and shifted away. But throughout my whole career, I could see that I was reinventing myself periodically. I started in a big insurance company and then I went into consulting. That was a reinvention when I shifted from being the individual contributor to managing projects and teams. That was a reinvention. When I started working with our HR team to kind of. Teach actuaries on our teams how to mentor each other a little bit better. That was a reinvention. So. At different levels. The reinvention can and should be coming regularly, and it should be something that we’re looking at deliberately as we’re kind of saying, okay, where do I want to be going and what steps do I take to move in that direction? And then it also means looking up occasionally and going, okay, I was headed on this path. Is it still right?

Betty: Yeah.

Aree: Or should I? What have I learned? What is The View look like now? And who’s with me now? Who’s on my team? Yeah, so all of that can change. I always think about it as when you’re wandering out in the landscape because I’m like, you mentioned, I’m from Colorado, I grew up in Wyoming. I spent a lot of time outside and I love hiking and I love exploring the wilderness and. Your career and your your life is a lot like that. It’s about getting around the next hill or looking over the next bend or crossing the river and seeing what it looks like from that side. So you have your goals, especially your long term goals that are more setting your direction. But at every point you can kind of say, okay, what do I see now? Where do I want to go? Do I want to go left on this path, or do I want to blaze my own trail to the right? What might I find there? Am I equipped to go in that direction or not?

Betty: Well, too, I think we look at reinvent sometimes as a major thing had to happen. So now I’ve got to reinvent versus just know. I’ve got to this top of this hill like you’re talking about. So now, now which way am I going to go? Which way am I going to? Yeah, I think we. I think look at it that way. Sorry.

Aree: No. Yeah, I think reinvention. Sometimes people tie the idea of I’m reinventing because I was wrong in my original direction. You know, it’s a correction where really it’s a realignment or an evolution. You’re not leaving everything that you’ve learned, who you are, your personality, all of that behind, all of that’s coming with you and building from there. You’re changing direction. Yes. But you’re not negating everything that happened before.

Betty: You know, and I think that’s really crucial when you’re looking at reinventing that. You I mean, what you’re saying it it isn’t all or nothing. It isn’t it might just be just enough step around just to get around something that you don’t want to get into. I don’t know. But that’s interesting. I just am this person like when I finished 418 for taxes. Now I think it’s this big life is going to change or January 1st of every year now is, you know. Yeah. And it really isn’t that way. I mean, life just continues to go on and I do do a really big reset and maybe, maybe I’m confusing reset with reinvent. So I need to think that through. But I do really like what you said. Cracks are where the light comes in. That is. I’m going to take that with me for sure. Well, so so, you know, you’ve talked a little bit about you’ve had teams because you’ve led teams and such. And and so what is alignment look like for a team? Like how does a team, whether you manage them, whether you’re the owner, you’ve got this executive team, small teams, whatever teams, how does that work? How does alignment look for a team look like for a team?

Aree: Yeah, it’s I love it because it’s it’s layering on the individuals alignment. You’re going to have teams where you can identify some values that are common through all of you and you can lean into those and you have other ones where you’re like, okay, these people are just very different. Their priorities are different. Ones focused on, you know, personal, professional financial success, which is a great value to have, and someone else is more focused on relationships. So when you’re thinking of teams, it’s about recognizing the similarities and the differences in the values and finding ways to lean into those and help them work together. Right. So and and also when you’re talking about the skills, I think a lot of times I saw this, you know, in my career, there was a lot of, well, you’re at this level, therefore this is the work you do and you’re at this level. So here’s your skills and your your challenge. But when you really step back and take the labels away and the roles away, you kind of say, okay, who’s equipped to do this and who wants to learn to do it? So it’s it’s really looking without the labels and without the the hierarchy of who is on our team and where are we headed and how do we best organize our people, given the skill sets that we have, given their natural strengths, given the time frame that we have in order to make this happen. So alignment when we’re talking about teams is about, first of all, understanding who’s on the team and then working together to say, okay, here’s where we’re going to go and why we’re going to go with that direction and how it’s going to work. Leveraging everybody’s skills and trying to keep people in their values as much as possible so that we can all be comfortable and more effective along the way.

Betty: You know, when you think about teams, I think sometimes we’re more wrapped up in in what is Betty Collins comfort. So I just want this person to do this because I trust them or and really, at the end of the day, you’re going, this is not what they do well or this isn’t something they’re thriving on because maybe they don’t really value it or it’s not in their DNA. It’s not the skill set, but it’s the team leader’s comfort. And that’s what I’ve always done. And so, so really, you know, how do how does Betty College Bridge to go? No, I’ve got to look at my team, which is about ten people and see their strengths and and focus on that. How do how do I start that? It’s a big question and I know it’s not on our list, but it’s. You just made me think about that.

Speaker2: Yeah. And so I actually worked with a team in my old company that wasn’t they were all very, very individually successful people, yet they were struggling to really make the progress that they should be making. And we actually did the exercise we use Strength Finder to really say, okay, let’s take a look. Going back to the facts, let’s take a look at the facts of who each of you are and what your strengths are. Because this is when you’re busy, when it’s April 1st and you’ve got two weeks or you’re in crunch period, we fall back on our natural tendencies, we fall back on our knee jerk reactions because those are innate to us. So we took some time to actually say, let’s take a look at that and put them together and line them up and be like, okay, this person’s very strategic thinking, this person’s relationship oriented, this person should be spending more time planning and this person should be working more closely with the clients. So let’s rearrange things to make sure that we’re setting us up for success by recognizing how people operate. And that helped to clarify some of the decisions because some people were saying, well, you’re just you just like them better. So you’re moving them to this role and you’re like, Well, no, there’s a reason to it. And once you put it all on paper and let everyone see, you know, and talk about it, it’s like, Oh, you know, I’m really good at this, but I’m really tired of doing that because I’ve been doing it for. Five years. I’d like to learn something new. How to get people’s input on. What they want to be building if it’s something new as well. So but yeah, I think a lot of it was just finding the time and I know it’s hard to do that sometimes, finding the time to get all that down and get the facts in front of you so that you can see where the pieces line up the best.

Betty: Because everyone doesn’t see their skill set. Right. I mean, that has been something where all my career someone sees my strength and I call it the five guys I worked for. I’ve worked for five guys, and they all saw something in my strength, right? They saw these things that I didn’t see. And so trying to convince me sometimes that those were my strengths and that’s where I would be valuable to the team was always has always been. It’s just been something I’ve had to work at. And then I’m like, Why didn’t I see it? You know? And so as the leader for them, it was this is a great skill. We’re going to use this in her and she’s going to do these things and boom. But I didn’t see it until about 50. And I’m like, Wait a minute, this is my journey and I should be seeing these things. But I still had to have people around me help, help me see it. Yeah. And so you’re doing your team of favor when you’re going. These are the strengths, these are the skills. And and they’ll be more motivated because when I focus on what I do well, I’m a lot happier. A lot.

Aree: Happier. So. Absolutely. And that that goes to when we focus on what we do well and intentionally kind of building the skills we don’t, but also pushing into and leaning into intentionally activating our values. We find more sustainable success. We’re not pushing as hard to achieve the the goal that we’ve set. But we’re finding more happiness. We’re finding more comfort. We’re finding more natural. Consistency. Ability to show up without draining our energy along the way. So it makes it a much more sustainable path when you can kind of pay attention to that. And a lot of times, like you said, people see it before we do, right?

Betty: Yeah. And they’ve got to be as a leader, you’ve got to be able to go, this is really what you do well. And chances are it’s because it’s a natural skill or they value it. Right, right, right. And I know Betty Clarky with CPMedia, she said, I really think you need to find out your why. And I think that you need to listen to Simon Simek and go through his stuff. I said, Oh, sure, you know, but I really did go from saying I can do your taxes and your QuickBooks, and these are the things that I do. And that’s what I was engrossed in to the marketplace needs to work in our country when it works, the world works because helping business owners be more of a business advisor, it’s what I’m better at. Right.

Aree: Well, in that example that you said, you’re good at QuickBooks, you have the skills, right? But once you start looking at the other elements that’s getting into your values, that’s touching your heart, not just your brain, it’s tying it all together.

Betty: Right. And I just started that was something that changed my whole perception of what I am about. And that’s where I could start seeing these are my skills and these are the things I’m in, and I do value the marketplace in our country. It’s just important. It’s provision for households. You know, when an employer can be your you have an employer who has employees. Those are households that form communities. And so you’re starting to see this bigger picture and then it doesn’t become accounting anymore to me. So. Right. But it’s a hard thing to challenge and to get people to see that side of who they are.

Aree: But yes. Yes.

Betty: So alignment for a team is huge, huge, huge. But what is with with alignment and reinventing ourselves and and just bringing our values, knowing our values, all the things that we’ve just kind of talked about. What is the first step that people can do to make change?

Speaker2: The first step is awareness, and it’s so hard to see the truth. Sometimes there’s if you start paying attention to what people are coming to ask you for, you know, they come to you to I had I had people that would come to me and say, hey, you know what? I know you’re not on this project. That’s kind of a difficult client. Can you just sit in on the call and listen and tell me where the challenge is? Where is the miscommunication? Because my skill was listening. Like I could pay attention and and hear what wasn’t being said. And, you know, not anything that an actuary is ever trained to do. It was something that was natural in me. But when I started paying attention, I’m like, Wait, people are asking me for things that I don’t go seeking. And and then I and then I start paying attention. I’m like, does that actually make sense? Is that something I enjoy doing? Is that something that when I get to do that, do I come away energized and pay attention to that? Pay attention to the negative things to pay attention to? What are you procrastinating on? What’s the friction that’s kind of holding you back? Is it something that’s pointing to a value that’s being violated? It’s like you just hesitate to do something because it doesn’t line up with your values. There’s usually a reason that your body is not jumping right into it and going, Okay, let’s get this project done.

Aree: So start paying attention to those things. So awareness is huge. And then, yeah, and then from there it’s activating it. I think that the, the big step that we miss once we start knowing what our values are is we tend to say, okay, you know, my value, I value curiosity. So I’m going to hope that it shows up. And when it does, I’m going to really enjoy it. But, but when we take that step of how do I create it for others, or how do I bring it alive in myself, adding a verb to what curiosity is for you or what collaboration is for you? Bringing that intentionally, bringing that value to life, whether it’s internal or with others, or just spreading it in the world, that will help you and create the habit of of making it a part of your days, not just waiting for it to show up and go, you know? Yeah. You know, I love authenticity and I’m glad I saw it in three people today and, you know, but intentionally saying, here’s how I’m going to do it. I’m going to start encouraging my team to show up. I’m going to ask them about what they’re doing at home so that they can bring their whole self. I’m going to act into these values, not just wait for them to show up.

Betty: That’s really good. I’m going to say that again, act into the values. And not just waiting for them to show up. That’s really good. So chances are you really have to get people to to define their values, you know, I mean, they really got to tap into what do I value?

Aree: Right.

Betty: Right. And and we think of sometimes that as well. We don’t want to hear about how you want to make money. That’s not a value. But it it is.

Aree: It can’t be.

Betty: Yeah, sure.

Aree: It’s financial security is a big value, especially for people who grew up without it. It’s important to have that because it keeps them safe. It helps them feel comfortable.

Betty: Acting to the values and not waiting for them just to happen. I really I’ll put that in my one of my quotes somewhere. I’m taking I’m stealing your quotes. I shouldn’t be doing this.

Aree: Perfect. Please do.

Betty: What is the one thing that you would want the audience to really take away today about alignment that so they can kind of maybe get started or really do some soul searching and thinking about it. What would that be?

Aree: I think the one thing is that with alignment, when you start seeing the the dimensions open up, it gives you choices. So you get to be the pilot. You get to navigate into what you want your future to be. So it’s it’s about taking those controls back and we all have that opportunity.

Betty: Right. So two more questions that have nothing to do with this. So what’s your favorite place to hike and go out? Where’s where’s the spot? Because you’re in you’re in beautiful country.

Aree: That’s for sure. I yes. And. Well lately around the Denver area. Roxboro is a it’s it’s right in the foothills and it’s got some beautiful, towering red rocks. And it’s just a very unique landscape where you never know what you’ll come across. There’s a lot of birds and wildlife and it’s just gorgeous because it’s got the red rock and the green grass and the blue skies. And yeah.

Betty: I love Sedona. Probably is one of my favorite places to go because of that Red Rock. But you also have a whole, I don’t know, whole series. I shouldn’t. But you have something about navigating and you use a lot of that. So if you’re looking for that, it’s it’s it’s a pretty cool. I’ve watched some of your TED talks and some of that. So but tell us where we can find you because she has been on a TED Talk. I don’t know how many you’ve done, but I saw some of them and and they’re pretty interesting topics. But tell us a little bit about about where they can find your information and maybe some of the other things that you speak about.

Aree: Yeah. So the best place to find me is on LinkedIn. It’s Aree Bly. Aree Bly the only one out there? That’s where I’m most active. And I also you can always go to my website alignmentally.com. I’ve got a blog active there and you can learn more about the speaking and, and how to reach me for coaching too, because I do complementary calls for anyone that might be interested in coaching this to, to get a little bit of traction. But yeah, I think that what I speak about and you’re right it all because of who I am, because I am happiest when there’s no roof above me is all very much navigation and outdoor lingo in it. So, you know, I’ve done quite a few talks on hacking your G.P.S., which is really about a lot of what we’ve been talking about now, how to involve your values, how to get beyond just the flat map of what are my skills and how do I move forward, but how do I activate that so that I can create the path that fits where I want to go like a GPS does? There’s do a bit of talking about the landscape itself and understanding the different areas and how to move through there. And then another talk that that I really enjoy giving is how not to die in the wilderness. It’s recently retitled, but it’s all about, you know, we die, quote unquote, in the wilderness, in our careers, in our in our lives by not living true to who we are, by not by going alone when we shouldn’t be going alone, by holding too tightly to the goal and getting there at all costs. And we lose ourselves along the way. There’s a lot of ways that we can counteract kind of our tendency to to let ourselves die in our careers.

Betty: Yeah, well, I certainly appreciate getting to know you and to getting to have you on the podcast today. I would tell you to check out Ari Bly. That’s cool that you’re the only Ari Bly on LinkedIn, how many people they have, but that’s awesome. But we appreciate you coming on today. We look forward to to getting to know you more and to the audience. Enjoy digging in a little bit and being inspired, that’s for sure. So I’m Betty Collins. This is inspiring women and we are so glad that you were with us today. Thank you.

Aree: Thank you.

 

Tagged With: Alignment Ally, Aree Bly, Betty Collins, Brady Ware, Brady Ware & Company, Inspiring Women

Decision Vision Episode 167: Should I Apply for Grants? – An Interview with Jill Wood, Phoenix Nest, Inc.

May 5, 2022 by John Ray

Grants
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 167: Should I Apply for Grants? - An Interview with Jill Wood, Phoenix Nest, Inc.
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Grants

Decision Vision Episode 167: Should I Apply for Grants? – An Interview with Jill Wood, Phoenix Nest, Inc.

Jill Wood, Co-Founder and CEO of Phoenix Nest, Inc., and Co-Founder of Jonah’s Just Begun- Foundation to Cure Sanfilippo, Inc.,  gave an overview of the process of applying for grants. She and her husband started the foundation when their son was diagnosed with Sanfilippo, Type C. With host Mike Blake, she covered the basics of applying for grants, becoming a “citizen scientist” to understand the science, where to begin, the need for help from consultants and grant writers, the strict requirements, timelines, and much more.

Decision Vision is presented by Brady Ware & Company and produced by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Phoenix Nest, Inc.

Phoenix Nest was founded by an alliance of parents with children suffering from Sanfilippo syndrome type C.

Our management team has a built-in sense of urgency and limitless determination to bring a treatment to the families affected by Sanfilippo syndrome to market. Phoenix Nest is the proud recipient of several Small Business Innovation Research grants from the National Institute of Health. Through funding from the NIH, we have been able to facilitate the research in academic labs and licensed these programs.  With support from our Independent Scientific Advisory Board and Board of Directors, we have thus far successfully met the challenges of pioneering treatments for these ultra-rare and untreatable diseases.

Company website

Jonah’s Just Begun – Foundation to Cure Sanfilippo, Inc.

Jonah’s Just Begun-Foundation to Cure Sanfilippo Inc. is a 501(c)3. The foundation raises funds then distributes them to academic research groups focused on finding treatments for Sanfilippo Syndrome, MPS III.

JJB was formed in 2011 after parents Jill Wood and Jeremy Weishaar after their son Jonah was diagnosed with Sanfilippo Type C. Jonah’s astute pediatrician, Dr. Hai Cao MD (South Slope Pediatrics), suggested that Jonah receives an MRI based on his abnormally large head size. Jonah’s Neurologist, Dr. Romaine Schubert (New York Methodist), concurred. At the time of diagnosis, Jonah was 22 months old and asymptomatic. Upon learning that their child had a fatal genetic disease that had no treatment, Jill and Jeremy received some advice from Jonah’s Geneticist, Dr. Karen David, also from New York Methodist. Dr. David told Jonah’s Parents to make a treatment happen. It was this advice that spawned JJB.

Jill and Jeremy hit the ground running, locating the world’s few scientists that were working on Sanfilippo, and seeking the support of like-minded parents. JJB brought these parents, scientists, and clinicians to New York for a patient population in May of 2011, just one year after Jonah’s diagnosis. Together they identified the three most promising approaches to a treatment. The parents went home filled with hope and began their grassroots fundraising efforts.  The scientists went back to their labs, inspired by the parents.

Today there are half a dozen Sanfilippo research projects in progress and a knockout mouse model.  Jonah’s Just Begun works hand in hand with other International and US type C Medical Research Foundation, we call this consortium HAND.

Website

Jill Wood, Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder, Phoenix Nest and Jonah’s Just Begun – Foundation to Cure Sanfilippo, Inc. and Chief Executive Officer

Jill Wood, Co-Founder, Jonah’s Just Begun and CEO, Co-Founder, Phoenix Nestc.

Jill Wood Co-Founded Jonah’s Just Begun-Foundation to Cure Sanfilippo (JJB) with her husband in May of 2010.  After their son Jonah was diagnosed with the ultra-rare genetic disease, Sanfilippo Syndrome type C.  JJB’s mission was to foster a treatment for Sanfilippo Syndrome type C; by connecting researchers, funding science, and mobilizing the patient population.

JJB revenue came through grassroots fundraising efforts, small grants, and private donors. Funding was then distributed to researchers through grants made by JJB.  Grassroots fundraising provided the seed money to initiate pre-clinical research but was far from what was needed to develop, test, and manufacture a drug. Jill founded Phoenix Nest (PN), a for-profit bespoke biotech in 2012. PN licensed the programs that JJB kickstarted, which allowed PN to apply for National Institute of Health (NIH) Small Business Innovation Research grants (SBIR/STTR). PN won its first SBIR grant in 2012, the start of a series of grants totaling $10,750,320.

The funding has allowed PN to bring one of its treatments almost entirely through its pre-IND studies and has funded a clinical observational study, still ongoing.

LinkedIn

Mike Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series

Michael Blake is the host of the Decision Vision podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms, and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth-minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

Decision Vision is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision-maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the Decision Vision podcast.

Past episodes of Decision Vision can be found at decisionvisionpodcast.com. Decision Vision is produced by John Ray and the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Connect with Brady Ware & Company:

Website | LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: [00:00:02] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions. Brought to you by Brady Ware and Company. Brady Ware is a regional, full-service accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality.

Mike Blake: [00:00:21] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast giving you, the listener, clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision making on a different topic from the business owners’ or executives’ perspective. We aren’t necessarily telling you what to do, but we can put you in a position to make an informed decision on your own and understand when you might need help along the way.

Mike Blake: [00:00:43] My name is Mike Blake, and I’m your host for today’s program. I’m a director at Brady Ware and Company, a full-service accounting firm based in Dayton, Ohio, with offices in Dayton; Columbus, Ohio; Richmond, Indiana; and Alpharetta, Georgia. I am Managing Partner of the Strategic Valuation and Advisory Services Practice, which brings clarity to the most important strategic decisions that business owners and executives face by presenting them with factual evidence for such decisions. Brady Ware is sponsoring this podcast.

Mike Blake: [00:01:12] If you would like to engage with me on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I’m on LinkedIn as myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. I also recently launched a new LinkedIn Group called Unblakeable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck, so please join that as well if you would like to engage.

Mike Blake: [00:01:30] Today’s topic is, Should I apply for grants? According to data from Foundation Center, there are over 86,000 grant making entities in the United States with 92 percent represented by independent foundations. According to the Instrumental Blog, there are 26 grant making agencies in the federal government. And corporations represent 17 percent of all non-government grant funding, according to Grant Station.

Mike Blake: [00:01:57] And I wanted to cover this topic separately from the discussion that we have with Lauren Cascio a couple of weeks ago on non-dilutive funding, because I do believe that grant making is its own animal. And, in fact, I don’t know that most people appreciate just how big the grant sector is in the United States, and how central the grant making sector is to supporting certain kinds of business, in particular biotechnology.

Mike Blake: [00:02:33] There’s a rule of thumb that says it takes about $100 million to get from molecule to market. And a lot of that early stage funding when you’re in that molecule phase and you’re not even sure that the molecule does anything useful yet, you’re trying to prove that (A) it might do something useful and then determine if it’s going to kill the person that you’re trying to cure. That’s what they call preclinical and phase one in clinical trials.

Mike Blake: [00:03:03] But to get to that point, that’s usually not done through venture investing. Sometimes it is, but it’s actually usually accomplished through some form of grants. And, indeed, I think this is something that my profession and the world of corporate finance has to come to grips with and really make a fundamental adjustment in how we value companies.

Mike Blake: [00:03:33] And I’m going to get a little bit technical here on that, because I think it’s really important, and then we’re going to get to the actual topic because you want to hear my guest, not me. But for those of you who are finance geeks out there – and I know that you’re out there because you send me you send me messages and emails – when we look at cost of capital to figure out the hurdle rate for a project, or a discount rate on an investment, or required rate of return, conventional wisdom says that we consider the cost of equity and the cost of debt financing, which is all well and good.

Mike Blake: [00:04:08] But conventional wisdom ignores non-dilutive financing. That is financing that has no cost of capital. There is no expectation that it’s going to generate a financial return to the investor. And, accordingly, I think that leads to a lot of companies, frankly, being undervalued – at least by people who do what I do – and explains, at least in part, some of the gap that exists between sort of academic finance and practical finance. So, I’ll put out a white paper on that. I’m not going to discuss that anymore because it really would make for a lousy podcast.

Mike Blake: [00:04:43] So, let’s go to the part that makes for a good podcast. And joining us today is Jill Wood, who co-founded Jonah’s Just Begun – Foundation to Cure Sanfilippo with her husband in May of 2010 after their son Jonah was diagnosed with the ultra rare genetic disease, Sanfilippo Syndrome Type C. Their mission was to foster treatment for Sanfilippo Syndrome Type C by connecting researchers, funding science, and mobilizing the patient population.

Mike Blake: [00:05:12] The revenue came through Grassroots Fundraising efforts, small grants, and private donors. Funding was then distributed to researchers through grants made by the foundation. Grassroots Fundraising provided the seed money to initiate pre-clinical research, but was far from what was needed to develop tests and manufacture a drug.

Mike Blake: [00:05:31] So, Jill then founded Phoenix Nest, a for-profit bespoke biotech in 2012. Phoenix Nest licensed the programs that the foundation kickstarted, which allowed them to apply for National Institute of Health, Small Business Innovation Research Grants. They won their first SBIR grant in 2012, the start of a series of grants totaling nearly $11 million. That funding has allowed Phoenix Nest to bring one of its treatments almost entirely through its pre-clinical studies and funded a clinical observation study which is still ongoing. Jill Wood, welcome to the Decision Vision podcast.

Jill Wood: [00:06:09] Thank you, Mike. Thanks for having me here.

Mike Blake: [00:06:13] So, let’s educate our audience first. We’ll talk about grants in a second. But what you do is so important and I also want to get into your origin story because I think it’s just amazing, candidly. I’m not sucking up to you. I truly believe that. What is Sanfilippo Syndrome? And so, you and I had spoken, I never heard of it, to be perfectly candid.

Jill Wood: [00:06:34] Yeah. Very few people have heard of it, and that’s one of the major problems with diagnosing this disease. So, Sanfilippo Syndrome is part of the umbrella group of syndromes called mucopolysaccaridosis, which is MPS for short. There are seven forms of MPS, and Sanfilippo Syndrome is MPS III, which breaks down to another four syndromes, MPS III A, B, C and D, or you can call it Sanfilippo Syndrome A, B, C, and D. I don’t know why they have to make this stuff so complicated, but that’s what it is.

Jill Wood: [00:07:16] So, my son, Jonah, was diagnosed with Sanfilippo Syndrome Type C about a year into his first year of life. We were really very lucky, for lack of better words, we lived in New York where we are surrounded by some really great institution, health care hospitals, who our pediatrician recognized that something was off with Jonah. And it was basically the head size, his head circumference, which a normal pediatrician would sweep under the rug, like no big deal. You know, if they’re Polish, they all have big heads, you know.

Jill Wood: [00:07:57] But he sent us over to a neurologist and that neurologists took a hard look at Jonah and saw some other things. And they sent us to an MRI that was done at NYU. And, luckily for us, the techs saw in Jonah’s brain deformities or lesions. The deformity was a skull deformity that’s pointed towards mucopolysaccharidosis. So, we were able to zero in right away into what diagnostic testing we needed to do for Jonah.

Jill Wood: [00:08:42] So, Sanfilippo Syndrome, it’s a genetic disease that has a mutation on one of the chromosomes. And a husband and a wife have a 25 percent chance of giving both of those bad genes to their child. And so, Jonah has a defect on his gene that stops an enzyme from forming. And that enzyme’s job is to break down a protein called heparan sulfate. And because that enzyme is not there or lacking, it doesn’t break down that protein. And the protein sits in the cell in every single cell.

Jill Wood: [00:09:26] This is called a lysosomal storage disease. There are numerous lysosomal storage disease out there. Gaucher, Fabry are some of the more popular ones that people might recognize. So, anyways, you could imagine what this storage must do to your cells that’s not supposed to be there, right? It has catastrophic effects. It starts with near degenerative progressive disease, a lot of behavioral issues. The symptoms are really quite diverse and it’s very hard to pick up because a lot of it in the early diagnosis is hyperactivity.

Jill Wood: [00:10:08] So, you have a two year old that’s extremely hyper. The two year old with a large head that’s extremely hyper. Then, what really sets people off to search is their speech delays and not keeping up with their peers. A lot of times, if they have older brothers, siblings, they’re like, “They’re just not like his older brother Johnny. You know, this is not the way he developed.” And so, they start on that odyssey of getting the diagnosis, and they usually get diagnosed as in the autism spectrum disorders until they start regressing.

Mike Blake: [00:10:47] And in the regression, they’ll start to lose their speech, their ability to walk, their ability to eat on their own, and they succumb to death between the ages of 10 to 30, really, depending on the severity of the syndrome.

Mike Blake: [00:11:04] So, at the time your son was diagnosed, were you already a biologist? Were you already a trained pharmaceutical researcher? What was your background?

Jill Wood: [00:11:16] No. Everybody always asks me that, Mike. They call us citizen scientist, is the term that came out. No. I was in the fashion industry. I think what gave me the ability to do what I’ve done is just being able to talk to people, not being shy. And it’s okay to not understand. And going after people and making those connections is one of my strong suits.

Mike Blake: [00:11:49] You know, and I think just aside from the story, being remarkable that you’re undertaking that challenge and you really just pivoted your life to pursue this, you’ve gone from that point to raising over $11 million of grant money. Which tells me – and I mean, this in no disrespect to you and in any way diminish your accomplishment – that you don’t necessarily have to be a “insider” to raise grant money. You don’t necessarily have to have lived that entire life, you’re part of a secret club, or anything, that there is a process, that if you muster that process, then grant money is achievable.

Jill Wood: [00:12:33] Yeah. But, Mike, I do think they were shocked. I think the people that released the funds when they talk to me that first round and they asked me who I was and what kind of financial setup I had, they were shocked. I could hear them gasp on the other line.

Jill Wood: [00:12:56] I would be curious to know how many other parents have started out. And since I’ve started doing this and telling my story – you know, the NIH brings me out all the time to campus to speak – and since I’ve started this, many families, many parents said, “Okay. I can do this too.” So, I know there’s been an uptick in that, but I would be curious to know.

Mike Blake: [00:13:19] So, walk through your first grant, if you can remember that. What was that like? How did you approach it? Was it successful?

Jill Wood: [00:13:34] You know, it took a couple of times, a couple of rounds to have our first successful grant. Obviously, I did not do this grant writing on my own. You do need to have a medical degree or a PhD – actually, you don’t. I mean, you could really educate yourself up to that point. But if you want to expedite the situation, you should probably bring some consultants in.

Jill Wood: [00:13:57] And so, I did have my colleague, my co-founder, was a PhD, and he had NIH grants under his belt. He inspired me and said, “Let’s do this.” I have really great researchers that I work with. We had preclinical work. We had efficacy. And we really had what was needed to start writing grants. So, he helped me put together our first grant application.

Jill Wood: [00:14:27] And to go back, so my major funding comes from the National Institute of Health, NINDS, as I mentioned, the Small Business Innovation Research Grants. To get these fundings, to start up, even able to apply, is a major undertaking. You can’t just go and log in and sign yourself up. There are several different agencies that you have to go through. The dance number, your cage code, all these steps that you have to go and be certified for. So, anyways, that could take you four to six months. So, if you’re going to do this, you’ve got to get started.

Jill Wood: [00:15:14] There’s very little cost that’s involved in starting up, though. I think there might just be a couple of fees, but, anyhow, it’s inexpensive to do, so – go ahead.

Mike Blake: [00:15:25] Please go ahead. No. Go ahead, please.

Jill Wood: [00:15:26] Okay. So, my researchers, with these small business grants, usually it’s a requirement. You’re working with an academic, and that academic worked with my grant writer, and we put together a strategy. There is a format to these grants. And I suggest you read the instructions over and over and over again. And you don’t throw anything in there that you think is really great. You need to follow what the FOA asks you to do.

Mike Blake: [00:16:04] FOA stands for what?

Jill Wood: [00:16:08] You put me on the spot there, and you’re going to come up –

Mike Blake: [00:16:12] I’ll look it up.

Jill Wood: [00:16:13] Yeah. Thanks. Look it up. You can call for grant FOA.

Mike Blake: [00:16:23] Funding Opportunity Announcement.

Jill Wood: [00:16:25] Thank you. There it is.

Mike Blake: [00:16:26] You’re such an expert, you’re so in it, it’s hard for you to get back to the [inaudible].

Jill Wood: [00:16:33] I was impressed that it came up with SBIR. So, anyways, you follow what the FOA is asking. And if you don’t, that is your first rejection. They’ll kick it right back at you. The NIH is not messing around. I once had a grant kicked back to me because there was a hyperlink in the page within the body of a CV. That was kicked back to me. I’ve had grants kicked back because we went over the page limit. I mean, you don’t even get reviewed. They kick it back and you can’t reapply for another six months.

Jill Wood: [00:17:13] So, you really got to take these things very, very seriously. Have other people take another eyeball on it, pass it over. I mean, bio sketches have to be in the form of an NIH bio sketch. Anyhow, so our first grants we applied had really great comments. We did not win. But you take those comments, and you take them seriously, and you go back and you address them. And you could have a chance, within time you can go and address those before your grant will go to committee for final review. But most often you have to reapply to the grant funding opportunities, which usually happen every six months.

Mike Blake: [00:18:04] Now, you’ve also received other grants from non-governmental organizations as well, correct?

Jill Wood: [00:18:14] Correct.

Mike Blake: [00:18:15] So, I guess I’m curious, why are they giving away money? I understand and our listeners will understand, government agencies, in a way, it’s sort of their job. But there are these private foundations, individuals, I guess, corporate entities, and so forth, what do you think kind of makes them tick?

Jill Wood: [00:18:39] Obviously, breast cancer awareness, you can see how that got started, because it affected people and maybe affected loved ones. A wealthy entrepreneur out there may have had a grandchild with a rare disease and somebody on a staff started up a foundation, because they want to help and maybe they don’t have the time or the resources to do what I’ve done.

Jill Wood: [00:19:11] And I’m sorry I keep regressing here, but I’m thinking back to the science. What was there ten years ago is here now. Alzheimer’s is a really good example. You know, that is a disease that’s only recently had treatments and it’s been known for 70 years. You can look that one up, Mike, as well. But some of these ultra rare diseases are easy fixes where a single gene defect and the science is finally here. You know, CRISPR gene therapy, it’s just opened up the world to us.

Jill Wood: [00:19:53] So, I’m going back to make my point is that, these large foundations that have been there for so long, they had to fund a lot of science to get to where they’re at now. I think we’re going to be seeing a lot more treatments coming out in the next couple of decades with the recent discoveries that we’ve had. So, yes, I think they have a connection. They have a connection to the community.

Mike Blake: [00:20:23] So, I’m not sure if the way to ask this question have you think back or maybe just if you’re going to start today. But, you know, I’m sure somebody who’s listening to this podcast is thinking this out, “You know, I’ve been thinking about getting a grant and this conversation with Jill is giving me the confidence to give this a shot.” Where do you start? How do you start figuring out what might be a potential source of grant money?

Jill Wood: [00:20:53] Well, you’re going to want to look at the institutions or the smaller nonprofits that are in your space. And NIH was obvious to me. But if you might have an education grants, you can go for the Department of Education. Department of Defense is a really good, huge funding opportunity. So, look within your space.

Mike Blake: [00:21:20] I imagine a lot of this can be just accomplished by Google Search, right? Because I think some organizations are very private, they don’t necessarily want a solicitation at large, but then there are some that do. But one thing I’ve read, and I’m curious if you agree with or have any experience with this, is that, it might be easier to obtain money from a smaller organization than a larger one simply because they may not have as many applicants. Any comment on that?

Jill Wood: [00:21:55] No offense, Mike, finding those is pretty dang tough. So, we can go on a tangent here, maybe there’s foundations. So, in my space you’ll have a foundation that supports MPS, but they support MPS as in the families, getting help to the families, and getting families to where they need to be. And I’m looking for foundations that are willing to fund research to bring a treatment.

Jill Wood: [00:22:30] The smaller ones are hard, I think, to find unless you know them because they’re in your space and then you have a link to them. But the larger foundations, you know, everybody always says, “Did you go for a Zuckerberg grant? Have you talked to Bill Gates?” It’s always the first thing out of people’s mouths. And it’s like, “Those are the people that are inundated with grant applications.”

Jill Wood: [00:22:56] You know, you really need to have an in, you need to have somebody you can talk to, a name, and ask for advice, what are people looking for, what’s the tone of this grant. And a lot of times you’ll look at the FOAs and it’s like, “I don’t even know they’re so all over the place.” Nothing has really zeroed in and there’s so many different ones. It’s really convoluted.

Jill Wood: [00:23:24] So, you start out doing that because that’s what everybody tells you to do. But I turned around and just walked away from it because it was all misses. You know, you could spend a lot of time putting things together and it’s just not what they’re looking for. But they don’t really tell you what they’re looking for. And the goalposts are changing all the time, whichever way the wind blows, what’s the sexy right here that I’m funding.

Mike Blake: [00:23:52] You know, the interesting thing about what you just described, I think, is that a lot of people who have had to raise venture capital would offer a very similar description. You’ve got to have an in and you’re not really sure what they want. The VCs aren’t sure what they want. It’s sort of like trying to define the difference between art and pornography. They don’t know. They can’t define exactly where it is, but they know it when they see it. And so, you get bouncing around saying, “Well, no. I’m really not into this. But maybe if you do this, I’ll take another look.”

Jill Wood: [00:24:26] And I don’t know about you, but I know that at least on the VC side of it, the funding seeker side, that can just be immensely frustrating, because it’s hard to tell the difference between being tasked to do something with a specific objective versus just sort of being frankly jerked around.

Jill Wood: [00:24:46] Yeah. Exactly. Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:24:49] So, in your experience, what does the timeline look like for applying to a grant? I’m curious, is it fairly quick? Is it lengthy? Is it variable? What’s your experience with that?

Jill Wood: [00:25:04] It’s all lengthy. From small to large, it’s all lengthy. I mean, small operations don’t have as many people onboard looking at it. They want to vet the application. So, it might take more time to find the right eyes to look at the application. And then, large institutions, you think they’re large, but the NIH, I feel like they don’t have enough employees, The FDA, they don’t have enough employees. And there’s a lot to go through as well. So, they’re about six months rotation. And if you have a government shutdown, it’s all over, and it happens all the time.

Mike Blake: [00:25:49] When that happens, do you basically have to start over or is it sort of extended animation?

Jill Wood: [00:25:53] No. We just sit in limbo. We sit in limbo. You know, it’s happened to me a couple of times during the Obama Administration, where towards the end we had shutdowns every other day. And it was between we had won the grant and now we’re waiting for the funds to release. Well, the funds aren’t being released because nobody’s made their decision on how much funds are being released. They’re all squabbling there. So, yeah, you sit down for another three months. It’s extremely frustrating. I mean, you think you got the funds, but it could take you a year to actually get them.

Jill Wood: [00:26:33] And I should preface that, too, maybe this is obvious to most people, but maybe not. Those funds don’t hit your bank account. They’re sitting up there in the cloud somewhere – we call it the Payment Management System – and you only pull down funds when you’re paying an invoice.

Mike Blake: [00:26:51] Oh, that’s interesting. I didn’t know that and I’ll bet our listeners didn’t know that. How does that impact your operations as you try to operate your company?

Jill Wood: [00:27:02] Mike, it’s really hard. I was laughing, I could tell you all the horror stories behind this. So, you know, you have to budget so fine tuned. You need to know every penny. And when those invoices are coming, a lot of these grants are milestone driven. If you don’t get to your milestones, your grants can be frozen. If you have a researcher that changes positions or you have to move to a different site, your grant is frozen. And if you’re in between a funding cycle and they only release fundings at certain points, it’s frozen, then you have to get permission to release it, and then here the funds come another six months.

Jill Wood: [00:27:58] So, you can’t get ahead of yourself. You can’t ever overcommit. You really need to be prepared for those things to happen because it is inevitable. They will happen. And if you are living from paycheck to paycheck, it can crush you.

Mike Blake: [00:28:19] And I’m guessing also it probably creates a vendor management challenge, too.

Jill Wood: [00:28:25] Yes, it is. Yeah. I always go in. And a lot of these vendors, believe it or not, even though the money is there, they don’t take on uber rare projects. You know, it’s like $1,000,000 actually means nothing to them. You know, patient population with 15 patients, I’ve had vendors have turned me down because my projects are too small. So, you get these good ones that want to work with you, that understand the situation, and they realize this is what’s happening, but we’re going to do the right thing. And I’ve had several of those vendors.

Jill Wood: [00:29:06] But, yeah, I work with one company that has been incredibly patient where that exact same thing happened. My grant got waylaid and I owed them hundreds of thousands of dollars, and they sat there for six months. And they continued to work, they kept on working until the funds were released. But I couldn’t sleep at night. I do not like living like this.

Mike Blake: [00:29:30] No, of course. I guess, on the bright side, I have to imagine if you provide those services or vendors provide, for example, clinical research organizations, that kind of thing, many of their clients are in your position. And so, my guess, if they’re smart, is that their business model already foresees the fact that there may be a six month delay between invoicing and being paid simply because that’s the nature of the beast.

Jill Wood: [00:30:05] Yeah. It’s like the venture capitalist, you know, they’re taking a little bit of a risk helping you out.

Mike Blake: [00:30:15] So, let’s go to the NIH, because I think that’s obviously a big source for you. How important has it been to develop a personal relationship with people at the NIH? And if that was important, how did that happen?

Jill Wood: [00:30:38] You know, they have to be very careful. There cannot be any favoritism there. You can’t take these guys out for lunch or buy them a drink. That is not appropriate. And if you’re in this space, it’s a small fishbowl. And I was fortunate enough where my grant funding came from the NINDS. And there’s a representative, our program manager that runs in the same circle – her name is actually the same as mine – who I just got to know her. And she really understood the science. She understood the disease. And so, when the grant application came through, it hit her desk. We already had the rapport. She knew the people that I work with.

Jill Wood: [00:31:27] But she’s not the one who’s making the decisions on reviews. You know, when your grant goes in, she gives it to the right people. But you never see your reviewers. They give you a list of their names, but you actually don’t know which ones are looking at your grant. And it is a major no-no to ever contact these reviewers. Don’t ever say anything to them. And it’s those guys that are making the decisions on giving you the score. And those guys can tear you apart if their idea does not fit with yours.

Jill Wood: [00:32:07] But the grant managers, how they can really help you is fight for you. When they do see something that is not in sync with the guidelines, they can call a reviewer out and say, “Hey, you know, this was an unjust comment.” During those times when grant funding freezes, they can help you find other ways to get bridge funding. So, my program managers are priceless. I do have a really great relationship with them. And they are extremely helpful, and networking, and giving ideas.

Mike Blake: [00:32:46] So, you’ve indicated that you’ve in the past, and perhaps you still do, have relied on the help of outside consultants and advisors to help you prepare grants. And I’ve read the same thing, like many organizations have internal grant writers because it’s such a specialized skill. If you’re going to apply for grants such as the ones that you’ve received, how much should somebody budget in terms of the cost of applying for this “free money,” which isn’t so free?

Jill Wood: [00:33:19] It’s not free. Oh, geez. You know, I think it could probably cost you, it depends, like, are you going to hire these people and keep them on staff. That’s where I always worry about. They need to not only have the gift of writing, they need to understand your disease too. And so, it’s hard to find a consultant out there that’s going to be able to nail both of them. So, I would suggest hiring somebody and then you’re going to give them a full salary, which you want to Google it, $100,000 to 300,000.

Jill Wood: [00:34:02] If you are going to piecemeal it, I just think you get what you pay for. You’re not going to get quality work out – maybe you will, maybe you can find somebody – just saying, “Here’s my package, put it together.” I would say that probably costs you at least $10,000.

Mike Blake: [00:34:23] Have you had grant applications rejected?

Jill Wood: [00:34:27] Oh, all the time nonstop. This one grant goes to cancel May 18th. And we are sitting on the edge of our seats. We got a really great score. And that grant has gone through three times. This is its fourth time.

Mike Blake: [00:34:48] It’s fourth time being submitted?

Jill Wood: [00:34:50] Fourth time being submitted.

Mike Blake: [00:34:52] And you’re hopeful that the fourth time is the charm?

Jill Wood: [00:34:55] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:34:56] Okay. So, actually this is one of my questions, I was curious if you’re able to apply for grants more than once. That sounds like you are. That may even be expected.

Jill Wood: [00:35:07] Yeah. So, you’ll get your comments, and you’re not always going to have the same reviewers. And sometimes you get lucky with a reviewer that knows exactly what it is that you’re trying to convey and get across, they’ve been in this space. They’re in your space. These people are in your space. They have understanding of the disease. And then, you’ll have somebody who is like, “No. That is not the route of administration I would suggest. No.” “F.” They score you for, like, one to eight, one being good, eight all the way across. So, it’s some egos in there.

Mike Blake: [00:35:44] So, is it fair to say there’s a certain amount of luck involved? Do I get the right application in front of the right reviewer on the right day in the right mood?

Jill Wood: [00:35:55] Yeah. I think with all honesty, Mike, yes. Because we’ve resubmitted it and gotten way different comments from the previous round, so it’s extremely frustrating.

Mike Blake: [00:36:13] Now, when you receive a grant – we touched upon this in terms of how money is dispersed – what other things do you have to change about your business or build your business around in order to manage the grant? Because my understanding is when there’s a grant, there’s just usually some sort of reporting function to send to the granting organization to verify, basically, that you took the money, you didn’t go to Atlantic City and put it all in 22 black. So, what does that look like?

Jill Wood: [00:36:43] It’s hard. And that was really scary for me. And I found there’s niche companies out there that specialize in managing your funds and helping you with the accounting. Yes, there will be line item budgets for travel, for equipment, for subcontracts, yadda yadda. And you get your F&A portion of it and your fee. There’s a lot of calculation that goes into these. It’s epic. It’s quite a lot of work. And your invoices all need to be properly coded.

Jill Wood: [00:37:22] So, all that goes into – I use this company and I’ll pitch them because I think they’re fabulous – Jameson, is my company that does that for me. But I take the invoices and I code them. They manage all the backend of it for me. And then, when you hit a milestone, it’s 750,000 in funding, you’re audited. It triggers an audit. And so, these guys come in, they’re certified by the NIH, and they come in and they look at all your books and make sure you spend down to the time cards, to every single sub-award, seeing the contracts, knowing how you vetted these different contracts. It’s pretty intense and it’s extremely intimidating.

Jill Wood: [00:38:14] So, I strongly suggest you bring somebody in to help you with that. Academia, who wins a lot of these kind of grants, they have entire departments that manage this. They manage the researchers grants for them. But I did not. And so, I found a company that could manage it for me.

Mike Blake: [00:38:38] So, I’m curious, does that also mean that you have to – I’m guessing – kind of approach accounting in a separate and kind of a different way? Some companies, frankly, can be pretty loosey goosey about accounting. And if all you’re doing is you’re running a business selling peat moss out of the back of your truck, you can do that. But it sounds like for you, you probably effectively need at least a controller, if not an outright CFO, and maybe even a whole separate kind of firm even to sell off on it to make sure that you’re doing what you need to do. Because I’m guessing that’s the kind of thing where a misstep can destroy a relationship forever.

Jill Wood: [00:39:24] Yeah. So, yeah, that’s why I depend on this company, and I really want to make sure. This was a portion that I did not know. There’s always that behind the scenes stuff, and this was one of them, is the reporting of the funds, how you spend the funds. I mean, there’s stipulations on how much funds you can roll over to the next accounting period. If you come up short in one budget item and over in the other one, how much you can reallocate to different areas. You know, it’s really detailed.

Mike Blake: [00:40:05] I’m talking with Jill Wood. And the topic is, Should I apply for grants? With the time we have left one question I want to get your thoughts on here is, who shouldn’t apply for grants? I’m sure you’ve probably talked to people that have asked, you know, “Hey, this sounds great. I want to get some of this free money to do X, Y, and Z.” Have you ever talked somebody out of applying for grants or can you see a scenario under which you might talk somebody out of applying for grants? Because for whatever reason, they’re not wired for it, they’re not appropriate, not the right space. Hopefully, you get my question there.

Jill Wood: [00:40:46] Yeah. I would say not in the right space. This is not free money. Because free means it’s my time. This is a massive amount of work that you’re doing to managing these grants. So, if you think you’re going to get free money, who’s going to manage that money for you? That’s not free. So, it would be the person that I would talk out of it.

Jill Wood: [00:41:14] Like, I know where I’m at. And I only have one child. I live in New York. I have access to a large infrastructure, lots of consultants at my fingertips. I don’t want to pick on anybody, but Arkansas did not have the infrastructure that I do and have more than one child, four kids, maybe two, very sick. It’s too much. It’s too much work. I know how hard it is.

Jill Wood: [00:41:52] And you’re not just managing grants. You’re also managing your research. You’re managing the companies. You’re managing your vendors. You’re trying to understand where to go to next, the NIH, the whole landscape. You have to quit your job. And if you’re taking care of multiple sick children, that’s too much. I ask myself all the time, “Is it worth it?”

Mike Blake: [00:42:20] And I imagine it must feel sometimes like you’re working for your granting organizations.

Jill Wood: [00:42:27] Yeah. I do. I really do. I would say that’s a good portion of my time is to make sure all my books are in order, that I’m making all my milestones, planning ahead so that I’ll get the funding when my milestones are met. Yeah. It’s a lot of juggling.

Mike Blake: [00:42:52] So, one way to potentially approach applying for grants is to basically put out as many applications as you possibly can, sort of a shotgun approach as opposed to being surgical. I think I know what the answer is going to be. That’s okay. But I’m sure somebody has tried that. Is that a viable strategy or do you really have to be zeroed in and decide and bet on organizations?

Jill Wood: [00:43:20] If you have nothing better to do, if you have nothing else to lose, you could sit around and write. I mean, some of these grants are small, but some of them are 30 pages. And you’re also wasting other people’s time. If you’re not serious about your grant writing, you’re wasting other people’s time because you have to go and get quotes from all your CROs. Maybe you need to rent a space. Maybe you need to hire other people. You have to get letters of support. There’s a lot that goes into this.

Jill Wood: [00:43:54] So, that would make me mad if you did that, because you are wasting a lot of people’s time, and you are wasting reviewer’s precious time by putting something in their face that’s just worthless. So, be focused.

Mike Blake: [00:44:17] What are the most common reasons that a grant is rejected in your mind?

Jill Wood: [00:44:23] Mistake.

Mike Blake: [00:44:26] Yeah?

Jill Wood: [00:44:27] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:44:28] Just like a factual error or –

Jill Wood: [00:44:30] A mistake. A hyperlink, too many pages, you didn’t follow the format. This was supposed to be ten pages, you know. Or in the mistake that you missed the concept, the FOA, you misunderstood it. You should really talk to the grant managers before you apply and say, “Are my aims, does this fall under what the reviewers are expecting?”

Mike Blake: [00:45:02] Jill, we’re running out of time and there are probably questions that our listeners would have liked me to have asked, but didn’t, or would have liked us to spend more time on, or maybe they just want to find out more about Sanfilippo Syndrome and how they can help. If somebody would like to contact you, can they? And if so, what’s the best way to do that?

Jill Wood: [00:45:24] You can contact me directly at my email address. If you have a place to put that, it’s in the blog text or in a text somewhere under my bio, it’s jwood@phoenixnestbiotech.com.

Mike Blake: [00:45:41] Very good. That’s going to wrap it up for today’s program. And I’d like to thank Jill Wood so much for sharing her expertise with us.

Mike Blake: [00:45:48] We’ll be exploring a new topic each week, so please tune in so that when you’re faced with your next business decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy these podcasts, please consider leaving a review with your favorite podcast aggregator. It helps people find us so that we can help them.

Mike Blake: [00:46:05] If you would like to engage with me on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I’m on LinkedIn as myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. Also, check out my new LinkedIn Group called Unblakeable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck. Once again, this is Mike Blake. Our sponsor is Brady Ware and Company. And this has been the Decision Vision podcast.

 

Tagged With: Brady Ware & Company, Decision Vision, grants, Jill Wood, JJB, Jonah's Just Begun, Mike Blake, NGO grants, NIH, Phoenix Nest, Sanfilippo Syndrome

Decision Vision Episode 166: Should I Use Artificial Intelligence in my Business? – An Interview with Charles Wardell, Digital Cortex, Inc.

April 28, 2022 by John Ray

Digital Cortex
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 166: Should I Use Artificial Intelligence in my Business? - An Interview with Charles Wardell, Digital Cortex, Inc.
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Digital Cortex

Decision Vision Episode 166: Should I Use Artificial Intelligence in my Business? – An Interview with Charles Wardell, Digital Cortex, Inc.

Exploring the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) in general and specifically for business use, Charles Wardell, CEO of Digital Cortex, and host Mike Blake discussed how to define AI, machine learning, and its applications both commercial and otherwise. They also covered its impact on the pandemic, the social implications of AI, the need for a commitment to trustworthy data, and much more.

Decision Vision is presented by Brady Ware & Company and produced by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Digital Cortex, Inc.

As technology rapidly evolves, so does the need for faster, more efficient data processing methods.

The Central Processing Unit (CPU) has been the workhorse behind digital endeavors, but today’s computation and data volumes challenge even the fastest CPUs. The modern world is increasingly becoming one where data reigns supreme. Data processing has evolved from serial computation and sequential storage to parallel computing with large pipelines and vast amounts of memory.

Today, there are options for accelerating computation, graphics processing units, FPGAs, ASICs, and DPUs designed specifically for data processing. Digital Cortex aims to converge these advanced technologies into a single unified platform, creating an ecosystem that simplifies the hyperscaling of complex data processing.

The Digital Cortex platform is a data appliance with built-in acceleration. It handles the undifferentiated heavy lifting so that you can focus on logic, analysis, and results. Our company is designed to bring the power of the Cloud to those use cases that cannot tolerate outage, latency, or uncapped expense.

Company website | LinkedIn 

Charles Wardell, CEO, Digital Cortex, Inc.

Charles Wardell, CEO, Digital Cortex, Inc.

Charles Wardell, CTO, Tech Visionary, Maker of Things That Work Fast with decades of experience working with leading MPP databases to implement world-class BI platforms, and then designing and developing one of the world’s most powerful cloud and edge-based analytics engines using MPP (massively parallel processing), grid computing, ML (machine learning), and AI (artificial intelligence), Charlie routinely tackles some of the world’s messiest and most intractable problems. The fact is, Charlie is one of the best big data platform architects in the world.

His superpower is weaving hardware, software, and database technologies into cutting-edge, high-performance solutions that provide insights at the scale and speed modern businesses require. The breadth and depth of Charlie’s experience also enable him to see around the corners well in advance, and the combination of his and David’s vision targeted on the biggest and most valuable solutions is what makes this duo such an amazing team.

If intellectual curiosity was a degree, Charlie would have a PhD. His curriculum has been intensive, and it continues today, his library is extensive, not in one discipline, but several: hardware, software, and database technology. But beyond reading, Charlie’s best work comes out of his lab, whether it’s a customized FPGA, the fastest database in the world (measured by inserts), or it’s a new application that integrates symbolic and connectedness AI, there is nothing he can’t do. However, his best problem-solving characteristics are that he is a natural systems thinker and he never brings bias to a problem, every problem gets his full attention, so he can always focus on identifying the best tool for the job, not necessarily the tool he knows. This is what makes him one of the best architects on the planet, maybe the solar system.

LinkedIn

Mike Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series

Michael Blake is the host of the Decision Vision podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms, and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth-minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

Decision Vision is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision-maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the Decision Vision podcast.

Past episodes of Decision Vision can be found at decisionvisionpodcast.com. Decision Vision is produced by John Ray and the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Connect with Brady Ware & Company:

Website | LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: [00:00:02] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions. Brought to you by Brady Ware & Company. Brady Ware is a regional, full-service accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality.

Mike Blake: [00:00:22] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast giving you, the listener, clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision-making on a different topic from the business owners’ or executives’ perspective. We aren’t necessarily telling you what to do, but we can put you in a position to make an informed decision on your own and understand when you might need help along the way.

Mike Blake: [00:00:44] My name is Mike Blake, and I’m your host for today’s program. I’m a director at Brady Ware & Company, a full-service accounting firm based in Dayton, Ohio, with offices in Dayton; Columbus, Ohio; Richmond, Indiana; and Alpharetta, Georgia. I am managing partner of the Strategic Valuation and Advisory Services Practice, which brings clarity to the most important strategic decisions that business owners and executives face by presenting them with factual evidence for such decisions. Brady Ware is sponsoring this podcast.

Mike Blake: [00:01:12] If you would like to engage with me on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I am on LinkedIn as myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. I also recently launched a new LinkedIn group called Unblakeable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck. So, please join that as well if you would like to engage.

Mike Blake: [00:01:31] Today’s topic is, should I use artificial intelligence in my business? According to PEGA, 77% of people already use a device or service that is AI powered. Eighty-five percent of customer relationships with business enterprises will be managed without human involvement, according to Gartner. And, according to Forbes, the number of AI startups since 2000 has increased four times.

Mike Blake: [00:01:57] And, you know, I’m actually a little surprised we haven’t gotten to this topic until now. It’s such an important topic. And, AI and the things that go with it or talk about it today are so pervasive that to be candid, spoiler alert, I think we’re going to come away from this conversation not so much debating how one, whether one should incorporate AI into your business, but what is the best way to do it or what’s the feasible way to do it because, you know, it’s in everything.

Mike Blake: [00:02:30] So, if you’ve been sort of living with a fear or a notion of robots sort of taking over or taking over things in our society, I got bad news for you. It’s already been happening for about 15 years or so, if not longer. But, knowledge is power, and the power of AI, and I think our guest is going to agree, is something where we have only scratched the surface. And it’s probably limited as much as anything by hardware at this point as it is by human ingenuity and the ability to write code.

Mike Blake: [00:03:10] And so, my suspicion is that for a lot of us who are small business executives and owners, we may have written off or not paid attention to artificial intelligence because, you know, candidly and I’m guilty of this too, it sounds like something that only the big largest companies can afford. Right? AI is so expansive. And, we’re going to talk a little bit about the alphabet soup that goes into AI and how to make a little bit of sense from it. But it’s been around a long time now. It’s beyond, well beyond that early adopter phase or the cutting edge phase. Maybe it’s still in early adoption, but that means there’s plenty of room for AI to grow, to be creatively addressed, to be approached, and probably no two businesses are going to use AI exactly alike.

Mike Blake: [00:04:01] And, as usual, since I know almost nothing about the topic that we’re going to discuss, we’ve brought in an expert. And, joining us today is Charlie Wardell of Digital Cortex. Charlie is a technology entrepreneur, inventor, and consultant with over 20 years of experience in the field. He has a passion for innovation, which is showcased by patents related to big data and distributed computing, text analytics, and emotion detection in texts. He is also the owner of a provisional patent for a very unique FPGA that’s freely programmable gate array, for those of you scoring at home, hardware accelerator that brought the demand of financial institution back testing from 130 servers down to five. And, he also has a patent on a big data business approach.

Mike Blake: [00:04:46] Digital Cortex is the ultimate data processing and machine learning accelerator. They read anything, apply solutions, specific models and analysis, and put the results for you where you need them. With its combination of proprietary hardware and software, Digital Cortex delivers hyperscale data processing and inferencing performance. Multiple CPUs, FPGA, GPUs, and DPUs work together to enable you to achieve blazing fast speeds for your most demanding tasks that are focused on solving, once and for all, the scalability issues that keep meaningful insights hidden in large data sets. With Digital Cortex, you get line speed and hyperscalable access to those insights when you need them. Charlie Wardell, welcome to the program.

Charlie Wardell: [00:05:30] Thank you. Thank you for having me.

Mike Blake: [00:05:33] So, what is AI? Some people who think about artificial intelligence out there know a lot more about it and they actually know what it is. Others think back to the time they last watched a Terminator movie and they think artificial is used to go back and kill John Connor. I don’t think we’re there yet, but if we did, we wouldn’t know about it. How do you describe artificial intelligence to somebody who doesn’t have a Ph.D. in the field?

Charlie Wardell: [00:05:57] Yeah. So, you know, AI has been around for ages, right, since the ’60s. They’ve been trying to crack the AI code and make essentially have computers make decisions. Not to be confused with machine learning, which is a subset of AI that helps drive those decisions, but AI is essentially a technique by which decisions are being made whether a human is in the loop or not is irrelevant. And then, there are various forms of AI. You have symbolic AI. You have expert systems. You have neural networks and things like that that help you drive these decision-making processes. So it’s a complex topic with many facets. But what I hope to do on this call is boil it down to some of the practical as to what it means for small and mid-sized businesses.

Mike Blake: [00:06:51] So, in around artificial intelligence, you see or hear a lot the terms neural networks and machine learning. In fact, you just spoke of them, right? How do those three things interact with one another?

Charlie Wardell: [00:07:09] Okay. So, machine learning is the analysis of data in one of two forms. It is analyzing data where you’re either analyzing it in a supervised fashion, like there’s a human in the middle, right? We are providing data to a machine. That is what we call labeled. Here are examples of smiles or happiness, okay, and we provide as many different variations of that smile as possible, maybe in an image. Okay. So, that’s human-annotated labeled data. And then, the machine learns that these are smiles, these are frowns. That’s essentially one type of machine learning.

Charlie Wardell: [00:07:54] Another type is unsupervised. And you say, given all of this data, maybe cluster together the ones that look alike and do it on your own. And, that’s a clustering algorithm and that’s another form of machine learning. Both of which are used or can bubble up into an AI solution, but by themselves are not necessarily AI. You might think the fact that a machine can pick out a smile versus a frown is artificial intelligence. And, you know, I guess at a rudimentary level, it is. But it is not the AI that we’re talking about today where you have some smart drones being able to pick out the proper target, you know, in Ukraine, which is crazy AI. It’s pretty wild. So, that’s machine learning. AI is layers and layers of the machine learning that actually create a human-like decision. Right?

Mike Blake: [00:08:57] So, I might be completely off base, but I’ve often thought of artificial intelligence, like you said, going back, I would argue that artificial intelligence on some level has been around almost as long as computer programming has. Right? The second that they started letting you make if-then statements, that is a rudimentary form of artificial intelligence. Right? But where the machine learning comes in – and I love your smile analogy, so I’m going to take it, steal it and run with it – and that is that under a sort of a pure or plain vanilla AI framework. The programmer would have to tell in exacting detail the computer what a – what the characteristics of a smile or group of smiles or an epistemology of smiles looks like. Whereas under machine learning, you can show a bunch of facial expressions and over time it becomes good at understanding on its own what a smile looks like and it doesn’t have to be a separate algorithm that is fixed, that defines that smile rigidly. Is that a fair distinction?

Charlie Wardell: [00:10:05] Yeah. I guess, so really interesting. So, your analogy about the if-then statement is spot on. Back then, we called those expert systems. They were based on Prolog and lists some – I’m dating myself, but those expert systems were essentially if-then statements to the extreme, so many of them that it’s not humanly possible to code them all and maintain them all. And some of the best expert systems are used in the medical field where you interview a doctor and he may be a specialist in cardiology and you just interview him every single weekend over a cup of coffee until you pick his entire brain and you document these things as rules. Right? And then, you have a patient that comes to you and you type in his symptoms and it traverses all of this logic and all of these if-then statements and it says you have this. And the doctor looks and he thinks about it and goes, “Oh, it’s right. Holy smokes.” So, that’s a form of AI, right? That is an expert system AI.

Charlie Wardell: [00:11:07] Today, you have the smile analogy where the machine is actually picking up what a smile looks like. You’re not telling it any rules. It’s actually figuring it out and it’s like, “Wow, this – you told me these were smiles. So, I’m going to figure out why they’re smiles. Okay. Teeth are showing. Maybe, the mouth is wider or maybe the eyes are squintier, or maybe all of that stuff. I’m going to figure out why.” And that’s a different kind of AI.

Charlie Wardell: [00:11:34] What’s happening today and what should be happening today is the convergence of the two, right? Because together they’re better. And I can give you an example of a chatbot that I did. So, you have a chatbot. Let’s say it’s a mortgage application chatbot and people are saying, hey, I want a mortgage. And then, you have this thing traversing through the rules and parsing out that text and say, “Mortgage wants to know about a mortgage. Here’s my response.” It’s a canned response. And he says, “Well, do I need – how much is my down payment?” Looks up, answers. That appears to be AI, but that’s all this symbolic expert system-driven stuff. Then, they throw you a curveball and they say, “Hey, did you see the game last night?” Because they think they’re talking to a real person. That’s not in my decision tree. So, what do I do? I go to a neural network that was trained with the latest news. And I see game, scores and I’m able to pull that out and reply, right? So, now I’m doing the best of both worlds and I’m now making a real AI experience that is very different than the old school symbolic if-then statements. People are like, “Wow, how did it know that.”

Mike Blake: [00:12:53] You know, as I listen to you and even as I was doing research for this conversation, I think I’ve probably made a moron of myself. I mean, it’s more in an okay way, but I’ve probably been very polite and I’ve probably been very complimentary to basically robots that have given me customer service. Right? Because I try to – I do try to be empathetic with customer service. They have a tough job. They probably have people that call up and swear at them and threaten to blow up their houses and God knows what else. They’re not happy with the outcome. And so, I get good service. I try to be positive about it, just like I do in life. I try to be acknowledging of when good things happen. I’ve probably told at least one robot how much I think they did a great job and I love them. I think they’re just awesome, quote-unquote, people, right, if we’re honest about it.

Charlie Wardell: [00:13:46] Right.

Mike Blake: [00:13:46] Right.

Charlie Wardell: [00:13:47] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:13:48] Which shows us doing its job, right? Because it had, the chatbot in this case had such a human quality. The artificial intelligence was so well developed that indeed I had no conception that there wasn’t actually somebody busily typing on a window somewhere actually helping me.

Charlie Wardell: [00:14:06] Yeah. You know, and AI, it’s getting to the point where it is so unbelievable that you are getting to a point where you’re not really able to tell a difference. My entire resume – my entire resume, I wrote, and then I put it into this AI machine. There’s a few of them out there. And it rewrote it for me and it was amazing. I was like, “Yep. we’re going to clip that. They didn’t get that quite right.” And people would say, “Oh, my gosh, your resume is amazing.” And, it’s all factually true. Everything in there is factually true. But the embellishments that it made and the connected words that it used, it’s just absolutely mind-blowing. So, that’s just one aspect of AI that anybody can use in their business, this narrative generator. And it’s scary how awesome it is. It really is. It’s very awesome. It is.

Mike Blake: [00:15:07] So, let’s talk about the awesome because I’m not sure there’s a full appreciation of the awesome. I think a lot of the awesome is sort of hidden from view by design. In your mind, what are some of the most exciting recent developments in AI? What’s kind of new and neat that’s come out? And if you want to talk about the stuff you’re doing, that’s fine too. I’m familiar with it to some extent. Chris has briefed me. Or, other things too. But what’s really neat and new with AI right now?

Charlie Wardell: [00:15:34] Well, you know, let’s go with Ukraine right now, you know, which is, maybe people didn’t realize what AI could do from a military aspect. Right? So, you have these things called slaughter bots, right? They’re called killbots. And they’re this £6-drone that launches and it can travel like 6 miles and hover the air and it looks for targets. Now, you have a line, a caravan of, you know, heavy equipment, you know, enemy personnel. Well, out of all of those, which one should a dive bomb? Well, it’s going to look for the gas tanker, got to kill that supply chain. And it knows. It knows. I’m going to go for those first. Right? And, after I get rid of all of those, then I’m going to start getting these, and I’m going to do the missile battery next, and I’m going to do this next. That’s where AI gets – that’s where people can relate to say, because it’s in the news right now and say, “Oh, I get it. I understand what AI is doing now. I can discern and I can make decisions in flight, in real time, and do my job.”

Charlie Wardell: [00:16:00] From a business standpoint, on marketing – my wife has a business. It’s an e-commerce site. And, in that business, it’s made up of moms. Right? And, these moms have certain characteristics of the things they like, the things they don’t like, the things they buy, the things they don’t buy. You can upload your customer list to Facebook. And you can say, “Hey, Facebook, you have a billion people in your audience. What I want you to do is I want you to give me a new audience that is not my customer base but that looks exactly like my customer base,” from mathematical point of view, exactly, age, demographic, region, interests, and all this other stuff. And, now that becomes my target list for sending ads or messaging or email or whatnot. It’s called lookalike audiences, and it uses clustering technologies.

Charlie Wardell: [00:17:44] So, you have the one extreme where you can see that, wow, this is real AI. It’s autonomous and it is just doing its job. And those things cost, you know, $6,000 apiece as opposed to $6 million apiece. And then, you have lookalike audiences that help small and midsize businesses become a little bit more effective and who they’re targeting. Right?

Charlie Wardell: [00:18:05] Back in the day, you had to buy a list, got to buy a list. You had to tell them, “Hey, you know, give me you know, people in this age, this demographic.” You buy a list, you put a stamp on an envelope and you sent it out. Those days are gone. Right? And it’s so far more accurate that this is the day and age of AI.

Mike Blake: [00:18:26] You know, one of the – the Ukraine thing that you bring up, that’s for personal reasons, that’s a conflict I’m following very closely. And the AI that you describe brings up another very interesting point, which I’ve kind of wondered about, and that is that in that war, friend or foe detection has got to be extremely difficult because they’re basically using the same stuff.

Charlie Wardell: [00:18:54] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:18:54] Right? It all looks the same. It’s not supposed to be that way, right? Everything was built so that our stuff would look like our stuff. And their stuff looks like their stuff. But now there’s stuff and our stuff or the Ukrainian stuff all looks the same. Right? And I got to imagine there’s also an AI – there has to be an AI component to helping assist, to make sure there’s not a lot of friendly fire. And, it’s interesting that I’ve not heard of a single incident of friendly fire, of a significant incident of friendly fire yet in this war.

Charlie Wardell: [00:19:22] Yeah. And that’s where expert systems start coming in play, right, where you have a rule-based on top of it. Okay, I’ve done my job. I’ve analyzed visually. Here’s my target. Now a series of rules start happening, right? There was another project that we were working on where, you know, there are experts in theater that they’re in the military and they just know when something’s up. There’s a van parked on that corner. There’s a dead dog over on this corner. There’s a group of people over on this corner. And there’s an IED under the dog who’s whimpering or dead, and you go over there to help the dog, and boom. Right.

Charlie Wardell: [00:20:03] So, this scenario, right, this scenario, that’s all rule-based. You know, what they’re doing is they’re typing in all these rules. The intelligence gathering is trying to type in environmental rules and then the expert system type AI will take over in cases like that. Others are visual. Others are audio. Others are streaming data where it’s such high velocity that you’re kind of stuck in having the machine make the decision for you in real time. And, that’s where things like the Digital Cortex comes in because the amount of data is so enormous that you’ve got a hyperscale and hyperspeed the processing of this data, and you can’t do it in the cloud, right? I cannot have this thing. It’s got to be in my backpack. It’s got to be on this machine. Can’t do that from the cloud.

Mike Blake: [00:20:53] So, what are the most common applications of AI right now? Is it all big data analytics or are there other applications that maybe are more visible that our audience would be familiar with?

Charlie Wardell: [00:21:10] Well, you’re going to see more and more of this writing style, help-me-write books and blog posts, and automatically you just seed your thoughts in it and it’ll ghostwrite an entire book for you. You’re going to see. That’s happening now. You can Google it. I’m not touting any one technology over another, but you can go find them and trial for 30 days. They are unbelievable.

Mike Blake: [00:21:37] I’ve seen the ads for that. Do they actually work?

Charlie Wardell: [00:21:39] They work.

Mike Blake: [00:21:40] They work.

Charlie Wardell: [00:21:41] They work. They are incredible. Then, you know, other aspects of AI, you know, obviously, in a practical sense, it’s – think of a camera hanging out in a WalMart parking lot and a guy taking out a gun out of the back of his truck. Is he returning it, or is he going to open fire on somebody? Is this an actual threat or is this just a customer that’s returning his gun, right?

Charlie Wardell: [00:22:14] And, given enough scenarios, right, given enough scenarios where we can actually train AI and all of the, what we call labeled data, it can make guesses and the guesses return percentage of probability. And that percentage of probability, once it crosses a threshold, then requires action to be taken. So, you’re going to see it in all aspects of life. And I know people are afraid of it, but there are good there are good aspects of AI that can help humanity, obviously.

Mike Blake: [00:22:49] Yeah. No, I think you’re right. I mean, you know – the thing about AI is that it never gets distracted, never gets bored, never gets arrogant and thinks it knows everything, right? And so, for things like things that require checklists, whether it’s prepping for surgery or landing an A350, AI’s not doing that. Yeah. Although I think AI probably could land a plane. We just never got on a plane that didn’t have a pilot in it.

Charlie Wardell: [00:23:22] Well, there’s AI – there’s AI Assist. Yeah, there’s AI Assist. And, this is where it’s human in the middle. Right? Trust your instruments. Trust your instruments. How many flights have gone down because they didn’t trust their instruments?

Mike Blake: [00:23:37] Oh, yeah. Yeah. Literally, pilots are fighting planes into the ground.

Charlie Wardell: [00:23:42] Yeah, exactly. Now, with AI – AI – see, AI is getting data that you can’t see, comprehend or process because it’s looking further down the road. It sees that there’s – it knows there’s turbulence ahead. Why? Because someone else reported it. It knows the wind speed. It knows, so it’s figuring stuff out, right? So, it’s going to have to take a lot of surrender to surrender to these machines and to totally trust it. And, machines have failed us miserably in the past. So, it’s going to be a while, but it’s definitely.

Mike Blake: [00:24:21] So, this is an impossibly broad question, but I have to ask because we have to start somewhere. Somebody is listening to this podcast or will be listening in when it gets published and they’re saying, “Okay. Hey, I can do all these things. I’m probably not knowingly using it a great deal in my company.” How do you get started? Where do you go from there, from saying, I’m kind of interested in getting AI into my company to have it actually do something useful for it?

Charlie Wardell: [00:24:52] Yeah. So, every company has their different aspects of AI, right? If you’re marketing product and services and things like that, and you’re an e-commerce site, there’s just tons of AI available to you in the form of lookalike audiences and market basket analysis to figure out if you buy this and most people buy this along with it and make recommendations. And Amazon’s been famous for that. You know, if you’re a bank, maybe you’re using AI to do some risk mitigation, you know, maybe you have all the people that defaulted and all their properties at default and you’re looking at this person’s characteristics and you have a default probability.

Charlie Wardell: [00:25:39] You know, most of it is related to the data that you’re collecting. A lot of it is is about lookalike audience. It’s about churn probability. These customers have the, hey, I know historically that a customer that visits my support site three times in a single month has called up and asked specifically about his contract price and has basically stop doing X, Y, or Z is likely to churn, right?

Charlie Wardell: [00:26:15] So, those are the types of things that businesses are doing now. Now, what’s typically required in order to get to that level of analysis is that you have a data scientist who has a hypothesis or you have a mandate from a company that says, “Hey, I want to identify my high churn risk customers.” Then, you get a data scientist to say, “Okay, give me a list of all the customers that churn and let me find out what’s in common with them,” and then runs it through these steps of trying to identify the actual machine models that would predict it with great precision and great recall. So, it usually starts there.

Mike Blake: [00:26:53] So, that suggests to me, correct me if I’m wrong, but that suggests to me that a prerequisite step for adopting an AI centric or AI adjacent strategy is you’ve got to have good data collection in place.

Charlie Wardell: [00:27:08] Absolutely.

Mike Blake: [00:27:10] Right? If you don’t have the data asking any – computers are no better at making decisions based on no data than we are.

Charlie Wardell: [00:27:17] That’s right. And, you remember the phrase, GIGO, right, garbage in, garbage out.

Mike Blake: [00:27:21] Sure.

Charlie Wardell: [00:27:22] Yeah. So, you know, it’s – we’re – I’m on a project right now where we have all of these customers calling in and these are accounts. And, I’m able to cluster the accounts together and say, these accounts look like this and this account looks like this. But what we’re trying to do is we’re trying to find out, okay, they’re service calls that they’re calling in about each product or platform that they’re calling in about. What is the tie between their overall happiness and the calling in that they’re doing on these products and actually seeing if there is upsell potential into new products? Is there expansion opportunity? Is there – are they about to churn or are they – so, the more data that I can feed this machine about that customer and about their interactions across my organization, the better. Now, the challenge is in these organizations. All this data is disparate. They’re in silos and they don’t connect. There’s no one single ID that connects this and this and this and this. They’re legacy systems. And that’s typically what the big challenge is.

Charlie Wardell: [00:28:27] And then, the next big challenge is, I have all this data and I can’t process it fast enough to make any difference because this is a wash,rinse, repeat cycle over and over and over again until you get to the model that does the prediction accurately. So, it’s an expensive proposition in some cases. But these off the shelf things, like lookalike audiences, that most of these social platforms and ad platforms have, they’re set it and forget it. You upload your list. It handles everything for you. So, you don’t have to really get involved in doing anything.

Mike Blake: [00:29:02] So, that leads me to a couple of questions. I hope I remember to ask them both, because I think they’re both important. The first question is, it seems to me, based on what you’re saying, that in some cases a move to heavy reliance on AI, whatever that may be may also require an accompanying culture change. Right? Because if you’re not used to collecting data, if you’re not used to, you don’t have a culture that’s willing to share data, you have little fiefdoms, you may even have a culture that resists accountability. And we know there are cultures out there that do that. And data is kryptonite for lack of accountability. There may be a culture change that needs to accompany this [inauidible] to work, right?

Charlie Wardell: [00:29:53] Well, so I think back to the example where I think it was Microsoft that put out this amazing chatbot. And the internet went crazy teaching the chatbot how to become a fascist. Right? The chatbot actually became rogue. They had to take them down. So, yeah, there’s a big cultural aspect of AI as well, because –

Mike Blake: [00:30:18] A fascist chatbot. I hadn’t heard of that. I can’t wait to Google that after this interview and hopefully Homeland Security will not be paying me a visit, but –

Charlie Wardell: [00:30:27] It’s crazy, you know, because the Internet is a thing of its own, right? And, AI learns what you teach it. And if you teach it, if enough people get together and start telling it truths that are not necessarily truths, it’s wrong.

Mike Blake: [00:30:47] Sure. And, was that an act of sabotage from within Microsoft?

Charlie Wardell: [00:30:52] No. It’s just the Internet having fun. Internet trolls having fun with it.

Mike Blake: [00:30:56] Okay. But what about within a company again? It seems to me that the move to AI, if you’re not already a data-centric company, if you’re already a company, that’s not – that struggles with internal transparency, sharing and teamwork, AI probably is not going to work all that well for such a company unless you kind of address those underlying cultural features.

Charlie Wardell: [00:31:25] That’s true. So, most of the data that’s curated is internal and well guarded, and they understand that there needs to be a big effort in protecting your biggest and most important asset, which is your data. Right? And, it’s only up until recently that people understand that their data is everything. Every company that I’ve been talking to, every single one, no matter how large or small, they want to be a data-driven business. Right? And, getting access to that data and treating it like gold is really, really important. And, they’re starting to get that part. People are just starting to embark on their AI efforts now because they’re only starting to grapple with the fact that we have to make an investment in curating our data in a way that is clean and trustworthy and accessible.

Mike Blake: [00:32:19] And so, I want to go back and ask the other question about that, which is, is AI in some fashion, is that in the realm of affordability for a small business? Are there models, other pieces of AI where a small business is doing, let’s say 1 to $10 million of revenue a year could reasonably take advantage of this technology? [Inaudible]

Charlie Wardell: [00:32:45] Yeah. Yeah. AI is white hot right now. The market for students coming out of the university, wanting to be developing machine learning algorithms and AI and things like that. They’re available, you know, for a reasonable salary. You can get reasonable AI work that will definitely help you drive good decisions in your business. And then, there are applications that you can download for $30 a month and have it write your your daily blog. You know, seriously, it’s that crazy.

Charlie Wardell: [00:33:19] And then, things like look alike audiences, if you’re doing ad spend and stuff like that that’s free. They just want your ad spend, right? So, for a once – for a milllion dollar company to get into the game, it’s not hard. And, those things will make you a $2 million company and the $3 million and then eventually you’ll have a team of data scientists doing amazing things. But, yeah, the barrier to entry has definitely reduced, over the last few years has definitely reduced.

Mike Blake: [00:33:52] Now, you’ve touched on this a little bit, and I want to make this explicit because I do think it’s important. If you’re going to undertake AI in a serious way, do you need to think about having a captive AI specialist or big data specialist on your team? And is that even possible? I mean, those people are very hard to hire anyway, even if you wanted to. But is that a prerequisite for success using AI tools?

Charlie Wardell: [00:34:20] It depends on the AI. Yeah. Yeah. So, I mean, if I’m, you know, just wanting something to write my blogs and my responses and my creative, no, right? There are applications out there that do that. But if I have a hypothesis and I have all this data and you definitely do need some sort of architect, some sort of data scientist that knows how to get there from here. There is a part of machine learning that is a black hole that we all fear. It’s called feature engineering. And, you have all of these attributes of data and only a handful of them make a difference. Right?

Charlie Wardell: [00:35:02] I’ll give you an example of – so, I’m big in text analytics and I would analyze text and try to pull out all the topics out of text and I curated a list of texts that were very pro a product, very pro, this product. And, I identified the language that made it pro the product. Now, think about the iPhone when it first came out. “Oh, my gosh, this is amazing. This is a game changer. You know, I’ve never seen anything like it.” or the iPad. “Hey, now I don’t have to carry my laptop with me wherever I go.”

Charlie Wardell: [00:35:40] So, there is a language of this wow. Right? There’s this language. So, I’m able to tease out this language and identify all of the features so that when a new tweak comes in, I can compare it to that model and say, is that wow factor in there or not? No. But here’s the interesting thing. Out of all the features that I found, and I added them all in, the sentiment of the text, the length of the words, the number of periods, commas, exclamation points, the number of curse words, the date, the length of the author’s email, there was one feature that made it really interesting, and that was the number of sentences, was an indicator to how prolific this product experience was for this person. It was the number one feature in machine learning, and nobody would have ever thought that unless the machine figured it out. The machine figured it out. It wouldn’t be something. I just threw it in as a happenstance. Right? Number of sentences.

Mike Blake: [00:36:51] Where in your mind is AI not being utilized to its fullest potential? Where you see as a sector or an application, you say, “You know what? I’m surprised more people are doing this.”

Charlie Wardell: [00:37:03] You know, schools, how we teach our children, we don’t all understand. Right? I think the schools should be looking at clusters of students and figuring out how best to hone curriculum for those types of students. We learn differently. I think that – you know, everything from your spending patterns and how you optimize your budget and where you should be investing, I think those types of things are very ripe for consumer programs where you feed in the characteristics of your family, your spending, your goals, and it comes out with a plan and says, follow this plan and you’ll get to where you’re going. And, I think there’s a lot of consumer activity that can happen in these just turnkey applications.

Mike Blake: [00:38:01] So, how do you evaluate AI platforms? Let’s take the lookalike audience platform. You brought that up a number of times. I presume that’s important and fairly widespread and I’m assuming there’s more than one source you can go to. How do you evaluate among competing or I guess what will be presented to the market as comparable platforms? How do you evaluate that? Is there a checklist? Are there certain things that sort of top three or top five things that you need to be looking at? You need to hire an external specialist or consultant that really understand this stuff. How do you go about doing that?

Charlie Wardell: [00:38:52] Lookalike audience. You know, they’ve really dumbed it down so that anybody can use it. But the success of the lookalike audience really determines – it’s really how much of the features do have you collected so that it can match up against. So if the only thing I have is gender and age, and I say give me a lookalike audience for gender and age, it’s a coin toss as to whether or not I’m going to hit the right demographic. But if I have gender, age, the car you drive, you know, the number of friends in your social sphere, the part of the world you’re in, the hobbies you do, and all of this other stuff, I’m going to radically change my marketing return on investment. Right?

Charlie Wardell: [00:39:44] So, what they’ve done is, they made it so easy. You upload a CSV spreadsheet to our platform and we’re going to carve out your lookalike audience, but give us as many of the features as you possibly have, because we have them all. They have them all and more. Right? You’d be surprised as to what they have. Right? So, what you’re doing is you’re uploading what you have and they’re matching it with what they have and are carving it out. So, very simple, very easy. And, most platforms to this day, specifically Facebook, all have this type of lookalike audience.

Mike Blake: [00:40:13] So, as we all know, looking back on the last two years, the world has just changed dramatically. Our relationship, among other things, with technology has changed dramatically because we had to. We had this sort of shock therapy in terms of digital transformation. Now, that we’re in this what I call a trans-pandemic period, I don’t think we’re out of it, but we’re not, and I’m not sure where we are so I’m calling it trans. Looking back, where did AI contribute to making that less terrible than it otherwise would have been? And then, if I can also ask this, I know this is a complicated question, but you can handle it, and that is, what opportunities for AI have been revealed or exposed by the COVID experience in your view?

Charlie Wardell: [00:41:15] Wow. Well, it may go hand-in-hand. I’ll answer your second question first. But we all know, and we spent so much time listening to what fake news was, right? And, you know, curating data and actual correct data is paramount to having good AI. So, I think that when you have such a divisive country in what they’re sharing in this sentiment and it becomes very nebulous and this is where AI failed you. This is like what is it about, you know?

Charlie Wardell: [00:42:11] But, you know, where AI succeeds is looking at the cellular level of maybe this disease state and looking at the characteristics and matching it up with others to to say there’s a similarity between these two and we’ve already figured out how to solve this one and it’s very similar and how we can apply some similar therapies to this and try it out and see if it works. That’s where it really could help us. So, on one hand, in the pandemic, you could see how it hurt. On the other hand, you could see very clearly how it helped. So, I think I got both your questions. Did I miss one?

Mike Blake: [00:42:59] No, no. I think you did. You answered it in a way I did not expect, but that didn’t make it bad. I think it’s a very – that’s a very thought-provoking answer, because in my view, I’ve got to be careful because I don’t want to be partisan the way that I express this. In one fashion or another, we have been flooded and continue to be flooded with – call it- anti-data. Right? Now, we’re in a a society now where gaslighting is a contact sport now and just like your analogy or your example of Microsoft chatbot being trained to be a fascist basically because of a big cyber prank, right?

Mike Blake: [00:44:01] Yeah. I do think that the drawback of AI, and this isn’t unique to AI, it’s really technology in general. Right? Technology is an amplifier first and foremost. Technology is basically a lever when you really boil down to it, or a power tool. So, something that’s good and productive be amplified tremendously by technology, and something that is destructive can also be and is amplified by technology. Right?

Charlie Wardell: [00:44:38] And, whether you’re a bot or whether you’re a person, you cannot possibly make – I shouldn’t say you can’t possibly – you can’t reliably and sustainably make good decisions. You can lock into a good decision even with bad data. That does happen. But you can’t be a sustainable and reliable decision-maker if the data on the front end is bad. But now what happens, I’ve posted about this before, particularly the way that the news and the social media business models are, it’s no longer about informing people. It’s about getting people riled up because riled up people tend to be better customers. They tend to watch through your commercials. Right? And they tend to spend more. They tend to pay more. They’re a much more valuable audience.

Charlie Wardell: [00:45:31] You’re absolutely right. You could see this in technologies like TikTok, where it’s bringing things up to you that are somewhat controversial and it may not be what you’re interested in, but it gets a lot of the stickiness. And then, when you start looking at all of the reactions, you start seeing that you’re in a bubble. If this is your only platform, you’re in a bubble. You think the world is exactly like what was just presented to you. And it is not. It is really not.

Charlie Wardell: [00:46:04] So, there’s got to be a gatekeeper of truth in AI. There’s got to be. And you call them fact checkers now, right? There’s got to be a move – with AI, the responsibility is truth. There’s got to be truth. And I don’t think we’re there. I think we’re far from there.

Charlie Wardell: [00:46:25] Now, into your internal organization, you can guarantee the truth, right? You could say this is the facts. These are customers that left me. These are customers who love me. This is where we screwed it up. This is where you have facts, you have truth. And then, you could trust that AI. But when you start coming into this social sphere, it’s going to represent what humanity looks like today. It’s just going to become whatever it’s being fed.

Mike Blake: [00:46:53] Well, I mean, definitionally, it’s a feedback loop, right? That’s what it’s designed to do. And, maybe that’s a flaw. Not a flaw, but that’s just a – it’s a point where we need to just be aware. And, we’re getting a fascinating social discussion here. Right? But perhaps an area of evolution for AI, and maybe this is already happening. And you tell me this, we’ve already got this. But one area of AI that has to, I think has to evolve is there has to be some sort of emergency brake that just sort of cuts off the feedback loop or it doesn’t go off an artificially intellectual deep end and go into a feedback loop that just sort of drives the AI off the rails and becomes and perpetuates more extreme decision-making.

Charlie Wardell: [00:47:46] You’re absolutely right. And, this is probably one of the scariest factors of AI in use is what happens because there are some malicious people out there. They’re just trolls and they don’t understand the impact of what they’re doing. Now, from a social perspective, I don’t think it’s going to make a difference as to whether an AI assists a doctor in atrial fibrillation ablation. It’s not going to make a big difference because completely different kind of AI. But from a social perspective, yeah, it’s a whole new can of worms that we haven’t even begun to navigate through yet.

Mike Blake: [00:48:34] So, let’s bring it back to business for a second even though I could talk about this for three hours, and maybe you could too but our listeners don’t want to listen to it for three hours. What are the risks of of bringing AI into a business? What could be unintended consequences? What could go wrong?

Charlie Wardell: [00:48:51] All right. So, I’ve been doing data warehousing for many years, close to 30 years. And, there are some key indicators as to why data warehouses fail. Lack of executive sponsorship, not understanding the technology or choosing the wrong technology, not understanding what you’re getting into and the commitment required to get into it. Lack of adoption, dirty data. These types of things all apply to AI initiatives today. Thirty years later, they still apply. Seventy percent of data warehouses failed because of the things I just mentioned.

Charlie Wardell: [00:49:33] Well, if you’re going to embark in an AI initiative, you have to have executive sponsors that say we are going to be a data-driven organization. Right? And if they say that, that means we are going to make an effort to make sure our data is trustworthy and properly cleansed and integrated. And, we’re going to have one source of the truth so that when we do develop our AI models, that we can trust our AI models and we are going to reasonably expect realistic expectations of AI. Is it 86% where we make a decision or does it have to be 95% in order for us to trust our AI models?

Charlie Wardell: [00:50:18] And it is a continuous, nonstop endeavor of constantly moving forward. So once you start, you’re always continuing to better it, right? So, if you’re taking it from a perspective of this is how I am going to be transformational in my business, it comes with a certain understanding that you have a – this is a marathon, it’s not a sprint. You want to sprint, go download that app to write your blog. You’re an AI. You want to be transformational, you have to be willing to run the marathon.

Mike Blake: [00:50:55] I’m talking with Charlie Wardell. The topic is, should I use artificial intelligence in my business? I want to be respectful of your time, so I only have time for a couple more questions. But one thing I want to get out of you, because I think your answer is just going to be awesome, that is, what’s coming ahead? What are some future applications of AI that you see that aren’t in use yet but we may see as viable in the next 5 to 10 years?

Charlie Wardell: [00:51:28] I think the obvious one is driverless cars. Logistics and supply chain, you know. I don’t understand the levers that are moving our supply chain problems right now. I just don’t understand. It makes no rhyme or reason to me that we have this supply chain problem.

Charlie Wardell: [00:51:52] Because we’re given a different reason. Every time something goes bad, there’s a different reason.

Charlie Wardell: [00:51:56] That’s right. But being able to predict manufacturing and supply chain and things like that, to be fully optimized in the supply chain, I think that’s another aspect that we’re going to see a lot of AI. Obviously, fintech. And, fintech has its problems, right? You have to be able to explain your AI. And, AI does not necessarily lend itself to explainability all the time. You got this black box of this machine doing something and figuring it out and comes out with an answer. And you don’t know how it came out with that answer. But it did and it’s right. I think there’s going to be some changes that you’re going to start seeing more AI used in the financial markets that is more widely accepted.

Mike Blake: [00:52:51] That’s a really interesting observation. So, I’m the world’s lousiest accountant, which is even though I work for an accounting firm, I don’t do any accounting. And, they’re smart not to let me do that. But that brings up a very interesting point, which I’ll bet you some smart accountants are thinking of and probably some of our people at Brady Ware are thinking of, which is, how do you audit data that is AI generated? Right? There’s a recognition in the accounting literature and the literature of what I do in business valuation and informed professional judgment is a recognized piece of the overall analytical story. But what if the informed professional judgment is my tablet or it’s in the cloud or it’s an app? How do we reconcile ourselves to that? I don’t expect you to have an answer for that, so it’s a rhetorical question generally, but it gets to the heart, I think, of that next level is, how do you make judgment? How do you make artificial judgment transparent?

Charlie Wardell: [00:54:01] Yeah. Well, I’m not sure that I’ve seen that aspect of it right now. I think people are more trying to figure out what the answers are, and we’ll deal with that a little bit later. But think about for a moment like all the CEOs that are doing earnings calls at the end of the year or every quarter, and you have 20 years worth of earnings calls from a CEO or an executive. And I train my model as to the cadence of his narrative. And then, I see a deviation, or the machine sees a deviation into what he’s saying is forward looking statements, so to speak. And, I start suspecting there may be deception. And maybe the first time, I was right, and maybe the second time is called reinforcement learning. The more the machine is right, the more right it becomes. Right? So, there are aspects of that that are pretty interesting right now, and that is auditing. Right? Auditing records of what people are saying. How do you transparently audit? I’m not 100% sure. How do you know that the data that is generated is artificial, if it’s speaking the truth?

Mike Blake: [00:55:36] Well, whether the data is generated is artificial, I think is beside the point. It’s really just understanding. You know, it’s either – it’s a combination of understanding how the AI reacts to and interprets that data. And then, asking the bigger philosophical question, again, this gets into the three-hour seminar on the quad kind of thing, but it gets into the question of, what an AI or does AI have the capacity to synthesize and interpret that data the same way that a human being would if it had the computing capacity to actually process it? And is that even the appropriate standard? At what point do we just say, you know what, not only can a computer process more data more quickly and more comprehensively without error, but also the computer just has better judgment. Right? And, that question – I’m sure that question’s been positive. Somebody has written a dissertation on that at some point. But it’s going to move out of a dusty old dissertation in someplace and some of these three-and-a-half inch floppy disks and into a really important practical question that has to be solved, or otherwise AI is just going to be permanently handcuffed.

Charlie Wardell: [00:57:02] Yeah. And it’s going to go back to the quality of the data and is the data non-biased? Is the data trustworthy? And it – here’s the thing about AI, you know, as a human, you can run through a few scenarios. Right? And AI can run through a few hundred models simultaneously. It’s like the hurricane models, right? You see the hurricane models and they all converged. And then, you have confidence that, yep, it’s going to hit Tampa. Right? They all converge. And it’s not just one model. So, what’s going to happen is you’re going to have many, many models and they’re all going to converge and they’re all going to say, yep, morning, you know, this is what we think. And, sooner or later, like, we – sometimes we’re just shocked at how the weather is predicted. And other times we’re just like, what were they thinking? Right?

Mike Blake: [00:58:00] Right.

Charlie Wardell: [00:58:01] It’s all about the data, right? It’s all about the data. So, it’s a little – I think a little easier than predicting the weather. When you have 100 models and you have your data and you can run it through all these scenarios simultaneously and they all come up with the same answer, you need to listen.

Mike Blake: [00:58:19] Charlie, this has been a great conversation. We didn’t even get to all the questions and I anticipated that would be the case. That’s okay. But there are questions I’m sure that people, our listeners, would have wished that we had discussed or would have or wished that we would have spent more time on. If somebody wants to follow up with you about discussing using AI in their business, how to formulate a business strategy around it, can they contact you for more information? And if so, what’s the best way to do that?

Charlie Wardell: [00:58:47] Yeah. They can reach out to me on email. I’m charlie@digital-cortex.io, or my partner in crime, chris@digital-cortex.io. And, yeah, we love talking about this stuff. I didn’t get to speak about the Digital Cortex product and its revolutionary aspects of how it’s going to change the game. But that’s yet to come. We’ll have another podcast specifically on that one because that’s exciting. That’s what I’m – that’s my passion project.

Mike Blake: [00:59:20] Sounds good. Well, I think people will be visiting your website once they listen to this conversation to learn more at any rate. So, that’s going to wrap it up for today’s program. And I’d like to thank Charlie Wardell so much for sharing his expertise with us.

Mike Blake: [00:59:34] We’ll be exploring a new topic each week, so please tune in so that when you’re faced with your next business decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy these podcasts, please consider leaving a review with your favorite podcast aggregator. It helps people find us that we can help them.

Mike Blake: [00:59:51] If you would like to engage with me on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I’m on LinkedIn as myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. Also, check out my new LinkedIn group called Unblakeable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck. Once again, this is Mike Blake. Our sponsor is Brady Ware & Company. And this has been the Decision Vision podcast.

 

 

Tagged With: artificial intelligence, Brady Ware & Company, Charles Wardell, data analysis, data gathering, Decision Vision, Digital Cortex, Machine Learning, Mike Blake

Decision Vision Episode 165: Should I Pursue Non-Dilutive Funding for my Start-up? – An Interview Lauren Cascio, Gulp Data

April 21, 2022 by John Ray

Gulp Data
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 165: Should I Pursue Non-Dilutive Funding for my Start-up? - An Interview Lauren Cascio, Gulp Data
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Gulp Data

Decision Vision Episode 165: Should I Pursue Non-Dilutive Funding for my Start-up? – An Interview Lauren Cascio, Gulp Data

Lauren Cascio, President of Gulp Data, was host Mike Blake’s guest to explore if start-ups should be looking for non-dilutive funding. They discussed the difference between non-dilutive and dilutive funding, different types of non-dilutive funding, risks and restrictions, the companies it works best for, and much more. Decision Vision is presented by Brady Ware & Company and produced by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Gulp Data

Gulp Data provides non-dilutive funding to early-stage companies using their data as collateral.

Unlike other sources of funding, Gulp Data recognizes your data as an asset. Use it as collateral for your loan – they make a secure, temporary copy that is held in escrow and released once you’re done. Gulp Data provides the capital you need now, at a lower cost, and without the hooks.

Gulp Data ensures you keep your equity and your board seats. They aim to close loans with minimal touchpoints and in less than two weeks.

Company website | LinkedIn

Lauren Cascio, President, Gulp Data

Lauren Cascio, President, Gulp Data

Lauren Cascio is the founder of Gulp Data, a company providing non-dilutive funding using data assets as collateral. She also recently founded aKinned, a seed fund backing healthcare in Africa. Prior to her recent move into funding, she co-founded abartysHealth, a growth stage health-tech company, where she ran product, data, and development for six years. She is a proven angel investor and an active tech ecosystem builder, successfully advising and mentoring dozens of companies through go-to-market, data monetization and fundraising.

LinkedIn

 

Mike Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series

Michael Blake is the host of the Decision Vision podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms, and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth-minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

Decision Vision is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision-maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the Decision Vision podcast.

Past episodes of Decision Vision can be found at decisionvisionpodcast.com. Decision Vision is produced by John Ray and the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Connect with Brady Ware & Company:

Website | LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: [00:00:01] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions. Brought to you by Brady Ware & Company. Brady Ware is a regional, full-service accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality.

Mike Blake: [00:00:25] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast giving you, the listener, a clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision-making on a different topic from the business owners’ or executives’ perspective. We aren’t necessarily telling you what to do, but we can put you in a position to make an informed decision on your own and understand when you might need help along the way.

Mike Blake: [00:00:46] My name is Mike Blake, and I’m your host for today’s program. I’m a director at Brady Ware & Company, a full-service accounting firm based in Dayton, Ohio, with offices in Dayton; Columbus, Ohio; Richmond, Indiana; and Alpharetta, Georgia. I’m also managing partner of the Strategic Valuation and Advisory Services Practice, which brings clarity to the most important strategic decisions that business owners and executives face by presenting them with factual evidence for such decisions. Brady Ware is sponsoring this podcast.

Mike Blake: [00:01:15] If you would like to engage with me on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I’m on LinkedIn as myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. I also recently launched a new LinkedIn group called Unblakeable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck. So, please join that as well if you would like to engage.

Mike Blake: [00:01:32] Today’s topic is, should I pursue non-dilutive funding? And probably if I were more detail-oriented, I’d say should I pursue non-dilutive funding for startups because that’s really what this is talking about. And, I wasn’t able to find data for the entire non-dilutive funding market, but just the revenue-based financing market, which I’m sure we’ll touch upon today, is expected to reach $42 billion globally by 2027 according to Allied Market Research.

Mike Blake: [00:02:02] And revenue-based funding is fairly novel. I’ve actually had a couple of clients that have used it and there are now, in effect, providers of capital that will lend you money based on your expected revenue coming in. So, in a way, it’s kind of like purchase order financing. But instead of doing that with equipment, it’s generally made available to software as a service company.

Mike Blake: [00:02:30] And it turns out it’s a not very visible market, but it is a much larger one that I think most people realize. And I’ve never met a startup yet that isn’t interested in the question of how to fund their business. So, we leave no stone unturned here on the Decision Vision podcast, and I hope that you’ll agree that this is a useful topic. And, I’m really happy to have somebody on that knows a lot about this topic and really a lot about the venture game as a whole. She’s just going to be a fabulous guest and a fabulous interview today.

Mike Blake: [00:03:04] Lauren Cascio is founder of Gulp Data, a company providing non-dilutive funding using data assets as collateral. She also recently founded aKinned, a seed fund, backing health care in Africa. Prior to her recent move into funding, she co-founded Arbutus Health, a growth-stage health tech company, where she ran product data and development for six years. She is a proven angel investor and an active tech ecosystem builder, successfully advising and mentoring dozens of companies through go-to-market, data monetization, and fundraising. And joining us as our first guest from Puerto Rico, Lauren Cascio, welcome to the Decision Vision podcast.

Lauren Cascio: [00:03:44] Thanks, Mike. I’m so excited to be here and to represent Puerto Rico. How fun. There are a ton of entrepreneurs here.

Mike Blake: [00:03:51] So, for a lot of our listeners, I think their ears are perking up because I don’t know if they necessarily understand when we say non-dilutive funding, even what that is. So, can you take us through, how do you define to somebody what non-dilutive funding is and how does that compare to funding that actually is dilutive?

Lauren Cascio: [00:04:13] Yes. So, this is – by the way, this is one of my absolute favorite topics to cover with founders. This is something that a lot of founders have to learn about the hard way both equity financing and non-dilutive funding. And, it’s never easy or fun to learn about things the hard way, specifically when it’s something you’ve felt.

Lauren Cascio: [00:04:35] I have so many questions about funding and fundraising and what it was like. I now have experience on both sides of the table. So, simply put, non-dilutive funding is any capital that does not require you to give up equity or ownership. And that compares with dilutive funding, where dilutive funding requires you to give up equity or ownership in exchange for capital.

Lauren Cascio: [00:05:03] Dilutive funding also early on can require you to give up things like board seats and preferred equity, anti-dilution provisions, warrants, all of the things that early-stage founders typically think that they need to give up in the beginning of building their business. And there are some caveats to non-dilutive funding as well, specifically around venture debt. We’ll get into the different types. But, yeah, that’s it in a nutshell. It’s either giving up equity or not.

Mike Blake: [00:05:35] So, whether you’re new to the game or you just sort of watch it play out on Shark Tank, which is kind of the WWE version of venture capital, we typically hear about venture funding, the venture capitalists are the ones that get all the pub, they’re the ones that that everybody knows, the Peter Thiel’s of the world, and so forth. Why are some investors now trying to change the model? Especially since that model has worked very well, at least for investors, why are some investors interested in changing the model and providing capital that goes outside the raised capital sell stock kind of model?

Lauren Cascio: [00:06:15] Yeah. So, I don’t think that this is a new tool that VCs or investors are using, but essentially it can do a few things and I have some examples. So, it can definitely lower the risk for VCs by passing on risk to future investors. So, for example, a company that has raised a bunch of money, maybe $10 million, they are going to be eligible for, I don’t know, pretty what’s considered friendly venture debt terms where they’ll be paying interest rates of like 10, 12, 15% and they can probably find financing for about 25 to 50% of that capital. That’s usually later-stage companies that are raising more money, and in turn, the investors like this because they’re essentially passing on that risk to future investors. The life cycle of venture debt is that people raise it and then future rounds pay it off.

Lauren Cascio: [00:07:18] There are some other non-dilutive, and we haven’t gone into the types of non-dilutive funding yet, which I know we will. But there are other types of non-dilutive funding that can be complimentary to VC as well. So, in some cases, VCs have a limitation on the amount of follow-on they can provide into a company, or they have a capped amount of their total fund that they can make into a single investment.

Lauren Cascio: [00:07:45] So, if they want to preserve their position as the company goes on to raise later rounds but they just don’t have the spare capital or can’t make those investments, non-dilutive funding can help them preserve their position in those companies. It’s also – so, yeah, I think with market conditions like we saw last year, we saw insane markups in 2021. We saw valuations go through the roof, seeds, average seed-stage rounds, where I mean over 4 million, I think, in the US, and 2022 is not producing the same valuations.

Lauren Cascio: [00:08:26] And what that means is that investors are locked into these companies and these companies don’t have a choice because a lot of them can’t take a down round because of anti-dilution or whatever other terms they have with their current investors. And so, they’re looking to bridge and they’re looking to preserve their own position in the company, but also the position of their current investors. And so, when we see stagnant valuations, non-dilutive capital can be great. So, yes –

Mike Blake: [00:08:57] You said something that’s really interesting. I’m sorry to interrupt, but I told you we might go off script and we are in question too and that’s okay. But you said something I think is really intriguing and I’m not – it may have been intentional and that is that non-dilutive funding might be used to create effectively a synthetic anti-dilution position. Right? Anti-dilution, at least the way I see it, is considered a pretty onerous, almost punitive term. You don’t see it that often, thank God, because valuing anti-dilution is a nightmare. But on the other hand, you could achieve some anti-dilution by offering non-dilutive financing and sort of have your cake and eat it too.

Lauren Cascio: [00:09:41] Exactly. Exactly.

Mike Blake: [00:09:43] I mean the thought of that.

Lauren Cascio: [00:09:45] It takes – yeah. It really takes risks out of the game for investors. So, yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:09:51] So, one type of non-dilutive funding that I don’t want to talk a lot about today because I have a separate interview scheduled is grants, right? But there are a number of other forms of non-dilutive funding that are available and to the extent that you can. Can you talk a little bit about what other forms of nondilutive funding are out there?

Lauren Cascio: [00:10:15] Yes. All right. So, I won’t cover grants even though I love grants. So, I will definitely dial in for that podcast. All right. So, there are a ton of non-dilutive funding, mechanisms, tools. I think the one that most founders think of when they think of non-dilutive funding is venture debt. And, venture debt can be very predatory. And it can really kill an early-stage company because the interest rates are typically very high because the risk is very high for an early-stage company. And, there are covenants and rights typically in those agreements. And so, venture debt is one type that’s like a Silicon Valley Bank, Mercury, a few others that offer the services, a ton of independent lenders that offer these services. But that is like the typical of what founders think of. It’s either venture debt or VC but is not true.

Lauren Cascio: [00:11:24] So, you also have accelerators that offer non-dilutive funding. I personally have been part of an accelerator here in Puerto Rico some years ago called Parallel 18 that provided just non-dilutive cash, a cash grant for joining their accelerator. You have crowdfunding which is like Kickstarter, Indiegogo, and this is essentially people buying your future product. So, any time that people are buying a future part of the company, that’s non-dilutive funding. They are funding you to get started.

Lauren Cascio: [00:11:59] You have revenue-based financing, which you mentioned earlier. And, revenue-based financing is one of my favorite types of non-dilutive financing for early-stage companies that have MRR or ARR multiples. And, those are companies like Pipe and Founderpath, Uncapped. I think most of those companies do revenue-based financing and factoring, which is for invoices. And, it’s great if you have the metrics to qualify for revenue-based financing.

Mike Blake: [00:12:36] And MRR and ARR for those of us who aren’t necessarily in that world, that’s basically for your sustainable revenue or sustainable growing revenue.

Lauren Cascio: [00:12:45] Yes.

Mike Blake: [00:12:46] Right?

Lauren Cascio: [00:12:46] Sorry about that. Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:12:47] Monthly run rate or annual run rate.

Lauren Cascio: [00:12:49] Yes. Sorry. So, yeah, it’s based on recurring. Well, I’m probably using acronyms. And I’m like, what? Don’t you know those acronyms? Yeah. Based on recurring revenue. So, predictable revenue. And then, they take a percentage of – so they’ll front you the money upfront, maybe 12 months of your monthly recurring revenue, and then you pay it off over time and they’re tapped into your bank account. They have some algorithms that tell you how much you’re eligible for and all of that.

Lauren Cascio: [00:13:21] You also have tax credits. And this is not something that a lot of companies think about, but it’s something that I have used myself living in Puerto Rico. There are other places like Australia that provide tax incentives typically in the form of income tax credits that you can then sell for cash and that’s just for doing research and development.

Lauren Cascio: [00:13:47] And then, you have government loans, like SBA loans, and you also have asset-backed lending. So, that can either be tangible assets or intangible assets like IP financing for patents and some other things. That was a mouthful. I’m sorry. There are a lot of different types of non-dilutive funding.

Mike Blake: [00:14:07] Well, yeah, look, it is a mouthful, but I think it’s really important because this is a world that I don’t think is very visible. Right? And, I share the same view with you in terms of venture debt. You know, it’s out there. But I don’t know that I’ve ever actually worked with or even met a company that has raised significant venture debt because either the terms themselves are so onerous, or if they’re not onerous the company is really in a point where it’s not really venture debt anymore anyway. It’s more like an SBA loan or something. And it’s like, wow, thanks a lot. We could have gotten money from nine other places. But, you know, not many people know about these other possibilities that are out there. And some companies have been very successful on that model.

Lauren Cascio: [00:14:58] Yeah. I’m actually really interested to hear how, for companies that were seeking revenue-based financing, how impacted their finances. I mean, I imagined it had a really positive impact.

Mike Blake: [00:15:14] Well, it did have a positive impact. And, I think what happens – I think what’s happened, at least in my experience, you know, the folks that are providing revenue financing are no dummies. Right? And, they do good due diligence to make sure that that’s a good investment or at least an investment that is at the appropriate risk level for their particular asset class. And, I think there’s a validation perspective there that is beneficial. And, there’s probably a little bit of selection bias too. I think the companies that are successful with revenue financing, they’ve achieved revenue financing because they were likely to be successful.

Lauren Cascio: [00:16:00] Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It’s a special kind of company typically that is eligible or a good candidate for revenue-based financing because they’ve obviously proven product-market fit, which is a lot of the uncertainty and risk that you have in early-stage financing or early-stage companies. And so, yeah, they’re definitely not the only but definitely a strong candidate for success. I agree.

Mike Blake: [00:16:28] Now, some listeners may be hearing this and thinking that this non-dilutive financing may almost sound too good to be true. Is there a risk? Is there anybody that’s taking advantage of this, of the attractiveness of non-dilutive financing, and doing bad things with it? Is there a risk of being scammed in this space?

Lauren Cascio: [00:16:54] I don’t know if it’s being scammed. Probably, in a lot of – and this is not just for non-dilutive funding and raising debt. This happens all the time in VC. It’s being misled and founders who are so focused on getting back. So, regardless if you’re doing non-dilutive funding in most cases or equity financing, it is very distracting process for a founder. They are plucked from their day-to-day. Probably, their sales pipeline is suffering and their development pipeline is suffering because they can really only focus on either fundraising or running their company. You can’t do both well simultaneously. Probably, very few founders will say that they can.

Lauren Cascio: [00:17:45] It’s a distracting and time-consuming process. And so, what happens is that founders get to the finish line after doing all of this due diligence and creating data rooms and all of these things, maybe if they’re doing non-dilutive funding and it’s like one of the – we didn’t talk about this, but a hybrid like a convertible note. They’re just glad to be getting the money so they can get back to work and they ignore the fine print. They don’t seek the proper legal advice.

Lauren Cascio: [00:18:13] And so, yeah, they can be misled. They were unaware of certain covenants. They didn’t know that they were signing up for a conversion into preferred shares or whatever it is. You have to be really, really careful. So, the takeaway here is that the wrong venture debt can definitely kill a company if they’re unable to pay the principal. And, what you really need to understand is your worst-case scenario when you’re signing a document. If I’m unable to pay this back, what happens to my company? And you should be asking yourself that whether you’re raising non-dilutive financing or equity. It doesn’t matter. You should always know what happens in the worst-case scenario.

Lauren Cascio: [00:18:57] And so, yeah. I don’t want to see it’s too good to be true or that people are trying to scam you as an entrepreneur, but they definitely have their own best interests in mind. That said, we’re seeing a lot of innovation like the revenue-based financing companies, the factoring companies that have very standard product and very standard terms, which I love, kind of like what safe agreement did for raising equity as an early-stage founder. We’re just finding these standard terms. And that’s great because then you know what you’re getting and everyone’s getting the same thing. But, yeah, legal advice is worth it.

Mike Blake: [00:19:41] Yeah. I was going to say one of the takeaways there probably is that it’s important to have an attorney look this over for you if you’re not really comfortable reading agreements, especially because, you know, some of these platforms, particularly in the revenue-based financing area, do this thing entirely online. Right? And so, I didn’t go through one of the processes, but I suspect that if they are run entirely online and it’s basically a bot that’s going to approve your loan or not, right, you start off by asking, by answering some questions, and the next thing you know, you’re offered a loan and you’re given just a, hey, click to accept. And the next thing you know, right, you’ve got some things you didn’t realize you were agreeing to, and having a lawyer ride shotgun in that can be really important.

Lauren Cascio: [00:20:29] Yeah. Yeah, definitely. Even in the standard products, I agree. It’s really important to understand what you’re signing and what you’re getting into. And you should always, as an entrepreneur, I assume that’s the audience, you should always plan for worst case. And so your worst case in non-dilutive funding is, I’m not paying you back or I’m not paying the interest during the loan term, or I can’t pay the principal or a combination of both. What happens? Do they have security over the entire company? Can they shut down your company and sue you for the assets? You have to understand what you’re signing.

Lauren Cascio: [00:21:07] So, in venture debt, it’s possible. But in the more innovative asset-backed loans and revenue-based financing, factoring, tax credits, typically, no. Typically, I find them more founder-friendly. I’m a big supporter of founder-friendly terms.

Mike Blake: [00:21:31] So, let’s say somebody listening is interested and I’m sure somebody will be. They’re going to want to find out on their own where they might be able to obtain this non-dilutive funding. Sounds great. What’s the best way to go about identifying those sources? Is it as simple as a Google search or are there databases? Are there trade associations, conferences? What’s the best way to go find these sources?

Lauren Cascio: [00:21:57] I really wish that there was – this is something that people ask all the time. They’re like, well, how do you find out about all of these different resources? I wish there was a better collective resource for this in general. You know, it’s so funny when you’re starting a company, there’s a ton of information you can find online about how to raise VC, how to create a pitch deck, how to run all of these metrics of turn and customer acquisition cost, and pretty much give yourself a degree online on how to start a company. It never – like one of the things that it never touches non-dilutive funding sources. And so, I wish there was a better collective for this.

Lauren Cascio: [00:22:40] But for the most part, I think that you can actually just Google some resources and maybe later we’ll start a website that just gives out resources. I’m kidding. I’m not going to do that. But, yeah, you can Google. You can look for, for example, you can Google crowdfunding and you’ll probably find like Indiegogo and Kickstarter. You can look up government loans or like SBA. You can go through SBA. It has a ton of loans. Grants, we’re not going to talk about grants, but there are a bunch of resources for how to find SBIR and grants online.

Lauren Cascio: [00:23:18] For revenue-based financing, you would Google like revenue-based financing for SaaS companies or for service companies or whatever you’re doing and you’ll find, yeah, like Founders Factory, Pipe, Uncapped, those companies. For the tax credits, I think that this is really regional. So, I know really well the tax incentives, the R&D incentives in Puerto Rico, familiar a bit because of a project about the ones in Australia. But I think that this is really regional. So, depending on where you live, maybe like look up research and development, tax credits in wherever you are and they’re maybe –

Mike Blake: [00:24:02] Or ask your CPA.

Lauren Cascio: [00:24:02] Or ask – so that’s another thing that you’re bringing up a really good point, Mike, asking your CPA or your CFO. A lot of early-stage founders don’t have this resource.

Mike Blake: [00:24:14] Yeah.

Lauren Cascio: [00:24:15] Which is part of this problem because part of their job is to find this type of financing. And, it’s one of the last things that founders hire. I mean, you must know this.

Mike Blake: [00:24:26] Oh, yeah. Yeah. In fact, one of the first shows we ever did was, should I hire a CFO? Right? I mean, the answer is yes as soon as you can. But a lot of people don’t because initially, it is a cost center. Right? A CFO is not a profit center. So, that’s very hard. But it’s exactly questions like this that a good CFO can not only help you answer but navigate kind of what is the best – what’s the best model? What’s the best provider?

Mike Blake: [00:24:55] Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but I think one of the other areas, one of the other characteristics that differentiate non-dilutive financing from equity, venture capital, in particular, is it seems to me that a lot of non-dilutive financing is almost anonymous. Right? I see so many online providers where you may never necessarily meet one another and we’re going to get into the process a little bit.

Mike Blake: [00:25:23] Whereas, with equity financing the game, you know, there’s no – you don’t just walk into a venture capitalist office, say, hey, can I have some funding? Right? It’s all about, you got to know somebody. You’ve got to get introduced by one of their investee companies or their investors or something. And, that in itself is very much a barrier to entry for people that are raising capital. Right? If you’re not a very good network, it makes it really tough. But for non-dilutive financings, it’s a little bit different, isn’t it?

Lauren Cascio: [00:25:52] Yeah. Depending on the type of non-dilutive funding, it is. There are some really innovative companies that have put this new spin on revenue financing and factoring and asset-backed lending where you don’t even need to talk to anybody on the phone. You connect your bank account and some metrics about your business model, and they spit out a, you know, a loan amount. And I think it’s great because it’s leveling the playing field for founders that are outside of the circles that are outside of these geographies. And so, it doesn’t require you to be in this insulated inner circle of VCs and what used to be just like Silicon Valley or New York or wherever. Now, it’s expanding a bit post-COVID. But that’s wonderful.

Lauren Cascio: [00:26:47] And I think knowing, and this is where this goes back to having the CFO, knowing the best type of financing for whatever you built is really important because there’s a better fit of non-dilutive funding for each type of company. But, yeah, you would basically plug in your the metrics that they’re asking for. Due diligence is probably not nearly as bad as it is in venture capital and get a loan. And, some of these companies are doing loans in like a day. It’s crazy.

Mike Blake: [00:27:21] Yeah. And that part, I think, also makes it attractive, right? Because the other – one of the other pieces that makes venture capital unattractive is best-case scenario. It’s a months-long process. Right? And, for a startup, months is a lot of time.

Lauren Cascio: [00:27:37] Oh, yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:27:38] Companies live and die in a few months. Right? But, yeah, I was noticing this that it’s almost like some of these non-dilutive loan sources almost operate like online mortgage companies, right, or car lending companies. You put in some information and semi-instant approval. It’s remarkable.

Lauren Cascio: [00:28:00] Yeah. And there will be more of this as well. I think we are just in the beginning. You shared an exciting number at the beginning of this podcast and it’s a growing market. It’s going to, I don’t want to say it’s going to take over portions of VC because there’s just never enough funding. You can never have enough funding. So, just more companies will have capital available to them based on what they’ve built.

Mike Blake: [00:28:29] So, we’ve made a pretty good case that non-dilutive funding is pretty attractive. It’s pretty awesome. Are there – what is the role for venture capital going forward? I’m not sure that Mark Cuban and Peter Thiel are going to be put out of business any time soon. When might somebody kind of pump the brakes in going after non-dilutive funding and instead start seeking equity capital in spite of the shortcomings that we’ve discussed? When might a more traditional route actually be appropriate?

Lauren Cascio: [00:29:03] So, my one-line summary for this is they should always – I want to say – I believe they need to coexist. That equity funding and non-dilutive funding should coexist. There is a time and a place for both of them, and in some cases, there is a time and a place for them to coexist on the same round or at the same time.

Lauren Cascio: [00:29:30] So, even though I’ve had my share of bad experiences with equity funding and boards and venture debt personally, I believe that taking on equity partners or equity investors, pardon me, is really important when you’re making strategic moves in your industry. This is like when you’ve found product-market fit, at least a bit of it, you can repeat the customer a dozen times and they’re paying a similar price for it. And/or you’re ready for an alignment for scale or go public strategy or exit.

Lauren Cascio: [00:30:22] The caveat to that is that there are so many empty promises that are made by VCs. Some VCs have hundreds of companies in their portfolio and not nearly enough time or effort to support all of these companies the way that they need to be supported through their pivots and changes and change management and all the things that happen in early-stage companies. And so, one advice that I often give to founders is that the majority of VC money is just money, and look at it that way and don’t trust the promises. But I always encourage founders to do diligence their investors the same way that the investors are doing diligence on them.

Mike Blake: [00:31:05] I agree with that.

Lauren Cascio: [00:31:06] One of my favorite ways to do that is to talk to their portfolio companies, but not the references that the VC gives you. Because if you ask an investor for references and their network, they’re going to cherry-pick references. I’m talking about going into Crunchbase, finding out the companies that may have died or gone out of business, and interviewing those founders, and understanding what the relationship was like and where there were weaknesses or blind spots within the VC firm.

Lauren Cascio: [00:31:43] So, it’s really, and I think already said this, it’s like getting married. You are bringing somebody into your company. And if you’re at like a seed-stage or Series A stage, likely you’re giving them board seats. You’re giving them power in your company. It was less common probably in the last year or so, where VCs were just handing out a bunch of checks with all the free money that was falling. But they take board seats. And so, you have to work with them. You’re going to have to understand how they envision your company, and you have to understand how you’ll work together just as much as you do with your co-founders or your top executives.

Lauren Cascio: [00:32:24] And so, yeah, there are pros and cons to both. And, I think that most successful companies will dabble in both types of financing because it can be done really eloquently when done correctly. That’s like the long and short of it.

Mike Blake: [00:32:45] Okay.

Lauren Cascio: [00:32:45] I have some other thoughts on how market conditions affect it and valuations play a role and the times that venture debt can be riskier. But, yeah, the main takeaways are that they really should coexist. And, as we see a rise in more standardized non-dilutive funding companies, we’re going to see the two marry in a lot more of the companies that hit the series A, series B, and scale metrics.

Mike Blake: [00:33:21] So, this was actually a nice segue to the next question I wanted to ask, which is, when we think of traditional non-dilutive funding, i.e. loans, the agreement will typically have something that are – some things that are called covenants, which is just another word for agreement, obviously, but they’re restrictive covenants that restrict what the borrower is allowed to do, and in some cases may impose penalties if the company fails to meet certain performance targets. Do those kinds of things, do covenants like that work their way into non-dilutive funding as well?

Lauren Cascio: [00:34:05] Into certain types of non-dilutive funding, absolutely. For example, traditional venture debt will carry usually financial and performance covenants and these are requirements that are part of the loan agreement. Yeah. If you violate – it depends. And this is another one of my many issues with venture debt. If you violate one, you may be defaulting. You may be in breach of contract. And so, they may be able to go after assets or after the company without you even realizing that you’ve done anything wrong.

Lauren Cascio: [00:34:46] It’s not specific to debt. It happens in equity too. But, yes, so you have covenants. You also have right of first refusal which can prevent you from taking other types of debt or other lenders. So, you have to be careful and this is going to go back to one of our first points, which was have a lawyer because you have to make sure that your lenders can coexist. You need to make sure that your debt and your equity can coexist, meaning that your debt does not violate terms of your equity agreements and your equity agreements do not violate terms of your debt. For example, some debt will be above even preferred equity. And so, if you have investors that are earlier investors that had preferred shares, which I also advise against, then – am I allowed to give advice? That’s my own advice.

Mike Blake: [00:35:39] Please.

Lauren Cascio: [00:35:39] My personal advice. Personal advice, don’t give preferred shares. But yes. So then, you would need sometimes subordination signatures and all of these complicated things that I don’t do that lawyers do. And so, yeah, you need to understand what you’re reading or what you’re signing. And, some of the documents can be really long, specifically in venture debt. You can have secured debt that’s like a general obligation of the company. It could also be specifically asset-backed.

Lauren Cascio: [00:36:11] And so, yeah, it’s not innocent, you know, specifically venture debt, it’s not innocent. Typically, it is secured in some form or fashion. It’s not just free money. If you want just free money for doing research and development, I’ll segue into your podcast about grants, so.

Mike Blake: [00:36:34] So, those terms obviously can be very complicated, can certainly be very impactful. In your experience, are non-dilutive capital providers open to negotiation? Is it worth trying to negotiate with them or do they typically just issue a term sheet take it or leave it?

Lauren Cascio: [00:36:55] Everything in life is negotiable. You can negotiate anything in life. So, okay, in the standard products – so Pipe is actually a really good example of this. They’re a marketplace. They take bids for contracts. And so, essentially, those terms are set. Right? They are standard terms. They’ve been evaluated by some models. There hasn’t been a back and forth. There hasn’t been an in-person meeting or a phone call. They’re just terms that are given and people can bid on those terms and you’ll take the best terms that are available. Right?

Lauren Cascio: [00:37:37] And I really love these standardized products because, again, it levels the playing field that you can’t really hide much under it. Everyone’s getting the same deal. And you know what you’re getting into as a founder, which you should be able to safely feel like you know what you’re getting into as a founder. However, when you’re doing convertible debt or you’re doing venture debt, or just like a general note on the company in any form or fashion, yeah, usually you can just negotiate them. They’re not – I mean, I don’t think that any – I don’t think there’s ever a time where you shouldn’t negotiate.

Mike Blake: [00:38:17] Okay. Are there certain kinds of companies or models that tend to be a better fit for non-dilutive funding than others?

Lauren Cascio: [00:38:28] Oh, yeah. Definitely. So, I’ll just say that for mature companies that have clear product-market fit, they’re able to raise equity with strategic investors from strategic, from big firms. They’re on the path to IPO or exit or whatever it is. Equity is definitely a frontrunner. I don’t think that they shouldn’t supplement with financing, taking advantage of financing the other assets they built. Like if they built a strong annual recurring revenue, why not take financing to grow with that asset? Or, if they have created a portfolio of IP assets, why not borrow against those IP assets, if you can, for a reasonable amount of money? And those types of financings are typically reasonable. They have very reasonable loan terms.

Lauren Cascio: [00:39:33] So, the companies that are typically attracted to like, I don’t know, tax incentives, grants, or asset-backed loans, specifically intangible asset back, are typically companies that have taken a heavy technical risk. So, they’ve spent a lot of money developing the infrastructure, the architecture of the product, those are your deep tech companies, and a lot less on sales and marketing efforts. And so, they won’t be able to get revenue-based financing. And in some cases, it’s very difficult for them to raise VC on favorable terms because investors just simply don’t value those intangible assets the way that, I don’t want to say the way that they should, but, yeah, really, the way that they should. Intangible assets are an asset that should be on our financial statements. They should be on our balance sheets, and they’re just not and so –

Mike Blake: [00:40:34] That would be a three-hour rant for me. Don’t get me started on that. Oh, boy.

Lauren Cascio: [00:40:39] Exactly. Yeah. That’s a rabbit hole there. But – that’s one of the big blind areas, in my opinion, of venture capital, is that they have absolutely no idea how to value intangible assets properly specifically for the SME market.

Mike Blake: [00:41:00] Yeah. And the accounting world in general.

Lauren Cascio: [00:41:02] The accounting gap. We’re all running off of gap.

Mike Blake: [00:41:06] It all behaves as if intangible assets don’t exist. Right? I mean, okay, I need to center myself because otherwise we’ll be a three-hour off-ramp into intangible asset valuation and gap, and –

Lauren Cascio: [00:41:18] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:41:19] No. We’re just not going to do that.

Lauren Cascio: [00:41:21] Okay. So, we’re not going to go down that rabbit hole. I would jump down the hole with you, Mike. Maybe, we’ll crack open a bottle of port and have a virtual session to commiserate. But, yeah, so, definitely companies that have taken heavy technical risks, deep tech companies, research companies should absolutely optimize what they’ve built with grants and tax incentives or intangible asset-backed loans.

Lauren Cascio: [00:41:51] Companies that have focused more on sales and marketing that have some strong early traction should be looking at revenue-based financing or factoring, depending on what they’re selling and how they’re selling it. Why not? And allow that to fund your build-out of your product or whatever your version too. Companies that are direct-to-consumer, D2C, companies that have tangible products, so many founders I’ve talked to that are building tangible products and I don’t do tangible things. I’m like, I live in the intangible space, data systems, cloud infrastructure, code. But founders that build tangible products, they almost never consider crowdfunding. I’m like, why? If you have all these people asking to buy your product or have purchased prototypes, do crowdfunding effort. Like, that is the perfect non-dilutive financing and you have revenue built in to your funding. And so, yeah –

Mike Blake: [00:42:56] It’s the ultimate customer validation.

Lauren Cascio: [00:42:58] Absolutely, the ultimate. And you don’t even have to take risk because unless you hit a certain metric or sell a certain number, you’re not going to build it and you don’t have to pay the factories or the suppliers. And so, yeah, so there are definitely better types of financing. Maybe, I should write like a post on this, a blog post. I have lots to say.

Mike Blake: [00:43:24] I think you should. You know crowdfunding reminds me – have you ever watched the movie The Producers?

Lauren Cascio: [00:43:30] Possibly.

Mike Blake: [00:43:32] It’s a Mel Brooks movie. It was eventually remade. But basically, the story goes, it’s about a couple of playwrights that recognize that failed plays actually enrich the playwrights more than successful plays. Right? If you raise a bunch of money, it bombs night one, you shut it down, and then you actually pocket the rest of the money. Right? Whereas if it’s successful, you may not. And so, the producers deliberately set out, these two guys, deliberately set out to make a play that would fail, raise a bunch of money for it, sabotage the play, and then pocket the proceeds. The problem was, and they thought they had this winning theme, they called it Springtime for Hitler. Right? It was a musical about Adolf Hitler basically in Brooklyn. And the problem is, that it was so bad, it was hilarious. And it was a smash hit and it basically ruined the two guys that had raised the money.

Lauren Cascio: [00:44:31] That’s funny. I have to check it out.

Mike Blake: [00:44:32] It just occurred to me that whole story was just Mel Brooks talking about crowdfunding in the 1970s.

Lauren Cascio: [00:44:38] Love it. Yeah. There you go. It’s not a new concept. Well, don’t do that to any –

Mike Blake: [00:44:45] Don’t do that. We’re not advocating fraud at the end of the day. I should point out that was fraud, so.

Lauren Cascio: [00:44:52] Yes.

Mike Blake: [00:44:53] And also, don’t make material about Hitler. Only Mel Brooks can get away with making Hitler funny. Nobody else can do that, so.

Lauren Cascio: [00:45:02] No.

Mike Blake: [00:45:02] Not a place we recommend that you go. I’m talking with Lauren Cascio and the topic is, should I pursue non-dilutive financing? I’m curious because you have a unique or certainly a very an unusually informed perspective on this because you’ve been with companies that have raised capital, you’re now a capital provider yourself. Is non-dilutive financing starting to disrupt conventional venture capital?

Lauren Cascio: [00:45:36] This is such a tough question because I think that they’ve co-existed for a long time for as long as I’ve been in the game, at least. And, I don’t – I believe – I firmly believe there’s a shortage of capital, that there is a higher demand and there always will be a higher demand for capital. And there is a true funding gap not only in the US but in global markets, and we will never have enough funding.

Lauren Cascio: [00:46:11] I believe that non-dilutive funding, outside of traditional venture debt, but the other types that we talked about, is going to be a key mechanism in the ability for companies to capitalize on the things that they’ve built and fund their companies to success. And that doesn’t mean that it’s going to take away from the VC market. There’s still a time and a place for VC. We’re seeing a ton of VC funds that are very small emerging – from emerging managers, new managers. People have never run VC funds before. A lot of them, ex-founders, left their own firms to build impact firms.

Lauren Cascio: [00:46:58] And so, I think that that will continue. That trend will continue where you have a lot of emerging managers beginning to fund companies that are seeking to make impact. But I think that non-dilutive funding is just going to slightly close the funding gap that we have. And, you know, as entrepreneurship and building companies become more status quo for people that we’ve seen or seen in post-COVID, people creating their own businesses, leaving the corporate world, there will always just be a demand for capital, and we’re not ever going to be able to fill it.

Mike Blake: [00:47:45] So, before we wrap up, I’d like to ask you a patently unfair question. But I only ask patently unfair questions to my very best, very smartest guests because I know you can handle the curveball.

Lauren Cascio: [00:47:57] Oh God.

Mike Blake: [00:47:58] And that is that it seems to me that non-dilutive funding might also be a path to closing the gender and race bias in early-stage financing because it’s not so personalized. Right? It’s not about being part of the same club, the same alumni association, the same country club. But as we talked about earlier, the sources of financing may not even know who you are. Right?

Lauren Cascio: [00:48:26] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:48:27] And there’s no basis for the bias. Does that resonate at all or am I just grasping at straws here?

Lauren Cascio: [00:48:33] Yeah. No. 100%. I’ll make one reference to Gulp Data. In our survey, we ask a question about being minority-owned or being women-owned and that is because I want to compare funding metrics with the SBA’s funding report that they did. I think it was in 2020. There’s a huge gap not only in minority and gender but in geography. And, I think that non-dilutive funding is, I mean, one of the questions you asked me was this decision-making process is essentially blind. It is because it’s merit-based. Does the company fit the profile we’re looking for? Does it fit the risk profile that we’re looking for? And if it does, it gets funded. And if it doesn’t, it does not. It doesn’t matter who you know. It doesn’t matter what school you went to, where you live, what gender you are, what race you are, you get funded. And it’s a beautiful – I mean, I wish that more funding operated like this, including government loans and grants. Like, this is information that they also know typically when you’re applying for funding, and I don’t think it should be relevant. It’s just not a relevant input metric to determine risk.

Mike Blake: [00:50:04] And in fact, that in part is why I sort of carved out grants into a separate topic because a lot of the automation, a lot of sort of the distance between a funding applicant and funding provider that exists in a lot of these revenue-based financing solutions does not exist in a lot of the grant world. The grant world, in my view, actually resembles much more closely venture capital, right, in terms of the relationship building and so forth. That’s why I did carve it out.

Mike Blake: [00:50:39] Lauren, this has been a great conversation. I know it’s an hour later for you there than it is for us, although knowing you, you’re probably working another 10 hours. But if – there are probably questions that we haven’t covered or maybe a listener would have wished we’d spent more time on. If somebody wants to contact you to follow up about this, I mean, you’re so knowledgeable about the topic, can they do so? And if so, what’s the best way to do that?

Lauren Cascio: [00:51:04] Oh, yeah. So – absolutely. And I’m always, like, happy to help founders navigate fundraising or whatever they’re facing. I’ve been there, done that, doing it again. So, the short one I think is lc, like Lauren Cascio, but lc@gulpdata.com. That’s like an easy one. Or you can find me on LinkedIn. I like notes though. You connect with me at a note, so I know why you’re connecting with me.

Mike Blake: [00:51:35] Okay. Well, that’s going to wrap it up for today’s program. And, I’d like to thank Lauren Cascio so much for sharing her expertise with us.

Mike Blake: [00:51:43] We’ll be exploring any topic each week, so please tune in so that when you’re faced with your next business decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy these podcasts, please consider leaving a review with your favorite podcast aggregator. It helps people find us so that we can help them.

Mike Blake: [00:52:00] If you would like to engage with me on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I am on LinkedIn as myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. Also, check out my new LinkedIn group called Unblekable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck. Once again, this is Mike Blake. Our sponsor is Brady Ware & Company. And this has been the Decision Vision podcast.

 

Tagged With: Brady Ware & Company, Crowdfunding, Decision Vision, Gulp Data, Lauren Cascio, Mike Blake, non-dilutive funding, venture capital funding

Mentor and Mentee Pt. 2

April 19, 2022 by John Ray

Inspiring Women PodCast with Betty Collins
Inspiring Women PodCast with Betty Collins
Mentor and Mentee Pt. 2
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

MentorandMenteePt2

Mentor and Mentee Pt. 2 (Inspiring Women, Episode 45)

In this episode of Inspiring Women, Merry Korn and Sheryl Marrero continue the story of their mentor-mentee relationship, which began through the Women’s Small Business Accelerator.

The host of Inspiring Women is Betty Collins and the show is presented by Brady Ware & Company.

Betty’s Show Notes

In our previous episode, Merry Korn and Sheryl Marrero talked about their journey as a mentor and a mentee.

Merry is the owner of Pearl Interactive Network, Inc., and Sheryl is the President of SavKon Construction.

Sheryl, as the mentee, was in really, really bad shape as a business owner and reached out and said, I need a mentor. And she met Merry Korn, who’s a very successful businesswoman. She has used common sense practices, good advisors, all that kind of stuff. But Merry was not in Sheryl’s industry. Merry was a little intimidated by it, but she became a great mentor because business is business.

The key thing about their relationship that made it successful from the beginning, there was a connection. They had a great connection to the point that Sheryl, who didn’t know Merry, could be transparent, be open, and then she could actually listen and as she says, “be obedient” to and accountable to what Merry was telling her. Those were key elements of a good mentor relationship.

They also didn’t put a timetable on the relationship. They are still going strong. It’s not just about getting together. It’s not just getting coffee together. It’s just not talking. It’s about developing success. And in the case of Sheryl and Merry, Sheryl really became a completely different person as a business owner and a person. And Merry really loved the mentor role and was energized by being there with her. And there will probably be, I would say, business friends and lifetime friends.

This is why Sheryl thinks the mentoring was so impactful.

It was impactful because it actually pushed me to believe in myself. It was like it unleashed my potential that I didn’t even recognize.

We find out what Sheryl was hoping in the beginning that the mentoring would accomplish.

In the beginning, I was just hoping to break even because I was in a different mindset at the time. So initially I was thinking, if I can just break even, I’ll walk away and be done with business. But after being in the program, that changed it. I mean, it just changed everything and it just ended up being so much more.

And what did Merry want the mentoring relationship to accomplish?

One of the things I always said to Sheryl is, Sheryl, whatever happens between us, I know you’re going to be successful. And my big ask is to pay it forward. Her success as a minority woman business owner is she’s literally one in a million. It’s that rare. So my big ask of Sheryl is to pass it forward.

This is THE podcast that advances women toward economic, social, and political achievement. Hosted by Betty Collins, CPA, and Director at Brady Ware and Company. Betty also serves as the Committee Chair for Empowering Women, and Director of the Brady Ware Women Initiative. Each episode is presented by Brady Ware and Company, committed to empowering women to go their distance in the workplace and at home.

For more information, go to the Resources page at Brady Ware and Company.

Remember to follow this podcast on Apple Podcasts and Google Podcasts.  And forward our podcast along to other Inspiring Women in your life.

TRANSCRIPT

[00:00:00] Betty
Has anyone ever inspired you to change your life that made you more fulfilled? Well, as a leader in your business and in your community, what are those questions that you ask yourself on a daily basis? It’s these questions that we explore on inspiring women. I am your host, Betty Collins, and I’m a certified public accountant, a business owner and a community leader who partners with others who want to achieve remarkable results for themselves and their organizations. I am here to help inspire you to a positive step forward for a better life. So today we’re in part two of a podcast on mentoring, whether you’re the mentor or the mentee. And in our previous episode, which you should listen to, by the way, Merry Korn and Sheryl Marrero talked about their journey as mentor and mentee. And Sheryl was the mentee and she was in really, really bad shape as a business owner and reached out and said, I need a mentor. And she met Merry Korn, who’s a very successful businesswoman, who has used common sense practices, good advisors, all that kind of stuff. And she was not in her industry. She was a little intimidated by it, but she became a great mentor because business is business. The key things about their relationship that made it successful was this from the beginning, there was a connection. They had a great connection to the point that Sheryl, who didn’t know Merry, could be transparent, be open, and then she could actually listen and as she says, be obedient in and accountable to what Merry was telling her. Those were key elements of a good mentor relationship. They also didn’t put a timetable on the relationship. They are still going along as this has played out.
Other successful things about mentoring is that you see progress. In some manner.

[00:02:08] Betty
It’s not just getting together. It’s not just coffee. It’s just not talking. You’re seeing success. And in the case of Sheryl and Merry, Sheryl really became a completely different person as a business owner and a person. And Merry really loved and was energized by being there with her. And there will probably be, I would say, business friends and lifetime, lifetime friends the way the way they are. What generally doesn’t work well, though, in mentoring is if there is no connection from the beginning, if there is even a bit of tension or. You just can’t really let your guard down. You know, that’s not the mentor for your life. You know, that’s not going to get you through it if you start off anyways with that relationship and nothing progresses and everything they try to mentor you on is going against the entire grain of what you wanted to get out of this. You’ve got the wrong mentor, so knowing how to be a mentor and identifying things in your mentee are really important from the beginning. The connection is really important. In the case of Merry and Sheryl, there was Sheryl who had a lot of hard work to do, was willing to be the student. That’s the key. And and then in the whole mentoring episode that we have, everyone needs to play the role. Whether you’re the mentee or the mentor throughout your entire business career, people around you need you and you need them. So we’re going to talk a little bit more today about Sheryl, the mentee, and Merry, the mentor. Let’s take a shift and go and talk about the mentoring piece. I’m going to talk to Sheryl a little bit first and then we’ll talk with Merry. But why do you think the mentoring was so impactful, this program?

[00:04:11] Cheryl
I think it was impactful because it actually pushed me to believe in myself. I had different abilities. I didn’t know that I had because I almost gave up. But the mentoring program, it was impactful because. It was like it unleashed. Like. I guess my some of my potential that I didn’t even recognize. And and just seeing small wins at the time, I think that was the the key that I needed to keep going.

[00:04:55] Betty
Those milestones are awesome. When you can and you see it, then you’re like, okay, what’s the next milestone? Instead of I’ve got this big cloud, it’s like, I’m on my next milestone, right? What were you hoping in the beginning that that the mentoring would accomplish?

[00:05:11] Cheryl
In the beginning, I was just hoping to break even because I was in a different mindset at the time. So initially I was thinking, if I can just break even, I’ll walk away and be done with business. But after being in the program, that changed it. I mean, it just changed everything and it just ended up being so much more. I just got more involved with Get Well Planned. I was able to push myself, become more confident, like Merry said, and then it all just came together for me as we continued on the program.

[00:05:55] Betty
Well, how long did it take you to see impact? I mean I mean, how long were you in in the journey? I mean, it’s been a couple of years now, but when was that first impact that you saw?

[00:06:06] Cheryl
I believe the first impact, I would say, was the first six months I recognized that I was headed in the right direction, even though, you know, six months just wasn’t enough to help me get to where I am today. Because at that point, that’s when I went back to the SBA and I had asked them if they would be willing for me to continue like six month program and extend it six months within six month increments. So I recognized a difference within the first six months, but it just ended up being two years.

[00:06:47] Betty
And probably now you just want to be together. That’s all good. But you know, you had results. Obviously a paying down a lot of debt, but what other results did you see that that we haven’t kind of talked about?

[00:06:59] Cheryl
Okay. So some of the other things I think that was very helpful for me, paying down the debt was one of them. That was the biggest issue that I had, but also just starting from scratch. I didn’t have what I would consider a good foundation for my business. I mean, although I had QuickBooks, but we were doing it internally. And I learned, just like you mentioned earlier, Betty, like having the right professionals in your corner. So we had QuickBooks, but we were doing it internally. And so there was no one internally who. Who would be considered an expert. So that’s when I met Kathy, who’s a professional in QuickBooks. So I ended up surrounding myself with professional people who could help me with the foundation of my business. And by doing that, it seemed like it had a ripple effect. So now I have bigger lines with better interest rates. Now my banker, if they ask for anything, I can provide it with a click of a button for certain reports. And now I’m getting notified by my banker saying, Hey, we got this good promotion for business owners. Here you go. So it was just one thing after another. So I’m in a very good place, credit wise, for the business. I’m also what most people say bankable. I’m bankable, but I’m just very careful. Yes. Linda Boyle. So I’m Linda Boyle. And. It’s just been good. I mean, those are some of the things I can think of off the top, you know, having a CPA, you know, as a resource. He works well with Cathy and, you know, just the team together know, they just help me with certain expenses and and a smarter way of spending for the business and things like that. So it’s help all the way around and it’s like it came back full circle, you know, from the financial piece of it.

[00:09:19] Betty
Well, when I hear you talk about being the mentee, I really I really kind of summarize it in this way. It sounds like being in in this I’m going to call it not a program, but a journey of these last couple of years. It’s redefined you as a businesswoman. And I think that’s just key for other people to hear, because now you can be a different business woman going forward as you get to keep seizing the opportunities and the dream of that because you have a lot of passion about it. So I’m going to switch over to the mentor, which of course, is is Merry. And, you know, first of all, how were you guys matched? You did talk a little bit about that and you talk a little bit about I didn’t know anything about construction, but talk a little bit more about so other people who think they can’t be a mentor because they don’t know construction, how can that work? How can you be matched with someone?

[00:10:19] Merry
Sheryl, could you take a stab at that first? Because I don’t know quite how they decided we should be together, but what is your perception?

[00:10:32] Cheryl
I think my perception of it, I know initially it was probably thought I would end up being matched with the other construction person there, but I believe they took the time to review my story, you know, where I was. And I believe and no one said this, but this is just my belief. I believe they knew that I needed support. You know how to start a business from scratch pretty much, and to get on a financially healthy plan. And I believe they probably looked at Merry’s background or what she had done with her business. She I’m pretty confident that she had to grow it to get to where she is today. And so I think she had the proper skills and characteristics to know the basics of a business, just maybe not the specialty. Right. And I think I had the specialty when it came to the construction, but I was missing everything she had, although it wasn’t with construction, but I was missing everything that she had from a business standpoint on how to make it successful. And like she said, I had the number like the revenue coming in the top line, but the bottom line just wasn’t there. And I think she probably has a special skill on how to make it work for your bottom line to be profitable.
Probably more than she knows. And I think that’s probably why they agreed to allow us to. Well.

[00:12:19] Betty
I think when we’re word we’re talking to the audience about becoming a mentor, don’t get wrapped up in. I can only mentor this industry. Right. Because what techniques really did you kind of use, Merry, in helping her? It was just business, common sense. But I mean, what did you you know, what were some of those things that you saw and maybe advised the audience on? Don’t be intimidated by industry. Help help your peer, help your other woman.

[00:12:48] Merry
So I feel like the collaboration we had, I had the success of it. I attribute to Sheryl’s. And I said this at that dinner you were at Betty, she has resilience because there are so many people who dream of having businesses and then they stumble and they fall and they don’t pick themselves up again. So a big part of it was Sheryl’s dream was so visual and so visceral, so it was starting with her passion. And I knew she wanted it so much. So the student was so open. So the first place we started was numbers, numbers, numbers. What are we going to do to pay back your debt? What are we going to do to build this business? And how are we going to more intelligently pick business that has both bottom and top line viable revenues? And by the way, to Sheryl’s credit, she did all this fixing and wellness plan. Well, she was working full time, and I thought that was just remarkable.

[00:14:07] Betty
So really, the technique you saw, the resilience you saw the characteristics and you took your common sense and applied it right. And so the mentor mentee relationship works when those things are there, right? Because if she didn’t have the resilience and it would have been the same conversation over and over then, right? It would have been. I’m kind of done mentoring because you’re but I like your whole thing that the student the teacher will come when the student is ready. Is that how you what do you feel, though, as the mentor that you learned from Sheryl? Because you’re very successful. You’ve been there, you’ve done that, you’ve had your rollercoaster ride. You’re probably still going to have some. What did you learn from her?

[00:14:51] Merry
So Bernie Brown has written all these books on being vulnerable.

[00:14:55] Betty
Yeah.

[00:14:55] Merry
And a lot of people have a very hard time being vulnerable, but it’s actually a gift because if you’re honest with someone else about, I need help, can you support me? And Sheryl was so is that honesty? I don’t know about you. Sure, but I just liked you. And I felt myself caring about you. And that I think that in any relationship, whether it be therapist and patient or doctor and patient, mentor and mentee, you have to have that rapport and you have to have that trust and relationship. And if you have that, anything can happen.

[00:15:34] Betty
Yeah. So as the mentor, I think you’ve gotten out of this just as much in some ways as Sheryl, because you talk about her so passionately. What’s the biggest change you’ve seen in Sheryl since you guys started the journey together?

[00:15:52] Merry
The biggest was, I mean, I wish I could describe for you that luncheon we met at a luncheon some someplace downtown. It was some venue. And I just saw this very frail, scared, timid, very soft spoken, unsure woman. And you can see in front of you, Betty, I mean, I don’t know if you’re podcast, I don’t know if you could send this visual to podcasters, but she’s just like blossoming into this beautiful, confident woman who can’t be broken because she’s grown so much faith and strength.

[00:16:36] Betty
It’s huge. I mean, what I want, what I want women to take from this today is that this relationship can work in your own life. And if you’re at and it doesn’t matter what stage you are, because I mean, I’ve done this since I was since 1988, done this a long time. I’m 58 years old and I still look for the mentor. But I also know that I have a responsibility to be the mentor and not just be the mentee. Right. What I want to end today with Sheryl is tell the audience, be the mentee, you know, but tell them what what you’re. Let me I’m going to start that over. So I want to end today is Sheryl you’re the mentee and and Merry, you’re the mentor. Give that audience that last tidbit on being the mentee and being the mentor, and don’t be afraid of being both. So, Sheryl, that’s a I’ll put you up first. Sorry for the pressure.

[00:17:45] Cheryl
Okay. So I would say as the mentee. The key would be obedience. Just obedience and. There’s a reason you’re learning or there’s a reason you’re going through the journey, and you should apply that to help someone who or another entrepreneur or someone else who has not made it to the point where you are when it’s time for you to be the mentor. So there was a couple of things I would advise people at their mentee just be obedient and also take notes from your mentor. Because I know for me, just from watching Merry and my experience with Merry as my mentor, I cannot wait to be someone else’s mentor. I love that.

[00:18:43] Betty
Nice Merry Corn, the mentor. What would be the thoughts you would want to leave with the audience today?

[00:18:53] Merry
Well, one of the things I always said to Sheryl is, Sheryl, whatever happens between us, I know you’re going to be successful. And my big ask is pay it forward. Because what Sheryl hasn’t shared is that when we had that dinner at the Women’s Small Business, I did research to try to understand how many black women are in construction and the number is so small, I couldn’t find the number anywhere. But the granular statistics I did is even in male owned construction businesses very close to the average male construction company, was it 50% of the top line revenues of Sheryl’s numbers? So her success as a minority woman business owner is she’s literally one in a million. It’s that rare. So my big ask of Sheryl is pass it forward. And then on another SBA project, we hired a group of graduate students to share with us what do women need for success? And they need mentors. They need mentors because it’s lonely. And as far as women have come in business, yeah, they’ve come real far, but oh my God, they have a much further way to go for the listeners. Find a mentor. And if you don’t need a mentor, become a mentor, right? And as a mentor, always start with where your mentee is. Begin with where they are, not where you think they should be.

[00:20:45] Betty
Very, very good. Ladies, I always love to go through this and I improvise, as, you know, with my questions and my where we navigated today. But because you’re both so passionate and you’ve been on this, it was just a great information for the audience and to encourage other women. But I’m going to leave with this because I really think people who who are thinking about mentoring or being a mentee or both or whatever. Women in business. Women who lead. Be kind to yourself regardless. And we need to do that more. And that that’s just so part of this journey and time. I know for me, I have informal mentoring relationships, formal relationships. And we as women need to be giving back and doing. We’ve just experienced a really tough time period that has affected women greatly, whether it’s about day care issues, having to leave workforce, all of it industries you’re in. So get out there and help your peer, help that other woman. And there’s so many ways to do it. I can’t help but plug the SBA Women’s Small Business Accelerator out of Columbus, Ohio. Phenomenal organization to be a part of. And these these ladies have been totally effective by that. So thank you again for your time today. I know you’re very busy and but my audience, I know, appreciates that you were with us today. So thank you. Inspiring Women has been presented by Brady and Company. As your career advancements continue, your financial opportunities will continue to grow. Be prepared. Visit Brady Care.com to find out more about the accounting services that can assist you to that next level. All this, plus more about the podcast can be found in the show notes for this episode. Thank you so much for tuning in. Feel free to share this show or give us a review. Remember, inspiration is powerful. Whose life will you be changing?

Automated transcription by Sonix www.sonix.ai

Tagged With: Betty Collins, Brady Ware & Company, business mentor, Inspiring Women, Mentee, mentor, Merry Korn, Sheryl Marrero

Decision Vision Episode 164: Should I Do Business in Ukraine? – An Interview with Dr. Leonid Kistersky and Dr. Tetyana Lypova

April 14, 2022 by John Ray

Ukraine
Decision Vision
Decision Vision Episode 164: Should I Do Business in Ukraine? - An Interview with Dr. Leonid Kistersky and Dr. Tetyana Lypova
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Ukraine

Decision Vision Episode 164: Should I Do Business in Ukraine? – An Interview with Dr. Leonid Kistersky and Dr. Tetyana Lypova, IPR Group

Dr. Leonid Kistersky and Dr. Tetyana Lypova, co-founders of Kyiv-based IPR Group and long-term friends of host Mike Blake, joined the show from Poland after safely escaping their home country Ukraine. They discussed their work, the evolution of their work as they cope with the realities of war, the way the war has reshaped the economy in Ukraine, the resiliency of the Ukrainian people, future opportunities in the country, and much more.

Decision Vision is presented by Brady Ware & Company and produced by the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

During the show, Leonid and Tetyana offered several causes to which you can contribute to help the Ukrainian cause. Follow this link for more information.

Dr. Leonid Kistersky

Dr. Leonid Kistersky

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Founding Director of the Institute for International Business Development (Kyiv), Professor of Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University (Vinnytsia).

He worked as an economic adviser at the Secretariat of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in Geneva (Switzerland), was the founding chairman of the National Center for Implementation of the International Technical Assistance to Ukraine in the rank of a Minister. 

Leonid Kistersky has taught and conducted research at the world’s leading research centers and universities – Institute of Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Konstance University (Germany), Brown and Stanford Universities (USA), Kyiv Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University, Higher School of Business (Poland). 

Dr. Kisterski is the author and co-author of almost 150 scientific works, including 15 books and textbooks on international economic relations and business development, published in Ukraine, Switzerland, Russia, USA, Great Britain, Poland, Germany, Czech Republic and in other countries; international organizations such as the UN, the World Bank and the European Union also published his books and articles. 

Leonid Kistersky is a member of prestigious international and national scientific institutions and organizations – specialized scientific councils at the Kyiv Institute of International Relations and Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University, Ukrainian Association of International Economists, Ukrainian Academy of Economics, the Academy of Higher Education of Ukraine; for many years he was a member of the UN Scientific Council, editorial boards of foreign and Ukrainian scientific journals and publications.

In 2019, President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy awarded Professor Kistersky the title of “Honored Worker of Science and Technology of Ukraine”.

LinkedIn

Dr. Tetyana Lypova (Tatiana Lipovaya)

Dr. Tetyana Lypova

Dr. Tetyana Lypova received a Ph.D. in economics from the Institute of International Relations of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. She is Associate Professor and Deputy Director of the Institute for International Business Development, which promotes business development and financing of business projects.

Graduated from the Faculty of Economics and Management of Vadym Hetman National Economic University of Kyiv. She underwent internships in the programs of Brown University (USA), the London Center for International Economics, and the Consortium for the Improvement of Education Management in Ukraine. 

Tetyana Lypova has worked as a trainer, consultant, expert analyst on numerous projects and programs of such international organizations as the EU, UNDP, World Bank, USAID, Know-How Found, and other leading international institutions.

Since 2015, she has also been working as the head of the licensing department at the international company IPR Group, where she provides advice to Ukrainian and foreign entrepreneurs on prosecution and registration of trademarks, enforcement of rights, licensing and franchising, protection of geographical indications, copyrights, dispute resolutions, etc. She works with national and international clients and companies on intellectual property protection in Ukraine and in post-soviet independent countries like Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Moldova.

She was a member of the Geographical Indications Committee of the International Trademark Association (INTA).

Tetyana Lypova is the author of about 60 scientific publications, including 5 monographs and textbooks on international economic relations, international technical assistance, and small and medium business development.

LinkedIn

Mike Blake, Brady Ware & Company

Mike Blake, Host of the “Decision Vision” podcast series

Michael Blake is the host of the Decision Vision podcast series and a Director of Brady Ware & Company. Mike specializes in the valuation of intellectual property-driven firms, such as software firms, aerospace firms, and professional services firms, most frequently in the capacity as a transaction advisor, helping clients obtain great outcomes from complex transaction opportunities. He is also a specialist in the appraisal of intellectual properties as stand-alone assets, such as software, trade secrets, and patents.

Mike has been a full-time business appraiser for 13 years with public accounting firms, boutique business appraisal firms, and an owner of his own firm. Prior to that, he spent 8 years in venture capital and investment banking, including transactions in the U.S., Israel, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.

LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

Brady Ware & Company

Brady Ware & Company is a regional full-service accounting and advisory firm which helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality. Brady Ware services clients nationally from its offices in Alpharetta, GA; Columbus and Dayton, OH; and Richmond, IN. The firm is growth-minded, committed to the regions in which they operate, and most importantly, they make significant investments in their people and service offerings to meet the changing financial needs of those they are privileged to serve. The firm is dedicated to providing results that make a difference for its clients.

Decision Vision Podcast Series

Decision Vision is a podcast covering topics and issues facing small business owners and connecting them with solutions from leading experts. This series is presented by Brady Ware & Company. If you are a decision-maker for a small business, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at decisionvision@bradyware.com and make sure to listen to every Thursday to the Decision Vision podcast.

Past episodes of Decision Vision can be found at decisionvisionpodcast.com. Decision Vision is produced by John Ray and the North Fulton studio of Business RadioX®.

Connect with Brady Ware & Company:

Website | LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

TRANSCRIPT

Intro: [00:00:01] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast series focusing on critical business decisions. Brought to you by Brady Ware & Company. Brady Ware is a regional, full-service accounting and advisory firm that helps businesses and entrepreneurs make visions a reality.

Mike Blake: [00:00:22] Welcome to Decision Vision, a podcast giving you, the listener, clear vision to make great decisions. In each episode, we discuss the process of decision making on a different topic from the business owners’ or executives’ perspective. We aren’t necessarily telling you what to do, but we can put you in a position to make an informed decision on your own and understand when you might need help along the way.

Mike Blake: [00:00:45] My name is Mike Blake, and I’m your host for today’s program. I am a director at Brady Ware & Company, a full-service accounting firm based in Dayton, Ohio, with offices in Dayton; Columbus, Ohio; Richmond, Indiana; and Alpharetta, Georgia. I am Managing Partner of the Strategic Valuation and Advisory Services Practice, which brings clarity to the most important strategic decisions that business owners and executives face by presenting them with factual evidence for such decisions. Brady Ware is sponsoring this podcast.

Mike Blake: [00:01:16] If you would like to engage with me on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I’m on LinkedIn as myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. I also recently launched a new LinkedIn Group called Unblakeable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck, so please join that as well if you would like to engage.

Mike Blake: [00:01:39] Today’s topic is a topic that I hoped that I would address at some point over the course of this program in a very different context. But there’s a saying in Yiddish that roughly translates into, Man plans and God laughs. And there’s nothing particularly funny about this topic, but life does have a way of of bringing the unexpected.

Mike Blake: [00:02:06] So, as I record this on the 8th of April 2022, we are something on the order of about six weeks into the Russia-Ukraine war. And I recorded a podcast on this about five or six weeks ago with the topic Should I continue to do business in Russia and Belarus? And I explained my qualifications to address that topic in that episode. And I would encourage you to listen to that episode for that information as well as more.

Mike Blake: [00:02:39] And the only thing that I’ll rehash here – I dislike strongly that I have to address this topic in the way that it is being addressed – the early part of my career was formed by living and working in Russia, and in Belarus, and in Ukraine. And if there’s anything good that I’ve brought to the table professionally today in large part, it is due to the learning experiences of which I had the benefit those many years ago, long before I had any grey hair, that’s for sure, and I was a lot thinner then as well. But here we have it.

Mike Blake: [00:03:28] And so, the topic we’re going to discuss is sort of the flip side of the topic, instead of Should I do business with Russia and Belarus, I laid forth a case that I don’t think you should. And, frankly, I’m not sure it’s realistically feasible. I think it’s very difficult to do business there. I think that although no set of economic sanctions work perfectly, we have certainly made life very difficult for the Russians and for those who may seek to do business with them.

Mike Blake: [00:04:00] And if they choose to become a client state of China, as appears to be their choice at this point, there’s really nothing that we can do about that. But one thing we can do, and I guess I’m pleased to say that I’m pleased that we’re doing is we are supporting Ukraine, a fascinating country with a fascinating history that for most of its history has been a people much longer than it has been an organized country, if you will. It’s very paradoxical, and there are people who can discuss it much better than I can. We have professors that do that. But it’s a very interesting place with a very complicated history.

Mike Blake: [00:04:51] And as we’re now six weeks into the Russian invasion and we’ve witnessed extraordinary events, things that I think my generation -I’m going to be 52 next month – we never thought that we would see in my generation. We thought this is something that my grandfather would have dealt with, but certainly not today. But, again, here it is. History does have a tendency to be cyclical in nature.

Mike Blake: [00:05:27] And the discussion of whether or not to do business in Ukraine may seem bizarre. And I grant you, if you’re not all that familiar with Ukraine, its history, its geography, I can understand that. And that’s why this topic is so necessary, because Ukraine is a very big place. And although a large portion of the country – really, any portion of the country in those conditions be considered large – but something on the order of about 10 percent is an active war zone. And most of the country is under threat of some attack in some fashion by the Russian armed forces.

Mike Blake: [00:06:13] The fact of the matter is that (A) there has been a war going on since 2014, since the annexation of Crimea and the bizarre quasi independence of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. That’s been going on anyway. It was simply sort of self-contained. But, of course, now it’s been expanded, and most of you have seen the pictures, you’ve read the news, in many ways it’s probably worse than is being reported on the ground, there before the grace of God go I.

Mike Blake: [00:06:50] But the reality is that there’s a lot of Ukraine that amazingly is still functioning. It is still a functioning state. Volodymyr Zelenskyy, their President, who, frankly, if I’m honest about it, I had a lot of doubts when he was elected. That a comedic actor would rise to the level of being able to govern such a complex country with a very complex political structure as Ukraine. And, now, he’s being mentioned in the same words as Winston Churchill. So, it really goes to show you what I know, which is probably absolutely nothing.

Mike Blake: [00:07:28] But all of a sudden now we all know who he is. We all know his famous quote that he says he wants weapons, not a ride. And, you know, this is a country that’s not going away silently by any stretch of the imagination.

Mike Blake: [00:07:46] And I think I owe it to you as the listeners to help you understand what the opportunities are to do business in Ukraine, not just from a humanitarian perspective, not just from a moral and ethical imperative, although those do still exist. But the country is amazingly, with all the things that are happening to it, that they are still open for business.

Mike Blake: [00:08:17] And joining us today are two longtime dear friends of mine, who I was very relieved to speak to only a few days ago. I realized that they had managed to escape the country after their home came under attack. And joining us from Poland are Dr. Leonid Kistersky and Dr. Tatiana Lipovaya. Who, again, I’ve known for a very long time.

Mike Blake: [00:08:44] And they are co-founders of a company called IPR. That, among other things, is a law firm that provides counsel for companies seeking to do business from the West into the former Soviet Union. I’m not even sure what that region of the world is going to be called anymore. I think it’s going to be different. I just can’t predict what that’s going to be. And their specialization has long been about protecting Western intellectual property rights in those countries, anti-counterfeiting in particular.

Mike Blake: [00:09:25] As well as working with a sister company, where I guess I was sort of an entrepreneur or teacher in residence, for lack of a better term, for about two-and-a-half years, The Institute for International Business Development, whose focus has been to serve as a bridge between Western companies seeking to learn about how to do business in that region, how to take advantage of the opportunities that that region has held and, I think, will hold at some point in the future – God knows only when – as well as how to navigate the many risks that region holds.

Mike Blake: [00:10:07] And they’ve just been fantastic people. And I’m delighted – but really proud – to call them my friends. By way of a little bit of a professional introduction in no particular order, Dr. Leonid Kistersky got a lot of things to his claim to fame. I could read a very lengthy bio, but I don’t want to do that because I want to get to questions.

Mike Blake: [00:10:35] But suffice to say that he was the First Minister of Foreign Economic Relations in the First Post-Independent Ukrainian Government of the early 1990s. He has been a visiting instructor at places such as Brown University, Stanford University, and Columbia, there are others that I’m probably forgetting. And he’s been doing this for about 50 years.

Mike Blake: [00:11:01] I couldn’t believe it when I looked up his bio, he does not look like he’s as old as his calendar would say. Hedoesn’t sound like he’s that old either. I look and sound older than the guy does. So, Leonid, whatever you’re doing, keep doing it because God knows it’s helping you.

Mike Blake: [00:11:19] And he was also recently the recipient of Ukraine’s Highest National Honor in Support of Science and Technology for the Republic of Ukraine.

Mike Blake: [00:11:31] Dr. Tatiana Lipovaya is the Head of Licensing and Trademark at IPR, where she’s been advising national and international clients on trademark filing, prosecution and enforcement, domain name infringements, unfair competition assignments, licensing, and all the work that goes with that. Has done a tremendous amount of work, in particular with some places that are very hard to do business in, Kazakhstan, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, et cetera.

Mike Blake: [00:12:05] And she, herself – I can’t believe it’s been this long. We knew each other when we were much younger – accumulated over two decades of experience in not just the legal aspect, but also becoming a top notch business advisor and holds a PhD in International Economics. She’s a member of INTA as well as the Ukrainian Association of International Economics. Has graduated with economics and management degrees of the Kiev National Economic University.

Mike Blake: [00:12:42] The firm itself has been in operation since 1999, and the sister group, IIBD, since before that, since at least the early 1990s. And I guess fittingly, it’s always seemed to me to be a very awkward translation, but the title of Ukrainian’s National Anthem is Ukraine is not yet perished, and neither has their firm. And I think when you think about what they’re doing, how they continue to do business in spite of all that’s going on, it gives you an appreciation as to why the Russians have, frankly, failed to achieve their military objectives by and large, and have redefined kind of what a Pyrrhic victory is, if you can even call it that.

Mike Blake: [00:13:34] I’m going to stop talking. I think I’ve established these are really good guests. You’re really going to enjoy talking to them. The more I talk, the less you hear from them. So, Leonid and Tatiana, welcome to the program. It is so good to see you and it’s so good to hear from you, more or less safe and sound. And I guess you’re joining us from Poland.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:13:57] Yes. Mike, thank you very much for such a very kind introduction. And sometimes I think that you know more about us than we do. Anyway, we can see that you to be, not only our long term friend, but we consider you also to be a founding father of our businesses and all endeavors since, as you rightly mentioned, we came together in the middle of previous millennium a long time ago.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:14:42] And in order to train Ukrainian entrepreneurs who set up Institute for International Business Development, which you helped to establish, and through which we started developing private business training people in Ukraine more than a quarter of a century ago already. And, in fact, IPR Group, it’s probably sort of a business which has been set up by the Institute for International Business Development and helped to develop even to a much more important private business now than the Institute for International Business Development is.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:15:42] So, both of us try to combine private business since I keep on provide consultancy before the war, of course, for governmental institutions, for international companies, for Ukrainian private businesses, just helping them to establish and to use high ethical norms in business, and was helping to develop high moral values of them, like personalities and like entrepreneurs. And still combining my activities with consultancy and private business.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:16:33] I still until now keep on training it to Ukrainian universities, Kiev National, Taras Shevchenko University, and Donetsk National University named after Vasyl’ Stus, which, eight years ago, moved from Donetsk to Vinnytsia in order to continue its activity. And they needed specialists in international economic relations. And that’s why I willingly joined them. And still I keep on doing this online until today and will continue to do so.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:17:25] Well, Tatiana is more a private businessman now.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:17:30] Businesswoman.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:17:33] Businesswoman, yeah. And probably she will tell herself about what is she doing in the IPR Group.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:17:45] I actually deal with the trademarks protection, prosecution. So, our IPR Group company, it’s a Ukrainian established and based in Ukraine business, but we deal with a lot of other countries. We provide our services in former Soviet Union countries, like Mike already mentioned, Georgia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and other countries which are not accessible for foreigners because they have special laws, they have special rules which you need to know to deal with these countries, especially for business and for also intellectual property rights protection, there are a lot of specific in these countries.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:18:39] And I’m really happy that I’m involved in such kind of business. I received a lot of new skills. And all the time develop myself, not only as a business consultant, which I used to be for the last 20 years, but now I developed myself as a lawyer and as a specialist in intellectual property rights protection.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:19:11] So, it’s also important for developing business, because intellectual property rights is the very important part of the business development, especially for new companies, for companies who involve the new technologies, would like to protect their property rights, patents licensing. So, they need a lot of advice and a lot of support for doing business in our countries.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:19:48] So, we continue our businesses.

Mike Blake: [00:19:52] And I think that’s remarkable and I think that’s one thing I want to make sure our audience hears, is, how are you continuing your business?

Leonid Kistersky: [00:20:07] Well, as you know, we had to move from Ukraine further to west, west, west, and so we appeared in Poland. And, currently, we are in the City of Nowy Sącz in Poland.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:20:28] Of course, we used to live some 30 kilometers from Kiev, in the City of Vasylkiv. Probably does ring a bell for you since press wrote a lot of the city there was the [inaudible] and airport and the tank farm which was bombed every day, and we were living nearby. In a couple of weeks, the situation at that time became dangerous to my mind. And we read that Russian, you know, monsters rush into houses, kill people, rape women and girls. So, that’s why we drove to the west in a couple of weeks after the start of the Russian invasion.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:21:30] So, we were going west and west, and so Tatiana’s colleague wrote us when we were in Lviv, and we were invited to live three weeks in their house while her kids were away. And so, during this time, we somehow managed to do now business, establish again contacts to start doing business online. And so, moving in, we rented a small apartment in Nowy Sącz. There is a famous school of business here where I taught 25 years ago, again for some time, and my colleagues helped us to rent an apartment here.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:22:26] So, there are, of course, difficulties in doing business outside of Ukraine, but in Ukraine. But still it is quite possible as far as teaching is concerned, it’s almost no difference. You have good internet, you have good connections, and you keep on doing it online.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:22:52] With Tatiana’s business, it is more complicated. Tatiana probably will tell about it herself. Not only our businessmen, but also our government on a daily basis introduces new opportunities first to revive businesses in Ukraine and to further develop there.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:23:26] As for my business, we understood that in such situations which all of us need to move from Kiev to other places, some of us still stay in Ukraine. For example, in the western part of Ukraine, some of our staff – and some of our staff means women – who can leave Ukraine, they are moved to Poland and to other countries in the Western Europe. We understand there’s a weak possibility to keep our business awake. It’s only the distance, the remote work on a distance. It’s online work. Hopefully, our kind of business, because we provide the services for international companies, our business allowed us to work remotely.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:24:30] So, our technical specialists did as much as possible to secure our business, our services, emails, our database, to put them to the safe servers to support our everyday activities. We’re happy that the Government of Ukraine, especially the national body, which is responsible for intellectual property rights protection in Ukraine, allowed us to work and link to them also online. So, they provided the system which allowed us to apply and file trademarks, patents, other intellectual property requests to the office online without providing papers.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:25:37] You mean Ukrainian Patent Office?

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:25:40] Yes. I mean the Ukrainian Patent Office, which still works, still keep their activities, and still provide full range of services to the clients and allowed us, as the patent attorneys, to conduct our activities on a very good level.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:26:03] In fact, Tatiana already mentioned a very good example of the Ukrainian State Patent Office, which provides all opportunities for this business to be on the surface, so to say. And private entrepreneurs, as you taught us, still used to take care of themselves. Moreover, I would like to say that we have a lot of big and middle sized businesses in Ukraine.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:26:38] And, now, our government helps them materially to move from those parts of our country, which is still bombed by Russian monsters, to move to the center of Ukraine, to the more safe areas. And until today, several hundreds of such businesses were moved to central part of our country and they keep on functioning. Also, government introduced several important privileges for businesses to function.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:27:20] Now, this is decreased taxation. For example, when I saw the consultant, I owned some small money and there is so-called simplified system of taxation. I was paying just 5 percent from turnover. Now, during the war time, it was brought down to 2 percent only. And we keep on paying taxes. We keep on paying now for our communal services for the apartments.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:28:02] Also, businesses were given an opportunity to have access to cheap credits, sometimes interest free credits. Tatiana, what is the amount of such? Several million hryvnia. Effective cost of hryvnia to U.S. dollar is approximately, roughly, 29 hryvnias per U.S. dollar. And you can get several million hryvnias of interest-free credit. So, there are simplified now procedures for registering your business, for reporting about your financial and other situations.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:28:53] So, I would like to say that it’s very sad that really this awful war triggered such support of private business in Ukraine. But, still, I am absolutely sure that after our victory, the war is over, business in Ukraine will be developing at a very high speed, especially internationally.

Mike Blake: [00:29:24] So, you said something I had not even thought of, and it reminds me of history. Because in World War II, the Soviet Union had to move entire industries east, out of the way of Hitler. And it hadn’t even occurred to me, but I suppose in a way that’s actually a skill and, in fact, if factories were built during Soviet times, they may have been designed to be moved again in case of an invasion. It’s history repeating itself.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:29:57] Yes, the history repeating. But to tell you very openly, we did not expect that this history repeats in Ukraine. We didn’t expect it.

Mike Blake: [00:30:12] Of course. And you didn’t think you’d be moving out west.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:30:18] I think [inaudible] how we cope with it.l

Mike Blake: [00:30:18] But I hadn’t even thought of that, but you’re right. I mean, there’s historical precedent that entire industries, factories can be picked up and simply moved to a part of the country that is not as close to the combat area.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:30:36] Look, now combat area, it’s all over Ukraine now. Of course, Russian bombed the country or fired missiles on a random basis. That is done deliberately to create panic, to create atmosphere of fright. But, still, people in Ukraine somehow coped with it, and business continues functioning despite. This is one of the purposes of Russia now, to destroy Ukraine.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:31:24] Again, also like you, Michael, I like history. And very recent history after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. And when Putin came to power, on many occasions, including internationally, he was saying that dissolution of the Soviet Union is the greatest, probably, awful event of the 19th Century. He did not mention First World War. He did not mention starvation. He didn’t mention Second World War. A lot of original wars. But dissolution of the Soviet Union. And this is his maniacal idea to restore it in some form. And, of course, without Ukraine, that is not attainable. And that’s why he is trying to do away with our country. But as you rightly said, he failed and continues to fail.

Mike Blake: [00:32:36] So, a thought that occurred is one of the things that already is resulting from the war, and I think will result for a generation, is that, economic ties between Russia and Ukraine will be effectively cut off. Forgive and forget is one thing. But I think there’s decades of healing that’s going to have to take place, I think, for that to occur. Belarus the same.

Mike Blake: [00:33:13] And as you know, oddly enough, you guys are as pro-Russia as any Ukrainians I’d ever met. You always took a very pragmatic view. Why do we want to make a big enemy? There’s no reason to do that. Not that it matters. I’m an American citizen, but I always thought it was smart. But now this has happened.

Mike Blake: [00:33:36] And there are certain things that Ukraine is not going to be able to get from Russia or Belarus anymore. Are there opportunities now for other countries to supply those things? What are those things that you can’t get from Russia anymore? Is it steel? Or is it fuel? Or is it something else? And are there opportunities for another country now to come in and and fill the void that is left because the Russia trade link has been cut off?

Leonid Kistersky: [00:34:09] Yeah. That’s true. Because sentiments in Ukraine against Russia now are self-understandable, because our country to no extent was anti-Russian. We treated Russia in a very friendly way. And we did not expect such a cruelty from their side and such behavior to do away with our country. And, now, I am, and all of us, are so anti-Russian and we cannot forgive what they did. And during my lifetime, I will never forgive them. And probably that will take several generations, somehow, to cool down with our sentiments towards Russia.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:35:11] Because a recent statistical polls indicated that now about 85 percent of Ukrainians see no way of improving the relations with Russia. And the other 12 percent just are still hesitant and they think that maybe it may take a generation or 10, 15 years. And only two or three percent believe that it could be repaired very soon. So, unfortunately, Russia should blame itself only for such a cut off of all kind of relations with Ukraine and with other countries.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:36:05] And so, I would like to separately single out one sphere that we have lost Russia and they have lost us for generations. But we gained a lot of friends, other friends. We are so grateful to Poland, which hosted 2.5 million Ukrainians now. And we feel such friendly relations and they take care of Ukraine and they support us. Also, the United Kingdom.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:36:47] Separately, I would like to mention the United States, which is the country with which we have long term friendly relations, including a lot of individuals. I would like to mention Al and Cher who introduced us to each other, and we continue this cooperation and friendly. Of course, the United States is the world leader, which provides moral, economic, military, all types of support. And other countries, I cannot just mention every country, a lot of them.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:37:29] That is why we are very optimistic about the outcome of this war and the prospects of business development in Ukraine. Michael and John, you have our invitation to meet in Kiev after the victory in this war and you will enjoy our hospitality.

Mike Blake: [00:37:56] I’ll be on the first plane.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:37:59] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:38:00] I’ll be on the first plane. So, now that trade has been cut off, what did Ukraine used to import from Russia that it can’t get anymore and now has to go to a different source?

Leonid Kistersky: [00:38:14] First of all, oil and gas. Anything else is of meager importance. It could not be even mentioned. And so, moreover, they are deliberately bombing and destroying our tank farms. They bombed one of them, I mentioned near Vasylkiv, where we used to live before the war for several years, for almost ten years already. And so, they wanted to cut off, not only supplies of oil, but also to destroy available oil tanks in our country.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:39:06] And we started to receive gas on a reverse basis from Europe. And, again, I would like to mention the very important initiative of the United States is to discontinue buying oil, gas, and coal from Russia, which is extremely important. But more so, United States announced, to put it correctly, the availability of their strategic oil reserves for the international market. And, you know, it’s like a positive signal for the market and other countries join this initiative. And, now, about 30 countries, including the United States, made their strategic oil reserves available for the international market.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:40:11] So, due to this, our military drivers and other sectors of economy started receiving gas – I mean, petrol. Meaning petrol, you call it gas in the United States. But for us, gas is gas, petrol is petrol. So, we started receiving it by railways, through automobile supplies in the country. Of course, we felt sometimes, you know, deficit of petrol in Ukraine, but still it is in the quantity sufficient for the country to survive now. So, energy resources, of course.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:41:07] Same thing with Belarus. But we were supplying services of electricity for Belarus, which we do not do anymore. And we discontinued our electricity system from Russia a couple of months ago. And it took Europe, European Union, only about three days to include Ukraine into the European system of electricity. And so, it functions properly. So, step by step, we are discontinuing our ties and our business links with Russia, Belarus, and other countries from former Soviet Union, and switched it to Europe and to the United States. Among the countries, of course, I would like to mention Canada and North America.

Mike Blake: [00:42:09] Of course, there’s a very large Ukrainian diaspora in Canada, especially in the western part of the country.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:42:15] Which raised their voice and provide support.

Mike Blake: [00:42:20] So, another challenge to the economy must be labor, right? Four million people have left. Ten million people have been displaced. We don’t know how many people have been killed. I’m guessing 100,000 people have probably been killed. We just can’t count them yet. And pretty much almost every able bodied man, whatever they were doing six weeks ago, they’re now holding a gun. And many women as well, by the way. There’s a lot of reports that women are also in active military service as well. And is that impacting simply the supply of labor to actually do economic things?

Leonid Kistersky: [00:43:11] Of course, this is an issue which is widely discussed, but there are speculations how many people were killed in Ukraine. I would like to say that especially we have heavy casualties among the civil population, of course. Probably today you’ve heard that they bombed the railway station killing several thousands of people and wounding more than 100.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:43:52] But our economy now is being restructured. And, again, it’s an irony that war forces us to reform at a quicker pace, introducing higher technologies which are not so labor intensive. And that is the way out of the situation. More so, as I see from internet, IPR Group, from Tatiana’s business, that ladies now do all this business. Even sometimes Tatiana invites our 18 year old daughter, Olga, to join. So, even kids, even grown up already with kids, but, still, they do what they can to make the country not to feel the deficit of a labor force. That is, high technologies, less labor important technologies. And, of course, our female population started to do a lot of work, which they were not even thinking about before the war.

Mike Blake: [00:45:13] So, you mentioned something that surprised me positively. I think you said the hryvnia is something around 29 to the dollar, is that correct?

Leonid Kistersky: [00:45:26] Yes. That is correct.

Mike Blake: [00:45:29] So, it’s fairly –

Leonid Kistersky: [00:45:31] 29.3 it seems to be.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:45:33] [Inaudible].

Leonid Kistersky: [00:45:34] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [00:45:35] 29.3.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:45:37] It’s by the National Bank.

Mike Blake: [00:45:40] So, is the banking system able to still function? It sounds like it is.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:45:51] Yes. Look, again, I like very much comparison and historic examples like you. And before the war, the exchange rate of hryvnia-dollar was something 27.9, about 28. Now, it’s 29.3. It says that our government understands the basics of the economy. If we recollect historically, Adam Smith, who wrote his famous book some 250 years ago, he said, “Stable exchange rate is a fundamental principles of successful functioning of any economy.” And he explained why.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:46:51] So, our National Bank maintains stable, despite there is higher inflation – of course as compared before the war period – but still the exchange rate is very stable.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:47:10] Examples, we keep on working. We receive hryvnias on our business cards, and we can pay by those cards in Poland. Our National Bank agreed with the Polish banking system about the exchange rate, which is fair enough, and so we can pay by hryvnias from our business cards in Poland. Tatiana, maybe you will tell the rest.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:47:46] For businesses, there are still some problems since the beginning of the war [inaudible] because budgetary deficit and, again, a lot of countries support us on a grand basis supporting our budget. But, still, our Ministry of Finance and National Bank are doing a lot of useful things on their own. At the beginning of war, they stopped currency operations, which was not very useful for business but, still, it helped our economy to survive and our banking system to function. And today, it was announced that they are easing those regulations in order to allow our businesses to function internationally to make payments and to receive payments.

Mike Blake: [00:48:43] So, that means that they’re loosening capital controls.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:48:46] Yes.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:48:47] Yes. Exactly, Michael. Exactly. Yeah. Despite there are still some limitations, but they are also because –

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:48:59] Emergency goods, medical goods, and for humanitarian purposes. They just drove down this –

Leonid Kistersky: [00:49:06] Easing, easing regulation.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:49:08] And they allowed for payments in the foreign currencies as well.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:49:15] That is true, especially for critical sectors of our economy, like agriculture, chemistry, and others.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:49:27] It’s a first step for the future.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:49:33] For future business development internationally.

Mike Blake: [00:49:40] So, as a matter of history, any time that there’s a great disruption, such as a war, that also sometimes creates opportunities in its aftermath. And I’m curious, what do you see will be the opportunities of a post-war or post-victory Ukraine?

Leonid Kistersky: [00:50:09] I am very optimistic about those opportunities. Of course, for those weeks, maybe weeks or month ahead of us, in this state of war, I hope people understand the importance of real values. You cannot imagine how people in Ukraine became friendly to each other. I was always surprised in the United States or in Western Europe, people were smiling to each other, helping each other. When driving, they’re making friendly gestures. They are just letting all the cars to go.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:50:55] It was not the case in Ukraine before the war, as you probably know. But, now, it took us several weeks to cover this huge distance. So, before war period, I see a period of very quick reconstruction of our country. Of course, our government and our administration are ready to take steps to achieve agreements with countries, with companies for reconstructing Ukraine.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:51:35] And remember that some 22 years ago, I published an article – it is available in English – Marshall Plan for Ukraine. At that time, I was thinking of reforming the economy of Ukraine. But, now, it will be a real Marshall Plan for Ukraine to reconstruct the country, and ways of reconstruction, and ways of further development will be unprecedented, believe me. And Ukraine may become, in some near future, a member of the European Union. And we have support of key players in Europe and in North America. So, I’m very optimistic about this period. Of course, war changed people in my country in a very positive way.

Mike Blake: [00:52:33] I’m talking with Dr. Leonid Kistersky and Dr. Tatiana Lipovaya. And the topic is, Should I do business in Ukraine? So, I’m going to ask you a very unfair question, but I want to know the answer. I know our listeners want to know the answer. And that is, how do you think this ends? What does it look like? Is there a total Ukrainian victory? Is there a return to the 2014 situation? Is it something else? How does this end?

Leonid Kistersky: [00:53:10] Michael, it’s one of the most probably difficult questions for me to address. And I could just mention that there are possible scenarios. If we receive more weapons, more support, then maybe rather quickly with our victory. Of course, Russia behaving in such a monstrous way because before recently, nobody dared to protect itself and to give them heavy blows, which they received from Ukraine.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:54:06] If we come back to a more remote history, I always remember an article so-called Long Telegram of the prominent American Historian Diplomat George Kennan. In his Long Telegram, who explained the essence of Russian empire and of the Soviet Union. And Russia inherited the Soviet Union efficiently, all of them. So, it will be attacking and attacking its neighbors because of its traditions. They are not capable of creating something on their own. They are capable of destroying other people.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:54:58] Let’s take now very recent history, for example, 1993, occupation of part of Moldova, Pridnestrovian so-called, non-recognised artificial republic. Then, ’08 the War in Georgia, they unleashed and occupied Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Then, Syria, other countries, some other continents, and 14 that is occupation of Crimea and part of Donbas. And at that time, there was their market. They’re in charge of Ukraine, which, in fact, allowed infiltrating our country by Russian agents.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:55:58] So, now, it’s different. And February 24, Russia attacked Ukraine, it received severe blows and keep on receiving it. So, end of the war depends decisively, probably not on negotiations, but on the performance of our military, and our territorial defense, and on patriotic support of all Ukrainian population, which is practically unanimous now. So, it may take more time. It may take several weeks or several months.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:56:51] I don’t like to see freezing this conflict because our military are in a position, not only to defend, but also to attack. And, now, I see that Western democracies at least started supplying heavy weapons to Ukraine, which may be a decisive factor in achieving a victory in the quite predictable future. Anyway, I will inform you. I’ll be the first to inform you that this is end of war. But end of war could be only a victory for Ukraine.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [00:57:39] Yeah.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:57:41] As our president told this.

Mike Blake: [00:57:44] I think not many people would doubt you at this point. Underestimate Ukraine at your peril, I think, is probably a good way to put this and maybe a good way to wrap this up. I know it’s late there. You have a lot of other things that you need to take care of.

Mike Blake: [00:58:08] But I would like to ask you this, and that is, many people are asking me – and I’m helping them as best I can, but you probably have better information – people, individual citizens, in the United States do want to donate money or other things to support Ukrainian refugees, to support Ukraine’s struggle against Russia, are there organizations that you recommend that you think are the most helpful that provide the most direct assistance on the ground?

Leonid Kistersky: [00:58:44] Yeah. First of all, Michael, when we will prepare the information which we promised to do after the show, we will probably give you official addresses how to do it. But may I tell you what Tatiana and I are doing in this respect. We are not rich people, as you know, but at least we are well to do, I would like to say some middle Ukrainian class.

Leonid Kistersky: [00:59:19] First of all, we donate money to official sides of Ukraine for our military. Then, we know a lot of individual families whose husbands or fathers now in the military of Ukraine and they require some equipment, some arms. And the people who know those family, we put our money together in order to buy what they require. They have all these devices which make it possible to see during night time, for example, the necessity of such.

Leonid Kistersky: [01:00:16] Then, we like animals very much, and we have a cat here in Poland. We took it together. We said that all of us or nobody. So, all of us. And we donate money to special organizations which support animals. Plus, we buy tickets for zoos in various parts of Ukraine. They appeal, “Please buy tickets for our zoos online. Transfer money for buying tickets.” And they feed their animals.

Leonid Kistersky: [01:00:55] So, there are a lot of opportunities how to support Ukraine, and probably people in the United States they would prefer to support it in some official way, which supports directly Ukrainian military or humanitarian support. And we will send those addresses to you, so you could provide your fellow citizens with those reliable addresses.

Mike Blake: [01:01:33] Very good. Well, we’ll make sure that those get published when we publish this show next Thursday.

Leonid Kistersky: [01:01:40] Yeah.

Mike Blake: [01:01:44] Leonid, Tatiana, I can’t tell you how this is a confusing time. It’s a very difficult time, obviously. But I truly thank God that you and Olga are safe. I know many others are not. And I wish I could help them, but I can’t. But I can at least speak to you. And I cannot imagine what you’re going through physically, emotionally. But, again, if there’s any way that I or my family can help or our community here – and we do even have a Ukrainian church here in Atlanta – please let us know. I would like to know.

Mike Blake: [01:02:33] But you’ve shared, I think, a lot of information that I don’t think gets reported here. And I’m extremely grateful. [Foreign Language] that you agreed to come on our show. Yeah, I still remember a little Ukrainian. In fact I find it very hard to speak Russian right now. It’s emotionally very difficult. But thank you very much for, again, being on the program and for being patriots.

Mike Blake: [01:03:06] And I think you guys realize and we realize in America that the war for, in many cases, humanity’s soul is being fought in Ukraine. We always thought that it would be in Iraq over oil for something like that. But it turns out it’s in Ukraine. And, you know, we all are pulling for you. And we just thank you for your courage. We admire you for your courage and the sacrifice you’re making. And, hopefully, you’ll achieve a swift victory and get this thing over with and send a message that this just was a bad idea from the outset.

Leonid Kistersky: [01:03:49] Yeah. Michael, may I say that we are very grateful to our American friends, Michael Blake and John Ray, and to all of the American people who are interested in Ukraine, who support Ukraine. And so, this is minimum what we can do now for American-Ukrainian development sharing our information with you. And we will be more than happy to do it in the future. We are so grateful to you. Thank you, guys.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [01:04:28] Thank you very much.

Mike Blake: [01:04:30] Well, all right. Thank you very much. And have a pleasant evening. And we will tell you when the podcast is ready so that you can see it and listen to it and, hopefully, share with other people that you think will be interested and have an impact.

Leonid Kistersky: [01:04:44] Thank you very much, Michael.

Tatiana Lipovaya: [01:04:45] Thank you, Michael.

Leonid Kistersky: [01:04:45] And we will try to share this show with our Ukrainian contacts back in Ukraine to demonstrate to everybody that America fully supports us on all levels. Thank you.

Mike Blake: [01:05:01] [Foreign Language]. Thank you very much and all the very best.

Leonid Kistersky: [01:05:08] [Foreign Language].

Tatiana Lipovaya: [01:05:10] [Foreign Language].

Mike Blake: [01:05:11] Okay. That’s going to wrap it up for today’s program. And I’d like to thank Dr. Leonid Kistersky and Dr. Tatiana Lipovaya so much for sharing their expertise with us.

Mike Blake: [01:05:21] We will be exploring a new topic each week, so please tune in so that when you’re faced with your next business decision, you have clear vision when making it. If you enjoy these podcasts, please consider leaving a review with your favorite podcast aggregator. It helps people find us so that we can help them.

Mike Blake: [01:05:38] If you would like to engage with us on social media with my Chart of the Day and other content, I’m on LinkedIn as myself and @unblakeable on Facebook, Twitter, Clubhouse, and Instagram. Also, check out my new LinkedIn Group called Unblakeable’s Group That Doesn’t Suck. Once again, this is Mike Blake. Our sponsor is Brady Ware & Company. And this has been the Decision Vision podcast.

 

 

Tagged With: Brady Ware & Company, Decision Vision, Dr Tetyana Lypova, Dr. Leonid Kistersky, hryvnia, Mike Blake, Ukraine

Mentor and Mentee Pt. 1

April 12, 2022 by John Ray

Mentor-Mentee-Inspiring-Women
Inspiring Women PodCast with Betty Collins
Mentor and Mentee Pt. 1
Loading
00:00 /
RSS Feed
Share
Link
Embed

Download file

Mentor-Mentee-Inspiring-Women

Mentor and Mentee Pt. 1 (Inspiring Women, Episode 44)

In this episode of Inspiring Women, Merry Korn and Sheryl Marrero share the story of how they came together in a mentor-mentee relationship through the Women’s Small Business Accelerator. The host of Inspiring Women is Betty Collins and the show is presented by Brady Ware & Company.

Betty’s Show Notes

I have two women who completely inspired me at an event that I attended for the Women’s Small Business Accelerator. The WSBA has a gala every fall, and Brady Ware & Company is a big supporter of that organization.

Merry Korn and Sheryl Marrero told their story of how they came together. They started out together as mentor-mentee through a six-month program with the WSBA. As women business owners, we need to be inspired by other women business owners. So I really want them to tell a little bit about their journey together. And then we’re going to talk about mentoring, being a mentor or a mentee.

Merry is the owner of Pearl Interactive Network, Inc., and Sheryl is the President of SavKon Construction.

We cover a lot of ground in this episode, including how and why Sheryl needed the mentor relationship that Merry had to offer to help her with her business debt.

I was in a large deficit and so I was referred to the Mentor Match program through the WSBA. I ended up at the table with Merry. And although her business was totally different from mine, I instantly felt trust in her. And that was one of the things I had hoped for and prayed for, for a mentor who I could trust.

Find out what made the difference in turning her business around, and more detail about Merry’s Wellness Checkup Plan.

This is THE podcast that advances women toward economic, social, and political achievement. Hosted by Betty Collins, CPA, and Director at Brady Ware and Company. Betty also serves as the Committee Chair for Empowering Women, and Director of the Brady Ware Women Initiative. Each episode is presented by Brady Ware and Company, committed to empowering women to go their distance in the workplace and at home.

For more information, go to the Resources page at Brady Ware and Company.

Remember to follow this podcast on Apple Podcasts and Google Podcasts.  And forward our podcast along to other Inspiring Women in your life.

TRANSCRIPT

[00:00:00] Betty
So today on inspiring women. I have two women who completely inspired me at an event that I attended for the Women’s Small Business Accelerator. They have a gala every fall, and we’re a big supporter of that organization. I’ll refer to it as the SBA, and these two ladies told their story and how they came together. And it’s Merry Korn and Sheryl Marrero. And they just were so awesome that I said, I’ve got to have this out to women, business owners and women so they can, you know, take their journey if they’re in the same path that these two have been on and utilize the experience of it and come together. So, you know, they started out together as mentor mentee, which is like this six month program with the SBA. Well, that’s a couple of years ago, I think. So they’ve really had a great time with it and really have just done some amazing things. And as women business owners, we need to be inspired by other women business owners. And so I really want them to to tell a little bit about their journey together. And then we’re going to talk about mentoring, being a mentor or a mentee. So first, Merry, I’m going to just start with you. Just a real quick introduction of who you are. I look at you as the Merry Corn in Columbus, Ohio, but maybe just tell us two or 3 minutes at the most of who you are and your company. It can be 30 seconds as well, but go ahead.

[00:01:34] Merry
Yeah. So I am a clinical social worker by background and I love business and our company is a women owned federal contracting call center. We’re a social impact firm in that we always give hiring priority to disabled veterans, veterans, military spouses, people with disabilities, and people living in geographically challenged areas at the number of employees. We have changes by the day, but it’s anywhere from 700 to 1200 employees we have in 27 states.

[00:02:15] Betty
Wow. I would just wrap up that with she’s a mover and shaker. She gets it done and she really is just an inspiration to women in the Columbus, Ohio and beyond area. So thank you again for being here, Merry and Sheryl, if you could just give your 32nd to three minute commercial on who you are and what you do.

[00:02:39] Sheryl
Okay. So my name is Sheryl Marrero, and I am a business owner of a company known as Self Construction. The company has been around since 2010. And what we do, we do renovations for residential and commercial real estate, and it’s always been a passion of mine, although my background was in information technology. But real estate is just been a passion of mine. So that’s what we do, definitely.

[00:03:09] Betty
When when Sheryl told her background of growing up and it’s a great story. So if you’re inspired, maybe you should have a conversation with her and coffee over zoom but she she really loved real estate and construction when she was what six or seven years old wanting to fix her house. So it’s a great story, great background. I wish we had all the time for it, but but these two ladies got together and a lot of times we we go to mentors or find mentors. Sometimes we have them. We don’t even realize it. But because Sheryl really needed some help and she sought that out. And so I want Merry and Sheryl to kind of just share quickly that time that day you met and what you had to face, what you were facing. Sheryl, we’ll start with you. Kind of like I went, sought out a mentor, got connected to Merry. Where were you at that moment in time as a business owner and a person?

[00:04:06] Sheryl
So at that moment in time, I was actually at what I would consider one of my lowest points as an entrepreneur. I was actually thinking that I was going to have to close my doors, things. They just weren’t going as planned or as I had hoped for. I was in a large deficit and so I was referred to the Mentor Match program through the SBA. And initially, what was strange, I initially was at a table with another woman entrepreneur who was in construction, but after we traded tables, I ended up at the table with Merry Korn. And although her business was totally different from mine, I instantly felt trust with her. And that was one of the things I had hoped for and prayed for, for a mentor who I could trust. And just to help me turn my business around to a point where I wanted it to just break even and possibly walk away. But it ended up being so much more than that after we connected and she agreed to be my mentor.

[00:05:23] Betty
Merry, do you remember the day when you heard the story of Sheryl and how you just thought, oh, my gosh. Take us back to that start.

[00:05:33] Merry
I thought, I don’t know anything about construction. She’s not she doesn’t want me because I just I know government contracts, which, by the way, Sheryl knows government contracts. But I was intimidated because I felt incompetent. And I am I don’t know government. I don’t know construction. But I know business.

[00:06:00] Betty
Right? Right. And did you ever see you know, when you heard where she was, did you think, could we get through this challenge? Because you’re a business owner, right?

[00:06:12] Merry
Yeah. Business owners need so much support. It is so hard. And it’s lonely. And it is so lonely. But I was sitting with Melissa. Inger. Is it Ingersoll?

[00:06:27] Betty
Yeah.

[00:06:28] Merry
She was the president of KeyBank. And sure, both of us heard your story, and both of us came to the same conclusion of You just need to get well planned. Because, you know, Sheryl, very few people get beyond 90,000 a year in revenue and you were three, almost three quarters of a million. You came too far to turn away.

[00:07:02] Betty
Right. Right. Well, and so the starting point was a lot of debt lay offs. All of I mean, it was just one big bundle of mess, which, you know, every entrepreneur goes through it. I don’t care who you are. It’s not an easy path. But let’s do one thing. That’s that was the starting moment we met each other. Now, where are you right now, Sheryl? Where are you today?

[00:07:27] Sheryl
Today I am profitable. The deficit is very manageable and I’m in business. My doors are open. And, you know, the biggest thing is I’m out of debt and I’m very happy because I’m doing what I love to do as an entrepreneur, you know, just being passionate about real estate. I feel like I’m back at it. I’m taking it slower and it’s it feels really good. So I’m in a very good place today.

[00:08:01] Merry
By the way.

[00:08:02] Betty
Go ahead, Merry.

[00:08:03] Merry
I’ve just seen Cheryl go through this. She’s not the same person today. When I met Sheryl, she was broken and timid and uncertain. And all I knew is that she had this great heart for the work she did. And Sheryl, I look at you and no one would know you were the same person, because there’s this level of strength and confidence and joy as you’re working on screen with her.

[00:08:37] Betty
She’s she is all confident. She’s all smiles.

[00:08:40] Merry
And so different. Right. So different.

[00:08:43] Betty
Well, that was what I loved about the connection at that gala when you guys were talking about this journey. And I wanted to go back to that starting day of despair, overwhelmed. How am I ever going to do this to There is victory, it’s still work, it’s still a journey. You’re always on a journey as an entrepreneur, right till you sell and you have the check in your hand. But that success is due to a lot of hard work in between that starting day to now. Which which. Merry, what was the time frame of that? Is it about two, two and a half years?

[00:09:18] Merry
Yeah. Nobody told me it was only supposed to be six months.

[00:09:23] Betty
Well, in trying to get rid of that kind of debt, you could never have that. What? The debt that you were in, Cheryl, you could have never done that in six months. It was a process in time, right?

[00:09:33] Merry
It still is a process. Sure.

[00:09:35] Speaker1
Sure. So what I want to talk about and I and I loved this and I’ve done this a long time and I read every book. And I you know, I’m out there with hearing speakers and such, but I never heard the wellness checkup or plan. You always hear you need a business plan. Well, she already had a business. She already had a plan that went amuck. It was now we just need to fix, you know, we need to to to get wellness in business. And I thought that was a great I liked the way that flowed for sure when you guys talked about it. And the plan, of course, was attached to accountability and some mentoring, because obviously Mary took the time to go. I’m going to mentor, I’m going to tell you facts, I’m going to give you direction. And I kind of expect you to do it right. So what I’d love to hear from is just some highlight, Sheryl, from you of why why you have this success in the wellness program. What did you do? What were the things that made the difference for the turnaround? Because women need to hear that they’re listening right now that are where you are.
What were some key things that turned it around for you? And then, Mary, I want you to kind of add to what she’s saying.

[00:10:52] Speaker3
Okay. So for me, I’m the type of person I’ve always been like a hard worker and I’ve always held myself accountable and responsible for things maybe too much versus the average person, I would say. So for me, I was very hard on myself because I couldn’t figure out like, how did I get to that point so fast? And so the first thing I think was key for me was just to surrender. Like I surrendered everything and I put my trust into my mentors guidance. I had to trust her 100%. And although some of the advice that was given or even some of the tasks in the beginning, it seemed kind of foreign to me because it wasn’t the way I was used to operating, but I had to have that trust and I trusted her from day one, and that’s why I thought she would be the best mentor for me. I never had any doubt that if I, you know, open up any financial statements or just anything to her, that I could just really trust her. So giving complete trust to your mentor, although you may not understand the task, but you just go and do it and with trust.

[00:12:15] Speaker3
The second thing I would say for me, it was, you know, I learned this from Mary. Like, don’t be so hard on myself. I was really hard on myself. I had beaten myself up in addition to the deficit that I was facing. So she taught me during the journey, like just something personal, like be kind to yourself and I’ll never forget the words when she told me that. And so once I started looking at myself differently, as, you know, there’s no way you could have known. You know, I wasn’t ever exposed to certain types of resources and things like that. I started to just give myself a break because that’s what I would have done for someone else. So you just have to do it for yourself as well. So I would say trust a trusted mentor, you know, just surrender to it and hold yourself accountable to the task that they give you. You know, you may not understand it, but it’ll all work out.

[00:13:19] Speaker1
Well, it sounds like you had to be pretty transparent with Mary, and that’s a hard thing. Everyone’s like, Oh no, I’m smiling today and I have a perfect Facebook life. You had to be really open and say, Here’s where I’m at. How was that for me?

[00:13:38] Speaker3
I thought it was going to be hard because part of my story was part of my deficit had come. You know, it it turned out because I ended up having employees and people who are very close to me who I couldn’t trust. So I didn’t know how I was going to go about trusting a total stranger. But because I felt like Mary was just God sent, I surrendered and I trusted her. So it was very easy from day one.
Like I said, that was the first thing about her, is why I wanted her to be my mentor, because I felt like an instant trust with her. But it was easy. I was very transparent with her. It was easy for me to just open up everything from my business to my personal life, just everything. And so she was able to just give me the proper coaching and advising that was needed to get me in a better place.

[00:14:42] Speaker1
I hope my audience hears that because that’s so key. So key that you could be trusted. You can trust someone, you can be open and then go, okay, I’m going to surrender this and I’m going to listen. I mean, perfect. So, Mary, tell me about the things in the wellness thing. Like you probably challenged her with things that she wasn’t used to doing, but kind of go back to that time where you were helping her through things to get out of the position she was in.

[00:15:11] Speaker2
So there is an old adage when the student is ready, the teacher comes. And so step number one is Cheryl attained heights in business that she has the God given talent for. But there’s a big difference between top line and bottom line revenue. Yes. And so a big first step is we’ve got to get your finances into account. And we introduced her to a financial advisor who was I think the. Is it okay to mention names?

[00:15:50] Speaker3
Oh, absolutely.

[00:15:52] Speaker2
They weren’t like, Yeah, she was perfect because Cathy is very pro women in business. And I remember I saw Cathy and I said, I really think you could help her. And she did. And Cheryl, you could go into detail about what she did. But so many people get so enamored with the business. And they and Betty, you know this, when it comes to finances, it’s like, oh, it’s a deer in headlights. But the other thing that Sheryl and I worked on is a go, no go. So even though contracts sound really good and wonderful, they could put you under if you don’t have a very thoughtful process. And which contracts are you going to take on and which are you not? So step number one is pay down the debt. And Sheryl has the fortitude of having a really good full time job. So plan number one is pay down the debt. Plan number two was go, no go. Plan A, number three, a really good, solid financial advisors who got deep into the weeds but sure went through a whole lot of heartache with her family and health. And I felt like almost 50% of my being there is just the heartache, just being there and saying, this is a horrible thing that’s going on with the health of all these people you love and the losses you’ve had. But you can do this and you can go on. Don’t give up. Sheryl at least that’s my perception is, well, the financials were incredibly important. It was the belief, the support behind you saying this feels insurmountable, but you’re going to get through it. And sometimes in all of our lives, terrible things happen. But to let you know, sometimes you can’t be there for people who are dying and that you love. And sometimes your personal life has to take precedence because you can’t do it all right. All the time.

[00:18:09] Speaker1
Right. Well. And hopefully, you know, women that are listening to this podcast can take away that there’s there’s plans there steps, but there’s emotions. All of it needs to be dealt with. All of it need. It’s a whole package. And I love the fact that you said you can’t do it all. And women don’t get that. I mean, especially women. I always say you can have it all. You just can’t do it. All right. And those are two different things. So I just wanted to kind of get that background before we dive into being mentors and being the mentor and being the mentee so that they kind of would get an idea of the journey that you guys have gone on together. And I can’t emphasize enough, and probably it’s because I am a professional that I always go, You’re as good as your professionals, but it’s true. And there’s many professionals you have to have in your life when you when you run a business. I mean, some of them are different for other things. But the banker and not the bank, the banker, you know, the financial advisor that understands.

[00:19:17] Speaker2
The accounting, the bookkeeping.

[00:19:20] Speaker1
Right. And you have to understand that, you know, earning money like she had to go back to a job for a while because you’ve got to pay bills. And so it was this whole big balance, which I that’s why I just wanted you guys to encourage people today. There’s ways out. It might not be what you think it is at first, but man, where you are today, Cheryl, you have a lot more options because you chose to do those things that you maybe didn’t want to do. So let’s just take this one step further. Can you guys I mean, because. You were in a pretty, pretty bad place. And I’d love for you to give perspective of the debt you had and that that big, big, big cloud over you so people can understand that you can get out of anything if you put together the things we just talked about.

[00:20:06] Speaker3
So for me, I had well over $200,000 in debt. Like, I was upside down with the business and. Initially I didn’t know how I would be able to pay it off because at the time, you know, I was under with my business. I couldn’t see a way out. And I think. One of the most impactful things from having a mentor. I’m not going to say that it diminished my fear, but it when I was open with Mary about it, I was very I mean, she listened. She understood that I didn’t have a clue how to get rid of that amount of debt that was strictly just from the business. But. She always had words of encouragement as if it was nothing. That’s how I interpreted it. So she was like, Oh, that’s nothing. You can do this. And so. I would walk away or, you know, thinking maybe I’m thinking this is bigger than what it actually is. And so I could take a step back and take a breather and go through the world plan. And then I just started to tackle the debt we mean some of the tasks were to get refinanced and, you know, take out loans and different things of that nature, you know, lower interest rates and just start plugging away at paying it down, you know, as efficiently as possible.

[00:21:50] Speaker3
And just to hear someone else say that, you know, it can be done. When I didn’t have a clue how to get it done. It just, I guess more so confirms that you really have to trust them. You have to trust their advice and trust what they tell you. And it also. Boosted my confidence because as I started to pay things down, then it was like, I can do this. She’s right, I can’t do this. And then the tasks just seemed easier and easier. I mean, they were a lot of tasks, but I was able to accomplish them and, and just it was just one step at a time until I was able to pay it down. And just to give you a perspective like today, I think I’m like closer to $41,000 in debt at this point, but it’s very, very manageable.

[00:22:53] Speaker1
Well, I appreciate Mary and Sheryl sharing so beautifully and being very open and honest with the audience. But this is this is a great time to kind of recap, because we’re going to have part two where we really talk about what it is to be a mentor and what it is to be a mentee and what works and what doesn’t. So make sure you tune in for part two of this podcast. Inspiring Women has been presented by Brady and Company. As your career advancements continue, your financial opportunities will continue to grow. Be prepared. Visit Brady where to find out more about the accounting services that can assist you to that next level. All this, plus more about the podcast can be found in the show notes for this episode. Thank you so much for tuning in. Feel free to share this show or give us a review. Remember, inspiration is powerful. Whose life will you be changing?

Automated transcription by Sonix www.sonix.ai

Tagged With: Betty Collins, Brady Ware & Company, Inspiring Women, mentor, Merry Korn, Pearl Interactive Network, SavKon Construction, Sheryl Marrero

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 15
  • Next Page »

Business RadioX ® Network


 

Our Most Recent Episode

CONNECT WITH US

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Our Mission

We help local business leaders get the word out about the important work they’re doing to serve their market, their community, and their profession.

We support and celebrate business by sharing positive business stories that traditional media ignores. Some media leans left. Some media leans right. We lean business.

Sponsor a Show

Build Relationships and Grow Your Business. Click here for more details.

Partner With Us

Discover More Here

Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy

Connect with us

Want to keep up with the latest in pro-business news across the network? Follow us on social media for the latest stories!
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Business RadioX® Headquarters
1000 Abernathy Rd. NE
Building 400, Suite L-10
Sandy Springs, GA 30328

© 2025 Business RadioX ® · Rainmaker Platform

BRXStudioCoversLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of LA Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDENVER

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Denver Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversPENSACOLA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Pensacola Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversBIRMINGHAM

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Birmingham Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversTALLAHASSEE

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Tallahassee Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRALEIGH

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Raleigh Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversRICHMONDNoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Richmond Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversNASHVILLENoWhite

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Nashville Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversDETROIT

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Detroit Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversSTLOUIS

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of St. Louis Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCOLUMBUS-small

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Columbus Business Radio

Coachthecoach-08-08

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Coach the Coach

BRXStudioCoversBAYAREA

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Bay Area Business Radio

BRXStudioCoversCHICAGO

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Chicago Business Radio

Wait! Don’t Miss an Episode of Atlanta Business Radio